SEC Company Response from SYSCO CORP (SYY) (CIK 0000096021) (SYY) — May 18, 2007
SYSCO CORP (SYY) (CIK 0000096021)
Date: May 18, 2007 · CIK: 0000096021 · Accession: 0000914062-07-000242
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
Referenced dates: May 8, 2007
Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm
Response Letter
ARNALL
GOLDEN GREGORY LLP
171
17TH
STREET NW
SUITE
2100
ATLANTA,
GEORGIA 30363-1031
Direct
phone: 404.873.8688
Direct
fax: 404.873.8689
E-mail:
joseph.alley@agg.com
www.agg.com
May
18,
2007
VIA
EDGAR
Mr.
Adam
Phippen
Division
of Corporation Finance
U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission
100
F
Street, NE
Washington,
D.C. 20549-0405
Mail
Stop
3561
Re:
SYSCO
Corporation
Item
4.02 Form 8-K
Filed
May 7, 2007
File
No. 1-6544
Dear
Mr.
Phippen:
On
behalf
of SYSCO Corporation (“SYSCO” or the “Company”), we transmit for filing SYSCO’s
response to the staff’s letter of comment dated May 8, 2007. For your
convenience, the comment contained in that letter is reprinted below in italics.
SYSCO’s
response is as follows:
Form
8-K filed May 7, 2007
1. In
light of the restatements please confirm to us that your officers’ reconsidered
their conclusions regarding the effectiveness of disclosure controls and
procedures for the quarterly periods ended September 30, 2006 and December
30,
2006. In future filings, when you amend your periodic reports to file restated
financial statements, describe the effect of the restatement on the officers’
conclusions regarding the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures.
If the officers’ conclude that disclosure controls and procedures were
effective, despite restatement, describe the basis for the officers’
conclusions. See Item 307 of Regulation S-K.
Response:
On
behalf
of SYSCO, we confirm that SYSCO’s officers reconsidered their conclusions
regarding the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures for the
quarterly periods ended September 30, 2006 and December 30, 2006 in light of,
and giving due consideration to, the restatements and the reasons therefor,
and
concluded that SYSCO’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of
those dates at the reasonable assurance level, despite the restatements. We
also
confirm that, in future filings, when SYSCO amends its periodic reports to
file
restated financial statements, it will describe the effect of the restatement
on
the officers’ conclusions that disclosure controls and procedures were
effective, and if the officers conclude that disclosure controls and procedures
were effective despite the restatement, it will describe the basis for the
officers’ conclusions.
Mr.
Adam
Phippen
May
18,
2007
Page
2
SYSCO
acknowledges that:
·
it
is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in
the
filing;
·
staff
comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments do
not
foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the
filing;
·
it
may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated
by
the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of
the
United States; and
·
the
Division of Enforcement has access to all information provided by
SYSCO to
the staff in its review of SYSCO’s filing or in response to staff comments
on SYSCO’s filing.
If
you
have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (404)
873-8688.
Very
truly yours,
ARNALL
GOLDEN GREGORY LLP
/s/
B. Joseph Alley, Jr.
B.
Joseph Alley, Jr.
cc:
William
Thompson, Branch Chief, Division of Corporation Finance
John
K. Stubblefield, SYSCO Corporation
Michael
C. Nichols, SYSCO Corporation