SEC Company Response from CATERPILLAR INC (CAT) (CIK 0000018230) (CAT) — Aug 5, 2005
CATERPILLAR INC (CAT) (CIK 0000018230)
Date: Aug. 5, 2005 · CIK: 0000018230 · Accession: 0000018230-05-000565
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
File numbers found in text: 333-121003
Referenced dates: May 2, 2005
Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm
response to SEC 050205 letter
August
5,
2005
Via
Facsimile
Ms.
Mary Beth
Breslin
Attorney
Advisor
Division
of
Corporation Finance
U.
S. Securities and Exchange Commission
100
F Street,
NE
Mail
Stop
6010
Washington,
D.C.
20549
Re:
Caterpillar
Inc.
Amendment
No. 2 to Registration Statement on Form S-4
Filed
April 28, 2005
File
No. 333-121003
Dear
Ms.
Breslin:
We
have received your comment letter dated May 2, 2005. Caterpillar’s responses to
each item follow each comment.
Material
U.S. Federal Tax Consequences - Page 27
1.
We
note your response to comment 3, including your statement that you
have
identified throughout this section the specific tax consequences
that
represent the opinion of counsel. Particularly given the length and
complexity of your tax consequences discussion, please revise the
introductory paragraph of this section to include a brief bullet-point
list of the specific tax consequences upon which counsel has opined.
Please also revise that paragraph to briefly identify the consequences
upon which counsel is unable to
opine.
Response:
We
acknowledge the
staff’s comment; tax counsel has revised its opinion to include discussion of
the specific tax consequence upon which it has opined. The tax opinion also
discusses the specific tax consequences upon which counsel is unable to opine
due to the lack of legal authority addressing those issues.
Tax
treatment of the Exchange - Page 28
2.
Please
revise your disclosure in this section and on pages 4-5 of the summary
section to state more clearly the tax consequences upon which counsel
has
opined and to state with greater precision any factual assumptions
upon
which those opinions are dependent. For example, we note that several
of
counsel's statements of opinion are qualified by language such as
“it is
impossible to know with certainty,”“unless there is a change in interest
rates,”“unless there is a substantial change in interest rates," “based on
current facts,” and “in such event.” Providing a short-form tax opinion
does not modify counsel’s obligation to clearly
and unambiguously state the matters upon which counsel is opining
and any
factual assumptions upon which those opinions are based; the primary
difference between a short-form opinion and a long-form opinion is
that
the corpus of the opinion that would otherwise be included in a long-form
opinion is instead included, with substantially the same clarity
and
precision, in the prospectus. Thus, just as such qualifying language
would
not be appropriate in a long-form opinion, that qualifying language
is not
appropriate in the prospectus when counsel is providing a short-form
opinion. For example, if an opinion with respect to a particular
material
tax consequence is dependent upon future interest rates, the disclosure
in
the opinion should state the range of future interest rates for which
counsel is able to give the stated opinion and also include counsel’s
opinion, if any, if future interest rates are ultimately outside
of that
range.
Response:
We
acknowledge the
staff’s comment. As noted above, tax counsel has revised its opinion to include,
in long form, a discussion of the specific tax consequence upon which it has
opined. The tax opinion also discusses the specific tax consequences upon which
counsel is unable to opine due to the lack of legal authority addressing those
issues. Consistent with the inclusion in the registration statement of a
long-form opinion, the discussions of the tax treatment of the exchange in
the
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences section and prospectus summary
section have been revised to refer to and conform with the long-form opinion.
Exhibit
8
3.
The
last paragraph of the opinion implies that shareholders are not entitled
to rely on the opinion. Please remove the
disclaimer.
Response:
We
acknowledge the
staff’s comment; tax counsel has revised the opinion to eliminate the statements
that (a) the opinion is issued solely for the Company’s benefit; and (b) the
opinion may not be relied upon by any person other than the
Company.
Please
contact
either myself or our Securities Counsel, Sean McKessy ((309) 675-1094), should
you have any questions or wish to discuss our responses further. Thank
you.
Very
truly
yours,
/s/James
B.
Buda
James
B.
Buda
Caterpillar
Inc.
General
Counsel,
Vice President and Secretary
Telephone
(309)
675-4428