SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Comment Letter for OMNICOM GROUP INC. (OMC) (CIK 0000029989) (OMC) — Jun 13, 2017

OMNICOM GROUP INC. (OMC) (CIK 0000029989)
Date: June 13, 2017 · CIK: 0000029989 · Accession: 0000000000-17-020635

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Sentiment
Urgency
Document Type
Confidence
SEC Posture
Company Posture

Summary

Reasoning

File numbers found in text: 001-10551

Date
December 31, 2016
Author
/s/ Robert S. Littlepage, for
Form
UPLOAD
Company
OMNICOM GROUP INC. (OMC) (CIK 0000029989)

Letter

Mail Stop 3720 June 12, 201 7 Philip J. Angelastro Chief Financial Officer Omnicom Group, Inc. 437 Madison Avenue New York, NY 10022

Re: Omnicom Group, Inc. Form 10 -K for Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2016 Filed February 9, 2017 Response Dated April 28, 2017 File No. 001-10551

Dear Mr. Angelastro :

We have reviewed your April 28, 2017 response to our comment letter and have the following comments. In some of our comments, we may ask you to provide us with information so we may better understand your disclosure.

Please respond to these comments within ten business days by providing th e requested information or advise us as soon as possible when you will respond. If you do not believe our comments apply to your facts and circumstances, please tell us why in your response.

After reviewing your response to these comments, we may have additional comments.

7. Segment Reporting, page F -17

1. We note y ou identify your Networks by name on your website. Please provide us the names of each of the five numbered Network s in your response and their respective geographic jurisdictions/ organiza tions as applicable.

2. Given that each Network (or major agency within each Network ) appears to have its respective brand distinction and primary discipline, tell us how this differentiation and respective offering matter to a client in its Network (agency) selection decision.

3. We note in your response to comment 4 that Network s 1 and 2 were legacy from formation while Network s 3, 4 and 5 evolved over time. In this regard, please tell us :

Philip J. Angelastro Omnicom Group, Inc. June 12, 2017 Page 2

a. how agencies get assigned to a particular Network;

b. how much advertising revenue is earned by Network s 1, 2, 3 and 5 ;

c. how much revenue from CRM, PR and Specialty services are earned by each Network; and

d. under what circumstances, how often , and to what extent has your CODM moved a client relationship from one Network to another or to another agency within a Network . Explain to us how this impacts your reporting .

4. You also provided us your aggregation considerations based on Network similarities in terms of their economics, products and services, and distri bution methods . In those respects, we have the following comments .

a. Tell us more in detail the underlying factors and the nature of Network 1’s customers/ contracts to explain why its margin is consistently different from the other Networks.

b. Since ad vertising is the primary discipline of Network s 1, 2 3 and 5, please provide additional details regarding why they appear to be economically dissimilar.

c. Given that the work for a particular client can come from 4 or 5 Network s, tell us how revenue and exp ense associated with a client (contract) is allocated to each of the Network s.

d. Given that you report services and their respective revenues across four disciplines, tell us how you concluded that the services provided under each of these disciplines are similar (for example, explain how you concluded that advertising is similar to CRM).

5. With respect to Network 4:

a. Tell us, in more detail, about its types of services as compared with those of the other Network s which report advertising as their primary discipline.

b. Tell us how you considered Network 4’s practice areas in your aggregation analysis and how material they are in relation to Network 4’s total revenues .

c. Explain to us your specific plans in forming new practice areas within Network 4.

6. Given your notable “wins” of large media accounts, tell us under which reportable discipline are media agencies’ revenues included and how media services are similar (dissimilar) in material respects to that reportable discipline.

Philip J. Angelastro Omnicom Group, Inc. June 12, 2017 Page 3

You may contact Kathryn T. J acobson, Senior Staff Accountant at (202) 551 -3365 or Robert S. Lit tlepage, Accountant Branch Chief at (202) 551 -3361 or me at (202) 551 -3810 with any questions.

Sincerely,
/s/ Robert S. Littlepage, for

Show Raw Text
Mail Stop 3720

June 12, 201 7

Philip J. Angelastro
Chief Financial  Officer
Omnicom Group, Inc.
437 Madison Avenue
 New York, NY  10022

Re: Omnicom Group, Inc.
 Form 10 -K for Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2016
Filed February 9, 2017
Response Dated April 28, 2017
  File No. 001-10551

Dear Mr. Angelastro :

We have reviewed your April 28, 2017  response to our comment letter and have the
following comments.  In some of our comments, we may ask you to provide us with information
so we may better understand your disclosure.

Please respond to these comments within ten business days by providing th e requested
information or advise us as soon as possible when you will respond.  If you do not believe our
comments apply to your facts and circumstances, please tell us why in your response.

After reviewing your response to these comments, we may have additional comments.

7. Segment Reporting, page F -17

1. We note y ou identify your Networks by name on  your website.  Please provide  us the
names of each of the five numbered Network s in your response and their respective
geographic jurisdictions/ organiza tions as applicable.

2. Given that each Network  (or major agency within each Network ) appears to have its
respective brand distinction and primary discipline, tell us how this differentiation and
respective offering matter to a client in its Network  (agency)  selection decision.

3. We note in your response to comment 4 that  Network s 1 and 2 were legacy from
formation while Network s 3, 4 and 5 evolved over time.  In this regard,  please  tell us :

Philip J. Angelastro
Omnicom Group, Inc.
June 12, 2017
Page 2

 a. how  agencies get assigned to a particular Network;

b. how much advertising revenue is earned by Network s 1, 2, 3 and 5 ;

c. how much revenue from CRM, PR and Specialty services are earned by each
Network; and

d. under what circumstances, how often , and to what extent has your CODM moved a
client relationship from one Network  to another  or to another agency within a
Network .  Explain to us how this impacts your reporting .

4. You also provided us your aggregation considerations based on Network similarities in
terms of their economics, products and services, and distri bution methods .  In those
respects, we have the following comments .

a. Tell us more in detail the underlying factors and the nature of Network  1’s customers/
contracts to explain why its margin is consistently different from the other Networks.

b. Since ad vertising is the primary discipline of Network s 1, 2 3 and 5, please provide
additional details regarding  why they appear to be economically dissimilar.

c. Given that the work for a particular client can come from 4 or 5 Network s, tell us how
revenue and exp ense associated with a client (contract) is allocated to each of the
Network s.

d. Given that you report services and their respective revenues across four disciplines,
tell us how you concluded that the services provided under each of these disciplines
are similar (for example, explain how you concluded that advertising is similar to
CRM).

5. With respect to Network 4:

a. Tell us, in more detail, about its types of services as compared with those of the other
Network s which report advertising as their primary discipline.

b. Tell us how you considered Network  4’s practice areas in your aggregation analysis
and how material they are in relation to Network  4’s total revenues .

c. Explain to us your specific plans in forming new practice areas within Network 4.

6. Given your notable “wins” of large media accounts, tell us under which reportable
discipline are media agencies’ revenues included and how media services are similar
(dissimilar) in material respects to that reportable discipline.

Philip J. Angelastro
Omnicom Group, Inc.
June 12, 2017
Page 3

 You may contact Kathryn T. J acobson, Senior Staff Accountant  at (202) 551 -3365  or
Robert S. Lit tlepage, Accountant Branch Chief  at (202) 551 -3361  or me at (202) 551 -3810 with
any questions.

Sincerely,

 /s/ Robert S. Littlepage, for

 Carlos Pacho
Senior Assistant Chief Accountant
 AD Office 11 – Telecommunications