SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Company Response from NCR Voyix Corp (VYX, NCRRP) (CIK 0000070866) (VYX) — Oct 31, 2006

NCR Voyix Corp (VYX, NCRRP) (CIK 0000070866)
Date: Oct. 31, 2006 · CIK: 0000070866 · Accession: 0001193125-06-219190

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Referenced dates: October 26, 2006

Date
October 31, 2006
Author
/s/ Peter J. Bocian
Form
CORRESP
Company
NCR Voyix Corp (VYX, NCRRP) (CIK 0000070866)

Letter

United States Securities and Exchange Commission Filed March 10, 2006 Forms 10-Q filed during Fiscal 2006 Forms 8-K filed during Fiscal 2006 File No. 1-00395

Dear Mr. Wilson,

Thank you for your comment letter dated October 26, 2006 (the “Comment Letter”). Set forth below is NCR Corporation’s (the “Company”) response to your comments based on your review of NCR’s Form 10-K for Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2005, Forms 10-Q filed during Fiscal 2006, and Forms 8-K filed during Fiscal 2006 (File No. 1-00395). The comment from your letter of October 26, 2006 is included below in bold. The Company’s response follows your comment. Please do not hesitate to contact me if there are any comments or questions concerning our response or if we can be of further assistance.

Accounting for Reworkable Service Parts

1. We have considered the information provided in your response. While we believe your previous accounting method is not an acceptable method under GAAP, no change would be required if the application of that method does not produce materially different results from the inventory accounting method. The quantified impact of the change on your historically reported operating cash flows raises concern as to whether the effect of changing to the inventory accounting method is indeed immaterial. However, considering the insignificant impact on your reported cash flow trends and your previous disclosure of the expenditures for the reworkable service parts, we will not object to your conclusion that the impact of the change is immaterial. In your next interim and annual reports filed with the Commission, please include footnote disclosure stating that the reason you are treating the change in method of accounting

NCR Corporation

Page 2

for reworkable service parts as a change in accounting principle under SFAS 154 is because the impact of the change is not material.

Response:

In future filings, the Company will revise its discussion of reworkable service parts to state that the reason we are treating the change in method of accounting for reworkable service parts as a change in accounting principle under SFAS 154 is because the impact of the change is not material.

Please do not hesitate to contact me at 937-445-7300 if there are any comments or questions concerning the foregoing or if we can be of assistance in any way.

Sincerely,
/s/ Peter J. Bocian

Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm

Letter of Correspondence to the SEC

 1700 S. Patterson Boulevard

 Dayton, OH 45479

 October 31, 2006

 Mr. Craig Wilson

 Senior Assistant Chief Accountant

 United States Securities and Exchange Commission

 Washington, D.C. 20549

Re:
NCR Corporation

 Form 10-K for Fiscal Year Ended
December 31, 2005

 Filed March 10, 2006

 Forms 10-Q filed during Fiscal 2006

 Forms 8-K filed during Fiscal 2006

 File No. 1-00395

 Dear
Mr. Wilson,

 Thank you for your comment letter dated October 26, 2006 (the “Comment Letter”). Set forth below is NCR Corporation’s
(the “Company”) response to your comments based on your review of NCR’s Form 10-K for Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2005, Forms 10-Q filed during Fiscal 2006, and Forms 8-K filed during Fiscal 2006 (File No. 1-00395). The
comment from your letter of October 26, 2006 is included below in bold. The Company’s response follows your comment. Please do not hesitate to contact me if there are any comments or questions concerning our response or if we can be of
further assistance.

 Accounting for Reworkable Service Parts

1.
We have considered the information provided in your response. While we believe your previous accounting method is not an acceptable method under GAAP, no change would be required
if the application of that method does not produce materially different results from the inventory accounting method. The quantified impact of the change on your historically reported operating cash flows raises concern as to whether the effect of
changing to the inventory accounting method is indeed immaterial. However, considering the insignificant impact on your reported cash flow trends and your previous disclosure of the expenditures for the reworkable service parts, we will not object
to your conclusion that the impact of the change is immaterial. In your next interim and annual reports filed with the Commission, please include footnote disclosure stating that the reason you are treating the change in method of accounting

 NCR Corporation

 Page 2

 for reworkable service parts as a change in accounting principle under SFAS 154 is because the impact of the change is not
material.

 Response:

 In
future filings, the Company will revise its discussion of reworkable service parts to state that the reason we are treating the change in method of accounting for reworkable service parts as a change in accounting principle under SFAS 154 is because
the impact of the change is not material.

 Please do not hesitate to contact me at 937-445-7300 if there are any comments or questions concerning the
foregoing or if we can be of assistance in any way.

Sincerely,

 /s/ Peter J. Bocian

Peter J. Bocian

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

NCR Corporation

(937) 445-7300

cc:
Audit Committee of the Board of Directors

 PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

 James M. Ringler, Chairman of the Board of Directors

 William Nuti, Director, President and Chief Executive Officer