SEC Company Response from MEDICORE INC (CIK 0000008643) — Jul 19, 2005
MEDICORE INC (CIK 0000008643)
Date: July 19, 2005 · CIK: 0000008643 · Accession: 0001028212-05-000041
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
Referenced dates: June 22, 2005
Show Raw Text
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>CORRESP
<SEQUENCE>1
<FILENAME>filename1.txt
<TEXT>
Medicore, Inc.
2337 West 76th Street
Hialeah, FL 33016
Telephone: (305) 558-4000
Telecopier: (305) 825-0961
July 19, 2005
Jim B. Rosenberg
Senior Assistant Chief Accountant
Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street
Washington, D.C. 02549
RE: Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004
Medicore, Inc. (06906)
In response to your comments relating to our annual report on Form 10-K,
we have made the revisions you noted with one clarification to our earlier
response to the staff's prior comments forwarded to you on June 29, 2005
("Initial Response"). We appreciate your review and assistance for
compliance with the applicable disclosure requirements.
The following responses are keyed to your comments. We are providing
you with marked copies of our amendment no. 1 to our annual report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, to facilitate your review. Based
on the modifications, the pagination has changed (new pagination marked in
[ ]).
General
-------
1. We have revised the disclosures, including, among others, pages 7-8,
45-46, 52-53, F-9 and F-11.
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
. . ., page 39 [page 40]
------------------------
2. Disclosed and quantified.
Liquidity and Capital Resources, page 48 [page 49]
--------------------------------------------------
3. Discussion revised as requested by Section IV.B. of Financial Reporting
Release 72.
Aggregate Contractual Obligations, page 51 [52]
-----------------------------------------------
4. Table revised consistent with Item 303(a)(5) of Regulation S-K and
Financial Reporting Release 67.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates, page 52 [53]
--------------------------------------------------------
5. Initial Response comment no. 2, clarified as follows:
<PAGE>
(b) The provision for doubtful accounts is determined under a variety of
criteria, primarily the aging of the receivables, historical
collection trends, and payor mix. This is generally a reflection of
DCA's collection experience. Due to the uncertainties involved and
the lengthy period over which the collection problem with respect to
Georgia Medicaid reimbursements had persisted, management determined
that it was reasonable to include these receivables in the provision
for doubtful accounts. As a result, DCA added $413,000 to doubtful
accounts due to the issues with Georgia Medicaid. This disclosure
has been provided. See page 46 of the amended Form 10-K. Based on
the above, particularly the uncertainties involved and the lengthy
period over which the collection problem persisted, management
believes such complies with SFAS 5, including paragraphs 8, 22 and 23
of SFAS 5.
6. We have added a response to "Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates,"
page 54 of Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations."
Item 15(a)(1) and (2) - Financial Statements, page F-1
------------------------------------------------------
Report of Independent Certified Accountants, page F-3
-----------------------------------------------------
7. Auditor's Report Revised; new consents are provided for each accounting
firm. See Exhibits 23.1 and 23.2.
Consolidated Statements of Operations, page F-5
-----------------------------------------------
8. Revised to present gain as discontinued operations. Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows also revised. See pages F-5 and F-6, Note 1, F-8
and F-13, Note 6, F-26 and F-27, and Note 12, F-31 (also Part I, page 16,
Part II, pages 39, 44, 49 and 53).
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity, page F-6
---------------------------------------------------------
9. We concur that our policy regarding subsidiary stock option exercises,
which we have consistently followed over the years pursuant to the guidance
in Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 5H, should be reflected in our accounting
policy disclosures. We have revised our accounting policy disclosures
accordingly and have specifically identified the amount and effect of all
such transactions reflected in the financial statement included in our Form
10-K. See Note 1, page F-9.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, page F-8
----------------------------------------------------
10. We have revised the disclosure in the Form 10-K, pages 7 and 8, and
Note 7 to the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, page F-27.
We believe the contract is in substance a buy/sell agreement of 80% of
the related dialysis center whose terms should be disclosed in the Notes to
the Consolidated Financial Statements. Pre-tax profits trigger the potential
sale on the sell or put side, although the purchase price is based on EBITDA.
In the dialysis services business, pre-tax profits are directly related to
the number of patients serviced or service revenues. If the dialysis center
did not achieve specified volumes of service revenues, it would never reach
the required pre-tax profit levels. EBITDA is an adjusted pre-tax profits
amount. Thus, in substance the contract meets the conditions of paragraph
10(e)(3) and is not subject to SFAS 133.
<PAGE>
We also believe the contract is analogous to paragraph 11(c) since, as
mentioned above, we believe the contract is in substance a buy/sell agreement
or business acquisition of 80% of the related dialysis center. The terms are
contingent, since on the sell side the purchase is contingent on achieving a
certain level of pre-tax profits and the purchase price would be based on
EBITDA (an adjusted pre-tax profits amount). Also, as disclosed in the
contract, "the asset acquisition shall be subject to and governed by an asset
acquisition agreement to be negotiated and completed in good faith between
the Parties...." Accordingly, the terms of the final purchase agreement in
theory can vary from the fixed multiple times EBITDA calculation mentioned in
the contract.
Additionally, we believe any calculation of fair value would not have a
material effect on the consolidated financial position or consolidated
results of operations of the company. Also, as of the current date there has
been no purchase or sale.
Based on the above, we have concluded that the transaction is consistent
with a contract incurred in the normal course of business and we have added
additional disclosure as noted above.
Note 6 - Business Segment Data, page F-24
-----------------------------------------
11. Breakdown of medical services revenue provided as per paragraph 37 of
SFAS 131.
Note 9 - Acquisitions, page F-28 [F-29]
---------------------------------------
12. Recognition of goodwill, disclosure provided.
Item 9A, "Controls and Procedures," has been modified (page 56) as we
proposed in the Initial Response to comment no. 7 of the staff's initial
comments dated June 22, 2005.
New certifications have been provided. See Exhibits 31.1, 31.2 and 32.1.
We have added an "Explanatory Note" up front (page (ii), reflecting the
modifications made by the Form 10-K Amendment).
Once again, we would appreciate expedited review to the extent you are
able to provide such, since DCA and Medicore are attempting to hold their
respective annual meetings, particularly relating to approval of the merger
and related matters, as discussed in the Registration Statement. Your
consideration to these circumstances is greatly appreciated.
Very truly yours,
Medicore, Inc.
/s/ Daniel R. Ouzts
By:________________________________
Daniel R. Ouzts, Vice President of
Finance and Principal Financial
Officer
cc: Jeffrey Reidler, Asst. Dir. of Corp. Finance
Zafar Hasan, Staff Attorney
Oscar M. Young, Senior Staff Acct.
Tabatha Akins, Staff Acct.
</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>