SEC Company Response from US ENERGY CORP (USEG) (CIK 0000101594) (BSIN) — Mar 31, 2006
US ENERGY CORP (USEG) (CIK 0000101594)
Date: March 31, 2006 · CIK: 0000101594 · Accession: 0000101594-06-000062
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
File numbers found in text: 333-115477
Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm
USE Letter to SEC 3-16-06
March
16,
2006
Sent
Via Fax (202) 772-9369
United
States Securities and Exchange Commission
Division
of Corporate Finance
100F
Street, N.E.
Washington,
D.C. 20549-7010
Attn:
Jennifer Gallagher
Re:
U.S.
Energy Corp.
Post-Effective
Amendment No. 1 to Form S-1
Filed
October 25, 2005
File
No.
333-115477
Form
10-Q
for the Period Ended September 20, 2005
Filed
November 14, 2005
Supplemental
Information
Dear
Ms.
Gallagher;
Our
outside SEC counsel, Mr. Steve Rounds, notified me yesterday that you and Karl
Hiller had visited with him regarding our response letter of February 21, 2006.
Mr. Rounds indicated that you had requested that we prepare a schedule detailing
out the net gain for U.S. Energy Corp., Crested Corp. and Yellowstone Fuels
Inc.
from the sale of Rocky Mountain Gas on June 1, 2005. Additionally Mr. Rounds
indicated that you would like to see what the employees, directors and others
were paid out of the total $20 million in compensation paid by
Enterra.
Please
find the table you requested attached to this letter. You will see that the
total compensation paid was $19,999,970 which accounts for a $30 wire transfer
fee that RMG paid when the initial $500,000 cash was wired in from Canada.
You
will see that the total consolidated compensation received by U. S. Energy
was
$18,904,313 less (1) the buy out of an over riding royalty of $266,000, (2)
book
basis of $2,869,944, (3) the 10% discount taken on the Acquisition Class D
shares of $1,178,596 and (4) income taxes of $235,000 for a net gain on the
disposal of Rocky Mountain Gas of $14,354,876.
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
U.S. Energy Corp. - Post Effective Amendment No 1 to From S-1
March 16, 2006
Page 2 of 3
Crested
recognized a gain of $5,292,184 on the sale of Rocky Mountain Gas while
Yellowstone Fuels Inc. recorded a net book loss of $360,794.
All
of
the Enterra Initial Units that were received by U.S. Energy and Crested were
sold during the third quarter of 2005. Yellowstone Fuels still holds its Enterra
Initial Units. The Class D shares in Acquisitions are convertible automatically
on a one to one basis at June 1, 2006 into Enterra units. It currently is
management’s plans to sell the Class D shares as quickly as possible after June
1, 2006 without disrupting the market for the security. U.S. Energy, Crested
and
Yellowstone Fuels have no control over Enterra Acquisitions, do not give
direction to Acquisitions or to Enterra and are only shareholders of the Class
D
shares, and do not participate in any manner in other assets which Acquisitions
has acquired or may acquire in the future. We are not entitle do dividends
or
other distributions on the Class D shares. We only will be entitled to dividends
on the Enterra units as paid from June 1, 2006.
On
a
related matter, Mr. Rounds said that you inquired about the other business
activities of Acquisitions. We are not kept informed of Enterra’s activities
either generally or with specific reference to Acquisitions. However, as a
result of your discussion with Mr. Rounds, we have reviewed some of the many
Form 6-K filings made by Enterra Energy Trust in the third quarter 2005 and
first quarter 2006. For example, the Form 6-K filed on March 3, 2006 discloses
that Enterra, through Acquisitions, was in the process of closing a US $249
million acquisition of Oklahoma oil and gas properties. The precise terms of
the
transaction (e.g. when the Acquisitions equity is exchangeable into Enterra
units) are not disclosed. Enterra also apparently runs acquisitions through
other entities - an example appears to be Rocky Mountain Acquisition Corp.
(not
to be confused with our sold subsidiary Rocky Mountain Gas, Inc.). Enterra’s
Form 6-K of October 25, 2005 discloses that a holder of ‘Enterra Energy Corp.’
or RMAC exchangeable shares can convert to Enterra units at any time. But all
of
these other activities are of limited interest to us: To the extent Enterra’s
acquisitions are profitable, the value of its units may increase, but again,
we
have no participation rights in Acquisitions or the other Enterra subsidiaries.
As a final note, also as relayed to us by Mr. Rounds, in response to your
question on Enterra’s dividend policy (or distribution policy, as the entity is
a trust) Enterra’s Form 6-K of October 25, 2005 stated that the original monthly
distribution rate was US$0.10 per unit; at January 15, 2005, the rate was
increased to US $0.14.
The
second issue that Mr. Rounds indicated that you had discussed was the fact
that
we have just discovered that we are going to have to amend our Form 10-Q’s for
the quarters ended March 31, 2005, June 30, 2005 and September 30, 2005 due
to
an inadvertent error we made in booking a convertible debt facility which we
entered into on February 4, 2005. At the time the transaction was closed we
did
research, sought counsel from our outside auditors as well as an additional
audit firm as to how the transaction should be booked.
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
U.S. Energy Corp. - Post Effective Amendment No 1 to From S-1
March 16, 2006
Page 2 of 3
We
recognized the
appropriate discount on the fair value of the warrants which were issued in
conjunction with the $4,720,000 debt facility. The item which we overlooked
was
the intrinsic value of the Beneficial Conversion Feature. During the course
of
closing our books and records for the year and consultations with our auditors,
we became aware that EITF 98-5 had not been complied with as we had not
correctly calculated the beneficial conversion feature. We had not considered
that fair value of the warrants had not been deducted from the face amount
of
the debt in determining whether a beneficial conversion feature
existed.
We
voluntarily have discussed the issue with our outside auditors and have agreed
to amend our quarterly filings as indicated above. The entire amount of the
convertible debt was converted to common stock during the year ended December
31, 2005 so the entire amount of the beneficial conversion feature is to be
amortized as interest expense during the year ended December 31, 2005. The
non
cash adjustments to income will be $15,400 in the quarter ended March 31, 2005,
$1,543,200 for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 and $110,900 for the quarter
ended September 30, 2005. We plan on filing these amended Form 10-Q’s at the
same time we file our Form 10K.
To
avoid
these types of issues in the future we continue to send our staff members to
SEC
and accounting training sessions annually. We also have subscribed to the RIA
Checkpoint software which gives us updated information as well as gives us
the
opportunity of doing more comprehensive research. Lastly we have requested
that
our outside auditors perform more extensive procedures each quarter as a part
of
their reviews of our interim financial information.
Should
you wish to discuss these matters further you can reach me at (307) 856-9271
or
Mr. Rounds at (303) 377-6997. We would like to resolve these issues so we can
move forward with our filings on a timely basis. Your assistance is greatly
appreciated.
Sincerely,
Robert
Scott Lorimer,
CFO/V.P.
Finance
cc. Steve
Rounds
Daniel
P.
Svilar
Mark
Weber