SecProbe.io

CORRESP
1
filename1.htm

corresp

March 31, 2009

By EDGAR and U.S. Mail

Rufus Decker

Accounting Branch Chief

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Division of Corporation Finance

100 F Street, N.E.

Mail Stop 7010

Washington, DC 20549-7010

    Re:

    The Sherwin-Williams Company

    Form 10-K for Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2008

    File No. 033-28585

Dear Mr. Decker:

We have set forth below responses of The Sherwin-Williams Company (“Sherwin-Williams”) to address
the comments of the Staff of the Division of Corporation Finance contained in your letter dated
March 17, 2009 regarding your review of Sherwin-Williams’ filing noted above.

For your convenience, we have restated in boldface each of the Staff’s comments followed by our
response.

FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008

General

    1.

    Comment: Where a comment below requests additional disclosures or other revisions,
please show us in your response what the revisions will look like. These revisions should be
included in your future filings, including your interim filings where appropriate.

    Response: Where a comment requests additional disclosures or other revisions, our
response includes an example of what the revisions will look like. We will include these
revisions in our future filings, including our interim filings, where appropriate.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, page 14

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates, page 15

Purchase Accounting, Goodwill and Intangible Assets, page 16

    2.

    Comment: You have recognized significant goodwill and intangible asset charges
during the year ended December 31, 2008. In the interest of providing readers with a better
insight into

The Sherwin-Williams Company       101 Prospect Avenue, N.W.       Cleveland, Ohio 44115

Phone: 216 566-2000
      Fax: 216 566-1708

Mr. Rufus Decker

March 31, 2009

Page 2

    management’s judgments in accounting for goodwill and intangible assets, please consider
disclosing the following:

    •

    The reporting unit level at which you test goodwill for impairment and your basis
for that determination;

    •

    Sufficient information to enable a reader to understand how you apply the
discounted cash flow valuation model in estimating the fair value of your reporting
units and why management selected this method as being the most meaningful in
preparing your goodwill impairment analyses;

    •

    How you determine the appropriate discount rates and attrition rates to apply in
your intangible asset impairment and analysis;

    •

    A qualitative and quantitative description of the material assumptions used and a
sensitivity analysis of those assumptions based upon reasonably likely changes; and

    •

    If applicable, how the assumptions and methodologies used for valuing goodwill and
intangible assets in the current year have changed since the prior year, highlighting
the impact of any changes.

Response: In future filings, we will revise our disclosure regarding accounting for goodwill
and intangible assets to provide readers with a better insight into management’s judgments and a
better understanding of the assumptions and methodologies used for valuing goodwill and
intangible assets. For example, we will include the following revised disclosure in our future
filings, including our interim filings, where appropriate:

     Purchase Accounting, Goodwill and Intangible Assets

     In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (FAS) No. 141, “Business
Combinations,” the Company used the purchase method of accounting to allocate costs of
acquired businesses to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated
fair values at the dates of acquisition. The excess costs of acquired businesses over the
fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recognized as Goodwill. The
valuations of the acquired assets and liabilities will impact the determination of future
operating results. In addition to using management estimates and negotiated amounts, the
Company used a variety of information sources to determine the estimated fair values of
acquired assets and liabilities including: expert appraisals for the estimated value and
lives of identifiable intangible assets and property, plant and equipment; actuaries for the
estimated obligations of defined benefit pension plans and similar benefit obligations; and
legal counsel or other experts to assess the obligations associated with legal,
environmental and other contingent liabilities. The business and technical judgment of
management was used in determining which intangible assets have indefinite lives and in
determining the useful lives of finite-lived intangible assets in accordance with FAS No.
142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.”

     As required by FAS No. 142, management performs impairment tests of goodwill and
indefinite-lived intangible assets whenever an event occurs or circumstances change that
indicate impairment has more likely than not occurred. Also, as required by FAS No. 142,
management performs impairment testing of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets at
least annually during the fourth quarter of each year.

Mr. Rufus Decker

March 31, 2009

Page 3

     In accordance with FAS No. 142, management tests goodwill for impairment at the
reporting unit level. A reporting unit is a reportable operating segment per FAS No. 131,
“Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information” or one level below the
reportable operating segment (component level) as determined by the availability of discrete
financial information that is regularly reviewed by operating segment management or an
aggregate of component levels of a reportable operating segment having similar economic
characteristics. At the time of goodwill impairment testing, management determines fair
value through the use of a discounted cash flow valuation model incorporating discount rates
commensurate with the risks involved for each reporting unit. If the calculated fair value
is less than the current carrying value, impairment of the reporting unit may exist. The use
of a discounted cash flow valuation model to determine estimated fair value is common
practice in impairment testing in the absence of available domestic and international
transactional market evidence to determine the fair value. The key assumptions used in the
discounted cash flow valuation model for impairment testing include discount rates, growth
rates, cash flow projections and terminal value rates. Discount rates are set by using the
Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) methodology. The WACC methodology considers market
and industry data as well as Company-specific risk factors for each reporting unit in
determining the appropriate discount rates to be used. The discount rate utilized for each
reporting unit is indicative of the return an investor would expect to receive for investing
in such a business. Operational management, considering industry and Company-specific
historical and projected data, develops growth rates and cash flow projections for each
reporting unit. Terminal value rate determination follows common methodology of capturing
the present value of perpetual cash flow estimates beyond the last projected period assuming
a constant WACC and low long-term growth rates. As an indicator that each reporting unit has
been valued appropriately through the use of the discounted cash flow valuation model, the
aggregate fair value of all reporting units is reconciled to the total market capitalization
of the Company. The discounted cash flow valuation methodology and calculations used in 200X
impairment testing are consistent with prior years and have been reviewed by valuation
specialists.

     In accordance with FAS No. 142, management tests indefinite-lived intangible assets for
impairment at the asset level, as determined by appropriate asset valuations at acquisition.
Management utilizes the royalty savings method and valuation model to determine the
estimated fair value for each indefinite-lived intangible asset or trademark. In this
method, management estimates the royalty savings arising from the ownership of the
intangible asset. The key assumptions used in estimating the royalty savings for impairment
testing include discount rates, royalty rates, growth rates, sales projections and terminal
value rates. Discount rates used are similar to the rates developed by the WACC methodology
considering any differences in Company-specific risk factors between reporting units and
trademarks. Royalty rates are established by management and valuation experts and
periodically substantiated by valuation experts. Operational management, considering
industry and Company-specific historical and projected data, develops growth rates and sales
projections for each significant trademark. Terminal value rate determination follows common
methodology of capturing the present value of perpetual sales estimates beyond the last
projected period assuming a constant WACC and low long-term growth rates. The royalty
savings valuation methodology and calculations used in 200X impairment testing are
consistent with prior years and have been reviewed by valuation specialists.

Mr. Rufus Decker

March 31, 2009

Page 4

     In accordance with FAS No. 144, management performs impairment tests of long-lived
assets whenever an event occurs or circumstances change that indicate that the carrying
value may not be recoverable or the useful life has changed. Management utilizes
undiscounted cash flow projections to calculate the recoverable value of long-lived assets
to determine if the assets are impaired. When impairment is identified, a discounted cash
flow valuation model similar to that used to value goodwill at the reporting unit level,
incorporating discount rates commensurate with the risks associated with each asset, is used
to determine the fair value of the asset to measure potential impairment.

     The discounted cash flow and royalty savings valuation methodologies require management
to make certain assumptions based upon information available at the time the valuations are
performed. Actual results could differ from these assumptions. Management believes the
assumptions used are reflective of what a market participant would have used in calculating
fair value considering the current economic condition. See Notes X and X, pages XX through
XX of this report, for a discussion of businesses acquired, the estimated fair values of
goodwill and identifiable intangible assets recorded at acquisition date and reductions in
carrying value of goodwill, indefinite-lived intangible assets and long-lived assets
recorded during the interim and annual impairment tests in accordance with FAS No. 142 and
FAS No. 144.

In connection with responding to the Staff’s comments, Sherwin-Williams acknowledges that:

    •

    Sherwin-Williams is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in its
filings;

    •

    staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments do not foreclose
the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filing; and

    •

    Sherwin-Williams may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated
by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.

We want to thank the Staff for its review of our filing to assist us in compliance with the
applicable disclosure requirements and to enhance the overall disclosures in our filing.

If the Staff has any questions regarding our responses or any additional comments, please feel free
to contact me at (216) 566-2573.

Sincerely,

/s/ Sean P. Hennessy

Sean P. Hennessy

Senior Vice President-Finance and

Chief Financial Officer

    cc:

    Ernest Greene, Staff Accountant, SEC

    Louis E. Stellato, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

    John L. Ault, Vice President-Corporate Controller