SEC Company Response from A. M. Castle & Co. (CIK 0000018172) — Jul 6, 2005
A. M. Castle & Co. (CIK 0000018172)
Date: July 6, 2005 · CIK: 0000018172 · Accession: 0000018172-05-000044
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
Referenced dates: June 9, 2005
Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm
Castle Response to SEC Ltr 6-9-05
July
6,
2005
United
States
Securities and
Exchange
Commission
Division
of
Corporation Finance
Washington,
D.C.
20549-0405
Attention:
Ms. Jill
Davis, Branch Chief
RE: A.
M. Castle &
Co.
Form
10-K for Fiscal Year Ended December 31,
2004
Filed
March 16, 2005
File
No. 1-5415
Ladies
and
Gentlemen:
This
letter is in
response to your letter dated June 9, 2005 commenting on the Form 10-K for
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2004 (the "2004 10-K") of A. M. Castle & Co.
("Castle" or the "Company"). For purposes of referencing our responses, the
comments from your letter have been included prior to each
response.
Form
10-K for
the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2004
Balance
Sheet,
page 19
1. Please
revise your inventory presentation to separately report the value of inventory
consigned to others at each balance sheet date. See Question 2 of SAB Topic
13-A-2.
RESPONSE.
Based on
its LIFO valuation of inventory, the value of Castle’s consigned inventory is
approximately $0.5 million, or 0.34% of its $135 million book inventory at
December 31, 2004.
The
Company
maintains consignment relationships with nine customers. For all nine of these
consignment arrangements, revenue is recognized when the inventory is consumed
by the customer, which is also the point when title passes and the Company
has
no further obligations to the customer.
Question
2 of SAB
Topic 13-A-2 states that åif title to the goods has passed but the substance of
the arrangement is not a sale, the consigned inventory should be reported
separately from other inventory in the consignor’s financial statements as
åinventory consigned to othersæ or another appropriate caption.
The
Company
maintains title to the consigned inventory until a sale has occurred and,
accordingly, Question 2 of SAB Topic 13-A-2 is not applicable to
the Company’s consignment arrangements. We have considered this guidance,
the immaterial nature of consigned
July
6,
2005
A.
M. Castle & Co.
Form
10-K for
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2004
Filed
March 16,
2005
File
No.
1-5415
Page
2
inventory
and the
related sales to the Company’s consolidated inventory and net sales, and have
determined, therefore, that separately reporting the value of inventory
consigned to others on the balance sheet would not enhance the Company’s
disclosure.
Therefore,
Castle
does not believe that it is necessary to update or amend its 2004 10-K in
response to the staff’s comment. Castle, as part of its preparation of its
financial statements in any report or document filed with the Commission, will
continue to assess the value of its consigned inventory and, if such value
in
the future becomes material to Castle’s inventory presentation, Castle will
include appropriate disclosure in its financial statements in any such future
report or document.
2. Include
in Management’s Discussion and Analysis, a more detailed analysis of the revenue
recognized in each period from sales of consigned inventory.
RESPONSE.
Due to
the fact that consigned inventories generally turn at a faster rate than
Castle’s inventory as a whole, net sales of consigned inventory in 2004 was
approximately $9 million, or 1.2% of total consolidated sales reported for
the
year.
Specifically,
on
page 15 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K under the caption åCritical
Accounting Policiesæ in Management’s Discussion and Analysis (åMDAæ) a section
on revenue recognition states clearly that revenues of consigned inventory
are
not recorded until the customer has consumed the product from the consigned
inventory and title has passed. Since, the amount of sales from consignment
arrangements is 1.2% of net sales, in our opinion, a more detailed analysis
of
revenue recognized from consigned inventory is not pertinent in understanding
the Company’s consolidated business or year-end results.
Given
the facts
relating to the materiality of the amount of inventory and sales associated
with
consignment arrangements, the Company does not believe that an amendment to
its
2004 10-K expanding the discussion of revenue in the MDA is
necessary.
Castle,
as part of
its preparation of its Management’s Discussion and Analysis in any report or
document filed with the Commission, will continue to assess its policies
regarding revenue recognition generally and for its consigned inventory and,
if
such policies in the future would require additional disclosure or analysis,
Castle will include appropriate disclosure or analysis in its Management’s
Discussion and Analysis in any such future report or
document.
For
the reasons
stated in its responses above, Castle does not believe that it is necessary
to
revise its disclosure or amend its 2004 10-K and we respectfully request the
staff to reconsider its request in light of this response letter.
July
6,
2005
A.
M. Castle &
Co.
Form
10-K for
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2004
Filed
March 16,
2005
File
No.
1-5415
Page
3
In
closing, Castle
acknowledges that it has responsibility for the adequacy and accuracy of the
disclosure in its 2004 10-K. Castle furthermore understands and acknowledges
that staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments
do
not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the 2004
10-K and that Castle may not assert staff comments as a defense in any
proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal
securities laws of the United States.
Hopefully
this
letter sufficiently responds to the staff’s comments and has brought this matter
to a successful conclusion. Please feel free to contact me at (847) 349-2576
should you have any questions about this response letter.
Very
truly yours,
/s/
Lawrence A. Boik
Vice
President -
Finance & CFO
cc: Ms.
Gabrielle Malits, Staff Accountant
Division
of Corporation Finance
United
States Securities and
Exchange Commission
Washington,
D.C.
20549-0405