SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Company Response from THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC. (TMO) (CIK 0000097745) (TMO) — Jun 13, 2013

THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC. (TMO) (CIK 0000097745)
Date: June 13, 2013 · CIK: 0000097745 · Accession: 0000097745-13-000030

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Sentiment
Urgency
Document Type
Confidence
SEC Posture
Company Posture

Summary

Reasoning

Date
June 13, 2013
Author
/s/ Peter M. Wilver
Form
CORRESP
Company
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC. (TMO) (CIK 0000097745)

Letter

United States Securities and Exchange Commission Washington D.C. 20549 Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 File no. 1-08002

Re: Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.

Dear Mr. James:

In response to the staff’s letter of May 30, 2013, we respond as follows:

1.

Comment: We note that within your effective tax rate reconciliation, the impact of the foreign rate differential is significant in each year. Please tell us the countries for which the significant portion of this item relates and quantify to the extent practicable. In future filings, revise the income tax discussions in Management’s Discussion and Analysis to provide a robust discussion of your tax positions in these foreign tax jurisdictions and how they have impacted, and will impact in future periods, your income tax provision and net income. Refer to Item 303(a)(3)(i) of Regulation S-K.

Response: The company has operations and a taxable presence in nearly 50 countries outside the U.S. All of these countries except three have a lower tax rate than the U.S. The countries in which the company has a material presence that have significantly lower tax rates than the U.S. include Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. In addition, in some instances, the company obtains interest expense deductions outside the U.S. on intercompany loans for acquisitions where the offsetting interest income is earned and taxed in lower rate jurisdictions. Thus, the foreign rate differential does not relate proportionally to the amount of pre-tax foreign income reported in the company’s breakdown of domestic and foreign pre-tax income.

The company discussed the judgments involved in computing its income tax provision in the Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis on pages 32-33 of its 2012 Form 10-K. In response to the staff’s comment, in future filings, the company proposes to disclose the following:

The company has operations and a taxable presence in nearly 50 countries outside the U.S. All of these countries except three have a lower tax rate than the U.S. The countries in which the company has a material presence that have significantly lower tax rates than the U.S. include Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. The company’s ability to obtain a benefit from lower tax rates outside the U.S. is dependent on its relative levels of income in countries outside the U.S. and on the statutory tax rates in those countries. Based on the dispersion of the company’s non-U.S. income tax provision among many countries, the company believes that a change in the statutory tax rate in any individual country is not likely to materially affect the company’s income tax provision or net income, aside from any resulting one-time adjustment to the company’s deferred tax balances to reflect a new tax rate.

- 2 -

If you have any questions on this response, please contact Peter Hornstra or me at (781) 622-1000.

Sincerely,
/s/ Peter M. Wilver

Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm

    corresp.htm

June 13, 2013

Mr. Martin James

Senior Assistant Chief Accountant

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Washington D.C. 20549

Re:    Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.

Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012

File no. 1-08002

Dear Mr. James:

In response to the staff’s letter of May 30, 2013, we respond as follows:

1.

Comment: We note that within your effective tax rate reconciliation, the impact of the foreign rate differential is significant in each year. Please tell us the countries for which the significant portion of this item relates and quantify to the extent practicable. In future filings, revise the income tax discussions in Management’s Discussion and Analysis to provide a robust discussion of your tax positions in these foreign tax jurisdictions and how they have impacted, and will impact in future periods, your income tax provision and net income. Refer to Item 303(a)(3)(i) of Regulation S-K.

Response:  The company has operations and a taxable presence in nearly 50 countries outside the U.S. All of these countries except three have a lower tax rate than the U.S. The countries in which the company has a material presence that have significantly lower tax rates than the U.S. include Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. In addition, in some instances, the company obtains interest expense deductions outside the U.S. on intercompany loans for acquisitions where the offsetting interest income is earned and taxed in lower rate jurisdictions. Thus, the foreign rate differential does not relate proportionally to the amount of pre-tax foreign income reported in the company’s breakdown of domestic and foreign pre-tax income.

The company discussed the judgments involved in computing its income tax provision in the Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis on pages 32-33 of its 2012 Form 10-K. In response to the staff’s comment, in future filings, the company proposes to disclose the following:

The company has operations and a taxable presence in nearly 50 countries outside the U.S. All of these countries except three have a lower tax rate than the U.S. The countries in which the company has a material presence that have significantly lower tax rates than the U.S. include Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. The company’s ability to obtain a benefit from lower tax rates outside the U.S. is dependent on its relative levels of income in countries outside the U.S. and on the statutory tax rates in those countries. Based on the dispersion of the company’s non-U.S. income tax provision among many countries, the company believes that a change in the statutory tax rate in any individual country is not likely to materially affect the company’s income tax provision or net income, aside from any resulting one-time adjustment to the company’s deferred tax balances to reflect a new tax rate.

- 2 -

If you have any questions on this response, please contact Peter Hornstra or me at (781) 622-1000.

Sincerely,

/s/ Peter M. Wilver

Peter M. Wilver

Senior Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer