SEC Comment Letter for TRI VALLEY CORP (CIK 0000022551) — Oct 11, 2005
TRI VALLEY CORP (CIK 0000022551)
Date: Oct. 11, 2005 · CIK: 0000022551 · Accession: 0000000000-05-052038
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
Referenced dates: September 20, 2005
Show Raw Text
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>LETTER
<SEQUENCE>1
<FILENAME>filename1.txt
<TEXT>
October 7, 2005
Mr. Thomas J. Cunningham
Secretary, Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer
Tri-Valley Corporation
5555 Business Park South, Suite 200
Bakersfield, CA 93309
Re: Tri-Valley Corporation
Form 10-K/A for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2004
Filed September 20, 2005
File Number 1-31852
Response Letter Dated September 20, 2005
Dear Mr. Cunningham:
We have reviewed your filings and have the following
comment. We
think you should revise your document in response to this comment.
If
you disagree, we will consider your explanation as to why our
comment
is inapplicable or a revision is unnecessary. Please be as
detailed
as necessary in your explanation. After reviewing this
information,
we may raise additional comments.
Form 10-K/A for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2004
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statement
Note 13 - Subsequent Events
1. After reviewing the reserves report prepared by Stan Brown it
appears that the 22.7 million barrels of proved reserves in the
report
are too high. According to Rule 4-10(a) of Regulation S-X, proved
undeveloped reserves may only be attributed to wells directly
offsetting a well that has shown to be productive. It appears
that
proved reserves were attributed to large amounts of acreage that
are
beyond productive wells. The definition of proved undeveloped
reserves states that reserves can only be attributed to acreage
beyond
a direct offset where it can be demonstrated with certainty that
there
is continuity of production from the existing productive
formation.
Please revise your document to only disclose as proved, those
undeveloped reserves that are direct offsets from wells that have
demonstrated to be productive, provided the offsetting acreage has
not
been previously drained and provided that management has
sanctioned
the project including drilling the wells, installing the necessary
steam generators and infrastructure and purchasing natural gas to
fuel
the generators. Reserves that do not qualify as proved reserves
may
be determined to be proved in the future as the drilling program
progresses and you demonstrate the new wells be productive. The
full
cost of the project including the cost to purchase natural gas
should
be disclosed. In addition, the costs and economics should include
the
approximately $1 million estimate for emission credits that will
have
to be purchased in order to meet Ventura County`s emission
standards.
Closing Comments
As appropriate, please amend your filing and respond to this
comment within 10 business days or tell us when you will provide
us
with a response. You may wish to provide us with marked copies of
the
amendment to expedite our review. Please understand that we may
have
additional comments after reviewing your amendment and response to
our
comment.
You may contact James Murphy, Petroleum Engineer at (202) 551-3703
with questions about engineering matters. Please contact me at
(202)
551-3740 with any other questions.
Sincerely,
H. Roger Schwall
Assistant Director
??
??
??
??
Mr. Thomas J. Cunningham
Tri-Valley Corporation
October 7, 2005
page 1
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
100 F Street, N.E.
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
DIVISION OF
CORPORATION FINANCE
MAIL STOP 7010
</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>