SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Company Response from INTEL CORP (INTC) (CIK 0000050863) (INTC) — Jun 4, 2009

INTEL CORP (INTC) (CIK 0000050863)
Date: June 4, 2009 · CIK: 0000050863 · Accession: 0000050863-09-000116

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Sentiment
Urgency
Document Type
Confidence
SEC Posture
Company Posture

Summary

Reasoning

Referenced dates: May 12, 2009

Date
June 4, 2009
Author
/ s / Stacy Smith_____________________
Form
CORRESP
Company
INTEL CORP (INTC) (CIK 0000050863)

Letter

United States Securities and Exchange Commission Division of Corporate Finance Re: Intel Corporation Form 10-K for the year ended December 27, 2008 Filed February 23, 2009

Dear Ms. Blye:

We have received your comment letter dated May 12, 2009, and the following information responds to your inquiries. For your ease of reference, we have included your comment below. Please note that this letter omits confidential information included in the unredacted version of the letter that was delivered to the Division of Corporation Finance and that asterisks, as indicated below, denote such omissions.

Pursuant to 17 C.F.R. § 200.83, we are requesting confidential treatment for portions of our response below. We request that these portions, as indicated by [***], be maintained in confidence, not be made part of any public record and not be disclosed to any person as they contain confidential information, disclosure of which would cause Intel competitive harm. In the event that the Staff receives a request for access to the confidential portions herein, whether pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) or otherwise, we respectfully request that we be notified immediately so that we may further substantiate this request for confidential treatment. Please address any notification of a request for access to such documents to the undersigned with a copy to Cary Klafter, Vice President, Legal and Corporate Affairs, and Corporate Secretary, Intel Corporation, 2200 Mission College Blvd., mail stop RNB4-151, Santa Clara, CA 95054.

Intel Corporation

2200 Mission College Blvd.

Santa Clara, CA 95052

www.intel.com

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Division of Corporate Finance

June 4, 2009

Page 2

Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended December 27, 2008

Operations in the Middle East and Africa, page 15, and “Intel in the Middle East” section on the intel.com website

Your Comment:

It appears from page 15 of your Form 10-K and the “Intel in the Middle East” section of your website that you have operations in the Middle East and Africa, which are regions that include Iran, Syria, and Sudan. In addition, we are aware of a May 2008 news report that PCs in Cuba contain your Celeron processors. Cuba, Iran, Sudan, and Syria are identified by the State Department as state sponsors of terrorism, and are subject to U.S. economic sanctions and export controls. We note that your Form 10-K does not include disclosure regarding contacts with Cuba, Iran, Sudan, and Syria. Please describe to us the nature and extent of any past, current, and anticipated contacts with the referenced countries, whether through distributors, resellers, licensees, or other direct or indirect arrangements. Your response should describe any products or technology you have provided to the referenced countries, directly or indirectly, and any agreements, commercial arrangements, or other contacts you have had with the governments of those countries or entities controlled by those governments.

Response to Your Comment:

For ease of reference, page 15 from Intel’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 27, 2008 is attached hereto as Attachment 1 and the “Intel in the Middle East” section of the intel.com website is attached hereto as Attachment 2.

Your comment notes that Intel Corporation’s Form 10-K does not include disclosure of business activities with countries designated under U.S. law as State Sponsors of Terrorism--Cuba, Iran, Sudan and Syria (“Subject Countries”). Lack of disclosure on that topic is appropriate because Intel does not conduct business activities in or with the Subject Countries, as they constitute a subset of the embargoed countries under U.S. Export Administration regulations (“Export Regulations”). Intel’s microprocessor products are subject to the Export Regulations, and Intel (including its subsidiaries worldwide) has an active program in place to meet these export compliance obligations. Intel prohibits all transactions with countries identified under certain trade related sanctions, and Cuba, Iran, Myanmar (Burma), North Korea, Syria, and Sudan are currently identified under Export Regulations as embargoed countries. Consequently, the company prohibits all business transactions with the Subject Countries, which are included in the list of embargoed countries under the Export Regulations, through its export compliance program and takes appropriate action to enforce this policy through customer contracts, policy reminder communications, training of employees and customers, and investigation of potential policy violations.

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Division of Corporate Finance

June 4, 2009

Page 3

Intel has no business contacts with the Subject Countries, either directly or indirectly through tacit agreement with its customers. Intel does not provide products or technology to the Subject Countries,

directly or indirectly, and the company does not have any agreements, commercial arrangements or other contacts with the governments of the Subject Countries or to our knowledge, entities controlled by those governments, relating to sales of Intel products. It is possible that some Intel employees may have had incidental contacts with government officials from the Subject Countries, or with agents of entities controlled by those governments at industry conferences and other functions, but we are not aware of any sales of Intel products to the Subject Countries resulting from actions of Intel employees. On occasion, Intel has followed up with customers regarding possible shipments of Intel products to the Subject Countries in violation of Intel’s policy, but there have not been any instances of Intel direct shipments or customer shipments with the express or implied agreement of Intel, to such countries.

Among other activities, our compliance policies and procedures dealing with the Export Regulations include:

•

Automatically blocking direct sales activities to embargoed countries within Intel’s enterprise shipping systems.

•

Providing annual export compliance training that includes specific instructions regarding embargoed countries to all employees working within the Intel Sales and Marketing Group.

•

Requiring Intel’s customers to follow Intel’s export compliance policy. Intel includes export compliance provisions in its contracts with distributors, original equipment manufacturers and resellers. Representative language is attached hereto as Attachment 3.

•

Providing on-site export compliance training to direct customers and/or Intel employees located in areas that may present a higher risk of diversion to countries subject to the Export Regulations. For example, in the Middle East, we provided training in 2007 and 2008 in Cairo, and in 2005, 2007 and 2008 in Dubai.

•

Participating in routine audits conducted by Intel’s internal audit department of sales reports of Intel customers to verify adherence to the policy.

•

Intel has an ongoing and open dialogue with the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), Office of Export Enforcement (OEE), to mutually address potential risks of product diversion contrary to the Export Regulations. For example, OEE contacts Intel’s Export Compliance Manager from time to time to obtain Intel product classification or customer information, and Intel will collaborate with OEE for guidance involving a potential export compliance issue.

In the event the company learns of a suspected deviation from its export policies or contract provisions, Intel pursues prompt and appropriate action to communicate to the Intel employee or customer of Intel’s strict policy in this area.

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Division of Corporate Finance

June 4, 2009

Page 4

A current example demonstrating our compliance efforts in connection with alleged sales of Intel

products in an embargoed country is a matter involving a company in [***] that is using our trademarks to sell its computer products. Our information is that the company is operating under the name [***] in [***] and using Intel registered trademarks in the sale of microprocessors. As it happens, we believe that the processors are not Intel processors, but are processors manufactured by one of our competitors, [***]. We are concerned about this matter not only from the trademark infringement perspective, but also because of the implication that this company is authorized by Intel to sell Intel products in [***], an embargoed country. We intend to file a lawsuit in [***] to enjoin this company from using Intel’s trademarks to promote its sale of non-Intel products.

We also note your reference to a May 2008 news report that personal computers (PCs) in Cuba contain Intel®Celeron® processors. A May 2, 2008 Associated Press article about the availability of PCs in Cuba said: “The Cuban PCs have Intel Celeron processors with 80 gigabytes of memory and 512 RAM and are equipped with Microsoft’s Windows XP operating system. Both could be violations of a U.S. trade embargo, but not something Washington can do anything about in the absence of diplomatic relations with Havana. Clerks said the PCs were assembled by Cuban companies using parts imported from China.” As noted above, Intel policy in accord with the Export Regulations prohibits the sale of Intel products to Cuba. We have not received any information concerning the parts referred to in the news article beyond the reference in the news article. We do not know if an Intel customer in China, or a party who purchased processors from an Intel customer in China, shipped the parts to Cuba, nor if the article is accurate with regard to the reference to China. Each year we sell millions of microprocessors to approximately 13,000 customers in China. The article also noted that the U.S. government could not take action on the matter since there are no diplomatic relations between the U.S. and Cuba. Similarly, due to the travel and other constraints imposed by the embargo, it was not feasible for Intel to investigate this matter in Cuba.

**********

We have sought to be fully responsive to your comment letter, and if you have further comments that you would like to have addressed, please let us know. If you have any questions, you may contact Terri Remillard at (408) 765-4747 or Ronald Mueller at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, at (202) 955-8671.

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Division of Corporate Finance

Page 5

Sincerely,
/ s / Stacy Smith_____________________

Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm

CONFIDENTIAL

FOR INFORMATION OF SEC STAFF ONLY

Confidential Treatment Requested by Intel Corporation

For a Portion of This Letter Described Below

June 4, 2009

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Division of Corporate Finance

100 F Street NE

Mail Stop 6010

Washington, D.C. 20549-3628

Attn:  Cecilia Blye, Chief, Office of Global Security Risk

            Re:

            Intel Corporation

            Form 10-K for the year ended December 27, 2008

            Filed February 23, 2009

Dear Ms. Blye:

We have received your comment letter dated May 12, 2009, and the following information responds to your inquiries. For your ease of reference, we have included your comment below. Please note that this letter omits confidential information included in the unredacted version of the letter that was delivered to the Division of Corporation Finance and that asterisks, as indicated below, denote such omissions.

Pursuant to 17 C.F.R. § 200.83, we are requesting confidential treatment for portions of our response below. We request that these portions, as indicated by [***], be maintained in confidence, not be made part of any public record and not be disclosed to any person as they contain confidential information, disclosure of which would cause Intel competitive harm. In the event that the Staff receives a request for access to the confidential portions herein, whether pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) or otherwise, we respectfully request that we be notified immediately so that we may further substantiate this request for confidential treatment. Please address any notification of a request for access to such documents to the undersigned with a copy to Cary Klafter, Vice President, Legal and Corporate Affairs, and Corporate Secretary,
Intel Corporation, 2200 Mission College Blvd., mail stop RNB4-151, Santa Clara, CA  95054.

Intel Corporation

2200 Mission College Blvd.

Santa Clara, CA  95052

www.intel.com

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Division of Corporate Finance

June 4, 2009

Page 2

Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended December 27, 2008

Operations in the Middle East and Africa, page 15, and “Intel in the Middle East” section on the intel.com website

Your Comment:

It appears from page 15 of your Form 10-K and the “Intel in the Middle East” section of your website that you have operations in the Middle East and Africa, which are regions that include Iran, Syria, and Sudan. In addition, we are aware of a May 2008 news report that PCs in Cuba contain your Celeron processors. Cuba, Iran, Sudan, and Syria are identified by the State Department as state sponsors of terrorism, and are subject to U.S. economic sanctions and export controls. We note that your Form 10-K does not include disclosure regarding contacts with Cuba, Iran, Sudan, and Syria. Please describe to us the nature and extent of any past, current, and anticipated contacts with the referenced countries, whether through distributors, resellers, licensees, or other direct or indirect arrangements. Your response should describe any products or technology you have provided to the
referenced countries, directly or indirectly, and any agreements, commercial arrangements, or other contacts you have had with the governments of those countries or entities controlled by those governments.

Response to Your Comment:

For ease of reference, page 15 from Intel’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 27, 2008 is attached hereto as Attachment 1 and the “Intel in the Middle East” section of the intel.com website is attached hereto as Attachment 2.

Your comment notes that Intel Corporation’s Form 10-K does not include disclosure of business activities with countries designated under U.S. law as State Sponsors of Terrorism--Cuba, Iran, Sudan and Syria (“Subject Countries”). Lack of disclosure on that topic is appropriate because Intel does not conduct business activities in or with the Subject Countries, as they constitute a subset of the embargoed countries under U.S. Export Administration regulations (“Export Regulations”). Intel’s microprocessor products are subject to the Export Regulations, and Intel (including its subsidiaries worldwide) has an active program in place to meet these export compliance obligations. Intel prohibits all transactions with countries identified under certain trade related sanctions, and Cuba, Iran, Myanmar (Burma), North Korea, Syria, and Sudan are currently identified under Export Regulations
as embargoed countries. Consequently, the company prohibits all business transactions with the Subject Countries, which are included in the list of embargoed countries under the Export Regulations, through its export compliance program and takes appropriate action to enforce this policy through customer contracts, policy reminder communications, training of employees and customers, and investigation of potential policy violations.

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Division of Corporate Finance

June 4, 2009

Page 3

Intel has no business contacts with the Subject Countries, either directly or indirectly through tacit agreement with its customers. Intel does not provide products or technology to the Subject Countries,

directly or indirectly, and the company does not have any agreements, commercial arrangements or other contacts with the governments of the Subject Countries or to our knowledge, entities controlled by those governments, relating to sales of Intel products. It is possible that some Intel employees may have had incidental contacts with government officials from the Subject Countries, or with agents of entities controlled by those governments at industry conferences and other functions, but we are not aware of any sales of Intel products to the Subject Countries resulting from actions of Intel employees. On occasion, Intel has followed up with customers regarding possible shipments of Intel products to the Subject Countries in violation of Intel’s policy, but there have not been any instances of Intel direct shipments or customer shipments with the express or implied agreement of Intel, to such countries.

Among other activities, our compliance policies and procedures dealing with the Export Regulations include:

            •

            Automatically blocking direct sales activities to embargoed countries within Intel’s enterprise shipping systems.

            •

            Providing annual export compliance training that includes specific instructions regarding embargoed countries to all employees working within the Intel Sales and Marketing Group.

            •

            Requiring Intel’s customers to follow Intel’s export compliance policy. Intel includes export compliance provisions in its contracts with distributors, original equipment manufacturers and resellers. Representative language is attached hereto as Attachment 3.

            •

            Providing on-site export compliance training to direct customers and/or Intel employees located in areas that may present a higher risk of diversion to countries subject to the Export Regulations. For example, in the Middle East, we provided training in 2007 and 2008 in Cairo, and in 2005, 2007 and 2008 in Dubai.

            •

            Participating in routine audits conducted by Intel’s internal audit department of sales reports of Intel customers to verify adherence to the policy.

            •

            Intel has an ongoing and open dialogue with the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), Office of Export Enforcement (OEE), to mutually address potential risks of product diversion contrary to the Export Regulations. For example, OEE contacts Intel’s Export Compliance Manager from time to time to obtain Intel product classification or customer information, and Intel will collaborate with OEE for guidance involving a potential export compliance issue.

In the event the company learns of a suspected deviation from its export policies or contract provisions, Intel pursues prompt and appropriate action to communicate to the Intel employee or customer of Intel’s strict policy in this area.

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Division of Corporate Finance

June 4, 2009

Page 4

A current example demonstrating our compliance efforts in connection with alleged sales of Intel

products in an embargoed country is a matter involving a company in [***] that is using our trademarks to sell its computer products. Our information is that the company is operating under the name [***] in [***] and using Intel registered trademarks in the sale of microprocessors. As it happens, we believe that the processors are not Intel processors, but are processors manufactured by one of our competitors, [***]. We are concerned about this matter not only from the trademark infringement perspective, but also because of the implication that this company is authorized by Intel to sell Intel products in [***], an embargoed country. We intend to file a lawsuit in [***] to enjoin this company from using Intel’s trademarks to promote its sale of non-Intel products.

We also note your reference to a May 2008 news report that personal computers (PCs) in Cuba contain Intel®Celeron® processors. A May 2, 2008 Associated Press article about the availability of PCs in Cuba said: “The Cuban PCs have Intel Celeron processors with 80 gigabytes of memory and 512 RAM and are equipped with Microsoft’s Windows XP operating system. Both could be violations of a U.S. trade embargo, but not something Washington can do anything about in the absence of diplomatic relations with Havana. Clerks said the PCs were assembled by Cuban companies using parts imported from China.”  As noted above, Intel policy in accord with the Export Regulations prohibits the sale of Intel products to Cuba. We have not received any information concerning the parts referred to in the news article beyond the reference in the news article. We do not know if an Intel customer in China, or a
party who purchased processors from an Intel customer in China, shipped the parts to Cuba, nor if the article is accurate with regard to the reference to China. Each year we sell millions of microprocessors to approximately 13,000 customers in China. The article also noted that the U.S. government could not take action on the matter since there are no diplomatic relations between the U.S. and Cuba. Similarly, due to the travel and other constraints imposed by the embargo, it was not feasible for Intel to investigate this matter in Cuba.

**********

We have sought to be fully responsive to your comment letter, and if you have further comments that you would like to have addressed, please let us know. If you have any questions, you may contact Terri Remillard at (408) 765-4747 or Ronald Mueller at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, at (202) 955-8671.

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Division of Corporate Finance

Page 5

Sincerely,

/ s /  Stacy Smith_____________________

Stacy Smith

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Intel Corporation

            cc:

            Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of Intel Corporation

            Cary Klafter, Vice President, Legal and Corporate Affairs, and Corporate Secretary

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Division of Corporate Finance

June 4, 2009

Page 6

ATTACHMENT 1

Table of Contents

Executive Officers of the Registrant

The following sets forth certain information with regard to our executive officers as of February 20, 2009

(ages are as of December 27, 2008):

            Craig R. Barrett , age 69

            •   2005 – present,

            Chairman of the Board

            •   1998 – 2005,

            Chief Executive Officer

            •   Member of Intel Board of Directors since 1992

            •   Joined Intel 1974

            Paul S. Otellini , age 58

            •   2005 – present,

            President, Chief Executive Officer

            •   2002 – 2005,

            President, Chief Operating Officer

            •   Member of Intel Board of Directors since 2002

            •   Member of Google, Inc. Board of Directors

            •   Joined Intel 1974

            Andy D. Bryant , age 58

            •   2007 – present,

            Executive VP, Finance and Enterprise Services, Chief Administrative Officer

            •   2001 – 2007,

            Executive VP, Chief Financial and Enterprise Services Officer

            •   Member of Columbia Sportswear Company and McKesson Corporation Board of Directors

            •   Joined Intel 1981

            Stacy J. Smith , age 46

            •   2007 – present,

            VP, Chief Financial Officer

            •   2006 – 2007,

            VP, Assistant Chief Financial Officer

            •   2004 – 2006,

            VP of Finance and Enterprise Services, Chief Information Officer

            •   2002 – 2004,

            VP of Sales and Marketing Group, General Manager (GM) of Europe, Middle East, and Africa

            •   Joined Intel 1988

            Sean M. Maloney , age 52

            •   2008 – present,

            Executive VP, Chief Sales and Marketing Officer

            •   2006 – 2008,

            Executive VP, GM of Sales and Marketing Group, Chief Sales and Marketing Officer

            •   2005 – 2006,

            Executive VP, GM of Mobility Group

            •   2001 – 2005,

            Executive VP, GM of Intel Communications Group

            •   Member of Autodesk, Inc. Board of Directors

            •   Joined Intel 1982

            David Perlmutter , age 55

            •   2007 – present,

            Executive VP, GM of Mobility Group

            •   2005 – 2007,

            Senior VP, GM of Mobility Group

            •   2005

            VP, GM of Mobility Group

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Division of Corporate Finance

June 4, 2009

Page 7

            •   2000 – 2005,

            VP, GM of Mobile Platforms Group

            •   Joined Intel 1980

            Arvind Sodhani , age 54

            •   2007 – present,

            Executive VP of Intel, President of Intel Capital

            •   2005 – 2007,

            Senior VP of Intel, President of Intel Capital

            •   1990 – 2005,

            VP, Treasurer

            •   Joined Intel 1981

            Robert J. Baker , age 53

            •   2001 – present,

            Senior VP, GM of Technology and Manufacturing Group

            •   Joined Intel 1979

            Patrick P. Gelsinger , age 47

            •   2005 – present,

            Senior VP, GM of Digital Enterprise Group

            •   2002 – 2005,

            Senior VP, Chief Technology Officer

            •   Joined Intel 1979

            William M. Holt , age 56

            •   2006 – present,

            Senior VP, GM of Technology and Manufacturing Group

            •   2005 – 2006,

            VP, Co-GM of Technology and Manufacturing Group

            •   1999 – 2005,

            VP, Director of Logic Technology Development

            •   Joined Intel 1974

            D. Bruce Sewell , age 50

            •   2005 – present,

            Senior VP, General Counsel

            •   2004 – 2005,

            VP, General Counsel

            •   2001 – 2004,

            VP of Legal and Government Affairs, Deputy General Counsel

            •   Joined Intel 1995

            Thomas M. Kilroy , age 51

            •   2005 – present,

            VP, GM of Digital Enterprise Group

            •   2003 – 2005,

            VP of Sales and Marketing Group, Co-President of Intel Americas

            •   Joined Intel 1990

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Division of Corporate Finance

June 4, 2009

Page 8

Attachment 2

Intel in the Middle East

News. Events. Promotions.

Find out what is happening near you

About Intel Corporati