SEC Company Response from MCDONALDS CORP (MCD) (CIK 0000063908) (MCD) — Jun 21, 2006
MCDONALDS CORP (MCD) (CIK 0000063908)
Date: June 21, 2006 · CIK: 0000063908 · Accession: 0000063908-06-000040
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
Referenced dates: May 26, 2006
Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm
Correspondence Comment Letter
McDonald's
Corporation
2915
Jorie Boulevard
Oak
Brook, IL
60523-1900
June
21,
2006
Ms.
Linda
Cvrkel
Branch
Chief
Division
of Corporation Finance
U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington,
D.C. 20549
RE:
McDonald’s
Corporation
Form
10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2005
File
No. 1-05231
Dear
Ms.
Cvrkel:
In
reply
to your letter dated May 26, 2006, we have the following responses to your
comments. We appreciate the staff’s willingness to discuss the comments with us
and to provide us with the staff’s perspective on these matters.
Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005
Item
6. Selected Financial Data, page 12
1. Comment
Revise
future filings to balance your presentation of cash provided by operations
with
disclosures of cash flows from investing and financing activities for each
year
presented.
Response
In
an
effort to provide a balanced presentation in Item 6, we have included what
we
believe to be the most significant uses of cash flows for investing (i.e.
capital expenditures) and financing activities (i.e. treasury stock purchases
and common stock cash dividends). As requested by the staff, however, we will
enhance future filings to include total cash used for or provided by both
investing and financing activities.
1
Financial
Statements
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
Long-lived
assets, page 40
2. Comment
We
note that you initially group assets together at the television level in the
U.S. and at the country level for each of the international markets for purposes
of annually reviewing your restaurant assets for impairment. Supplementally
tell
us, with a view toward expanded disclosure in future filings, how you determine
that cash flows of single restaurants are not independent for purposes of
initially grouping assets for purposes of performing your recoverability test
pursuant to paragraph 10 of SFAS 144. We may have further
comments.
Response
We
supplementally advise the staff that, for purposes of assessing indicators
of
impairment as contemplated by paragraph 8 of SFAS 144, we assess specific events
at the individual restaurant level such as a decision to close an individual
restaurant or the condemnation of a site by a governmental authority.
Additionally, in assessing whether an indicator of impairment exists, we believe
that a meaningful indicator in our business is recurring negative operating
cash
flow for a trailing 24-month period at a market level since we manage our
restaurants as a group or portfolio with significant common costs (i.e.
advertising and supply chain costs) and promotional activities. As such, we
do
not believe negative cash flows are a meaningful indicator for each individual
restaurant because restaurant cash flows, although identifiable, are not largely
independent of the cash flows of other restaurants in a market. If we determine
in connection with this initial market-level assessment that any of our market
groups have recurring negative cash flow for the trailing 24-month period,
we
perform, as appropriate, detailed testing at the individual restaurant level
for
purposes of recognition and measurement of an impairment loss in accordance
with
paragraph 10 of SFAS 144.
Other
3. Comment
Please
revise your notes to your financial statements in future filings to disclose
commitments and contingencies, including management’s assessment of loss
contingencies as required by SFAS 5.
Response
At
December 31, 2005, the Company did not have any commitments and contingencies
that met SFAS 5 requirements for disclosure. We will continue to review SFAS
5
disclosure requirements and will make the appropriate disclosures as warranted
in future filings.
2
In
connection with this response, the Company acknowledges that (i) the Company
is
responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the filing;
(ii)
staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to the staff’s comments do
not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filing;
and (iii) the Company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any
proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal
securities laws of the United States.
We
hope
that our responses adequately address your comments. If you have any questions
on this letter or need further assistance, please call Dave Pojman, Corporate
Senior Vice President - Controller, at (630) 623-3162 or me at (630)
623-7001.
Sincerely,
/S/ Matthew
H. Paull
Matthew
H. Paull
Corporate
Senior Executive Vice
President
and Chief Financial Officer
cc:
U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission
Katherine Mathis
Lyn Shenk
McDonald’s
Corporation
Jim
Skinner, Chief Executive Officer
Dave
Pojman, Corporate Senior
Vice President - Controller
3