SEC Company Response from SIBONEY CORP (CIK 0000090057) — Sep 21, 2005
SIBONEY CORP (CIK 0000090057)
Date: Sept. 21, 2005 · CIK: 0000090057 · Accession: 0001068800-05-000598
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
Referenced dates: September 8, 2005
Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm
Siboney Correspondence
September
21, 2005
Mr.
Daniel L. Gordon
Branch
Chief
Securities
and Exchange Commission
Division
of Corporation Finance
Washington,
D.C. 20549
RE:
Siboney
Corporation
Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004
File
No. 1-03952
Comment
letter dated September 8, 2005
Dear
Mr.
Gordon:
In
response to your September 8, 2005 letter, Siboney Corporation (the Company)
provides the following information and explanations.
1.
Please tell us what gave rise to the Refundable income taxes asset at December
31, 2004, and your accounting policy related to this asset.
The
forecasted income before income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2004
was
significantly higher than the actual income before income taxes of $101,172.
The
Company made estimated tax payments totaling approximately $600,000 in the
first
half of the fiscal year when operating results were consistent with forecasted
annual income before taxes. In the third quarter of 2004, income before taxes
decreased significantly due to litigation settlement expense of approximately
$615,000 and higher general and administrative expenses than anticipated
due to
increased legal fees. Lower income before taxes resulted in a refund due
to the
Company for the year ended December 31, 2004.
The
Company received a refund of $406,584 from the IRS in April 2005. The remainder
of the refundable income taxes asset of $620,769 less the April refund will
either be refunded from the December 31, 2004 returns or applied to 2005
estimated payments.
The
Company’s accounting policy is to calculate estimated tax payments based on
annual forecasted income before income taxes adjusted for permanent differences
between book and tax and changes in temporary differences between book and
tax.
2.
Please tell us your policy for recognizing revenues under agreements where
goods
shipped by you can be returned within 45 days and agreements where products
may
be returned after longer periods if the customer is not satisfied. Please
cite
the accounting literature that you have relied upon in your
response.
The
Company recognizes revenue in accordance with SOP 97-2, Software
Revenue Recognition.
Revenue
for software sales is recognized when persuasive evidence of an agreement
exists, delivery of the software has occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable,
and collectibility is probable.
The
Company’s product sales meet the six criteria provided in SFAS No. 48,
Revenue
Recognition When Right of Return Exists (SFAS
48), paragraph 6. Reserves for estimated returns and allowances are provided
at
the time revenue is recognized in accordance with SFAS 48, paragraph 7. Such
reserves are recorded based upon historical rates of returns and allowances
and
other factors. Total returns approximated 2% of gross sales in 2004. The
allowance for returns at December 31, 2004 was $38,005.
While
certain product lines previously had a return policy of 12 months, the Company
changed the return policy to 45 days in 2005.
3.
Please expand your accounting policy for software development costs to address
at least the following:
·
The
types of
costs that are capitalized
·
The
point at
which you cease capitalizing costs related to software development;
and
·
Your
impairment
policy for capitalized software development
costs.
Salary
and estimated payroll taxes are capitalized for the employees that work on
capitalized software based on actual direct development hours. Additionally,
consulting fees for outside consultants are capitalized.
The
Company ceases capitalizing costs when the product is released for sale to
customers.
On
an
annual basis, the Company reviews each capitalized project for impairment.
If
the remaining book value of a capitalized project cannot be supported by
anticipated future revenue net of future costs, the Company would write down
the
asset to net realizable value. In future filings, the Company will expand
the
discussion of this accounting policy to include the foregoing, as
appropriate.
*
*
*
We
acknowledge that the Company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy
of the
disclosure in the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. We understand
that staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments
do
not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filing.
We understand that the Company may not assert staff comments as a defense
in any
proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal
securities laws of the United States.
Sincerely,
/s/
Timothy J. Tegeler
Timothy
J. Tegeler
Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer
Siboney
Corporation