SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Comment Letter for Vaxart, Inc. (VXRT) (CIK 0000072444) (VXRT) — Aug 28, 2012

Vaxart, Inc. (VXRT) (CIK 0000072444)
Date: Aug. 28, 2012 · CIK: 0000072444 · Accession: 0000000000-12-046615

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Sentiment
Urgency
Document Type
Confidence
SEC Posture
Company Posture

Summary

Reasoning

Date
August 27, 2012
Author
/s/ David L. Orlic
Form
UPLOAD
Company
Vaxart, Inc. (VXRT) (CIK 0000072444)

Letter

August 27, 2012 Via E -mail Raafat E.F. Fahim, Ph.D. Nabi Biopharmaceuticals 12270 Wilkins Avenue Rockville, MD 20852

Re: Nabi Biopharmaceuticals Definitive Additional Proxy Soliciting Materials Filed August 23, 2012 File No. 001 -35285

Dear Dr. Fahim :

We have reviewed your filing and have the following comments. Please revise your filing and future filings as appropriate.

1. On page 80 of the merger proxy you estimate liquidation expenses of $13.5 million to make provision for existing and known potential claims and liabilities. Please provide us with a reasonably itemized statement of these estimated liquidation expenses.

2. In two contexts you cite Mangrove’s decision to tender its shares in the issuer tender offer that was completed on July 30, 2012 and the company’s resulting purchase of 2.74 million of Mangrove’s outstanding shares. In each context, please revise your disclosure to explicitly pro vide the full context for such statements and, rather than implying a particular conclusion, clearly state your beliefs and conclusions with respect to Mangrove’s decision to tender its shares at the price that it specified. We note that Mangrove’s price election may have reflected its views as to whether the merger was likely to be approved by other shareholders.

3. Please provide support for your statement that Biota’s shares a re “undervalued and thinly traded on the ASX.”

We urge all persons who are res ponsible for the accuracy and adequacy of the disclosure in the filing to be certain that the filing includes the information the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all applicable Exchange Act rules require. Since the company and its management are in po ssession of all facts relating to a company’s disclosure, they are responsible for the accuracy and adequacy of the disclosures they have made.

Raafat E.F. Fahim, Ph.D. Nabi Biopharmaceuticals August 27, 2012 Page 2

Please contact Karen Ubell, Staff Attorney, at (202) 551 -3873 or me at (202) 551 -3503 with any questions.

Sincerely,
/s/ David L. Orlic

Show Raw Text
August 27, 2012

Via E -mail
Raafat E.F. Fahim, Ph.D.
Nabi Biopharmaceuticals
12270 Wilkins Avenue
Rockville, MD  20852

Re: Nabi Biopharmaceuticals
 Definitive Additional Proxy Soliciting Materials
Filed August 23, 2012
File No. 001 -35285

Dear Dr. Fahim :

We have reviewed your  filing and have  the following comments.  Please revise your
filing and future filings as appropriate.

1. On page 80 of the merger proxy  you estimate liquidation expenses of $13.5 million to
make provision for existing and known potential claims and liabilities. Please provide us
with a reasonably itemized statement of these estimated liquidation expenses.

2. In two contexts you cite Mangrove’s decision to tender its shares in the issuer tender
offer that was completed on July 30, 2012 and the company’s resulting purchase of 2.74
million of Mangrove’s outstanding shares.  In each context, please revise your disclosure
to explicitly pro vide the full context for such statements and, rather than implying a
particular conclusion, clearly state your beliefs and conclusions with respect to
Mangrove’s decision to tender its shares at the price that it specified.  We note that
Mangrove’s price election may have reflected its views as to whether the merger was
likely to be approved by other shareholders.

3. Please provide support for your statement that Biota’s shares a re “undervalued and thinly
traded on the ASX.”

We urge all persons who are res ponsible for the accuracy and adequacy of the disclosure
in the filing to be certain that the filing includes the information the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and all applicable Exchange Act rules require.   Since the company and its management are
in po ssession of all facts relating to a company’s disclosure, they are responsible for the accuracy
and adequacy of the disclosures they have made.

Raafat E.F. Fahim, Ph.D.
Nabi Biopharmaceuticals
August 27, 2012
Page 2

 Please contact Karen Ubell, Staff Attorney, at (202) 551 -3873  or me at (202) 551 -3503
with any questions.

Sincerely,

 /s/ David L. Orlic

David L. Orlic
Special Counsel
Office of Mergers and Acquisitions

cc: Via E -mail
Joseph E. Gilligan, Esq.
 Hogan Lovells US LLP