SecProbe.io

CORRESP
1
filename1.htm

    responseltr.htm

    April 3,
2009

    Via Federal
Express

    Mr. Kevin
L. Vaughn

    Accounting
Branch Chief

    U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission

    100 F Street, NE

    Washington,
DC 20549

    Re: Texas
Instruments Incorporated

    Form 10-K for the Year Ended December
31, 2008

    File No.
001-03761

    Dear Mr.
Vaughn:

    I am
writing in response to your letter dated March 19, 2009, to Texas Instruments
Incorporated containing comments on our Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2008.  We will address your comments in future filings as
discussed below.

    COMMENT
1:  The language that is currently included after the word
“effective” appears to be superfluous, since the meaning of “disclosure controls
and procedures” is established by Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange
Act.  Please remove the language in your future filings or revise the
disclosure so that the language that appears after the word “effective” is
substantially similar in all material respects to the language that appears in
the entire two-­sentence definition of “disclosure controls and procedures”
set forth in Rule 13a-15(e).

    RESPONSE
1:  We will revise this disclosure as requested in future
filings.

    COMMENT
2:  We note that you accrued $121 million in the year ended
December 31, 2008 relating to a restructuring action that you announced in
January 2009.  We further note that you record involuntary
severance-related expenses related to an ongoing benefit in accordance with the
provisions of SFAS 112 once they are probable and the amounts are
estimable.  With reference to this specific restructuring action,
please explain to us why you concluded it was appropriate to record the $121
million charge as of December 31, 2008.

    RESPONSE
2:  In the second half of December 2008, management approved a
restructuring plan to reduce employment through a combination of worldwide
voluntary and involuntary programs with a total estimated cost of $300
million.  With respect to the involuntary program in the U.S. (the
U.S. program), we apply SFAS 112 due to our determination that the benefits we
offer under that program are made under an ongoing benefit
arrangement.

      Mr. Kevin
L. Vaughn

      April 3,
2009

      Page
2

By December 31, 2008, we had identified either a named
individual or a position to be eliminated under the U.S. program, and were able
to apply factors such as salary and years of service to reliably estimate the
cost of the ongoing benefit.  With the liability being both probable
(due to management's approval of the U.S. program) and estimable, we recorded
the charge as of December 31, 2008, in accordance with SFAS
5.  Additionally, affected employees were notified of their
termination in January 2009 and, consistent with our ongoing benefit
arrangement, the affected employees were not required to provide future services
to obtain termination benefits.

    Of the
$121 million charge taken in the fourth quarter of 2008, $119 million related to
the U.S. program.  The remaining $2 million related to (a) incremental
benefits for U.S. employees who had accepted a voluntary severance arrangement
the company announced in December 2008 (accrued upon acceptance by the employees
in accordance with SFAS 88) and (b) severance costs for employees outside the
U.S. who were involuntarily terminated in December 2008 (accrued as of the
communication date in accordance with SFAS 146).

    COMMENT
3:  We note your disclosure on page 38 that you maintain
consigned inventory at your customer locations.  Please revise this
note in future filings to separately present your consigned inventory. Refer to
Question 2 of SAB Topic 13(A)(2).

    RESPONSE
3:  Question 2 of Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 13(A)(2)
indicates that “If title to the goods has passed but the substance of the
arrangement is not a sale, the consigned inventory should be reported separately
from other inventory in the consignor’s financial statements…”  Our
consignment arrangements with our customers provide that we ship products to the
customers’ locations, where the products are stored separately, but we retain
title to the products until the customer pulls the product for sale or use in
its manufacturing process. Once the product has been pulled, title passes and it
is at that point we recognize revenue from the transaction and bill the
customer.

    Because
our consignment arrangements are not of the type described in Question 2 of SAB
Topic 13(A)(2), we believe that there is no need to provide additional separate
disclosure of consigned inventory in our future filings.  However, we
will clarify in future filings the relationship between our consignment
inventory arrangements and revenue recognition.

    COMMENT
4:  We note from page 40 that your gross profit decreased by
15% due to lower revenue and, to a lesser extent, the impact of lower factory
utilization resulting from your efforts to reduce inventory.  Please
revise future filings to quantify the effects that your lower utilization had
upon your 2008 gross margin from your efforts to reduce your
inventory.

    RESPONSE
4:  We will expand our disclosure as requested in future
filings.

    COMMENT
5:  In addition, we note your disclosure on page 38 that you
''now tend to carry relatively higher levels of inventory than in past
years.”  However, we note that your total inventory has declined from
December 31, 2007 to December 31, 2008.  It appears that the higher
inventory levels you are referring to are in relation to your total sales, and
although total inventory has declined, it has not declined at the same rate as
revenues.  Please revise future filings to clarify what you mean by
''relatively higher levels of inventory than in past years.”

      Mr. Kevin
L. Vaughn

      April 3,
2009

      Page
3

    RESPONSE
5:  We will expand our disclosure as requested in future
filings.

    In
connection with this response to your comments regarding our Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2008, TI acknowledges that:

              ·

              TI
      is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the
      filing;

              ·

              staff
      comments or changes to our disclosures in response to staff comments do
      not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the
      filing; and

              ·

              TI
      may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by
      the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the
      United States.

    We trust
that the above information will be sufficient for your purposes.  If
you have any questions, please call Charlie Miller of Texas Instruments at
214-480-6707.

    Very
truly yours,

    /s/
Kevin P. March

    Kevin P.
March

    Senior
Vice President and

    Chief
Financial Officer