SEC Company Response from CVB FINANCIAL CORP (CVBF) (CIK 0000354647) (CVBF) — Aug 16, 2005
CVB FINANCIAL CORP (CVBF) (CIK 0000354647)
Date: Aug. 16, 2005 · CIK: 0000354647 · Accession: 0000354647-05-000071
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
Referenced dates: August 2, 2005
Letter
(909) 980-4030 August 15, 2005 Ms. Paula Smith Staff Accountant Securities and Exchange Commission Washington, D.C. 2049
Dear Ms. Smith:
On behalf of CVB Financial Corp., (the “Company”), set forth below is our response to the comment letter dated August 2, 2005 (the “Comment Letter”) with respect to Note 2 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.
1.
We note that you recorded in the first quarter of 2004 a $6.3 million other-than-temporary impairment relating to your FHLMC perpetual preferred stock investments. At December 31, 2004 and 2003 the unrealized loss positions on these investments were $5.6 million and $2.7 million, respectively. Please tell us how you were able to conclude that no other-than-temporary impairment relating to your FHLMC perpetual preferred stock investments existed as of these dates. Your response should include but not be limited to the quantifications supporting how you determined the recognized $6.3 million impairment, details for both periods including name of security, purchase date and price, current amortized cost, and any other information you consider in your periodic analysis. Please refer to the specific relevant guidance in SFAS No. 115 and SAB Topic 5:M in your response
The securities in question are the following two issues of Freddie Mac Preferred Stock (the “Preferred Securities”):
Freddie Mac Series N Preferred Stock CUSIP 313400764
Purchased March 20, 2001
12-month LIBOR floating, reset April 1
Dividend rate at purchase – 4.50%
Shares Purchased: 800,000
Purchase Price: $40,000,000
Freddie Mac Series B Preferred Stock CUSIP 313400608
Purchased October 1, 2001
3-month LIBOR floating, reset quarterly
Dividend rate at purchase – 4.29%
Shares Purchased: 500,000
Purchase Price: $23,750,000
Paula Smith
Securities and Exchange Commission Page 2
We purchased the Preferred Securities in 2001 to add some variable rate assets to our balance sheet. The Preferred Securities are indexed to LIBOR and reset on an annual or a quarterly basis. On a quarterly basis, and consistent with Staff Accounting Bulletin 5:M, we perform a detailed analysis of the Preferred Securities. Our analysis takes into consideration various factors, including:
– the financial condition of the issuer including items that may affect its performance,
– the length of time and extent to which the market value of the Preferred Securities has been less than cost,
– our intent and ability to hold the Preferred Securities for the foreseeable future,
– the current interest rate environment and how it affects our yield, and
– the spread between the Preferred Securities and treasury securities.
We have historically analyzed the Preferred Securities as debt-like instruments because they do not offer a conversion option and do not participate in the overall profitability of the issuer. In addition, the Preferred Securities (i) have par amounts; (ii) pay dividends which track LIBOR indices and (iii) are callable at par.
We track the market value of the Preferred Securities on a monthly basis to determine the gain or loss in the security. This allows us to determine the duration of the gain or loss and the fluctuation in the market value.
As of December 31, 2003, the Preferred Securities had an aggregate market value of $61.1 million and represented 3.27% of our total investment portfolio of $1.87 billion. As of December 31, 2004, the Preferred Securities had an aggregate market value of $52.7 million and represented 2.53% of the total investment portfolio of $2.09 billion. Given the size of our investment portfolio at each of these dates, the small percent of our overall investment portfolio which the Preferred Securities represented, and the overall financial strength of the Company, we have always had the ability to hold these securities for an extended period of time. The current amortized cost of the Preferred Securities is $58.3 million. We have the current intent and ability to hold these securities for the foreseeable future.
As of December 31, 2003 and 2004, the collective unrealized loss on these securities was $2.65 million and $5.64 million respectively. Exhibits A and B set forth the book value, market price, market value, and gain (or loss) on these securities from February 2002 through July 2005. Exhibits A and B clearly demonstrate the wide fluctuations in unrealized gains and losses of these securities.
Paula Smith
Securities and Exchange Commission Page 3
As part of our analysis, we have historically reviewed the spread differential between Freddie Mac subordinated debt (securities which we believe are analogous to the Preferred Securities) and both Freddie Mac senior debt and United States treasury debt. Our analysis has shown that no significant spread widening has occurred between subordinated debt and senior debt. We believe that if there were credit quality issues with Freddie Mac, the spread between Freddie Mac subordinated debt and Freddie Mac senior debt and United States Treasury debt would widen over time. Because there has been no demonstrated spread widening, we have determined that the decline in values of the Preferred Securities is other than credit-related, and, most likely, has been caused by the interest rate environment and the uncertain accounting treatment of these securities.
Furthermore, the credit ratings on the Preferred Securities have not declined since we acquired them. Set forth below are the credit ratings on these Preferred Securities as of our acquisition date and the credit ratings as of August 2005. There has been no intervening decline in these credit ratings between the time periods presented:
Purchase Date
August 2005
Twelve-month reset
Moody's Aa3 Aa3
S & P AA- AA-
Fitch Not rated AA-
Three-month reset
Moody's Aa3 Aa3
S & P Not rated Not rated
Fitch Not rated AA-
Based on our analysis of the securities, we determined that no write-down of these securities was appropriate at December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2004, as the decline in values were not attributable to a decline in the quality of the security. We also believe that the value of these securities has been negatively impacted by the accounting treatment of these issues and general market factors.
As of March 31, 2004, we took a write-down of the Preferred Securities in an amount equal to the total unrealized loss as of such date. Our determination to incur a write-down of the Preferred Securities of $6.3 million as of March 31, 2004 was based on a number of factors. In particular, the decision was based on direction from our accountants, Deloitte & Touche, LLP, and a review of the guidance provided in EITF 03-1. We also considered the length of time we were carrying the Preferred Securities at an unrealized loss. Subsequent to our determination to take the write-down, EITF 03-1 was withdrawn.
Paula Smith
Securities and Exchange Commission Page 4
We evaluate our security portfolio for other-than-temporary impairment based on SFAS 115 and SAB Topic 5:M. Neither SFAS 115 nor SAB Topic 5:M provide for any specific timeframe. Therefore, we have continued to monitor the fluctuations in the unrealized gains and losses on these securities, including the magnitude and the time period of any unrealized loss. We did not believe that sufficient time had passed from the original purchase of the Preferred Securities to require a write-down as of December 31, 2003. In particular, we note that with respect to the 12 month LIBOR Preferred Security, the unrealized loss as of November 2003 was over $7.2 million as compared to an unrealized loss at December 2003 of only $400,000. We also note that with respect to the 3 month LIBOR Preferred Security, there was only a minimal unrealized loss through February 2003, less than a year prior to our December 31, 2003 analysis.
We did not believe that sufficient time had passed from the write-down in March of 2004 to require another write-down as of December 31, 2004. In particular, we note that both issues of Preferred Securities had unrealized gains during the second quarter of 2004.
Based on our analysis, including the issuer’s credit ratings, the length of time the Preferred Securities were below our current carrying value, our intent and ability to hold the Preferred Securities for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value and the impact of interest rates, we believe that there was no other-than-temporary impairment for the Preferred Securities as of December 31, 2003 or December 31, 2004.
Going forward, we will continue to evaluate the Preferred Securities in accordance with SFAS NO. 115 and SAB 5:M. We respectfully note that as interest rates rise, the yield on the Preferred Securities will increase.
We believe this letter is responsive to your request. Do not hesitate to call upon us should you need any additional information on this matter.
In addition, as requested in your Comment Letter, we hereby acknowledge that (i) the Company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the filing; (ii) staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filing; and (iii) the Company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Edward J. Biebrich, Jr.
Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm
701 North Haven Ave., Suite 350
Ontario, CA 91764
(909) 980-4030
August 15, 2005
Ms. Paula Smith
Staff Accountant
Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 2049
Dear Ms. Smith:
On behalf of CVB Financial Corp., (the
“Company”), set forth below is our response to the comment letter dated August
2, 2005 (the “Comment Letter”) with respect to Note 2 to the Company’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.
1.
We note that you recorded in the first quarter of 2004 a $6.3 million other-than-temporary
impairment relating to your FHLMC perpetual preferred stock investments. At
December 31, 2004 and 2003 the unrealized loss positions on these investments were
$5.6 million and $2.7 million, respectively. Please tell us how you
were able to conclude that no other-than-temporary impairment relating to your FHLMC
perpetual preferred stock investments existed as of these dates. Your
response should include but not be limited to the quantifications supporting how
you determined the recognized $6.3 million impairment, details for both periods
including name of security, purchase date and price, current amortized cost, and any
other information you consider in your periodic analysis. Please refer to
the specific relevant guidance in SFAS No. 115 and SAB Topic 5:M in your response
The securities in question are the
following two issues of Freddie Mac Preferred Stock (the “Preferred
Securities”):
Freddie Mac Series N Preferred Stock CUSIP 313400764
Purchased March 20, 2001
12-month LIBOR floating, reset April 1
Dividend rate at purchase – 4.50%
Shares Purchased: 800,000
Purchase Price: $40,000,000
Freddie Mac Series B Preferred Stock CUSIP 313400608
Purchased October 1, 2001
3-month LIBOR floating, reset quarterly
Dividend rate at purchase – 4.29%
Shares Purchased: 500,000
Purchase Price: $23,750,000
Paula Smith
Securities and Exchange Commission
Page 2
We purchased the Preferred Securities
in 2001 to add some variable rate assets to our balance sheet. The Preferred Securities
are indexed to LIBOR and reset on an annual or a quarterly basis. On a quarterly basis,
and consistent with Staff Accounting Bulletin 5:M, we perform a detailed analysis of the
Preferred Securities. Our analysis takes into consideration various factors, including:
–
the financial condition of the issuer including items that may affect its performance,
– the
length of time and extent to which the market value of the Preferred Securities has been
less than cost,
– our intent and ability to hold the Preferred Securities
for the foreseeable future,
– the current interest rate environment and how it affects our
yield, and
– the spread between the Preferred Securities and treasury securities.
We have historically analyzed the
Preferred Securities as debt-like instruments because they do not offer a conversion
option and do not participate in the overall profitability of the issuer. In addition, the
Preferred Securities (i) have par amounts; (ii) pay dividends which track LIBOR indices
and (iii) are callable at par.
We track the market value of the
Preferred Securities on a monthly basis to determine the gain or loss in the security.
This allows us to determine the duration of the gain or loss and the fluctuation in
the market value.
As of December 31, 2003, the
Preferred Securities had an aggregate market value of $61.1 million and represented 3.27%
of our total investment portfolio of $1.87 billion. As of December 31, 2004, the Preferred
Securities had an aggregate market value of $52.7 million and represented 2.53% of the
total investment portfolio of $2.09 billion. Given the size of our investment portfolio at
each of these dates, the small percent of our overall investment portfolio which the
Preferred Securities represented, and the overall financial strength of the Company, we
have always had the ability to hold these securities for an extended period of time. The
current amortized cost of the Preferred Securities is $58.3 million. We have the current
intent and ability to hold these securities for the foreseeable future.
As of December 31, 2003 and 2004, the
collective unrealized loss on these securities was $2.65 million and $5.64 million
respectively. Exhibits A and B set forth the book value, market price, market value, and
gain (or loss) on these securities from February 2002 through July 2005. Exhibits A and B
clearly demonstrate the wide fluctuations in unrealized gains and losses of these
securities.
Paula Smith
Securities and Exchange Commission
Page 3
As part of our analysis, we have
historically reviewed the spread differential between Freddie Mac subordinated debt
(securities which we believe are analogous to the Preferred Securities) and both Freddie
Mac senior debt and United States treasury debt. Our analysis has shown that no
significant spread widening has occurred between subordinated debt and senior debt. We
believe that if there were credit quality issues with Freddie Mac, the spread between
Freddie Mac subordinated debt and Freddie Mac senior debt and United States Treasury debt
would widen over time. Because there has been no demonstrated spread widening, we have
determined that the decline in values of the Preferred Securities is other than
credit-related, and, most likely, has been caused by the interest rate environment and the
uncertain accounting treatment of these securities.
Furthermore, the credit ratings on
the Preferred Securities have not declined since we acquired them. Set forth below are the
credit ratings on these Preferred Securities as of our acquisition date and the credit
ratings as of August 2005. There has been no intervening decline in these credit ratings
between the time periods presented:
Purchase Date
August 2005
Twelve-month reset
Moody's
Aa3
Aa3
S & P
AA-
AA-
Fitch
Not rated
AA-
Three-month reset
Moody's
Aa3
Aa3
S & P
Not rated
Not rated
Fitch
Not rated
AA-
Based on our analysis of the
securities, we determined that no write-down of these securities was appropriate at
December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2004, as the decline in values were not attributable to a
decline in the quality of the security.
We also believe that the value of these securities has been negatively impacted by the
accounting treatment of these issues and general market factors.
As of March 31, 2004, we took a
write-down of the Preferred Securities in an amount equal to the total unrealized loss as
of such date. Our determination to incur a write-down of the Preferred Securities of $6.3
million as of March 31, 2004 was based on a number of factors. In particular, the decision was based on
direction from our accountants, Deloitte & Touche, LLP, and a review of the
guidance provided in EITF 03-1. We also considered the length of time we were carrying
the Preferred Securities at an unrealized loss. Subsequent to our determination to take the write-down,
EITF 03-1 was withdrawn.
Paula Smith
Securities and Exchange Commission
Page 4
We evaluate
our security portfolio for other-than-temporary impairment based on SFAS 115 and SAB Topic 5:M.
Neither SFAS 115 nor SAB
Topic 5:M provide for any specific timeframe. Therefore, we have continued to monitor the
fluctuations in the unrealized gains and losses on these securities, including the
magnitude and the time period of any unrealized loss. We did not believe that sufficient time had passed from
the original purchase of the Preferred Securities to require a write-down as of December
31, 2003. In particular, we note that with respect to the 12 month LIBOR Preferred
Security, the unrealized loss as of November 2003 was over $7.2 million as compared to an
unrealized loss at December 2003 of only $400,000. We also note that with respect to the 3
month LIBOR Preferred Security, there was only a minimal unrealized loss through February
2003, less than a year prior to our December 31, 2003 analysis.
We did not believe that sufficient
time had passed from the write-down in March of 2004 to require another write-down as of
December 31, 2004. In particular, we note that both issues of Preferred Securities had
unrealized gains during the second quarter of 2004.
Based on our analysis, including the
issuer’s credit ratings, the length of time the Preferred Securities were below our
current carrying value, our intent and ability to hold the Preferred Securities for a period
of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value and the impact of
interest rates, we believe that there was no other-than-temporary impairment for the
Preferred Securities as of December 31, 2003 or December 31, 2004.
Going forward, we will continue to evaluate the
Preferred Securities in accordance with SFAS NO. 115 and SAB 5:M.
We respectfully note that as interest rates rise, the yield on the Preferred
Securities will increase.
We believe this letter is responsive
to your request. Do not hesitate to call upon us should you need any additional
information on this matter.
In
addition, as requested in your Comment Letter, we hereby acknowledge that (i) the Company
is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the filing; (ii) staff
comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments do not foreclose the
Commission from taking any action with respect to the filing; and (iii) the Company may
not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or
any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Edward J. Biebrich, Jr.
Executive Vice President
Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT A
Cusip
313400764
Freddie Mac Preferred Stock Floating 12 months LIBOR
Month
Book Value
Market Price
Market Value
Gain/(Loss)
Shares
% Gain/(Loss)
Feb-02
40,000,000.00
49.0000
39,200,000.00
-800,000.00
800,000.00
-2.00%
Mar-02
40,000,000.00
49.0000
39,200,000.00
-800,000.00
800,000.00
-2.00%
Apr-02
40,000,000.00
48.2750
38,620,000.00
-1,380,000.00
800,000.00
-3.45%
May-02
40,000,000.00
48.0750
38,460,000.00
-1,540,000.00
800,000.00
-3.85%
Jun-02
40,000,000.00
48.0750
38,460,000.00
-1,540,000.00
800,000.00
-3.85%
Jul-02
40,000,000.00
46.2500
37,000,000.00
-3,000,000.00
800,000.00
-7.50%
Aug-02
40,000,000.00
46.5680
37,254,400.00
-2,745,600.00
800,000.00
-6.86%
Sep-02
40,000,000.00
46.9560
37,564,800.00
-2,435,200.00
800,000.00
-6.09%
Oct-02
40,000,000.00
46.7180
37,374,400.00
-2,625,600.00
800,000.00
-6.56%
Nov-02
40,000,000.00
45.7188
36,575,000.00
-3,425,000.00
800,000.00
-8.56%
Dec-02
40,000,000.00
44.5000
35,600,000.00
-4,400,000.00
800,000.00
-11.00%
Jan-03
40,000,000.00
45.7188
36,575,000.00
-3,425,000.00
800,000.00
-8.56%
Feb-03
40,000,000.00
45.7188
36,575,000.00
-3,425,000.00
800,000.00
-8.56%
Mar-03
40,000,000.00
45.4370
36,349,600.00
-3,650,400.00
800,000.00
-9.13%
Apr-03
40,000,000.00
44.7500
35,800,000.00
-4,200,000.00
800,000.00
-10.50%
May-03
40,000,000.00
44.7560
35,804,800.00
-4,195,200.00
800,000.00
-10.49%
Jun-03
40,000,000.00
39.8620
31,889,000.00
-8,111,000.00
800,000.00
-20.28%
Jul-03
40,000,000.00
41.6690
33,335,200.00
-6,664,800.00
800,000.00
-16.66%
Aug-03
40,000,000.00
40.9650
32,772,000.00
-7,228,000.00
800,000.00
-18.07%
Sep-03
40,000,000.00
40.6210
32,496,800.00
-7,503,200.00
800,000.00
-18.76%
Oct-03
40,000,000.00
40.6870
32,549,600.00
-7,450,400.00
800,000.00
-18.63%
Nov-03
40,000,000.00
40.8900
32,712,000.00
-7,288,000.00
800,000.00
-18.22%
Dec-03
40,000,000.00
49.5000
39,600,000.00
-400,000.00
800,000.00
-1.00%
Jan-04
40,000,000.00
48.0000
38,400,000.00
-1,600,000.00
800,000.00
-4.00%
Feb-04
40,000,000.00
45.7500
36,600,000.00
-3,400,000.00
800,000.00
-8.50%
Mar-04
36,560,000.00
45.7000
36,560,000.00
0.00
800,000.00
-0.00%
Apr-04
36,560,000.00
45.7000
36,560,000.00
0.00
800,000.00
-0.00%
May-04
36,560,000.00
46.2000
36,960,000.00
400,000.00
800,000.00
1.09%
Jun-04
36,560,000.00
45.5500
36,440,000.00
-120,000.00
800,000.00
-0.33%
Jul-04
36,560,000.00
45.5500
36,440,000.00
-120,000.00
800,000.00
-0.33%
8/19/04
36,440,000.00
45.5500
36,440,000.00
0.00
800,000.00
-0.00%
Aug-04
36,440,000.00
45.0500
36,040,000.00
-400,000.00
800,000.00
-1.10%
Sep-04
36,440,000.00
42.9000
34,320,000.00
-2,120,000.00
800,000.00
-5.82%
Oct-04
36,440,000.00
36.0000
28,800,000.00
-7,640,000.00
800,000.00
-20.97%
Nov-04
36,440,000.00
38.5000
30,800,000.00
-5,640,000.00
800,000.00
-15.48%
Dec-04
36,440,000.00
38.8500
31,080,000.00
-5,360,000.00
800,000.00
-14.71%
Jan-05
36,440,000.00
43.0000
34,400,000.00
-2,040,000.00
800,000.00
-5.60%
Feb-05
36,440,000.00
42.7500
34,200,000.00
-2,240,000.00
800,000.00
-6.15%
Mar-05
36,440,000.00
42.5000
34,000,000.00
-2,440,000.00
800,000.00
-6.70%
Apr-05
36,440,000.00
42.1200
33,696,000.00
-2,744,000.00
800,000.00
-7.53%
May-05
36,440,000.00
42.0500
33,640,000.00
-2,800,000.00
800,000.00
-7.68%
Jun-05
36,440,000.00
41.3000
33,040,000.00
-3,400,000.00
800,000.00
-9.33%
Jul-05
36,440,000.00
41.0700
32,856,000.00
-3,584,000.00
800,000.00
-9.84%
EXHIBIT B
Cusip
313400608
Freddie Mac Preferred Stock Floating 3 months LIBOR
Month
Book Value
Market Price
Market Value
Gain/(Loss)
Shares
% Gain/(Loss)
Feb-02
23,750,000.00
47.7400
23,870,000.00
120,000.00
500,000.00
0.51%
Mar-02
23,750,000.00
47.7400
23,870,000.00
120,000.00
500,000.00
0.51%
Apr-02
23,750,000.00
47.4950
23,747,500.00
-2,500.00
500,000.00
-0.01%
May-02
23,750,000.00
47.4950
23,747,500.00
-2,500.00
500,000.00
-0.01%
Jun-02
23,750,000.00
47.4950
23,747,500.00
-2,500.00
500,000.00
-0.01%
Jul-02
23,750,000.00
47.4950
23,747,500.00
-2,500.00
500,000.00
-0.01%
Aug-02
23,750,000.00
47.4950
23,747,500.00
-2,500.00
500,000.00
-0.01%
Sep-02
23,750,000.00
47.5000
23,750,000.00
0.00
500,000.00
0.00%
Oct-02
23,750,000.00
47.9750
23,987,500.00
237,500.00
500,000.00
1.00%
Nov-02
23,750,000.00
47.4950
23,747,500.00
-2,500.00
500,000.00
-0.01%
Dec-02
23,750,000.00
41.0000
20,500,000.00
-3,250,000.00
500,000.00
-13.68%
Jan-03
23,750,000.00
47.4950
23,747,500.00
-2,500.00
500,000.00
-0.01%
Feb-03
23,750,000.00
47.4950
23,747,500.00
-2,500.00
500,000.00
-0.01%
Mar-03
23,750,000.00
46.0000
23,000,000.00
-750,000.00
500,000.00
-3.16%
Apr-03
23,750,000.00
47.0000
23,500,000.00
-250,000.00
500,000.00
-1.05%
May-03
23,750,000.00
47.0100
23,505,000.00
-245,000.00
500,000.00
-1.03%
Jun-03
23,750,000.00
45.8480
22,924,000.00
-826,000.00
500,000.00
-3.48%
Jul-03
23,750,000.00
42.8950
21,447,500.00
-2,302,500.00
500,000.00
-9.69%
Aug-03
23,750,000.00
43.9570
21,978,500.00
-1,771,500.00
500,000.00
-7.46%
Sep-03
23,750,000.00
43.8360
21,918,000.00
-1,832,000.00
500,000.00
-7.71%
Oct-03
23,750,000.00
43.9150
21,957,500.00
-1,792,500.00
500,000.00
-7.55%
Nov-03
23,750,000.00
43.8600
21,930,000.00
-1,820,000.00
500,000.00
-7.66%
Dec-03
23,750,000.00
43.0000
21,500,000.00
-2,250,000.00
500,000.00
-9.47%
Jan-04
23,750,000.00
42.8000
21,400,000.00
-2,350,000.00
500,000.00
-9.89%
Feb-04
23,750,000.00
42.8000
21,400,000.00
-2,350,000.00
500,000.00
-9.89%
Mar-04
20,890,000.00
41.7800
20,890,000.00
0.00
500,000.00
0.00%
Apr-04
20,890,000.00
42.5000
21,250,000.00
360,000.00
500,000.00
1.72%
May-04
20,890,000.00
44.0000
22,000,000.00
1,110,000.00
500,000.00
5.31%
Jun-04
20,890,000.00
43.8000
21,900,000.00
1,010,000.00
500,000.00
4.83%
Jul-