SEC Comment Letter for NATIONAL WESTMINSTER BANK — Sep 27, 2005
NATIONAL WESTMINSTER BANK PLC /ENG/ (CIK 0000702162)
Date: Sept. 27, 2005 · CIK: 0000702162 · Accession: 0000000000-05-049744
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
File numbers found in text: 001-09266
Show Raw Text
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>LETTER
<SEQUENCE>1
<FILENAME>filename1.txt
<TEXT>
Mail Stop 4561
September 27, 2005
By U.S. Mail and Facsimile to +020 7085-5050
Frederick Inglis Watt
Group Finance Director
National Westminster Bank Plc England
135 Bishopsgate
London, EC2M 3UR
England
Re: National Westminster Bank Plc England
Form 20-F for Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2004
Filed May 9, 2005
File No. 001-09266
Dear Mr. Watt:
We have reviewed your filing and have the following
comments.
Where indicated, we think you should revise your document in
response
to these comments. If you disagree, we will consider your
explanation as to why our comment is inapplicable or a revision is
unnecessary. Please be as detailed as necessary in your
explanation.
In some of our comments, we may ask you to provide us with
information so we may better understand your disclosure. After
reviewing this information, we may raise additional comments.
Please understand that the purpose of our review process is
to
assist you in your compliance with the applicable disclosure
requirements and to enhance the overall disclosure in your filing.
We look forward to working with you in these respects. We welcome
any questions you may have about our comments or any other aspect
of
our review. Feel free to call us at the telephone numbers listed
at
the end of this letter.
Note 50: Significant differences between UK and US generally
accepted
accounting principles
(l) Acceptances, page 127
1. Please tell us the rationale for not including a reconciling
item
for acceptances in the US GAAP reconciliation.
Selected figures in accordance with US GAAP, page 129
2. Please provide us with a rollforward of the US GAAP basis
stockholders` equity using the balances provided in this
reconciliation.
Securitisations, page 131
3. Please tell us how you determined the criteria of paragraph 9
of
SFAS 140 for US GAAP purposes have been met to qualify the
securitization activity for sales treatment. In your response,
please specifically address the fact that under US GAAP the Group
was
determined to be the primary beneficiary of asset securitization
vehicles, as noted on page 132, which would require consolidation
of
such vehicles under US GAAP. If you have determined sales
treatment
has been achieved under paragraph 9 of SFAS 140, please tell us
the
reason for the absence of a reconciling item for this difference
from
UK GAAP was not presented on the reconciliation.
As appropriate, please amend your filing and respond to
these
comments within 10 business days or tell us when you will provide
us
with a response. You may wish to provide us with marked copies of
the amendment to expedite our review. Please furnish a cover
letter
with your amendment that keys your responses to our comments and
provides any requested information. Detailed cover letters
greatly
facilitate our review. Please understand that we may have
additional
comments after reviewing your amendment and responses to our
comments.
We urge all persons who are responsible for the accuracy and
adequacy of the disclosure in the filing to be certain that the
filing includes all information required under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that they have provided all information
investors require for an informed investment decision. Since the
company and its management are in possession of all facts relating
to
a company`s disclosure, they are responsible for the accuracy and
adequacy of the disclosures they have made.
In connection with responding to our comments, please
provide,
in writing, a statement from the company acknowledging that:
* the company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the
disclosure in the filing;
* staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff
comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action
with
respect to the filing; and
* the company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any
proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the
federal securities laws of the United States.
In addition, please be advised that the Division of
Enforcement
has access to all information you provide to the staff of the
Division of Corporation Finance in our review of your filing or in
response to our comments on your filing.
You may contact Margaret Fitzgerald at (202) 551-3556 or me
at
(202) 551-3490 if you have questions regarding comments on the
financial statements and related matters.
Sincerely,
Don Walker
Senior Assistant Chief Accountant
??
??
??
??
Frederick Inglis Watt
National Westminster Bank Plc England
September 27, 2005
Page 1
</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>