SEC Company Response from LGL GROUP INC (LGL) (CIK 0000061004) (LGL) — Apr 23, 2008
LGL GROUP INC (LGL) (CIK 0000061004)
Date: April 23, 2008 · CIK: 0000061004 · Accession: 0000921895-08-001197
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
Referenced dates: April 17, 2008
Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm
cor03725_04232008.htm
[
2525
Shader Road
Orlando,
FL 32804
Phone
(407) 298-2000 X146
Fax
(407) 578-7731
April 23,
2008
Dennis C.
Hult
Staff
Accountant
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
100 F
Street, N.W.
Washington,
DC 20549
Re: The
LGL Group, Inc.
Item 4.02 Form 8-K
Filed April 16, 2008
File No. 1-0016
Dear Mr.
Hult:
It was a
pleasure talking with you yesterday. As we discussed, listed below are our
responses to your letter dated April 17, 2008:
1.
Please tell us whether you
intend to file restated financial statements. We submitted a letter
to the Office of the Chief Accountant, Division of Corporation Finance of
the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on April 17, 2008. In our
letter, the Company stated that it determined that the accounting
treatment for certain foreign currency transactions was inappropriate and
that certain accounting errors were made in 2006 and prior years. At
December 31, 2006, the accumulated net credit balance was $172,000. As
discussed within our April 17, 2008 letter, the Company has determined
that recognizing the correction of this error in Q1 2007 would not have a
material effect on the Company’s 2007 financial statements, Q1 2007
results, nor on prior period financial statements, and has requested
guidance from and concurrence with our conclusion from the SEC. If the SEC
agrees with our conclusion, all three 10-Qs for 2007 need to be restated.
1
2.
Please tell us if your
certifying officers reconsidered the effect on the adequacy of your
disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by
your Form 10-Q for the period March 31, 2007 in light of
the material error you have disclosed. Additionally, tell us what affect
the error had on your current evaluation of disclosure controls and
procedures as of your fiscal year end December 31, 2007. No
disclosure was previously made for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 by the
former principal executive and financial officers of the Company.
Disclosures were made by the former executives for the quarters ended June
30, 2007 and September 30, 2007. The error was taken into consideration by
the Company’s principal executive and financial officers in evaluating the
overall effectiveness of the Company’s internal disclosure controls and
procedures. Listed below are the proposed disclosures that will be
included in the Company’s 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2007.
Item
9A(T). Controls and Procedures.
Evaluation
of our Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the
supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of
the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
under Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)) as of December 31, 2007 during the months of
February and March, 2008. Based on this evaluation, management has concluded
that as of December 31, 2007, such disclosure controls and procedures were
ineffective.
The
Company did not effectively communicate and implement the Company’s compliance
program. Specifically, internal controls were not properly identified,
communicated and implemented by the responsible personnel across the Company in
a timely manner. As a result, the Company had operating deficiencies primarily
due to undocumented evidence of the review and approval of key internal
controls. Our risk oversight function lacked enterprise-wide direction and
coordination with senior management in rolling out the Company’s compliance
program.
Management’s
Report on Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
Management
is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting. Under the supervision and with the participation
of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, management assessed the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2007 based on the guidance for smaller
companies in using the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO) Internal
Controls – Integrated Framework as it relates to the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting. Based on that assessment,
management has concluded that the Company’s internal controls over financial
reporting were not effective as of December 31, 2007 to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of its financial reporting and the
preparation of its financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
United States generally accepted accounting principles. As a result of its
assessment of our internal control over financial reporting, management
identified the material weaknesses discussed below.
Material
weaknesses were found in the following areas:
·
Inadequate Entity-Level
Controls - The Company did not effectively communicate and
implement the Company’s compliance program. Specifically, key internal
controls were not identified, communicated and implemented by the
responsible personnel across the Company in a timely manner. As a result,
the Company had operating deficiencies primarily due to undocumented
evidence of the review and approval of key internal
controls.
·
Enterprise-Wide Risk Oversight
- Our risk oversight function lacked enterprise-wide direction and
coordination with senior management in rolling out the Company’s
compliance program.
2
·
Financial Statement Close and
Reporting Process - We had inadequate procedures and personnel to
reasonably ensure that accurate, reliable quarterly financial statements
were prepared and reviewed on a timely
basis.
·
Inventory Controls –
The Company did not have documented evidence of the review and approval of
key internal controls related to the following sub
processes:
o
Inventory
Valuation
o
Inventory
Receiving
o
Inventory
Obsolescence
·
Information Technology
Company-Level Internal Controls - We did not maintain effective
internal control over financial reporting related to information
technology applications and infrastructure. Specifically, we identified
material weaknesses relating to our information technology company-level
controls concerning:
o
System
and Program Change Management
o
Logical
Access to Programs and Data
This
Annual Report does not include an attestation report of our registered public
accounting firm regarding internal control over financial
reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our
registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities
and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management’s
report in this Annual Report.
Plans
for Remediation of Material Weaknesses
Management
is currently addressing each of the material weaknesses in internal controls,
and is committed to remediating them as soon as possible. Management will devote
significant time and resources to the remediation effort. Management’s
remediation plans include the following:
·
Financial Management -
We have hired a new Chief Financial Officer and a new Corporate
Controller who have accounting, internal control and financial reporting
expertise. In addition, management has hired external consultants to
assist in the review of our internal control over financial
reporting.
·
Review of Internal Controls
- Management has engaged external consultants to assist in
reviewing our internal controls with the intent of improving the design
and operating effectiveness of controls and
processes.
·
Development of Compliance
Program - Management is in the process of hiring external
consultants to assist in the development and implementation of a
compliance program specific to our
needs.
·
Improving Information
Technology Company-Level Internal Controls – We are developing
mitigating controls to offset material weaknesses in system and program
change management, and system access while we implement an ERP
solution.
·
Enterprise Resource
Planning – We are developing and implementing an ERP strategy
solution. We need to perform the following steps, which we expect to take
approximately 12 months:
o
Current
state analysis of our systems from an internal control and business needs
perspective.
o
Select
an ERP solution, incorporating required re-engineering processes and
controls.
o
Data
conversion and implementation
testing.
3
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There
were no significant changes in our internal control over financial reporting
that occurred during the last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or
are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
As
requested in your letter, the Company acknowledges the following:
·
The
Company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in
the filing.
·
Staff
comments or changes to disclosures in response to staff comments do not
foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the
filing.
·
The
Company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding
initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities
laws of the United States.
If you
have any questions, please feel free to call me at (407) 298-2000 extension
146.
Very
truly yours,
/s/ Harold
Castle
Harold
Castle
Chief
Financial Officer
cc: Mark
A. Spelker, J.H. Cohn LLP
Anthony
Pustorino, Audit Committee Chair, LGL
David
J. Adler, Olshan Grundman Frome Rosenzweig & Wolosky
LLP
4