SEC Company Response from AMERICAN LOCKER GROUP INC (CIK 0000008855) — Oct 13, 2005
AMERICAN LOCKER GROUP INC (CIK 0000008855)
Date: Oct. 13, 2005 · CIK: 0000008855 · Accession: 0000898431-05-000127
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
File numbers found in text: 000-00439
Referenced dates: September 12, 2005
Show Raw Text
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>CORRESP
<SEQUENCE>1
<FILENAME>filename1.txt
<TEXT>
AMERICAN LOCKER GROUP INCORPORATED
815 SOUTH MAIN STREET
GRAPEVINE, TEXAS 76051
October 12, 2005
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549-7010
Attention: Ryan Rohn, Staff Accountant
RE: American Locker Group Incorporated
File #000-00439
Dear Mr. Rohn:
This correspondence is in response to your letter dated September 12, 2005,
concerning additional information regarding American Locker Group Incorporated's
recent filings.
Question #1. "Provide us with any letter or written communication to
and from the former accountants regarding the material
weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting, to
management or the Audit Committee."
Response:
Enclosed, as supplemental information, please find copies of communications by
the Company's independent registered public accounting firm, as follows:
o Required Communications related to the audit of the Company for the
year ended December 31, 2004, addressed to the Audit Committee of
the Board of Directors of American Locker Group Incorporated, dated
June 15, 2005.
o Management Letter related to the audit of the Company for the
year ended December 31, 2004, addressed to the Audit Committee of the
Board of Directors of American Locker Group Incorporated, and dated
May 11, 2005.
Enclosed, as supplemental information, you will also find management's responses
to the Management Letter, dated July 13, 2005. In the response, which was
addressed to the Audit Committee Chairman, Mr. Stuart Goodner was identified as
a newly hired Senior Accounting Manager and future CFO. In September 2005, Mr.
Goodner's employment with the Company was terminated and the search for a CFO is
currently underway.
Following the completion of your review, we respectfully request the return of
the enclosed letters.
<PAGE>
United State Security and Exchange Commission
October 12, 2005
Page 2
Question #2. "Please provide us with a schedule of your fiscal year end
2004 fourth quarter adjustments to close the books, or
adjustments recorded in connection with or as a result of the
audit. Clearly explain the reason for each adjustment. For
each adjustment, show us the impact on pre-tax net loss.
Quantify the net effect of all adjustments on pre-tax net
income (loss). Also, tell us why none of the adjustments
relate to prior period. Explain in detail why you believe the
timing of each adjustment is appropriate. Provide a similar
schedule for the March 2005 and June 2005 quarters."
Response:
Fourth Quarter of 2004
----------------------
During the monthly closing process the Company makes a significant number of
journal entries to record transactions related to that specific month. These are
considered normal and recurring monthly closing entries. The following entries
were recorded in the fourth quarter of 2004. These entries were the result of
additional year-end analyses, annual accounting procedures (eg. physical
inventory adjustments, update of standard costs, etc.) and entries identified
during the audit process.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>
(Increase)
Decrease
Pre-tax (Loss)
---------------------
1. Inventory book-to-physical and costing adjustments
o The Company's divisions and subsidiaries annually perform a
physical inventory on October 31st. At this time, inventory cost
standards are updated to approximate recent acquisition and
manufacturing costs. In November of 2004, a number of entries were
made to adjust inventory values as a result of the physical inventory
and re-standardization. The aggregate impact of these adjustments
decreased the pre-tax loss for the fourth quarter by $540,000. $
540,000
o After analysis, it was determined that the Company's
accounting practices during 2004 had improperly accounted for certain
labor costs. This discovery caused the Company to quantify the impact
of the error on the operating results of the first, second and third
quarters of 2004. In addition, due to cost increases during 2004, it
was determined that a certain portion of the year end
<PAGE>
United State Security and Exchange Commission
October 12, 2005
Page 3
re-standardization adjustment related to the first, second and third
quarters of 2004. The Form 10-Q's filed for the first three quarters
of 2004 were amended to properly reflect inventory and cost of sales
during these quarters, and refiled with the SEC in July 2005. These
adjustments served to increase the reported pre-tax income during the
first three quarters of 2004 by $582,000.
(582,000)
---------------------
The impact of the fourth quarter of 2004 book-to-physical inventory
adjustments and adjustments to inventory cost, less the restatement of the
first three quarters resulted in a $42,000 net increase to the reported
pre-tax loss in the fourth quarter of 2005. $ (42,000)
=====================
2. Certain of the Company's inventories are maintained on the last-in,
first-out (LIFO) costing method. The calculation required to determine the
cost of inventory under the LIFO method was performed in December 2004. The
adjustment to properly reflect LIFO costing was recorded in the fourth
quarter of 2004, and resulted in an increase in the fourth quarter 2004
pre-tax loss of $203,000. $ (203,000)
3. Inventory valuation reserve adjustments:
o The Company made a detailed evaluation of its inventory on hand
at December 31, 2004. As a result of this analysis, certain
inventories deemed worthless were charged-off directly to
earnings. The net impact of these adjustments, made in the fourth
quarter of 2004, increased the fourth quarter pre-tax loss by
$80,000. $ (80,000)
<PAGE>
United State Security and Exchange Commission
October 12, 2005
Page 4
o The Company's auditors performed an independent evaluation of the
Company's on-hand inventory. This analysis resulted in proposed
journal entries to: 1) reduce a previously established "lower of cost
or market" valuation reserve by $194,000; and 2) increase the reserve
for potentially obsolete inventory by $124,000. Management agreed with
the auditors' analysis and recorded the proposed entries. The net
impact of these two entries service to reduce the fourth quarter loss
by $70,000. 70,000
---------------------
Net impact of the inventory valuation reserve adjustments made in the
fourth quarter of 2004. $ (10,000) =====================
4. With respect to certain ongoing environmental claims, settlement
discussions commenced in the fourth quarter of 2004 and concluded in early
2005. In previous filings, the potential exposure to an environmental claim
was disclosed, but because a range of loss could not be determined, an
accrual was not established. As a result of the settlement, the loss became
estimable prior to closing the books for December 2004. Accordingly, an
accrual and related pre-tax charge to earnings was recorded in the fourth
quarter of 2004, totaling $1,103,000. $ (1,103,000)
5. In the fourth quarter of 2004, pursuant to an analysis by management, it
was determined that collection of certain aged trade receivables had become
doubtful. Accordingly, an entry to increase the reserve for doubtful
accounts was posted totaling $66,000. This adjustment increased the
reported fourth quarter pre-tax loss by $66,000. $ (66,000)
6. As disclosed in the Company's annual report, the Company provides "Other
Postretirement Benefits" in the form of a death benefit to certain
retirees. In 2004, as a result of the aging population of the participants,
the calculated liability under this plan decreased. This adjustment was
proposed by the Company's auditors as part of their audit findings. An
adjustment was posted decreasing the reported pre-tax loss in the fourth
quarter by $39,000. $ 39,000
<PAGE>
United State Security and Exchange Commission
October 12, 2005
Page 5
7. During the course of their audit, the Company's auditors identified an
error in the accrued payroll calculation at certain divisions/subsidiaries.
The auditors proposed an adjustment. Management agreed and recorded an
adjustment that increased the fourth quarter pre-tax loss by $32,000. $ (32,000)
8. During the course of the year the Company provides a monthly estimated
provision to record expense associated with its defined benefit pension
plan. This estimated provision is based on information provided to the
Company by its consulting actuary at the beginning of the year. The
Company's actuary updates the annual pension cost along with the other FASB
Statement No. 87 disclosures at the end of the accounting year. An
adjustment was made in December 2004 to adjust the estimated defined
benefit pension expense to the actuary's final calculation for 2004. This
adjustment increased the reported fourth quarter pre-tax loss by $20,000. $ (20,000)
9. The Company periodically pays year-end discretionary bonuses to both its
hourly and salaried workforce. During the year, the Company accrues an
estimate of these potential bonuses. In December, after the Board of
Directors' approval, final bonuses were determined and were either paid or
accrued. Actual bonuses paid and accrued (i.e., expensed) in excess of the
accrual established for these bonuses during the year totaled $198,000.
Accordingly, bonuses in excess of the normal provision, recorded in
December of 2004, increased the fourth quarter pre-tax loss by $198,000. $ (198,000)
10. Upon performing the bank reconciliation procedures at December 31, 2004,
certain adjustments were identified and made in December 2004. These
adjustments increased the fourth quarter loss by $14,000. $ (14,000)
The following entries were recorded during the first and second quarters of
2005. They would not be considered normal monthly closing entries in the
ordinary course of business.
<PAGE>
United State Security and Exchange Commission
October 12, 2005
Page 6
First Quarter of 2005
---------------------
1. During the first quarter of 2005, it became clear that a more significant
allocation of the Company's production would be shifting to the Company's
Texas facility. Accordingly, management evaluated its inventory costing
model used in Texas to value its work-in-progress inventory. As a result of
this evaluation, a decision was made to adjust the costing model to more
accurately account for production labor allocated to work-in-progress. The
imprecision of the prior costing model has not been significant to the
Company's previously reported financial results or financial position.
However, the impact of this change in the costing model will likely become
significant to the Company's future financial results and financial
position as production volumes continue to shift to Texas. Accordingly,
management implemented the costing model in the first quarter of 2005. This
costing adjustment decreased the reported pre-tax loss for the first
quarter of 2005 by $250,000. $ 250,000
2. On February 8, 2005, the Company was contacted by the United States Postal
Service (USPS) and informed that its supply contract to the USPS would not
be renewed. As discussed in more detail within Note 7 of the Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March 31, 2005, the loss of this contract caused
management to conclude that the fair value of the Company was no longer in
excess of the carrying value of the net underlying assets. Accordingly, the
Company's test for impairment indicated no goodwill exists. As a result the
Company recorded an impairment charge of $6,155,000 in the quarter ended
March 31, 2005. $ (6,155,000)
3. Again, as a result of the loss of the USPS contract, management made an
evaluation of inventories on hand and purchase commitments related to
supplying products under the USPS contract. As a result of this analysis,
an entry was made to reserve for the potential that certain inventory items
are obsolete without the USPS contract $147,000. Further, management
identified certain committed purchases related to the USPS contract
totaling $125,000. The impact of the adjustments for these items increased
the reported pre-tax loss for the first quarter of 2005 by $272,000. $ (272,000)
<PAGE>
United State Security and Exchange Commission
October 12, 2005
Page 7
Second Quarter of 2005
----------------------
1. Because of decreasing inventory quantities during the second quarter of
2005 related to the loss of the USPS contract, management made a mid-year
analysis of its LIFO costing. As a result of the interim analysis of LIFO
costing, an adjustment was made to decrease the previously established
debit balance LIFO reserve, thus increasing the pre-tax loss for the second
quarter of 2005 by $83,000. $ (83,000)
2. As discussed in greater detail in the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June
30, 2005, on May 18, 2005, the Company's Board of Directors announced a
restructuring plan to signif