SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Comment Letter for VOLT INFORMATION SCIENCES, INC. (CIK 0000103872) — Mar 29, 2022

VOLT INFORMATION SCIENCES, INC. (CIK 0000103872)
Date: March 29, 2022 · CIK: 0000103872 · Accession: 0000000000-22-003407

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Date
March 29, 2022
Author
Not clearly detected
Form
UPLOAD
Company
VOLT INFORMATION SCIENCES, INC. (CIK 0000103872)

Letter

United States securities and exchange commission logo March 29, 2022 Sanjeev Sardana Director Vega Consulting, Inc. 2400 Meadowbrook Parkway Duluth, GA 20096 Re:VOLT INFORMATION SCIENCES, INC. Schedule TO-T filed March 25, 2022 Filed by Vega Consulting. Inc. et al. SEC File No. 5-02933 Dear Mr. Sardana: We have reviewed your filing and have the following comments. In some of our comments, we may ask you to provide us with information so we may better understand your disclosure. All defined terms used here have the same meaning as in the Offer to Purchase included as an exhibit to the filing listed above. Please respond to these comments by providing the requested information or advise us as soon as possible when you will respond. If you do not believe our comments apply to your facts and circumstances, please tell us why in your response. After reviewing your response to these comments, we may have additional comments. Schedule TO-T filed March 25, 2022 General 1.Please explain why you have not included American CyberSystems, Inc. ("ACS") as a bidder on the Schedule TO-T. In this regard, it appears that representatives of ACS initiated contact with Volt Information Sciences and negotiated the merger agreement and accompanying tender offer, which, according to the Schedule 14D-9 filed by Volt, was contemplated as an acquisition of Volt by ACS. In addition, ACS and Parent are controlled by the same individual, Rajiv Sardana, who is a named bidder. Both Parent and Offeror are newly-formed entities formed in March 2022 to effectuate this transaction. Finally, ACS has entered into a commitment letter for the funds to be used to purchase tendered shares and is also acting as a guarantor of Parent's and Offeror's obligations under the Merger Agreement. In your response letter, analyze why ACS should not be included as a bidder, or revise the Schedule TO-T to add it as a filing person. If you add

FirstName LastNameSanjeev Sardana Comapany NameVega Consulting, Inc. March 29, 2022 Page 2 FirstName LastName Sanjeev Sardana Vega Consulting, Inc. March 29, 2022 Page 2 ACS, please revise the Offer to Purchase as necessary to provide all of the disclosure as to ACS individually that is not already included in that disclosure document. 2.In your response letter, explain why Rule 13e-3 does not apply to this transaction. In this regard, we note that William Grubbs is the non-executive Chairman of the Board of Volt and is also a director of a subsidiary of ACS. In addition, the disclosure in the Schedule 14D-9 filed by Volt indicates that he will have a future role in overseeing Volt after the consummation of the tender offer and merger. Please include Mr. Grubbs' ownership interest in Volt and any contemplated equity interest in the surviving entity in your analysis. Certain Information Concerning the Purchaser, the Offeror and Rajiv Sardana, page 26 3.Clarify the relationship between Parent and ACS. The current disclosure states only that both are affiliates of ACS but does not specify the nature of their relationship.

We remind you that the filing persons are responsible for the accuracy and adequacy of their disclosures, notwithstanding any review, comments, action or absence of action by the staff. Please direct any questions to Christina Chalk, Senior Special Counsel, at (202) 551- 3263. Sincerely, Division of Corporation Finance Office of Mergers & Acquisitions

Show Raw Text
United States securities and exchange commission logo
March 29, 2022
Sanjeev Sardana
Director
Vega Consulting, Inc.
2400 Meadowbrook Parkway
Duluth, GA 20096
Re:VOLT INFORMATION SCIENCES, INC.
Schedule TO-T filed March 25, 2022
Filed by Vega Consulting. Inc. et al.
SEC File No. 5-02933
Dear Mr. Sardana:
            We have reviewed your filing and have the following comments.  In some of our
comments, we may ask you to provide us with information so we may better understand your
disclosure.  All defined terms used here have the same meaning as in the Offer to Purchase
included as an exhibit to the filing listed above.
            Please respond to these comments by providing the requested information or advise us as
soon as possible when you will respond.  If you do not believe our comments apply to your facts
and circumstances, please tell us why in your response.
            After reviewing your response to these comments, we may have additional comments.
Schedule TO-T filed March 25, 2022
General
1.Please explain why you have not included American CyberSystems, Inc. ("ACS") as a
bidder on the Schedule TO-T.  In this regard, it appears that representatives of ACS
initiated contact with Volt Information Sciences and negotiated the merger agreement and
accompanying tender offer, which, according to the Schedule 14D-9 filed by Volt, was
contemplated as an acquisition of Volt by ACS.  In addition, ACS and Parent are
controlled by the same individual, Rajiv Sardana, who is a named bidder.  Both Parent and
Offeror are newly-formed entities formed in March 2022 to effectuate this transaction.
Finally, ACS has entered into a commitment letter for the funds to be used to purchase
tendered shares and is also acting as a guarantor of Parent's and Offeror's obligations
under the Merger Agreement.  In your response letter, analyze why ACS should not be
included as a bidder, or revise the Schedule TO-T to add it as a filing person.  If you add

 FirstName LastNameSanjeev Sardana
 Comapany NameVega Consulting, Inc.
 March 29, 2022 Page 2
 FirstName LastName
Sanjeev Sardana
Vega Consulting, Inc.
March 29, 2022
Page 2
ACS, please revise the Offer to Purchase as necessary to provide all of the disclosure as to
ACS individually that is not already included in that disclosure document.
2.In your response letter, explain why Rule 13e-3 does not apply to this transaction.  In this
regard, we note that William Grubbs is the non-executive Chairman of the Board of Volt
and is also a director of a subsidiary of ACS.  In addition, the disclosure in the Schedule
14D-9 filed by Volt indicates that he will have a future role in overseeing Volt after the
consummation of the tender offer and merger.  Please include Mr. Grubbs' ownership
interest in Volt and any contemplated equity interest in the surviving entity in your
analysis.
Certain Information Concerning the Purchaser, the Offeror and Rajiv Sardana, page 26
3.Clarify the relationship between Parent and ACS.  The current disclosure states only that
both are affiliates of ACS but does not specify the nature of their relationship.

            We remind you that the filing persons are responsible for the accuracy and adequacy of
their disclosures, notwithstanding any review, comments, action or absence of action by the staff.
            Please direct any questions to Christina Chalk, Senior Special Counsel, at (202) 551-
3263.
Sincerely,
Division of Corporation Finance
Office of Mergers & Acquisitions