SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Company Response from GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER (GT) — Mar 23, 2005

GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO /OH/ (GT) (CIK 0000042582)
Date: March 23, 2005 · CIK: 0000042582 · Accession: 0000950152-05-002397

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Sentiment
Urgency
Document Type
Confidence
SEC Posture
Company Posture

Summary

Reasoning

Date
March 23, 2005
Author
By
Form
CORRESP
Company
GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO /OH/ (GT) (CIK 0000042582)

Letter

CORRESPONDENCE

THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY

Akron, Ohio 44316-0001

March 23, 2005 LAW DEPARTMENT

VIA EDGAR

Ms. Jennifer Hardy

Branch Chief

Division of Corporation Finance

Securities and Exchange Commission

450 Fifth Street, NW

Washington, DC 20549-0404

RE:

The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company — File Number 1-1927:

Preliminary Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A Filed on March 9, 2005

This letter is in response to the letter, dated March 18, 2005 (the “comment letter”), from Ms. Jennifer Hardy, Branch Chief of the Division of Corporation Finance, Securities and Exchange Commission, to Mr. Michael R. Peterson, attorney for The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (the “Company”), regarding the comments of the Commission Staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to the Company’s Preliminary Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed on March 9, 2005 (the “Proxy Statement”). The comments are limited to Item 2 of the Proxy, which proposes an amendment to the Company’s Code of Regulations to permit the Company to notify shareholders of meetings by electronic or other means of communication.

For the convenience of the Commission Staff, each numbered paragraph response herein corresponds to the same numbered paragraph in the comment letter.

The Company respectfully submits the following information and comments with respect to each comment contained in the comment letter.

1. Please disclose that when a document is provided through electronic media, the recipient will have comparable access to the information as if it were delivered in paper.

The Company will include the following language in its description of Item 2 of the Proxy Statement: “When a document is provided through electronic means, the shareholder will have comparable access to the information as if it were delivered on paper.”

2. Please disclose how you will confirm that the investor has appropriate notice and access to the information.

The Company will include the following language in its description of Item 2 of the Proxy Statement: “Shareholders will be sent an email around the same time as the paper mailing containing a link to the documents, and the documents will remain posted until all shareholders have cast their votes and the meeting has been adjourned. Shareholders will also be able to download and print all of the delivered documents.”

3. We note Exhibit B, which states that notice of annual meetings may be waived by shareholders. Supplementally, please clarify how this procedure complies with Rule 14a-3.

The Company notes that the waiver of notice provision in Exhibit B is expressly permitted by Section 1701.42 of the Ohio Revised Code. A similar provision is contained in Delaware law at Section 229 of the Delaware General Corporation Law and a number of public companies have such a provision in their By-Laws. Rule 14a-3(a), while addressing proxy statement delivery requirements, does not address the manner in which notice of meetings must be given to shareholders, which is a matter governed by state law. There may be instances, though rare, in which a shareholder who receives a proxy statement pursuant to Rule 14a-3 may validly waive notice of the meeting under state law. For example, under Ohio law, and as set forth in Exhibit B, notice of a meeting must be given not less than seven or more than sixty days before the date fixed for a meeting of shareholders. There may be instances in which the notice provided by the Company does not comply with this requirement. In such cases, the failure to meet this requirement may be waived by the shareholder. The Company acknowledges, however, that any solicitation of proxies would have to comply with the information delivery requirements of Rule 14a-3.

As requested in the comment letter, the Company hereby acknowledges that (i) it is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in its filings, (ii) comments from the Commission Staff or changes to disclosure in response to such comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filing, and (iii) the Company may not assert comments of the Commission Staff as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.

Please direct any questions, comments and advice of the Commission Staff to me at 330-796-4141 (fax: 330-796-8836).

Respectfully submitted,
THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY

Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm

CORRESPONDENCE

THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY

Akron, Ohio 44316-0001

March 23, 2005
LAW DEPARTMENT

VIA EDGAR

Ms. Jennifer Hardy

Branch Chief

Division of Corporation Finance

Securities and Exchange Commission

450 Fifth Street, NW

Washington, DC 20549-0404

    RE:

    The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company — File Number 1-1927:

    Preliminary Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A Filed on March 9, 2005

     This letter is in response to the letter, dated March 18, 2005 (the “comment letter”), from
Ms. Jennifer Hardy, Branch Chief of the Division of Corporation Finance, Securities and Exchange
Commission, to Mr. Michael R. Peterson, attorney for The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (the
“Company”), regarding the comments of the Commission Staff of the Securities and Exchange
Commission with respect to the Company’s Preliminary Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed on March
9, 2005 (the “Proxy Statement”). The comments are limited to Item 2 of the Proxy, which proposes
an amendment to the Company’s Code of Regulations to permit the Company to notify shareholders of
meetings by electronic or other means of communication.

     For the convenience of the Commission Staff, each numbered paragraph response herein
corresponds to the same numbered paragraph in the comment letter.

     The Company respectfully submits the following information and comments with respect to each
comment contained in the comment letter.

1.    Please disclose that when a document is provided through electronic media, the recipient
will have comparable access to the information as if it were delivered in paper.

The Company will include the following language in its description of Item 2 of the
Proxy Statement: “When a document is provided through electronic means, the
shareholder will have comparable access to the information as if it were delivered
on paper.”

2.    Please disclose how you will confirm that the investor has appropriate notice and access
to the information.

The Company will include the following language in its description of Item 2 of the
Proxy Statement: “Shareholders will be sent an email around the same time as the
paper mailing containing a link to the documents, and the documents will remain
posted until all shareholders have cast their votes and the meeting has been
adjourned. Shareholders will also be able to download and print all of the
delivered documents.”

3.    We note Exhibit B, which states that notice of annual meetings may be waived by
shareholders. Supplementally, please clarify how this procedure complies with Rule 14a-3.

The Company notes that the waiver of notice provision in Exhibit B is expressly
permitted by Section 1701.42 of the Ohio Revised Code. A similar provision is
contained in Delaware law at Section 229 of the Delaware General Corporation Law and
a number of public companies have such a provision in their By-Laws. Rule 14a-3(a),
while addressing proxy statement delivery requirements, does not address the manner
in which notice of meetings must be given to shareholders, which is a matter
governed by state law. There may be instances, though rare, in which a shareholder
who receives a proxy statement pursuant to Rule 14a-3 may validly waive notice of
the meeting under state law. For example, under Ohio law, and as set forth in
Exhibit B, notice of a meeting must be given not less than seven or more than sixty
days before the date fixed for a meeting of shareholders. There may be instances in
which the notice provided by the Company does not comply with this requirement. In
such cases, the failure to meet this requirement may be waived by the shareholder.
The Company acknowledges, however, that any solicitation of proxies would have to
comply with the information delivery requirements of Rule 14a-3.

     As requested in the comment letter, the Company hereby acknowledges that (i) it is responsible
for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in its filings, (ii) comments from the Commission
Staff or changes to disclosure in response to such comments do not foreclose the Commission from
taking any action with respect to the filing, and (iii) the Company may not assert comments of the
Commission Staff as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the
federal securities laws of the United States.

     Please direct any questions, comments and advice of the Commission Staff to me at 330-796-4141
(fax: 330-796-8836).

    Respectfully submitted,

THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY

    By:
    /s/ Michael R. Peterson

    Michael R. Peterson

    Attorney

2