SEC Company Response from MML SERIES INVESTMENT FUND (CIK 0000067160) — Apr 1, 2022
MML SERIES INVESTMENT FUND (CIK 0000067160)
Date: April 1, 2022 · CIK: 0000067160 · Accession: 0001133228-22-001701
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
Letter
Division of Investment Management 100 F Street, NE Washington, DC 20549 Attention: Valerie J. Lithotomos Re: Definitive Proxy Statement for MML Series Investment Fund and MML Series Investment Fund II (each a “Fund” together, the “Funds”)
Dear Ms. Lithotomos:
Pursuant to Rule 14a-6(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, we are transmitting for filing today via the EDGAR system definitive proxy materials in connection with a meeting of shareholders of the Funds listed above to be held on May 25, 2022. These definitive materials are expected to be mailed to shareholders on or about April 8, 2022.
This letter also responds to your comments that you provided telephonically to me on behalf of the Staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission Staff”) on March 17, 2022 regarding the Funds’ preliminary proxy statements filed with the Commission on March 11, 2022. For convenience of reference, I have summarized each of the Commission Staff’s comment before the response by the Funds.
1. Comment: Please confirm that Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company, MML Bay State Life Insurance Company, and C.M. Life Insurance Company (together, the “Insurance Companies”) are relying on Northwestern National Life Insurance Company, SEC No-Action Letter (April 27, 1990) in order to reinvest the proceeds following the liquidation of each applicable Fund in Proposal 2 into a money market fund without a fund substitution order.
Response: Confirmed. The Insurance Companies are relying on the Northwestern National Life Insurance Company, SEC No-Action Letter (April 27, 1990) in order to reinvest the proceeds following the liquidation of each applicable Fund into a money market fund without a fund substitution order.
- 2 - April 1, 2022
2. Comment: Please confirm that the liquidation of each Fund in Proposal 2 is not contingent on the approval by shareholders of the liquidation of the other Funds in Proposal 2.
Response: We confirm that the liquidation of each Fund in Proposal 2 is not contingent on the approval by shareholders of the liquidation of any other Fund. In addition, we direct the Commission Staff’s attention to the language on page 18 of the proxy statement, which states: “Further, the liquidation of each Fund is not contingent on the approval by shareholders of the liquidation of any other Fund.”
3. Comment: Please confirm that the proposed liquidations in Proposal 2 are tax-free events for variable contract owners and policy holders.
Response: We direct the Commission Staff’s attention to the language on page 17 of the proxy statements which states: “Furthermore, the Insurance Companies have been advised by tax counsel that, if carried out, the proposed liquidations, followed by the transfers of variable contract/policy value to alternative subaccounts/divisions of each separate account, will not create any federal income tax liability for variable contract owners and policy holders.”
4. Comment: Please comment supplementally on whether the Trustees contemplated a merger of the Funds, instead of liquidating the Funds.
Response: We confirm that the Trustees considered the alternatives to liquidation for each Fund, including possible mergers and reorganizations. Among other things, the Trustees considered that the costs of possible mergers exceeded the benefits of such transactions and that liquidations of the Funds could be implemented more quickly.
5. Comment: The Commission Staff observed that not all proxy cards contain all proposals. Please confirm that the shareholders to which each proposal applies will receive the relevant proxy card(s).
Response: We confirm that the proxy cards were individualized so that not all proposals appear on each card. We additionally confirm that the shareholders to which each proposal applies will receive the relevant proxy card(s).
- 3 - April 1, 2022
I believe that this letter addresses the Commission Staff’s comments. Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to call me at (617) 951-7109.
Very truly yours,
/s/ Yana D. Guss
Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm
ROPES & GRAY
LLP
PRUDENTIAL TOWER
800 BOYLSTON STREET
BOSTON, MA 02199-3600
WWW.ROPESGRAY.COM
April 1, 2022
Yana D. Guss
T +1 617 951 7109
yana.guss@ropesgray.com
BY EDGAR
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Investment Management
100 F Street, NE
Washington, DC 20549
Attention: Valerie J. Lithotomos
Re: Definitive Proxy Statement for MML Series Investment Fund and MML Series Investment Fund II (each a “Fund” together,
the “Funds”)
Dear Ms. Lithotomos:
Pursuant to Rule 14a-6(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, we
are transmitting for filing today via the EDGAR system definitive proxy materials in connection with a meeting of shareholders of the
Funds listed above to be held on May 25, 2022. These definitive materials are expected to be mailed to shareholders on or about April
8, 2022.
This letter also responds to your comments that you provided telephonically
to me on behalf of the Staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission Staff”) on March 17, 2022 regarding
the Funds’ preliminary proxy statements filed with the Commission on March 11, 2022. For convenience of reference, I have summarized
each of the Commission Staff’s comment before the response by the Funds.
1. Comment: Please confirm that Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company, MML Bay State Life Insurance Company, and C.M. Life
Insurance Company (together, the “Insurance Companies”) are relying on Northwestern National Life Insurance Company, SEC No-Action
Letter (April 27, 1990) in order to reinvest the proceeds following the liquidation of each applicable Fund in Proposal 2 into a money
market fund without a fund substitution order.
Response: Confirmed. The Insurance Companies are relying
on the Northwestern National Life Insurance Company, SEC No-Action Letter (April 27, 1990) in order to reinvest the proceeds following
the liquidation of each applicable Fund into a money market fund without a fund substitution order.
- 2 -
April 1, 2022
2. Comment: Please confirm that the liquidation of each Fund in Proposal 2 is not contingent on the approval by shareholders of
the liquidation of the other Funds in Proposal 2.
Response: We confirm that the liquidation of each Fund in
Proposal 2 is not contingent on the approval by shareholders of the liquidation of any other Fund. In addition, we direct the Commission
Staff’s attention to the language on page 18 of the proxy statement, which states: “Further, the liquidation of each Fund
is not contingent on the approval by shareholders of the liquidation of any other Fund.”
3. Comment: Please confirm that the proposed liquidations in Proposal 2 are tax-free events for variable contract owners and policy
holders.
Response: We direct the Commission Staff’s attention
to the language on page 17 of the proxy statements which states: “Furthermore, the Insurance Companies have been advised by tax
counsel that, if carried out, the proposed liquidations, followed by the transfers of variable contract/policy value to alternative subaccounts/divisions
of each separate account, will not create any federal income tax liability for variable contract owners and policy holders.”
4. Comment: Please comment supplementally on whether the Trustees contemplated a merger of the Funds, instead of liquidating the
Funds.
Response: We confirm that the Trustees considered the alternatives
to liquidation for each Fund, including possible mergers and reorganizations. Among other things, the Trustees considered that the costs
of possible mergers exceeded the benefits of such transactions and that liquidations of the Funds could be implemented more quickly.
5. Comment: The Commission Staff observed that not all proxy cards contain all proposals. Please confirm that the shareholders
to which each proposal applies will receive the relevant proxy card(s).
Response: We confirm that the proxy cards were individualized
so that not all proposals appear on each card. We additionally confirm that the shareholders to which each proposal applies will receive
the relevant proxy card(s).
- 3 -
April 1, 2022
I believe that this letter addresses the Commission Staff’s comments.
Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to call me at (617) 951-7109.
Very truly yours,
/s/ Yana D. Guss
Yana D. Guss
cc: Andrew Goldberg, MML Investment Advisers,
LLC