SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Company Response from VANGUARD WELLINGTON FUND (CIK 0000105563) — Mar 16, 2005

VANGUARD WELLINGTON FUND (CIK 0000105563)
Date: March 16, 2005 · CIK: 0000105563 · Accession: 0000932471-05-000560

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Date
March 16, 2005
Author
Judith L. Gaines
Form
CORRESP
Company
VANGUARD WELLINGTON FUND (CIK 0000105563)

Letter

[SHIP LOGO] THE VANGUARD GROUP/(R)/LOGO March 16, 2005 Christian Sandoe, Esq. Division of Investment Management U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission via electronic filing 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Fifth Floor Washington, D.C. 20549

RE: VANGUARD WELLINGTON FUND

Dear Mr. Sandoe:

The following responds to your comments of March 15, 2005 on the post-effective amendment of the registration statement of each of the above-referenced registrants. You commented on Post-Effective Amendment No. 86 that was filed on January 28, 2005 pursuant to Rule 485(a).

COMMENT 1: PROSPECTUS--PRIMARY INVESTMENT STRATEGIES ----------------------------------------------------------- Comment: Vanguard should disclose somewhere, not necessarily in this section, the lowest level of credit quality in which the bond portion of the fund will be invested.

Response: We have disclosure in the Bond section of the Security Selection portion of the prospectus that states the credit quality of the bonds that the advisor will purchase for the fund assets. We think this disclosure is sufficient and addresses the comment.

COMMENT 2: PROSPECTUS--PRIMARY INVESTMENT STRATEGIES ----------------------------------------------------------- Comment: The Primary Investment Strategies section states that the bond portion of the fund is invested mainly in investment-grade corporate bonds, with some exposure to U.S. Treasury and government agency bonds, as well as mortgage-backed securities. You inquired whether the Treasuries, government agencies, and mortgage-backed securities were principal strategies. If not, they need not be referenced in the Primary Investment Strategies section of the prospectus.

Response: We are comfortable that the Primary Investment Strategies disclosure accurately describes the fund's principal strategies. <PAGE> March 16, 2005 Christian Sandoe Page 2 of 3

COMMENT 3: PROSPECTUS--SECURITY SELECTION ------------------------------------------------ Comment: In addition to providing the stock portion of the fund's median market capitalization, you would like us to add the fund's market capitalization range.

Response: We have disclosed the fund's median market capitalization. However, we do not plan to include the market capitalization range since investors are ill served by such disclosure for the following reasons: (1) Market capitalization ranges are subjective over different time periods and among different investment advisors and funds. Defining a particular market capitalization as a specific dollar range could confuse investors because the dollar ranges are so varied over time and among advisors and funds. (2) Ranges change continually because of fluctuations in stock market valuations. Therefore, disclosure of one range in a prospectus could be misleading when the stock market fluctuates. (3) A fund's overall market capitalization range can be very broad and not indicative of where the fund's overall market capitalization focus is. The median market capitalization is a more useful piece of information for investors concerned with market capitalization. (4) Form N-1A does not require funds to disclose specific market capitalization dollar ranges.

COMMENT 4: TANDY REQUIREMENTS ----------------------------- Comment: The SEC is now requiring all registrants to provide at the end of response letters to registration statement comments, the following statements:

o Each Fund is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the filing. o Staff comments or changes in response to staff comments in the filings reviewed by the staff do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filing. o Each Fund may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.

Response: As required by the SEC, we will provide the foregoing acknowledgements.

* * * * *

As required by the SEC, each Fund acknowledges that:

o The Fund is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the filing. <PAGE> March 16, 2005 Christian Sandoe Page 3 of 3

o Staff comments or changes in response to staff comments in the filings reviewed by the staff do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filing. o The Fund may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.

Please contact me at (610) 669-1538 with any questions or comments regarding the above responses. Thank you.

Sincerely,
Judith L. Gaines
Associate Counsel

Show Raw Text
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>CORRESP
<SEQUENCE>1
<FILENAME>filename1.txt
<TEXT>

                                   [SHIP LOGO]
                          THE VANGUARD GROUP/(R)/LOGO

                                                                  March 16, 2005

Christian Sandoe, Esq.
Division of Investment Management
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission                    via electronic filing
450 Fifth Street,
N.W., Fifth Floor
Washington, D.C. 20549

                       RE:        VANGUARD WELLINGTON FUND

Dear Mr. Sandoe:

         The following responds to your comments of March 15, 2005 on the
post-effective amendment of the registration statement of each of the
above-referenced registrants. You commented on Post-Effective Amendment No. 86
that was filed on January 28, 2005 pursuant to Rule 485(a).

COMMENT 1:        PROSPECTUS--PRIMARY INVESTMENT STRATEGIES
-----------------------------------------------------------
Comment:          Vanguard should disclose somewhere, not necessarily in this
                  section, the lowest level of credit quality in which the
                  bond portion of the fund will be invested.

Response:         We have disclosure in the Bond section of the Security
                  Selection portion of the prospectus that states the credit
                  quality of the bonds that the advisor will purchase for the
                  fund assets. We think this disclosure is sufficient and
                  addresses the comment.

COMMENT 2:        PROSPECTUS--PRIMARY INVESTMENT STRATEGIES
-----------------------------------------------------------
Comment:          The Primary Investment Strategies section states that the bond
                  portion of the fund is invested mainly in investment-grade
                  corporate bonds, with some exposure to U.S. Treasury and
                  government agency bonds, as well as mortgage-backed
                  securities. You inquired whether the Treasuries, government
                  agencies, and mortgage-backed securities were principal
                  strategies. If not, they need not be referenced in the Primary
                  Investment Strategies section of the prospectus.

Response:         We are comfortable that the Primary Investment Strategies
                  disclosure accurately describes the fund's principal
                  strategies.
<PAGE>
March 16, 2005
Christian Sandoe
Page 2 of 3

COMMENT 3:        PROSPECTUS--SECURITY SELECTION
------------------------------------------------
Comment:          In addition to providing the stock portion of the fund's
                  median market capitalization, you would like us to add the
                  fund's market capitalization range.

Response:         We have disclosed the fund's median market capitalization.
                  However, we do not plan to include the market
                  capitalization range since investors are ill served by such
                  disclosure for the following reasons:
                      (1) Market capitalization ranges are subjective over
                  different time periods and among different investment advisors
                  and funds. Defining a particular market capitalization as a
                  specific dollar range could confuse investors because the
                  dollar ranges are so varied over time and among advisors and
                  funds.
                      (2) Ranges change continually because of fluctuations in
                  stock market valuations. Therefore, disclosure of one range in
                  a prospectus could be misleading when the stock market
                  fluctuates.
                      (3) A fund's overall market capitalization range can be
                  very broad and not indicative of where the fund's overall
                  market capitalization focus is. The median market
                  capitalization is a more useful piece of information for
                  investors concerned with market capitalization.
                      (4) Form N-1A does not require funds to disclose specific
                  market capitalization dollar ranges.

COMMENT 4: TANDY REQUIREMENTS
-----------------------------
Comment:          The SEC is now requiring all registrants to provide at the end
                  of response letters to registration statement comments, the
                  following statements:

                  o Each Fund is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of
                    the disclosure in the filing.
                  o Staff comments or changes in response to staff comments in
                    the filings reviewed by the staff do not foreclose the
                    Commission from taking any action with respect to the
                    filing.
                  o Each Fund may not assert staff comments as a defense in
                    any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person
                    under the federal securities laws of the United States.

Response:         As required by the SEC, we will provide the foregoing
                  acknowledgements.

                                    * * * * *

                  As required by the SEC, each Fund acknowledges that:

                  o The Fund is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the
                  disclosure in the filing.
<PAGE>
March 16, 2005
Christian Sandoe
Page 3 of 3

                  o Staff comments or changes in response to staff comments in
                    the filings reviewed by the staff do not foreclose the
                    Commission from taking any action with respect to the
                    filing.
                  o The Fund may not assert staff comments as a defense in any
                    proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under
                    the federal securities laws of the United States.

         Please contact me at (610) 669-1538 with any questions or comments
regarding the above responses. Thank you.

Sincerely,

Judith L. Gaines
Associate Counsel
</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>