SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Company Response from LINCOLN NATIONAL CORP (LNC, LNC-PD) (CIK 0000059558) (LNC) — May 9, 2006

LINCOLN NATIONAL CORP (LNC, LNC-PD) (CIK 0000059558)
Date: May 9, 2006 · CIK: 0000059558 · Accession: 0000950159-06-000698

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Sentiment
Urgency
Document Type
Confidence
SEC Posture
Company Posture

Summary

Reasoning

File numbers found in text: 001-6028

Date
December 31, 2005
Author
Douglas N. Miller
Form
CORRESP
Company
LINCOLN NATIONAL CORP (LNC, LNC-PD) (CIK 0000059558)

Letter

Securities and Exchange Commission Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2005 Filed March 15, 2006 File Number: 001-6028

Re: Lincoln National Corporation

Dear Mr. Rosenberg:

This letter is in response to your letter of April 26, 2006 concerning Lincoln National Corporation’s (“LNC” or “the Company”) Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. Our reply refers to the specific comment in your letter. In responding to your comment, we acknowledge the following:

·

the Company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the filing;

·

staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filing; and

·

the Company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under federal securities laws of the United States

The following is your comment and our response:

Consolidated Financial Statement, page 106

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, page 111

Comment: Please confirm that the line item “Increase in funds withheld liability” represents a receipt of cash and explain to us why you have classified these amounts as a financing activity. It is our understanding that cash does not actually change hands in these agreements until the settlement at the end, so a reduction would be a cash outflow but an increase would not include an actual cash flow even with new agreements.

Response: Effective with the fourth quarter of 2003, we implemented Derivative Implementation Issue No. B36, Embedded Derivatives: Modified Coinsurance Arrangements and Debt Instruments That Incorporate Credit Risk Exposures That Are Unrelated or Only Partially Related to the Creditworthiness of the Obligor under Those Instruments (“DIG B36”). DIG B36 established that reinsurance arrangements involving modified coinsurance and similar arrangements, such as fund withheld coinsurance, contain an embedded derivative that must be bifurcated and accounted for separately. We determined that the embedded derivative contained in the reinsurance arrangement was a total return swap tied to an underlying pool of assets supporting the reinsurance arrangement. This approach is arrived at by imputing the following hypothetical elements to the reinsurance arrangement in accordance with the DIG B36:

1.

LNC and the reinsurer enter into a coinsurance arrangement;

2.

the reinsurer extends a hypothetical collaterized loan of the underlying pool of assets back to LNC; and

3.

the companies enter into a total return swap, pursuant to which the return on the underlying pool of assets is paid by LNC in satisfaction of its obligation to pay on the hypothetical loan from the reinsurer.

Under the assumptions described above, there are two separate transactions -- (i) a transaction involving the transfer of insurance risk and (ii) a hypothetical loan transaction. We determined that cash flow was occurring as two separate components of the two transactions under the guidance of DIG B36, as follows:

1.

the actual cash flow between the policyholder and LNC flow through the reinsurance arrangement and is an operating cash flow transaction, and

2.

the hypothetical loan under DIG B36 results in cash coming from the reinsurer to LNC similar to a financing activity.

Although cash is not actually passed to/from the reinsurer until settlement at the end of the contract, under the principles of DIG B36, which requires the bifurcation of the funds in a modified coinsurance reinsurance transaction into an insurance risk transfer arrangement and a loan, we concluded that two separate cash flow transactions were occurring between LNC and the reinsurer. Finally, if this amount were not included in the financing section of the cash flow statement, it would be included in the operating activities section of the cash flow statement as part of the adjustment to net income to arrive at operating cash flows.

****

If you have any questions regarding our response, please contact me directly at (215) 448-1430.

Sincerely,
/s/
Douglas N. Miller

Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm

      Lincoln Correspondence

        May
          8,
          2006

          Mr.
            Jim
            Rosenberg

          Senior
            Assistant Chief Accountant

          Securities
            and Exchange Commission

          100
            F
            Street, N.E.

          Washington,
            D.C. 20549

            Re:          Lincoln
              National Corporation

            Form
              10-K
              for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2005

            Filed
              March 15, 2006

            File
              Number: 001-6028

              Dear
                Mr.
                Rosenberg:

              This
                letter is in response to your letter of April 26, 2006 concerning
                Lincoln
                National Corporation’s (“LNC” or “the Company”) Form 10-K for the year ended
                December 31, 2005. Our reply refers to the specific comment in your
                letter. In
                responding to your comment, we acknowledge the following:

                    ·

                      the
                        Company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the
                        disclosure in
                        the filing;

                    ·

                      staff
                        comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments
                        do not
                        foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect
                        to the
                        filing; and

                    ·

                      the
                        Company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any
                        proceeding
                        initiated by the Commission or any person under federal securities
                        laws of
                        the United
                        States

      The
        following is your comment and our response:

      Consolidated
        Financial Statement, page 106

      Consolidated
        Statements of Cash Flows, page 111

      Comment:
         Please
        confirm that the line item “Increase in funds withheld liability” represents a
        receipt of cash and explain to us why you have classified these amounts as
        a
        financing activity. It is our understanding that cash does not actually change
        hands in these agreements until the settlement at the end, so a reduction
        would
        be a cash outflow but an increase would not include an actual cash flow even
        with new agreements.

      Response: Effective
        with the fourth quarter of 2003, we implemented Derivative
        Implementation Issue No. B36, Embedded Derivatives: Modified Coinsurance
        Arrangements and Debt Instruments That Incorporate Credit Risk Exposures
        That
        Are Unrelated or Only Partially Related to the Creditworthiness of the Obligor
        under Those Instruments (“DIG B36”).
        DIG B36
        established that reinsurance arrangements involving modified
        coinsurance and similar arrangements, such as fund withheld coinsurance,
        contain
        an embedded derivative that must be bifurcated and accounted for separately.
        We
        determined that the embedded derivative contained in the reinsurance arrangement
        was a total return swap tied to an underlying pool of assets supporting the
        reinsurance arrangement. This approach is arrived at by imputing the following
        hypothetical elements to the reinsurance arrangement in accordance with the
        DIG
        B36:

              1.

                LNC
                  and the reinsurer enter into a coinsurance arrangement;

              2.

                the
                  reinsurer extends a hypothetical collaterized loan of the underlying
                  pool
                  of assets back to LNC; and

              3.

                the
                  companies enter into a total return swap, pursuant to which the
                  return on
                  the underlying pool of assets is paid by LNC in satisfaction of
                  its
                  obligation to pay on the hypothetical loan from the
                  reinsurer.

        Under
          the
          assumptions described above, there are two separate transactions -- (i)
          a
          transaction involving the transfer of insurance risk and (ii) a hypothetical
          loan transaction. We determined that cash flow was occurring as two separate
          components of the two transactions under the guidance of DIG B36, as follows:

              1.

                the
                  actual cash flow between the policyholder and LNC flow through
                  the
                  reinsurance arrangement and is an operating cash flow transaction,
                  and

              2.

                the
                  hypothetical loan under DIG B36 results in cash coming from the
                  reinsurer
                  to LNC similar to a financing activity.

        Although
          cash is not actually passed to/from the reinsurer until settlement at the
          end of
          the contract, under the principles of DIG B36, which requires the bifurcation
          of
          the funds in a modified coinsurance reinsurance transaction into an insurance
          risk transfer arrangement and a loan, we concluded that two separate cash
          flow
          transactions were occurring between LNC and the reinsurer. Finally, if
          this
          amount were not included in the financing section of the cash flow statement,
          it
          would be included in the operating activities section of the cash flow
          statement
          as part of the adjustment to net income to arrive at operating cash
          flows.

        ****

        If
          you
          have any questions regarding our response, please contact me directly at
          (215)
          448-1430.

        Sincerely,

        /s/
          Douglas N. Miller

        Douglas
          N. Miller

        Vice
          President & Chief Accounting Officer

          Cc: Fredrick
            Crawford, Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer