SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Comment Letter for ECOLAB INC. (ECL) (CIK 0000031462) (ECL) — Feb 25, 2009

ECOLAB INC. (ECL) (CIK 0000031462)
Date: Feb. 25, 2009 · CIK: 0000031462 · Accession: 0000000000-09-009934

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Sentiment
Urgency
Document Type
Confidence
SEC Posture
Company Posture

Summary

Reasoning

Referenced dates: February 19, 2009

Date
February 25, 2009
Author
Pamela Long Assistant Director
Form
UPLOAD
Company
ECOLAB INC. (ECL) (CIK 0000031462)

Letter

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549-0510 DIVISION OF CORPORATION FINANCE Mail Stop 7010 February 25, 2009 By U.S. Mail and Facsimile to (651) 293-2573 Lawrence T. Bell General Counsel Ecolab Inc. 370 Wabasha Street North St. Paul, Minnesota 55102 Re: Ecolab Inc. Form 10-K for Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2007 Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A Filed on March 19, 2008 File No. 1-09328

Dear Mr. Baker: We have reviewed your response letter dated February 19, 2009 and have the following additional comments. In some of our comments, we may ask you to provide us with information so we may better understand your disclosure. After reviewing this information, we may raise additional comments. We welcome any questions you may have about our comments or on any other aspect of our review. Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A

Compensation Discussion & Analysis, page 25

1. We have considered your response to prior comment 4 and your request for confidential treatment. It is unclear how disclosure of these targets would provide competitive harm, especially since the prior fiscal year for which the targets applied has passed and the actual financial results of that fiscal year are available. Please either disclose your historical incentive targets in future filings or provide us with a more detailed description of each target to be excluded as well as your analysis of why you believe that disclosure of each target would result in competitive harm. For example, for each named executive officer, please specify his or her targets and provide a more detailed explanation of how disclosure of these targets would cause you competitive harm, including an explanation of how the specific competitive advantage would be attained through disclosure of these targets, addressing the fact that the targets relate to a past fiscal year.

Lawrence T. Bell Ecolab Inc. February 25, 2009 Page 2 Closing Comments

As appropriate, please respond to these comments within 10 business days or tell us when you will provide us with a response. Please furnish a letter on EDGAR that keys your responses to our comments and provides any requested supplemental information. Detailed response letters greatly facilitate our review. Please understand that we may have additional comments after reviewing your responses to our comments.

Please direct questions to Sherry Haywood, Staff Attorney at (202) 551-3345, or me at (202) 551-3760.

Sincerely,
Pamela Long Assistant Director
cc: Sarah Erickson (via facsimile 651/ 293-2573) Associate General Counsel Ecolab Inc.

Show Raw Text
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549-0510

       DIVISION OF
CORPORATION FINANCE

Mail Stop 7010

February 25, 2009

By U.S. Mail and Facsimile to (651) 293-2573

Lawrence T. Bell General Counsel  Ecolab Inc. 370 Wabasha Street North St. Paul, Minnesota 55102
Re: Ecolab Inc.
 Form 10-K for Fiscal Year Ended
December 31, 2007
 Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A  Filed on March 19, 2008   File No. 1-09328

Dear Mr. Baker:
We have reviewed your response letter dated February 19, 2009 and have the following
additional comments.   In some of our comments, we may ask you to provide us with information so we may better understand your disclosure.  After reviewing this information, we may raise additional comments.  We welcome any questions you may have about our comments or on any other aspect of our review.
Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A

Compensation Discussion & Analysis, page 25

1. We have considered your response to prior comment 4 and your request for confidential
treatment. It is unclear how disclosure of these targets would provide competitive harm, especially since the prior fiscal year for which the targets applied has passed and the actual financial results of that fiscal year are available.  Please either disclose your historical incentive targets in future filings or provide us with a more detailed description of each target to be excluded as well as your analysis of why you believe that disclosure of each target would result in competitive harm.  For example, for each named executive officer, please specify his or her targets and provide a more detailed explanation of how disclosure of these targets would cause you competitive harm, including an explanation of how the specific competitive advantage would be attained through disclosure of these targets, addressing the fact that the targets relate to a past fiscal year.

Lawrence T. Bell
Ecolab Inc. February 25, 2009 Page 2   Closing Comments

As appropriate, please respond to these comments within 10 business days or tell us
when you will provide us with a response.  Please furnish a letter on EDGAR that keys your responses to our comments and provides any requested supplemental information.  Detailed response letters greatly facilitate our review.  Please understand that we may have additional comments after reviewing your responses to our comments.

Please direct questions to Sherry Haywood, Staff Attorney at (202) 551-3345, or me at
(202) 551-3760.

Sincerely,

Pamela Long  Assistant Director
  cc:  Sarah Erickson (via facsimile 651/ 293-2573)        Associate General Counsel        Ecolab Inc.