SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Company Response from MGI PHARMA INC (CIK 0000702131) — Nov 14, 2005

MGI PHARMA INC (CIK 0000702131)
Date: Nov. 14, 2005 · CIK: 0000702131 · Accession: 0001193125-05-225062

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Referenced dates: November 2, 2005

Date
November 14, 2005
Author
/s/ MICHAEL J. SILVER
Form
CORRESP
Company
MGI PHARMA INC (CIK 0000702131)

Letter

via EDGAR and facsimile at (202) 772-9203 Office of Mergers and Acquisitions Securities and Exchange Commission Re: MGI Pharma, Inc. Schedule TO-I filed October 20, 2005 Staff Comment Letter dated November 2, 2005 SEC File No. 005-33822

Dear Ms. Murphy:

On behalf of MGI Pharma, Inc. (the “Company” or “MGI Pharma”), we are providing the Company’s response to the comments in the staff’s letter dated November 2, 2005.

For the convenience of the staff, each of the comments is set out in italic font immediately preceding the corresponding response.

* * * * *

Comment 1. Summary Term Sheet, page 1:

Please revise your characterization of the information in the summary as “not complete.” The summary term sheet must describe the most material terms of the proposed transaction. The summary sheet must provide security holders with sufficient information to understand the essential features and significance of the proposed transaction. Such summary may not be characterized as incomplete.

Celeste M. Murphy, Esq.

Special Counsel

November 14, 2005

Page 2

Response:

The Company will amend the Summary Term Sheet in the Offer to Purchase to remove the reference to the disclosure being “not complete.”

Comment 2. Forward-Looking Statements, page 6:

The safe harbor for forward-looking statements in the Private Securities Litigation reform Act of 1995 does not by its terms apply to statements made in connection with a tender offer. Therefore, your reference to the defined term “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 is inappropriate.

Response:

The Company will delete the reference to the defined term “forwarding-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and will amend and restate the first and second paragraph of the Section titled “CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS” without reference to the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

* * * * *

As the staff has requested, I confirm to you that the Company acknowledges that:

•

Filers are responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of disclosures in filings;

•

Staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to a filing; and

•

Filers may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.

* * * * *

Celeste M. Murphy, Esq.

Special Counsel

November 14, 2005

Page 3

If you have any questions or would like further information concerning the Company’s response to your letters, please do not hesitate to contact me at (410) 659-2741, or William Intner at (410) 659-2778. Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,
/s/ MICHAEL J. SILVER

Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm

Correspondence with the SEC

 [HOGAN & HARTSON L.L.P. LETTERHEAD]

 November 14, 2005

 via EDGAR and facsimile at (202) 772-9203

 Original to follow
by Federal Express

 Celeste M. Murphy, Esq.

 Special Counsel

 Office of Mergers and Acquisitions

 Securities and Exchange Commission

 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Mail Stop 0409

 Washington, DC 20549

Re:
MGI Pharma, Inc.

Schedule TO-I filed October 20, 2005

Staff Comment Letter dated November 2, 2005

SEC File No. 005-33822

 Dear Ms. Murphy:

 On behalf of MGI Pharma, Inc. (the “Company” or “MGI Pharma”), we are providing the Company’s response to the comments in the
staff’s letter dated November 2, 2005.

 For the
convenience of the staff, each of the comments is set out in italic font immediately preceding the corresponding response.

 *        *        *        *        *

 Comment 1. Summary Term Sheet, page 1:

 Please revise your characterization of the information in the summary as
“not complete.” The summary term sheet must describe the most material terms of the proposed transaction. The summary sheet must provide security holders with sufficient information to understand the essential features and significance of
the proposed transaction. Such summary may not be characterized as incomplete.

 Celeste M. Murphy, Esq.

 Special Counsel

 November 14, 2005

 Page 2

 Response:

 The Company will amend the Summary Term Sheet in the Offer to Purchase to remove the reference to the disclosure being “not
complete.”

 Comment 2. Forward-Looking Statements, page 6:

 The safe harbor for forward-looking statements
in the Private Securities Litigation reform Act of 1995 does not by its terms apply to statements made in connection with a tender offer. Therefore, your reference to the defined term “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 is inappropriate.

 Response:

 The Company will delete the reference to the
defined term “forwarding-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and will amend and restate the first and second paragraph of the Section titled “CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS” without reference to the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

 *        *        *        *        *

 As the staff has requested, I confirm to you that the Company acknowledges that:

•

Filers are responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of disclosures in filings;

•

Staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to a filing; and

•

Filers may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.

 *        *        *        *        *

 Celeste M. Murphy, Esq.

 Special Counsel

 November 14, 2005

 Page 3

 If you have any questions or would like further information concerning the
Company’s response to your letters, please do not hesitate to contact me at (410) 659-2741, or William Intner at (410) 659-2778. Thank you for your consideration.

 Sincerely,

/s/    MICHAEL J. SILVER

Michael J. Silver