SEC Company Response from LINCOLN NATIONAL CORP (LNC, LNC-PD) (CIK 0000059558) (LNC) — May 9, 2006
LINCOLN NATIONAL CORP (LNC, LNC-PD) (CIK 0000059558)
Date: May 9, 2006 · CIK: 0000059558 · Accession: 0000950159-06-000698
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
File numbers found in text: 001-6028
Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm
Lincoln Correspondence
May
8,
2006
Mr.
Jim
Rosenberg
Senior
Assistant Chief Accountant
Securities
and Exchange Commission
100
F
Street, N.E.
Washington,
D.C. 20549
Re: Lincoln
National Corporation
Form
10-K
for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2005
Filed
March 15, 2006
File
Number: 001-6028
Dear
Mr.
Rosenberg:
This
letter is in response to your letter of April 26, 2006 concerning
Lincoln
National Corporation’s (“LNC” or “the Company”) Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2005. Our reply refers to the specific comment in your
letter. In
responding to your comment, we acknowledge the following:
·
the
Company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the
disclosure in
the filing;
·
staff
comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments
do not
foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect
to the
filing; and
·
the
Company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any
proceeding
initiated by the Commission or any person under federal securities
laws of
the United
States
The
following is your comment and our response:
Consolidated
Financial Statement, page 106
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows, page 111
Comment:
Please
confirm that the line item “Increase in funds withheld liability” represents a
receipt of cash and explain to us why you have classified these amounts as
a
financing activity. It is our understanding that cash does not actually change
hands in these agreements until the settlement at the end, so a reduction
would
be a cash outflow but an increase would not include an actual cash flow even
with new agreements.
Response: Effective
with the fourth quarter of 2003, we implemented Derivative
Implementation Issue No. B36, Embedded Derivatives: Modified Coinsurance
Arrangements and Debt Instruments That Incorporate Credit Risk Exposures
That
Are Unrelated or Only Partially Related to the Creditworthiness of the Obligor
under Those Instruments (“DIG B36”).
DIG B36
established that reinsurance arrangements involving modified
coinsurance and similar arrangements, such as fund withheld coinsurance,
contain
an embedded derivative that must be bifurcated and accounted for separately.
We
determined that the embedded derivative contained in the reinsurance arrangement
was a total return swap tied to an underlying pool of assets supporting the
reinsurance arrangement. This approach is arrived at by imputing the following
hypothetical elements to the reinsurance arrangement in accordance with the
DIG
B36:
1.
LNC
and the reinsurer enter into a coinsurance arrangement;
2.
the
reinsurer extends a hypothetical collaterized loan of the underlying
pool
of assets back to LNC; and
3.
the
companies enter into a total return swap, pursuant to which the
return on
the underlying pool of assets is paid by LNC in satisfaction of
its
obligation to pay on the hypothetical loan from the
reinsurer.
Under
the
assumptions described above, there are two separate transactions -- (i)
a
transaction involving the transfer of insurance risk and (ii) a hypothetical
loan transaction. We determined that cash flow was occurring as two separate
components of the two transactions under the guidance of DIG B36, as follows:
1.
the
actual cash flow between the policyholder and LNC flow through
the
reinsurance arrangement and is an operating cash flow transaction,
and
2.
the
hypothetical loan under DIG B36 results in cash coming from the
reinsurer
to LNC similar to a financing activity.
Although
cash is not actually passed to/from the reinsurer until settlement at the
end of
the contract, under the principles of DIG B36, which requires the bifurcation
of
the funds in a modified coinsurance reinsurance transaction into an insurance
risk transfer arrangement and a loan, we concluded that two separate cash
flow
transactions were occurring between LNC and the reinsurer. Finally, if
this
amount were not included in the financing section of the cash flow statement,
it
would be included in the operating activities section of the cash flow
statement
as part of the adjustment to net income to arrive at operating cash
flows.
****
If
you
have any questions regarding our response, please contact me directly at
(215)
448-1430.
Sincerely,
/s/
Douglas N. Miller
Douglas
N. Miller
Vice
President & Chief Accounting Officer
Cc: Fredrick
Crawford, Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer