SEC Company Response from VANGUARD WELLINGTON FUND (CIK 0000105563) — Mar 16, 2005
VANGUARD WELLINGTON FUND (CIK 0000105563)
Date: March 16, 2005 · CIK: 0000105563 · Accession: 0000932471-05-000560
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
Show Raw Text
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>CORRESP
<SEQUENCE>1
<FILENAME>filename1.txt
<TEXT>
[SHIP LOGO]
THE VANGUARD GROUP/(R)/LOGO
March 16, 2005
Christian Sandoe, Esq.
Division of Investment Management
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission via electronic filing
450 Fifth Street,
N.W., Fifth Floor
Washington, D.C. 20549
RE: VANGUARD WELLINGTON FUND
Dear Mr. Sandoe:
The following responds to your comments of March 15, 2005 on the
post-effective amendment of the registration statement of each of the
above-referenced registrants. You commented on Post-Effective Amendment No. 86
that was filed on January 28, 2005 pursuant to Rule 485(a).
COMMENT 1: PROSPECTUS--PRIMARY INVESTMENT STRATEGIES
-----------------------------------------------------------
Comment: Vanguard should disclose somewhere, not necessarily in this
section, the lowest level of credit quality in which the
bond portion of the fund will be invested.
Response: We have disclosure in the Bond section of the Security
Selection portion of the prospectus that states the credit
quality of the bonds that the advisor will purchase for the
fund assets. We think this disclosure is sufficient and
addresses the comment.
COMMENT 2: PROSPECTUS--PRIMARY INVESTMENT STRATEGIES
-----------------------------------------------------------
Comment: The Primary Investment Strategies section states that the bond
portion of the fund is invested mainly in investment-grade
corporate bonds, with some exposure to U.S. Treasury and
government agency bonds, as well as mortgage-backed
securities. You inquired whether the Treasuries, government
agencies, and mortgage-backed securities were principal
strategies. If not, they need not be referenced in the Primary
Investment Strategies section of the prospectus.
Response: We are comfortable that the Primary Investment Strategies
disclosure accurately describes the fund's principal
strategies.
<PAGE>
March 16, 2005
Christian Sandoe
Page 2 of 3
COMMENT 3: PROSPECTUS--SECURITY SELECTION
------------------------------------------------
Comment: In addition to providing the stock portion of the fund's
median market capitalization, you would like us to add the
fund's market capitalization range.
Response: We have disclosed the fund's median market capitalization.
However, we do not plan to include the market
capitalization range since investors are ill served by such
disclosure for the following reasons:
(1) Market capitalization ranges are subjective over
different time periods and among different investment advisors
and funds. Defining a particular market capitalization as a
specific dollar range could confuse investors because the
dollar ranges are so varied over time and among advisors and
funds.
(2) Ranges change continually because of fluctuations in
stock market valuations. Therefore, disclosure of one range in
a prospectus could be misleading when the stock market
fluctuates.
(3) A fund's overall market capitalization range can be
very broad and not indicative of where the fund's overall
market capitalization focus is. The median market
capitalization is a more useful piece of information for
investors concerned with market capitalization.
(4) Form N-1A does not require funds to disclose specific
market capitalization dollar ranges.
COMMENT 4: TANDY REQUIREMENTS
-----------------------------
Comment: The SEC is now requiring all registrants to provide at the end
of response letters to registration statement comments, the
following statements:
o Each Fund is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of
the disclosure in the filing.
o Staff comments or changes in response to staff comments in
the filings reviewed by the staff do not foreclose the
Commission from taking any action with respect to the
filing.
o Each Fund may not assert staff comments as a defense in
any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person
under the federal securities laws of the United States.
Response: As required by the SEC, we will provide the foregoing
acknowledgements.
* * * * *
As required by the SEC, each Fund acknowledges that:
o The Fund is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the
disclosure in the filing.
<PAGE>
March 16, 2005
Christian Sandoe
Page 3 of 3
o Staff comments or changes in response to staff comments in
the filings reviewed by the staff do not foreclose the
Commission from taking any action with respect to the
filing.
o The Fund may not assert staff comments as a defense in any
proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under
the federal securities laws of the United States.
Please contact me at (610) 669-1538 with any questions or comments
regarding the above responses. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Judith L. Gaines
Associate Counsel
</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>