SEC Company Response from ASSOCIATED BANC-CORP (ASB, ASBA, ASB-PE, ASB-PF) (CIK 0000007789) (ASB) — May 27, 2009
ASSOCIATED BANC-CORP (ASB, ASBA, ASB-PE, ASB-PF) (CIK 0000007789)
Date: May 27, 2009 · CIK: 0000007789 · Accession: 0000950137-09-004097
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
File numbers found in text: 001-31343
Referenced dates: May 12, 2009
Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm
CORRESP
May 27, 2009
By Edgar
Mr. Kevin W. Vaughn
Branch Chief
Division of Corporation Finance
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20549
Re:
Associated Banc-Corp.
Form 10-K for Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2008
File No. 001-31343 and 0-5519
Dear Mr. Vaughn:
The response of Associated Banc-Corp (the “Corporation” or “Associated”) to the comments in the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC” or “Commission”) comment letter dated May 12, 2009
(the “Comment Letter”) related to our filing on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2008 follows. For reference purposes, the text of the Comment Letter has been reproduced below in
bold followed by Associated’s response. Proposed disclosures for future filings related to our
response are included as an appendix due to the length, utilizing strikeouts and underlining to
indicate proposed revisions.
Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2008
Selected Financial Data, page 24
1.
We note that your efficiency ratio excludes investment securities gains, net and asset
sale gains, net. Please tell us and revise your future filings to disclose whether your
presentation of the efficiency ratio complies with that of your primary banking regulator.
To the extent that it does not reflect the definition of the efficiency ratio based on
your primary banking regulator’s guidance, it would appear to be a non-GAAP measure under
Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K. Accordingly, please revise your future filings to include a
reconciliation of this measure to the closest GAAP ratio or the ratio based on your primary
banking regulator’s definition, and provide all of the disclosures required by Item 10(e)
of Regulation S-K.
The Federal Reserve (Associated’s primary regulator) guidance, as defined in the Bank
Holding Company Performance Report (“BHCPR”) and related BHCPR User’s Guide, calculates the
efficiency ratio as overhead expense (noninterest expense) divided by the sum of net
interest income plus noninterest income, excluding investment securities gains, net. The
purpose of the efficiency ratio is to measure the proportion of net operating revenues
absorbed by overhead expense.
Beginning with the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, we will revise our
disclosures related to the efficiency ratio to reflect this as a non-GAAP measure. See
proposed revised disclosures as required under Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K attached as
Appendix 1.
Critical Accounting Policies, page 27
2.
We note your disclosure on page 28 that “The Corporation believes the allowance for
loan losses is adequate as recorded in the consolidated financial statements.” Please
revise, here and throughout your filing, to state that the level of the allowance for loan
losses is “appropriate”, if true.
Page 1
Beginning with the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, we will revise our
disclosures related to the allowance for loan losses to state that the level of the
allowance for loan losses is appropriate. See proposed revised allowance for loan losses
disclosures of the “Critical Accounting Policies” and “Allowance for Loan Losses” sections
of the MD&A and Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” based on our Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008 attached as Appendix 2.
Note 10 Stockholders’ Equity, page 96
3.
Please revise to disclose the following information related to your preferred shares
and common stock warrants issued in connection with your participation in the CPP:
a)
Please revise to specifically disclose the methodologies used to
determine the respective fair values of both the preferred stock and the common
stock warrants for the purposes of allocating the proceeds.
b)
Please revise to disclose the assumptions used to determine the fair
value of the preferred stock for the purposes of allocating the proceeds.
Beginning with the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, we will revise our
disclosures related to the preferred stock and common stock warrants issued during the
fourth quarter of 2008 in connection with our participation in the CPP. See proposed
revised disclosures attached as Appendix 3.
Note 12 Retirement Plans, page 102
4.
Please revise to disclose the period over which you define “long-term” as it relates to
your expected long-term rate of return on plan assets. Additionally, please disclose what
your actual rate of return on plan assets has been for both 2008 and 2007.
Beginning with the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, we will revise our
disclosures to include the time period used to estimate our expected long-term rate of
return and the actual rate of return for the current and prior year, on plan assets. See
proposed revised disclosures attached as Appendix 4.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments, page 122
5.
In your disclosure here, you state that for available-for-sale securities, you utilize
bid quotations received from securities dealers when the bid prices are not available or
published in newspapers. Please tell us and revise to disclose the following:
a)
Please disclose how the use of bid quotations from securities dealers
relates to your disclosure on page 118 that states that you use quoted market
prices, when available. Please clarify where you classify the bid quotations
received from securities dealers in the fair value hierarchy.
b)
Please disclose whether the bid quotations received from securities
dealers are binding or non-binding, and quantify the portion of the securities
portfolio that is valued using this methodology. If you receive non-binding bids,
please tell us why you do not obtain binding quotes.
c)
Please tell us whether the bid quotations received from securities
dealers have appropriately considered the lack of liquidity in the marketplace.
d)
Please revise to expand your disclosure to discuss in more detail the
internal validation procedures you perform on the bid quotations received from
securities dealers. For example, please discuss systems controls you have in
place, your procedures to control outlying prices and other exceptions and the
procedures you perform to analyze relative values based on specific characteristics
of securities. Furthermore, please expand
Page 2
disclosures regarding the valuation methodologies and assumptions utilized by
dealers along with any testing of significant assumptions that you may perform.
Upon further review of our investment securities fair value disclosure on page 118 and page
122, we will revise and clarify our disclosures that describe our valuation methodology. The
term “bid quotation” used on page 122 was applied in a broader manner and was simply
intended to refer to the limited use of third party brokers, which provide us with fair
value estimates on certain investment securities. This has historically been a very limited
portion of our investment securities portfolio. We acknowledge that the use of the word
“bid” quotation on page 122 is not an accurate reflection of our current fair value
methodology and process as we do not solicit quotations with the intention of selling
securities. As such, we will remove the reference to “bid quotations” from our disclosure,
and will modify our disclosure in future filings to more accurately portray our current
process as disclosed on page 118. Moreover, since we did not use bid
quotations from security dealers, other information requested in
items 5b and 5c is not relevant to our disclosure.
To provide additional clarity, beginning with the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2009, we will revise our disclosures related to the fair value methodology applied to
investment securities available for sale, including our internal validation process. See
proposed revised disclosure attached as Appendix 5.
On behalf of Associated, and as requested in your letter, we acknowledge that:
•
Associated is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in its
filings;
•
Staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments in the filings
reviewed by the staff do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect
to the filing; and
•
Associated may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the
Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.
We believe this letter is responsive to your comments. Please feel free to contact me at
920-491-7120 if you have any questions or need further information.
Sincerely,
/s/ Joseph B. Selner
Chief Financial Officer
Associated Banc-Corp
Page 3
APPENDIX 1:
TABLE 1: EARNINGS SUMMARY AND SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
(In thousands, except per share data)
%
5-Year
Change
Compound
2007 to
Growth
Years ended December 31,
2008
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
Rate (5)
Interest income
$
1,126,709
(11.7
)%
$
1,275,712
$
1,279,379
$
1,094,025
$
767,122
9.1
%
Interest expense
430,561
(31.9
)
631,899
609,830
421,770
214,495
14.7
Net interest income
696,148
8.1
643,813
669,549
672,255
552,627
6.4
Provision for loan losses
202,058
485.5
34,509
19,056
13,019
14,668
34.0
Net interest income after provision
for loan losses
494,090
(18.9
)
609,304
650,493
659,236
537,959
1.3
Noninterest income
285,650
(17.2
)
344,781
295,501
291,086
210,247
5.7
Noninterest expense
557,460
4.2
534,891
496,215
480,463
377,869
9.2
Income before income taxes
222,280
(47.0
)
419,194
449,779
469,859
370,337
(7.1
)
Income tax expense
53,828
(59.7
)
133,442
133,134
149,698
112,051
(10.4
)
Net income
168,452
(41.0
)
285,752
316,645
320,161
258,286
(5.9
)%
Preferred stock dividends and discount
3,250
N/M
—
—
—
—
N/M
Net income available to common equity
$
165,202
(42.2
)%
$
285,752
$
316,645
$
320,161
$
258,286
(6.3
)
Taxable equivalent adjustment
$
27,711
1.7
%
$
27,259
$
26,233
$
25,509
$
25,528
2.2
%
Earnings per common share:
Basic earnings per share (1)
$
1.30
(42.0
)%
$
2.24
$
2.40
$
2.45
$
2.28
(8.9
)%
Diluted earnings per share (1)
1.29
(42.2
)
2.23
2.38
2.43
2.25
(8.8
)
Cash dividends per share (1)
1.27
4.1
1.22
1.14
1.06
0.98
7.4
Weighted average common shares outstanding
(1):
Basic
127,501
0.1
127,408
132,006
130,554
113,532
2.9
Diluted
127,891
(0.4
)
128,428
133,132
131,931
115,025
2.7
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Year-End Balances:
Loans
$
16,283,908
4.9
%
$
15,516,252
$
14,881,526
$
15,206,464
$
13,881,887
9.6
%
Allowance for loan losses
265,378
32.3
200,570
203,481
203,404
189,762
8.4
Investment securities
5,349,417
51.0
3,543,019
3,436,621
4,711,605
4,815,344
7.2
Total assets
24,192,067
12.0
21,592,083
20,861,384
22,100,082
20,520,136
9.7
Deposits
15,154,796
8.5
13,973,913
14,316,071
13,573,089
12,786,239
9.1
Long-term funding
1,861,647
(0.2
)
1,864,771
2,071,142
3,348,476
2,604,540
(1.8
)
Stockholders’ equity
2,876,503
23.5
2,329,705
2,245,493
2,324,978
2,017,419
16.4
Book value per common share (1)
18.54
1.2
18.32
17.44
17.15
15.56
8.6
Average Balances:
Loans
$
16,080,565
6.3
%
$
15,132,634
$
15,370,090
$
14,347,707
$
11,174,856
8.6
%
Investment securities
3,707,549
6.5
3,480,831
3,825,245
4,794,708
3,983,452
2.3
Total assets
22,037,963
6.8
20,638,005
21,162,099
20,921,575
16,365,762
8.0
Deposits
13,812,072
0.5
13,741,803
13,623,703
12,462,981
10,144,528
8.2
Stockholders’ equity
2,423,332
7.5
2,253,878
2,279,376
2,101,389
1,499,606
13.2
Financial Ratios: (2)
Return on average equity
6.95
%
(573
)
12.68
%
13.89
%
15.24
%
17.22
%
Return on average assets
0.76
(62
)
1.38
1.50
1.53
1.58
Efficiency ratio (3)
53.90
(66
)
54.56
51.67
50.09
49.57
Efficiency ratio, fully taxable equivalent (3)
52.41
(151
)
53.92
50.31
48.99
48.04
Net interest margin
3.65
5
3.60
3.62
3.64
3.80
Average equity to average assets
11.00
8
10.92
10.77
10.04
9.16
Dividend payout ratio (4)
97.69
4,323
54.46
47.50
43.27
42.84
(1)
Share and per share data adjusted retroactively for stock splits and stock dividends.
(2)
Change in basis points.
(3)
Efficiency ratio is noninterest expense dividend by the sum of taxable equivalent net
interest income plus noninterest income, excluding investment securities gains, net and asset
sale gains, net. See Table 1A for a reconciliation of this Non-GAAP measure.
(4)
Ratio is based upon basic earnings per common share.
(5)
Base year used in 5-year compound growth rate is 2003 consolidated financial data.
APP - 1
TABLE 1A: RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP MEASURE
Years ended December 31,
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
Efficiency ratio (a)
53.90
54.56
51.67
50.09
49.57
Taxable equivalent adjustment
(1.41
)
(1.48
)
(1.37
)
(1.30
)
(1.61
)
Asset sale gains / losses, net
(0.08
)
0.84
0.02
0.20
0.07
Efficiency ratio, fully taxable equivalent (b)
52.41
53.92
50.31
48.99
48.04
(a)
Efficiency ratio is defined by the Federal Reserve guidance as noninterest expense
divided by the sum of net interest income plus noninterest income, excluding investment
securities gains, net.
(b)
Efficiency ratio, fully taxable equivalent, is noninterest expense divided by the sum of
taxable equivalent net interest income plus noninterest income, excluding investment
securities gains, net and asset sale gains, net. This efficiency ratio is presented on a
taxable equivalent basis, which adjusts net interest income for the tax-favored status of
certain loans and investment securities. Management believes this measure to be the preferred
industry measurement of net interest income as it enhances the comparability of net interest
income arising from taxable and tax-exempt sources and it excludes non-recurring revenue items
(such as investment securities gains/losses, net and asset sale gains / losses, net).
APP - 2
APPENDIX 2:
Critical Accounting Policies (partial excerpt with proposed disclosure revis