SEC Company Response from COMPOSITE TECHNOLOGY CORP (CIK 0000317477) — Aug 8, 2005
COMPOSITE TECHNOLOGY CORP (CIK 0000317477)
Date: Aug. 8, 2005 · CIK: 0000317477 · Accession: 0001144204-05-024118
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
File numbers found in text: 333-122280, 333-12798
Referenced dates: August 3, 2005
Show Raw Text
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>CORRESP
<SEQUENCE>1
<FILENAME>filename1.txt
<TEXT>
RICHARDSON & PATEL LLP
10900 Wilshire Boulevard
Suite 500
Los Angeles, CA 90024
Telephone (310) 208-1182
Facsimile (310) 208-1154
August 4, 2005
VIA FACSIMILE
-------------
Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporation Finance
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington D.C., 20549
Attn.: Daniel F. Duchovny, Esq.
Russel Mancuso, Esq.
Re: Composite Technology Corporation
Amended Registration Statement on Form S-3
File No. 333-122280
Messrs. Duchovny and Mancuso:
On behalf of Composite Technology Corporation (the "Company"), this letter
responds to the comments received from the staff ("Staff") of the Securities and
Exchange Commission in their letter dated August 3, 2005 with respect to the
Company's registration statement on the above-referenced Form S-3. We appreciate
the opportunity to address the issues raised in these comments prior to filing
our amendment to the registration statement and reports in response to the
Staff's comments. We have reproduced the Staff's comments in bold type and have
followed each comment with our response. References in this letter to "we,"
"our" or "us" mean the Company or its advisors, as the context may require.
We are transmitting the changed pages in response to your letter dated
August 3, 2005. If the changed pages and this letter are acceptable, we intend
to file Amendment No. 5 to the registration statement along with an updated copy
of this letter with the SEC, immediately after the filing of the Company's
amendments to its 10-KSB for the year ending September 30, 2004, 10-Q's for the
quarters ending December 31, 2004 and March 31, 2005, and 8-K dated July 5, 2005
on or about August 5, 2005.
<PAGE>
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
August 4, 2005
Page 2
Form S-3
--------
Recent Developments, page 1
---------------------------
1. We note your response to comment 1; however, it remains unclear why you
believe outstanding shares of common stock could not be cancelled under
a Chapter 11 reorganization plan even if you do not elect to liquidate.
Please note that our plan of reorganization does not contemplate
cancellation of stock, however, such cancellation could occur under a
Chapter 11 reorganization if the court does not approve of our plan. We
have revised our disclosure in this section of the S-3 to clarify the
risk of cancellation of shares.
Risk Factors, page 3
--------------------
2. Please disclose the expected impact of the bankruptcy proceeding on
your financial statements and clarify the accounting that will be
followed subsequent to the bankruptcy reorganization.
Note that there is no impact of the bankruptcy on any financial
statements issued through the quarter ending March 31, 2005.
Going forward, beginning with the quarter ending June 30, 2005
reporting, we will follow the guidelines issued by the AICPA under SOP
90-7. However, due to the nature of our particular bankruptcy, we
anticipate the impact to be minimal, except for certain
reclassifications on the balance sheet, income statement and statement
of cash flows, and for approximately a $4.8MM reorganization expense to
adjust the carrying value of our $15MM debentures, for the following
reasons:
Under SOP 90-7, assets are presented at estimated realizable values.
Liabilities are set forth at the estimated amounts to be allowed in the
balance sheet and liabilities subject to compromise are to be
distinguished from those that are not. In addition, in the income
statement and statement of cash flows, normal transactions are to be
distinguished from those that are a consequence of the transactions as
a result of the reorganization.
For our particular situation, for the quarter ending 6/30/05, our
assets are typically "revalued" each quarter for the current assets
including cash, receivables, inventory, and prepaid expenses and since
these are recorded at the lower of cost or market, or realizable value,
as appropriate. In addition, since substantially all of our other or
longer term assets consists primarily of our equipment which has been
purchased within the past year, its depreciated net book value
approximates its market value. We have no other substantial assets
recorded. Our liabilities consist primarily of trade payables which we
intend to pay at 100% for both pre and post petition balances, our
capital leases which have been assumed and are secured by our
equipment, and our debentures which we will also assume under our plan
of reorganization. Therefore, there will be no impact due to the
bankruptcy reorganization due to the reduction of liabilities as one
might see when liabilities are paid at a discount. For the quarter
ending 6/30/05, we have reclassified our accounts payables and our
other pre-petition liabilities as a separate line item.
<PAGE>
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
August 4, 2005
Page 3
We have determined that our $15,000,000 debentures are an allowed claim
effective as of the date of the Bankruptcy petition filing and we have
recorded $4,831,970 in reorganization expense to bring the carrying
value up to $15,000,000 as appropriate under section 25 of SOP 90-7 on
May 5, 2005. Note that this will result in a reduction in interest
expense of approximately $177,000 per month beginning 5/5/05 or
$530,340 per quarter as compared to prior quarters in fiscal 2005.
Interest expense in the June quarter will include $206,245 of
prepetition amortization of this discount.
As for our expenses related to the bankruptcy, these consist primarily
of legal fees which will be segregated on the Income Statement as
appropriate under reorganization items. We have not paid any cash for
legal fees related to the bankruptcy to date and we use the indirect
method in our statement of cash flows so the impact to that financial
statement will be minimal.
For the activities after our plan of reorganization is approved, which
we anticipate to be on or shortly after September 8, 2005, SOP 90-7, we
believe that our assets will be in excess of our post petition
liabilities and since our equity positions will not change, we do not
qualify for "fresh start" accounting.
We have added the following risk factor to the S-3/A in the bankruptcy
risk factor section:
Accounting for Bankruptcy:
Under GAAP, in particular AICPA SOP 90-7, upon the approval of our plan
of reorganization, we are required to revalue our assets to their
market values and to record as additional expenses and additional
liabilities for any amounts which represent claims allowed by the
Bankruptcy Court, which may be in excess of the liabilities recorded in
our financial statements.
Assets: Our assets consist primarily of current assets valued at the
lower of cost or market, which we believe approximates their market
value and for equipment which we believe that depreciated net book
value to approximate the market value.
Current Liabilities and Capital leases: We plan to honor all payables
and accrued liabilities and our plan of reorganization stipulates
payment in full for our pre-petition accounts payable. Our Plan also
stipulates the assumption of our capital leases. However, we have not
reached the deadline for potential claimants to make claims under the
bankruptcy. In addition, to date, we have three claims representing
approximately $750,000 in additional expenses and liabilities that we
have disputed under the Chapter 11 but which may be allowed by the
Bankruptcy Court in their entirety or a fraction of that total, or not
at all. Although we have recorded all liabilities that we believe will
be the amounts approved under the bankruptcy, we may be required to
record additional expenses.
<PAGE>
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
August 4, 2005
Page 4
Convertible Debentures: Effective as of the date of the Bankruptcy
filing, the allowed value of our Debentures was determined to be
$15,000,000 which was in excess of our carrying value as of that date.
For the quarter ending June 30, 2005, we have recorded additional
expense of 4,831,970 as a reorganization item to adjust the carrying
value of the Debentures to $15,000,000.
Exhibit 23.1
------------
3. Provide an updated consent of your independent accountants.
We will file an updated consent with Amendment No. 5 to the
registration statement.
Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2004
-------------------------------------------------
Sales of Unregistered Securities, page 32
-----------------------------------------
4. We have reviewed the argument you submitted in response to comment 7
with your position that the June 2004 warrant exercise price reduction
is not an issuer tender offer. Although we are not making a
determination at this time regarding the applicability of the tender
offer rules to your transaction, please note that all persons who are
by statute and rule responsible for compliance with our rules remain
accountable for compliance with the requirements set forth in Rule
13e-4 and the referenced Heritage letter in connection with past
transactions and future similar warrant exercise price reduction
transactions.
Noted.
5. We note your reference in response to your registration statement on
Form SB-2 file No. 333-12798; however, it appears that that
registration statement registers the resale of securities, not the
original issuance of those securities. Therefore, we reissue the
comment.
We have revised Exhibit B to include the issuances of unregistered
shares of common stock pursuant to warrant exercises for the time
period from August 1, 2004 to present. Please note that we have also
added disclosure regarding share issuances pursuant to warrant
exercises that occurred during the fourth quarter ended September 30,
2004 to the 10-KSB/A.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, page F-2
-----------------------------------------------------------------
6. Please refer to prior comment 13. Please provide an updated report of
your independent auditors.
We will provide an updated report of our independent auditors with
Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-KSB.
<PAGE>
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
August 4, 2005
Page 5
Consolidated Statements of Shareholder's Equity, page F-5
---------------------------------------------------------
7. Please refer to prior comment 14. Please provide an updated version of
your Statements of Shareholder's Equity.
We have revised our Statements of Shareholder's Equity in response to
prior comment 14, which will be filed with Amendment No. 1 to the Form
10-KSB.
Form 8-K dated July 5, 2005
---------------------------
8. Please expand your disclosure in response to comment 19 to clarify how
you could have "expense exposure over the above the premiums paid."
Also, please provide and updated version of your disclosure you intend
to file on the Form 8-K/A.
We have revised our disclosure in the 8-K/A to state that we intend to
record warranty premiums paid or payable to expense in the applicable
time periods. If we determine through later experience that we have
expense exposure, due to underinsurance or undercoverage under the
insurance policy, over the premiums paid (and expensed), we intend to
record additional warranty reserve to cover the expected losses. We do
not anticipate that we will have additional expense exposure, however
and we believe that the insurance coverage will be sufficient to cover
any losses related to our product.
We hope that the information contained in this letter satisfactorily
addresses the comments by the Staff. Please do not hesitate to contact the
undersigned by telephone at (310) 208-1182, or by facsimile at (310) 208-1154.
Very truly yours,
RICHARDSON & PATEL, LLP.
/s/ Dorothy B. Vinski
Dorothy B. Vinski, Esq.
cc: Mr. Benton H. Wilcoxon,
Composite Technology Corporation
2026 McGaw Avenue
Irvine, CA 92614
Kevin K. Leung, Esq., Richardson & Patel LLP
10900 Wilshire Boulevard, Sute 500
Los Angeles, CA 90024
</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>