SEC Company Response from LSB INDUSTRIES, INC. (LXU) (CIK 0000060714) (LXU) — Jan 22, 2008
LSB INDUSTRIES, INC. (LXU) (CIK 0000060714)
Date: Jan. 22, 2008 · CIK: 0000060714 · Accession: 0000060714-08-000005
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
Referenced dates: December 18, 2007
Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm
form_corres.htm
FOIA
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT
OF
LIMITED PORTIONS REQUESTED
BY
LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
UNDER
17 C.F.R. SECTION 200.83
January
22, 2008
Ms.
Nudrat Salik
Division
of Corporation Finance
U.
S.
Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington,
D.C. 20549-7010
Re: LSB
Industries, Inc.
Form
10-K/A for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2006, filed July 18, 2007
Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2006, filed March 27, 2007
Form
10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2007, filed November 5, 2007
File
No.
1-7677
Dear
Ms.
Salik:
This
letter responds to the comment letter dated December 18, 2007 from the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”), as referenced above. We
have repeated your comments and provided our response immediately under the
heading “Company Response” or in a referenced exhibit to this letter. Where
appropriate, we have provided in our response what the revisions will look
like
in future filings. To assist you in your review of our response, we have
italicized our responses where they represent changes to previously filed
disclosures
Based
on
general comment number 1, any revisions or changes noted by our responses
to
your comments relating to our filings identified above will be made in future
filings.
FORM
10-K/A#1 FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2006
General
Comment
Number 1:
Where
a
comment below requests additional disclosures or other revision to be made,
please show us in your supplemental response what the revisions will look
like.
These revisions should be included in your future filings.
Company
Response
The
following responses have been prepared in accordance with this comment. Where
revisions to disclosures have been requested, revisions will be included
in our
future filings.
Confidential
Treatment Requested by LSB Industries, Inc.
1
Financial
Statements
Note
3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Accrued
Insurance Liabilities, page F-16
Comment
Number 2:
Please
disclose the levels of excess loss coverage by type of risk
self-insured.
Company
Response
Following
is our proposed revised footnote to disclose the levels of excess loss coverage
by type of risk self-insured.
Accrued
Insurance Liabilities - We are self-insured up to certain limits for
group health, workers’ compensation and general liability claims. Above these
limits, we have commercial insurance coverage for our contractual
exposure on group health claims and statutory limits under workers’ compensation
obligations. We also carry excess umbrella insurance of $50 million for most
general liability risks excluding environmental risks. We have a separate $30
million insurance policy covering pollution liability at our El Dorado and
Cherokee Facilities. Our accrued insurance liabilities are based on
estimates of the self-insured portions of the claims, which include the incurred
claims amounts plus estimates of future claims development calculated by
applying our historical claims development factors to our incurred claims
amounts. We also consider the reserves established by our insurance adjustors
and/or estimates provided by attorneys handling the claims, if any. In addition,
our accrued insurance liabilities include estimates of incurred, but not
reported, claims and other insurance-related costs. At December 31, 2006 and
2005, our claims liabilities were $1,646,000 and $1,426,000, respectively,
which
are included in accrued and other liabilities. It is possible that the actual
development of claims could exceed our estimates.
Income
(Loss) Per Common Share, page F-21
Comment
Number 3:
Please
help us better understand the components of the line item described on the
face
of your statement of income as dividend requirements and stock dividend on
preferred stock for the year ended December 31, 2006. Please provide us with
a
more detailed listing of the components and corresponding amounts than that
provided on page F-22. Please also revise your footnote disclosures to better
explain the components as well. Given that you disclose on page F-51 that
you
recorded a charge of $2,882,000 to accumulated deficit for the induced
conversion of the Series 2 Preferred Stock, it is not clear how you arrived
at
the amount of $2,630,000. Refer to EITF Topic D-42. Please also tell us how
you
accounted for and reflected the holders waiving their rights to accrued,
unpaid
dividends in your financial statements.
Confidential
Treatment Requested by LSB Industries, Inc.
2
Company
Response
A:
The
$2,882,000 disclosed on page F-51 is the amount recorded as a charge to
accumulated deficit. This amount is the excess of the fair value of the common
stock issued to the holders pursuant to the exchange agreements over the
fair
value of the common stock to be issued to the holders under the original
terms
of the Series 2 Preferred in accordance with EITF Topic D-42 and SFAS 84
as
shown in Exhibit A. The $2,882,000 effectively included the dividends in
arrears
at the time of the exchange agreements. The $2,630,000 is the total
dividend requirements and stock dividend deducted from net income to determine
net income applicable to common stock as shown below. The holders of the
shares
of Series 2 Preferred pursuant to the exchange agreements received consideration
in excess of the dividends in arrears at the time of the exchange agreements
as
shown below. Because these dividends in arrears have been deducted from income
(loss) applicable to common stock in previous years, only $705,000 was included
in dividend requirements and stock dividend for 2006 associated with shares
of
Series 2 Preferred pursuant to the exchange agreements as shown below. A
more
detailed list of the components and corresponding amounts of the line item
described on the face of the statement of income as dividend requirements
and
stock dividend on preferred stock for the year ended December 31, 2006 and
related line items on page F-22 and supporting calculations on how we arrived
at
the amount of $2,630,000 are as follows:
2006
dividend requirements for cumulative preferred stock:
($000’s
omitted)
20,000
shares of Series B 12% Cumulative, Convertible Preferred Stock ($12
per
share)
$
240
A
range of 499,102 to 500,702 shares outstanding of Series 2 $3.25
Convertible, Exchangeable Class C Preferred Stock which were not
pursuant
to any exchange agreements ($3.25 per share)
1,624
104,548
shares of Series 2 $3.25 Convertible, Exchangeable Class C Preferred
Stock
pursuant to
exchange agreements (see calculation below)
705
1,000,000
shares of Series D 6% Cumulative, Convertible Class C Preferred Stock
($0.06 per share)
60
A
range of 683 to 871 shares of Noncumulative Redeemable Preferred
Stock
($1.24 per share)
1
Total
dividend requirements and stock dividend
$
2,630
Calculation
of dividend requirements and stock dividend on Series 2 Preferred pursuant
to
exchange agreements:
2006
dividend requirements prior to exchange agreements (104,548
shares x $0.8125 x 3 quarters)
$
255
Excess
of stock dividend (see discussion and calculation in Exhibit
A and discussion in proposed footnote in Exhibit
B) over dividends in arrears at time of exchange agreements
(2,882,203 less (104,548 x $23.2625))
450
Total
dividend requirements and stock dividend relating to
exchange
$
705
Confidential
Treatment Requested by LSB Industries, Inc.
3
B:
See
Exhibit B for our proposed revised footnote to better explain
the components used in determining net income (loss) per share which
modifications in presentation, if applicable, would be applied to all periods
presented in future filings.
C:
We
have referred to the dividends that have accumulated under the terms of
cumulative preferred stocks but which are not due and payable as such have
not
been declared by our Board of Directors, as “accrued and unpaid”, based on the
discussion in Exhibit C. Because these dividends had not been
declared, they were not accrued as a liability, but instead the liquidation
preference was disclosed and the dividends in arrears were deducted in arriving
at net income applicable to common stock in the periods to which the dividend
pertained. As noted above as the consideration paid in the exchange exceeded
the
aggregate liquidation preference of the securities, the holders effectively
received these unpaid dividends. The consideration received in excess of
the
liquidation preference was deducted in arriving at net income applicable
to
common stock as discussed in (A) above.
We
propose replacing the phrase “accrued and unpaid” with the phrase “dividends in
arrears” in the various disclosures relating to this transaction in future
filings.
Comment
Number 4:
You
excluded the effect of certain shares of convertible preferred stock from
your
determination of diluted net income (loss) per share as their effect would
have
been anti-dilutive. Please disclose which series of Preferred Stock was
excluded. In light of the requirements of EITF Topic D-53, please tell us
what
consideration you gave to the induced conversion of certain shares of Series
2
Preferred Stock in your determination of whether the preferred stock was
dilutive.
Company
Response
A:
See Exhibit B for our proposed revised footnote for future
filings to disclose the series of preferred stock which were
anti-dilutive.
B:
In computing diluted net income per share for 2006, we followed the guidance
of
EITF Topic No, D-53. For computing purposes, we separated the Series 2 Preferred
shares relating to the exchange agreements from the other convertible
securities. We applied the “if converted” method from the beginning of 2006 to
the date of the exchange agreements using both the 2006 dividend requirements
prior to exchange agreements and the excess of the stock dividend over dividends
in arrears at the time of exchange agreements (redemption premium) which
totaled
approximately $705,000 (see calculation under Comment Number 3). As a result,
the $705,000 of dividend requirements and stock dividend on these shares
of
Series 2 Preferred was more dilutive than the underlying 348,366
weighted-average shares which were outstanding from the beginning of 2006
to the
date of the exchange agreements.
Confidential
Treatment Requested by LSB Industries, Inc.
4
Note
5. Inventories, page F-25
Comment
Number 5:
In
2006,
you recorded a reduction to cost of sales of $711,000 for the realization and
reversal of losses related to inventory reserves. For each period presented,
please tell us the gross amount for which cost of sales was reduced for the
reversal of losses. Please help us understand how you determined it was
appropriate to reverse previously recorded losses related to inventory. Refer
to
SAB Topic 5:BB.
Company
Response
A:
Our disclosure used the terminology “realization and reversal of losses”. As
explained below, cost of sales was not reduced by the “reversal” of losses
relating to inventory, only the realization of losses on inventory sold during
the subsequent period. However for your information, the following is the detail
of the net amounts which impacted cost of sales and included in our
disclosure:
2006
2005
2004
($000’s
omitted)
Slow-moving
inventory:
Provision
for losses
$
258
$
121
$
303
Cost
exceeding net realizable value inventory:
Provision
for losses
426
1,395
1,277
Realization
of losses
(1,395
)
(1,277
)
(563
)
Net
total
$
(711
)
$
239
$
1,017
B:
We follow the
accounting guidance as discussed in SAB Topic 5:BB. The inventories which had
these “lower of cost or market” reserves at the end of each respective year were
sold during the subsequent year and therefore realized. We have excluded the
use
of the term “reversal” in our disclosure for 2007 and future Form 10K and Form
10Q filings.
Note
12. Long-Term Debt, page F-29
Comment
Number 6:
You
state that the conversion rates on
your 7% Convertible Senior Subordinated Debentures due 2011 will be adjusted
to
reflect dividends, stock splits, issuances of rights to purchase shares of
common stock and other events, as set forth in the Indenture. Please further
expand your disclosure to describe the types of other events and types of
issuances of rights to purchase shares of common stock which would result
in a change to the conversion rates. Please clarify in your disclosure, if
true,
that the changes are due to standard antidilution provisions as discussed in
paragraph 8 of EITF 05-2.
Confidential
Treatment Requested by LSB Industries, Inc.
5
Company
Response
The
following is our p