SEC Company Response from TEJON RANCH CO (TRC) (CIK 0000096869) (TRC) — Dec 5, 2012
TEJON RANCH CO (TRC) (CIK 0000096869)
Date: Dec. 5, 2012 · CIK: 0000096869 · Accession: 0001193125-12-492312
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
Referenced dates: November 28, 2012
Letter
United States Securities and Exchange Commission Division of Corporation Finance Attention: Tejon Ranch Co. Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 Filed March 12, 2012 File No. 1-7183
Dear Mr. Woody,
Thank you for your response letter dated November 28, 2012, containing your additional questions on the above-captioned filing by Tejon Ranch Co., or the Company, with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, or the Commission. Set forth below are the Company’s responses to your comments. For your convenience, the text of the Staff’s comments is included below in bold text and is followed by the Company’s responses to such comments.
Form 10-k for fiscal year ended December 31, 2011
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, page 23
Results of Operations by Segment, page 28
Real Estate – Resort/Residential, page 30
1. We have reviewed your response to comment number 1. Please tell us what the expected period of performance is given that you have a commitment not to perform any development on the property. Additionally, please tell us what would happen if the property was sold to a third party. Specifically, tell us whether a new owner would be subject to the easement.
Response
The easements sold covering the 62,000 acres divested the Company of any current rights and any future rights to commercial and residential development on that land. The value of the easement was based on an appraisal/negotiation with the buyer and represented the difference in the value of the land with and without development rights. The easements became encumbrances on the land and have been recorded on the deeds and are discoverable through title searches. These easements will run in perpetuity with the land, making the expected period of performance perpetual.
In the event the land were sold to a third party, such third party would purchase the land with the easements in place and would have to follow the conditions of the easements. Any new owner through a purchase is subject to the easement.
Management of the Company is very aware of its responsibility for the adequacy and accuracy of both the financial numbers and disclosures within our filings. Our goal is to provide full disclosure and transparency in all of our filings. In connection with responding to the comments set forth in your letter of November 28, 2012, the Company hereby acknowledges that:
1. The Company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the filing;
2. Staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filing;
3. The Company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.
We appreciate the Staff’s assistance in this process.
Best regards,
/s/ Allen E. Lyda
Show Raw Text
CORRESP 1 filename1.htm Correspondence VIA FACSIMILE AND EDGAR December 5, 2012 United States Securities and Exchange Commission Division of Corporation Finance 100 F Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20549 Attention: Kevin Woody Accounting Branch Chief Mark Rakip Staff Accountant Re: Tejon Ranch Co. Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 Filed March 12, 2012 File No. 1-7183 Dear Mr. Woody, Thank you for your response letter dated November 28, 2012, containing your additional questions on the above-captioned filing by Tejon Ranch Co., or the Company, with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, or the Commission. Set forth below are the Company’s responses to your comments. For your convenience, the text of the Staff’s comments is included below in bold text and is followed by the Company’s responses to such comments. Form 10-k for fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, page 23 Results of Operations by Segment, page 28 Real Estate – Resort/Residential, page 30 1. We have reviewed your response to comment number 1. Please tell us what the expected period of performance is given that you have a commitment not to perform any development on the property. Additionally, please tell us what would happen if the property was sold to a third party. Specifically, tell us whether a new owner would be subject to the easement. Response The easements sold covering the 62,000 acres divested the Company of any current rights and any future rights to commercial and residential development on that land. The value of the easement was based on an appraisal/negotiation with the buyer and represented the difference in the value of the land with and without development rights. The easements became encumbrances on the land and have been recorded on the deeds and are discoverable through title searches. These easements will run in perpetuity with the land, making the expected period of performance perpetual. In the event the land were sold to a third party, such third party would purchase the land with the easements in place and would have to follow the conditions of the easements. Any new owner through a purchase is subject to the easement. Management of the Company is very aware of its responsibility for the adequacy and accuracy of both the financial numbers and disclosures within our filings. Our goal is to provide full disclosure and transparency in all of our filings. In connection with responding to the comments set forth in your letter of November 28, 2012, the Company hereby acknowledges that: 1. The Company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the filing; 2. Staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filing; 3. The Company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States. We appreciate the Staff’s assistance in this process. Best regards, /s/ Allen E. Lyda Allen E. Lyda Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Tejon Ranch Co.