SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Company Response from EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT CORP (EDUC) (CIK 0000031667) (EDUC) — Mar 17, 2008

EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT CORP (EDUC) (CIK 0000031667)
Date: March 17, 2008 · CIK: 0000031667 · Accession: 0001104659-08-018023

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Date
September 25, 2007
Author
/s/
Form
CORRESP
Company
EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT CORP (EDUC) (CIK 0000031667)

Letter

March 17,

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Division of Corporate Finance

Attn: William H. Thompson

F Street, NE

Washington, DC 20549

Educational Development Corp (EDUC)

Response to Comment Letter

Mr. Thompson:

I am writing in response to your comment letter, dated September 25, 2007, regarding our Form 10-K for Fiscal Year Ended February 28, 2007 (File No. 0-4957). I concur with your suggestions and appreciate your guidance towards improved compliance with SEC disclosure requirements. The following responses directly correspond with your comments.

1. Item 9A will be revised for future filings to read:

“An evaluation was performed of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) as of February 28, 2007. This evaluation was conducted under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Controller/Corporate Secretary (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer).

Based on that evaluation, these officers concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated and communicated to them, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure and is recorded, processed, summarized and reported in accordance within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms. It should be noted that the design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events.”

Finally, I confirm that our conclusion regarding effectiveness would not have changed had the above revisions been included in the 10-K filing.

2. Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 paragraphs 4 (d) have been revised to comply with the required language, including the previously deleted parenthetical language, as follows:

“d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the

registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and”

Please contact me if additional revisions are warranted or if you have questions.

Thank you.

Sincerely,
/s/
Marilyn Welborn

Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm

March 17,
2008

United
States Securities and Exchange Commission

Division
of Corporate Finance

Attn:  William H. Thompson

100
F Street, NE

Washington,
DC  20549

Educational
Development Corp (EDUC)

Response
to Comment Letter

Mr. Thompson:

I am writing in response to your comment
letter, dated September 25, 2007, regarding our Form 10-K for Fiscal
Year Ended February 28, 2007 (File No. 0-4957).  I concur with your suggestions and appreciate
your guidance towards improved compliance with SEC disclosure requirements.  The following responses directly correspond
with your comments.

1.               Item 9A will be revised for
future filings to read:

“An evaluation was performed of the
effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and
procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) as
of February 28, 2007. This evaluation was conducted under the supervision
and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive
Officer and our Controller/Corporate Secretary (Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer).

Based on that evaluation, these officers
concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure
that information required to be disclosed in reports that we file or submit
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated and communicated to
them, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure
and is recorded, processed, summarized and reported in accordance within the
time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and
forms. It should be noted that the design of any system of controls is based in
part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events.”

Finally, I confirm that our conclusion
regarding effectiveness would not have changed had the above revisions been
included in the 10-K filing.

2.               Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2
paragraphs 4 (d) have been revised to comply with the required language,
including the previously deleted parenthetical language, as follows:

“d.   Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the

registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the
case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting; and”

Please contact me if additional revisions are
warranted or if you have questions.

Thank you.

Sincerely,

/s/
Marilyn Welborn

Marilyn
Welborn

Controller

Educational
Development Corporation

918.622.4522
x118

mwelborn@edcpub.com