SEC Comment Letter for BANK OF AMERICA (BAC) — Jun 6, 2011
BANK OF AMERICA CORP /DE/ (BAC, BAC-PB, BAC-PE, BAC-PK, BAC-PL, BAC-PM, BAC-PN, BAC-PO, BAC-PP, BAC-PQ, BAC-PS, BML-PG, BML-PL) (CIK 0000070858)
Date: June 6, 2011 · CIK: 0000070858 · Accession: 0000000000-11-034796
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
Show Raw Text
June 6 , 2011 Brian T. Moynihan Chief Executive Officer and President Bank of America Corporation 100 North Tryon Street Charlotte, NC 28255 Re: Bank of America Form 10 -K for the year ended December 31, 2010 Filed February 25, 2011 File No. 001 -6523 Form 10 -Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011 Filed May 5, 2011 Dear Mr. Moynihan : We have reviewed your filing an d have the following comments. In some of our comments, we may ask you to provide us with information so we may better unde rstand your disclosure. Please respond to this letter within ten business days by amending your filing, by providing the requested information, or by advising us when you will provide the requested response. Where we have requested changes in future fili ngs, please include a draft of your proposed dis closures that clearly identifies new or revised disclosures. If you do not believe our comments apply to your facts and circumstances or do not believe an amendment is appropriate, please tell us why in your response. After reviewing any amendment to your filing and the information you provide in response to these comments, including the draft of your proposed disclosures, we may have additional comments. Form 10 -K for the Fiscal Year Ended D ecember 31, 2010 Risk Factors, page 8 Adverse changes to our credit ratings from the major credit ratings agencies could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity, cash flows, competitive position…, page 8 1. In future filings, please note which credi t agencies have issued a negative watch and Brian T. Moynihan Bank of America Corporation June 6, 2011 Page 2 quantify the expected impact of a one and two notch downgrade in credit ratings. Mortgage and Housing Market -Related Risk, page 9 2. We note your statements on page 81 relating to the total debt restructurings that were non-performing as of December 30, 2010. Please discuss the non -performance and delinquency rates related to loan modifications and TDRs and the impact they are likely to have on your operations. To the extent any of the modif ications are re -modific ations, please include this information in the discussion. If you do not believe nonperformance or delinquency following modification or restructuring presents a significant risk, please tell us the basis for your belief. 3. Please include a risk factor dis cussion addressing the possible losses due to the rapid amortization of the home equity securitization trusts. We note your statement in footnote 8 to the financial statements that the maximum funding obligation attributable to rapid amortization cannot b e calculated as a home equity borrower has the ability to pay down and redraw balances. 4. We note your disclosure regarding the December 31, 2010 agreements you reached with Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae to resolve repurchase claims involving first−lien residen tial mortgage loans sold directly to them by entities related to legacy Countrywide. It does not appear that those agreements have been filed with us. Please file the agreements or, if you do not believe you are required to do so, provide us with a detai led analysis supporting your conclusion . Government measures to regulate the financial industry, including the Financial Reform Act, either individually, in combination or in the aggregate, could require us to change certain of our business practices…, p age 14 5. This risk factor discussion includes a list of practices that may be affected without including a discussion of the potential impact. While it may be difficult to discuss the actual effects of some of the changes prior to the completion of required rulemakings, you should discuss the significance of the affected activities to your operations. For example: quantify your revenues from debit interchange fees; quantify the expected impact of the change in FDIC assessments; and discuss the expected impa ct of heightened capi tal and liquidity requirements. 6. Additionally, please consider discussing possible changes to the tax code and the GSEs conservatorship as separate standalone risks. These discussions should also address the potential consequences to y our operations. Brian T. Moynihan Bank of America Corporation June 6, 2011 Page 3 Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Financial Highlights Noninterest Income, page 28 7. We note that your noninterest income comprises a significant portion of your consolidated net revenues, and that this income is generated from various revenue sources in both your traditional banking and investment banking businesses. Please revise you future filings either here or in your accounting policy footnote to provide clear disclosure of your various revenue sources, including how such revenues are derived, in which line items they are reported and the manner in which they are recognized in your financial statements. For example, please ensure your disclosure addresses the following: As it relates to investment banking income, clarify whether it is recognized net of expenses, and address how non -reimbursed expenses are accounted for and classified; Address the types of income streams included within investment and brokerage services revenues and how those different revenue streams are recognized; and As it relates to card income and service fees, discuss the types of fees charged and address how uncollectible fees are accounted for (charged through the provision or reversed through noninterest income). Components of Global Banking & Markets Sales and Trading Revenue, page 46 8. We note your discussion of sales and trading revenue on pages 46 and 158. Please respond to the following and expand your disclosures in future filings to a ddress the following: Tell us and expand your disclosures to provide further discussion of the types of instruments that generate the sales and trading revenue by type of risk and how those instruments affect the financial statement line items. For examp le, discuss how interest rate derivatives generate sales and trading revenue (changes in fair value which reflect X line item, and fee charged to customer, which affects X line item, etc); Brian T. Moynihan Bank of America Corporation June 6, 2011 Page 4 Describe the significant drivers of the sales and trading revenue. For example, discuss how much of the revenue is driven by transaction fees versus changes in fair value of the instruments; Tell us in more detail how sales and trading revenue is generated by customer demand, the steps you take to fill the order, and h ow the associated revenue line items are affected. For example, if a customer requests a foreign exchange swap, discuss the types of fees charged for the transaction, and whether the sales and trading revenues you would recognize is the other side of the swap transaction that the customer requested; Given that the total “trading account profits (losses) on page 158 of your derivatives footnote nearly ties to the consolidated income statement for all years presented, it appears trading profits (losses) is made up almost entirely of derivative products. Please clarify if that is true. If so, tell us where you include trading gains (losses) from your non -derivative contracts, including things such as sales of trading securities, and quantify the amounts; an d Clarify why the total “trading account profits (losses)” on page 158 doesn’t tie to the consolidated income statement line item “tr ading account profits (losses).” Liquidity Risk, page 67 Global Excess Liquidity Sources and Other Unencumbered Assets , page 67 9. We note your disclosures and table 16 showing the global excess liquidity sources as of December 31, 2010 and 2009. Given the significant increase in the balance over the prior year (57% increase in global excess liquidity sources as of Decembe r 31, 2010), and the distinct possibility of significant daily variations in the balances, in future filings please also provide this disclosure on an average balance for the period. Additionally, given the significance of the balances, and the different securities held, please consider providing more quantitative information about the amount of each asset type held as part of the excess liquidity pool. Credit Risk Management, page 71 Consumer Credit Portfolio – Home Equity, page 75 10. We note your discuss ion of your home equity portfolio, including your tabular disclosures of key credit statistics and geographic concentrations. Please respond to the following and expand your disclosures in future filings to address the following: Brian T. Moynihan Bank of America Corporation June 6, 2011 Page 5 Tell us whether you are able to track whether the first lien position is in default, regardless of whether you hold the first lien loan. If so, please tell us the results of that data and consider providing disclosure of this information in future filings; Tell us and disclose the percentage of the home equity loan portfolio where you also hold the first lien; Tell us whether the default and delinquency statistics for the home equity loans where you also hold the first lien show a different trend than situations where you do not also hold the first lien loan; Tell us and enhance disclosures in future filings to provide a discussion of how many borrowers are only paying the minimum amount due on the home equity loan; Describe the terms of the home equity loans in more detail. For example, tell us how long the draw periods are for the loans and provide data on when the loans convert to amortizing; and Tell us whether the default and delinquency statistics for amortizing loans show a different trend than situations where the h ome equity loans have not converted to amortizing. Countrywide Purchased Credit -Impaired Loan Portfolio, page 78 11. We note your disclosure that the Countrywide PCI allowance for loan losses increased $2.5 billion from December 31, 2009 to $6.3 billion at D ecember 31, 2010 as a result of the increase in the provision for credit losses and the reclassification of a portion of the nonaccretable difference to the allowance. Please tell us the cause of the reclassification from nonaccretable difference to the a llowance and how you determined this reclassification was in accordance with ASC 310 -30. Restructured Loans, page 81 12. We note your disclosure in footnote 6 to Table 33 that your policy is to record any losses in the value of foreclosed properties as a red uction in the allowance for loan and lease losses during the first 90 days after transfer of a loan into foreclosed properties, and that thereafter they are recorded in non -interest expense. Please respond to the following: Tell us how your policy compli es with the guidance in ASC 310 -40-55-15; Quantify the effect of losses recorded as a reduction in the allowance after transfer to foreclosed properties during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009; and Brian T. Moynihan Bank of America Corporation June 6, 2011 Page 6 Tell us why the charge -offs to new foreclosed properties is so significant in the first 90 days after transfer into foreclosed properties. In this regard, it appears that you recorded charge -offs representing 20% and 29% of the amount transferred into foreclosed properties during the years ended Dec ember 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Additionally, we note your policy disclosure on page 81 that the outstanding balance of a real -estate secured loan that is in excess of the estimated property value less costs to sell, is charged off no later than th e end of the month in which the account becomes 180 days past due. Industry Concentrations, page 89 13. We note your discussion on page 90 regarding the stress on state and local municipalities and your process for monitoring your exposure to these entities. We understand based on various disclosures throughout your filing that you have exposure to municipalities through direct investments in both municipal bonds and auction rate securities, as well as through your sponsorship of municipal bond securitizatio n vehicles. We also understand that banks may have involvement with municipalities as underwriters of bond offerings, as providers of guarantees (typically letters of credit), and through the offering of deposit services, direct loans and other traditiona l banking products. Please provide us with an analysis that summarizes and quantifies your various exposures (both direct and indirect) to state and local municipalities. Please also consider providing this type of disclosure in your future filings in or der to more clearly identify any risk concentration in this industry. Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses, page 97 14. We note your disclosure in table 50 of the allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total nonperforming loans and leases at D ecember 31, 2010 and 2009. We also note your footnotes to the table that indicate the portion of the allowance that has been allocated to products that are excluded from nonperforming loans, leases and foreclosed properties. Given the significance of the allowance that relates to the loans that are not classified as nonperforming, the fact that a different trend would appear to exist in this ratio if the allowance related to those products was also excluded from the table, and the fact that information ne eded to recalculate the ratio to be comparable to other companies that do not have the same type/volume of products that are not classified as nonperforming is not located nearby, we believe you should also note either the ratio recalculated based on the n umerator excluding the allowance allocated to those products, which is already disclosed in the footnote, or separately also note in the footnote or table the amount of nonperforming loans and leases so the amount can be easily recalculated. Additionally, please clarify how the allowance related to products that are excluded from nonperforming loans, leases and foreclosed properties is calculated. Brian T. Moynihan Bank of America Corporation June 6, 2011 Page 7 Trading Risk Management, page 100 15. We note your disclosure on page 102 that there were zero days with ac tual losses exceeding your daily trading VaR in the twelve months ended December 31, 2010 or 2009. We also note your disclosure on page 103 of your March 31, 2011 Form 10 -Q where you indicate that actual losses did not exceed daily trading VaR. Finally we note your disclosure on page 102 that statistically your actual losses should exceed VaR, on average, one out of 100 trading days, or two to three times in a year. Given that your trading losses have not exceeded your one -day VaR in over two years, p lease tell us how you determined your VaR model is still statistically appropriate in light of so few exceptions. Please tell us about any work you performed to validate the appropriateness of your model in light of the fact that it is not performing as statistically predicted; and Address any changes you made, or plan to make, to your VaR methodology or assumptions during the last three years, particularly highlighting any changes made because no trading losses were in excess of your one -day in over two years. 16. We note your disclosure that your VaR model uses a historical simulation approach based on three years of historical data, as well as your disclosure on page 101 that historical results may not always be indicative of future results. In light of this fact, please tell us whether you considered using a Monte Carlo simulation which randomly generates new market factors based on a chosen distribution, instead of the historical simulation model that uses historical moves for each market factor replaye d exactly how they occurred. Complex Accounting Estimates, page 106 Goodwill and Intangible Assets, page 110 17.