SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Comment Letter for NATIONAL MERCANTILE BANCORP (CIK 0000714801) — Dec 23, 2005

NATIONAL MERCANTILE BANCORP (CIK 0000714801)
Date: Dec. 23, 2005 · CIK: 0000714801 · Accession: 0000000000-05-063819

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

File numbers found in text: 001-13015

Referenced dates: November 17, 2005, September 22, 2005

Date
December 21, 2005
Author
Angela Connell
Form
UPLOAD
Company
NATIONAL MERCANTILE BANCORP (CIK 0000714801)

Letter

December 21, 2005 By U.S. Mail and facsimile to (301) 201-0629. David R. Brown Chief Financial Officer National Mercantile Bancorp 1880 Century Park East Los Angeles, CA 90067

Re: National Mercantile Bancorp Form 10-KSB Filed March 31, 2005 File No. 001-13015

Dear Mr. Brown:

We have reviewed your response letter filed with the Commission on December 6, 2005 and have the following additional comments. Please provide us with the requested information so we may better understand your response. Please be as detailed as necessary in your explanation. After reviewing this information, we may or may not raise additional comments.

Please understand that the purpose of our review process is to assist you in your compliance with the applicable disclosure requirements and to enhance the overall disclosure in your filing. We look forward to working with you in these respects. We welcome any questions you may have about our comments or any other aspect of our review. Feel free to call us at the telephone numbers listed at the end of this letter.

Financial Statements

Note 13 - Derivatives, page 63

1. We note your response to our comment letter dated November 17, 2005. Based on your response, and the hedging documentation included in your response to our comment letter dated September 22, 2005, it appears that you are relying on the guidance in paragraph 65 of SFAS 133 in concluding that there is no ineffectiveness in this hedging relationship. We believe that paragraph 65 of SFAS 133 was not meant to suggest that an entity may assume that there is no ineffectiveness when ineffectiveness is definitely present. Since there likely is ineffectiveness in fair value hedges of interest rate exposures because of credit differences between the hedging instrument and the hedged item, please tell us why you believe that your fair value hedges of deferrable interest debentures are eligible for a paragraph 65 hedge assessment method.

2. If your assessment of no hedge ineffectiveness is not based on the guidance in paragraph 65, please advise us as follows:

* Tell us how you came to a conclusion of no ineffectiveness with respect to this hedging relationship. In your response to our November 17, 2005 letter, you indicate that you assess hedge effectiveness by comparing the fair values of the hedged item and the hedging instrument. However, the hedging documentation provided to us in your response to our letter dated September 22, 2005 did not specify a method of assessing effectiveness. Rather, you stated that since the critical terms matched at inception, you would assess the risk of counterparty default on a quarterly basis.

* Clearly explain how you prospectively assess hedge effectiveness and retrospectively measure ineffectiveness for this hedging relationship on an ongoing basis.

* Tell us how you have met the documentation requirements of paragraph 20(a) of SFAS 133 with respect your method of assessing hedge effectiveness.

* * * * *

Please respond to these comments within 10 business days or tell us when you will provide us with a response. Please furnish a cover letter that keys your response to our comments, indicates your intent to include the requested revisions in future filings and provides any requested supplemental information. Please understand that we may have additional comments after reviewing your responses to our comments.

We urge all persons who are responsible for the accuracy and adequacy of the disclosure in the filing reviewed by the staff to be certain that they have provided all information investors require for an informed decision. Since the company and its management are in possession of all facts relating to a company`s disclosure, they are responsible for the accuracy and adequacy of the disclosures they have made.

You may contact Rebekah Moore, Staff Accountant, at (202) 551- 3463 or me at (202) 551-3426 if you have questions.

Sincerely,
Angela Connell
Senior Accountant
??

Show Raw Text
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>LETTER
<SEQUENCE>1
<FILENAME>filename1.txt
<TEXT>

Mail Stop 4561

December 21, 2005

By U.S. Mail and facsimile to (301) 201-0629.

David R. Brown
Chief Financial Officer
National Mercantile Bancorp
1880 Century Park East
Los Angeles, CA 90067

Re:	National Mercantile Bancorp
Form 10-KSB
	Filed March 31, 2005
	File No. 001-13015

Dear Mr. Brown:

      We have reviewed your response letter filed with the
Commission
on December 6, 2005 and have the following additional comments.
Please provide us with the requested information so we may better
understand your response.  Please be as detailed as necessary in
your
explanation.  After reviewing this information, we may or may not
raise additional comments.

	Please understand that the purpose of our review process is
to
assist you in your compliance with the applicable disclosure
requirements and to enhance the overall disclosure in your filing.
We look forward to working with you in these respects.  We welcome
any questions you may have about our comments or any other aspect
of
our review.  Feel free to call us at the telephone numbers listed
at
the end of this letter.

Financial Statements

Note 13 - Derivatives, page 63

1. We note your response to our comment letter dated November 17,
2005.  Based on your response, and the hedging documentation
included
in your response to our comment letter dated September 22, 2005,
it
appears that you are relying on the guidance in paragraph 65 of
SFAS
133 in concluding that there is no ineffectiveness in this hedging
relationship. We believe that paragraph 65 of SFAS 133 was not
meant
to suggest that an entity may assume that there is no
ineffectiveness
when ineffectiveness is definitely present.  Since there likely is
ineffectiveness in fair value hedges of interest rate exposures
because of credit differences between the hedging instrument and
the
hedged item, please tell us why you believe that your fair value
hedges of deferrable interest debentures are eligible for a
paragraph
65 hedge assessment method.

2. If your assessment of no hedge ineffectiveness is not based on
the
guidance in paragraph 65, please advise us as follows:

* Tell us how you came to a conclusion of no ineffectiveness with
respect to this hedging relationship.  In your response to our
November 17, 2005 letter, you indicate that you assess hedge
effectiveness by comparing the fair values of the hedged item and
the
hedging instrument.  However, the hedging documentation provided
to
us in your response to our letter dated September 22, 2005 did not
specify a method of assessing effectiveness.  Rather, you stated
that
since the critical terms matched at inception, you would assess
the
risk of counterparty default on a quarterly basis.

* Clearly explain how you prospectively assess hedge effectiveness
and retrospectively measure ineffectiveness for this hedging
relationship on an ongoing basis.

* Tell us how you have met the documentation requirements of
paragraph 20(a) of SFAS 133 with respect your method of assessing
hedge effectiveness.

* * * * *

      Please respond to these comments within 10 business days or
tell us when you will provide us with a response.  Please furnish
a
cover letter that keys your response to our comments, indicates
your
intent to include the requested revisions in future filings and
provides any requested supplemental information.  Please
understand
that we may have additional comments after reviewing your
responses
to our comments.

	We urge all persons who are responsible for the accuracy and
adequacy of the disclosure in the filing reviewed by the staff to
be
certain that they have provided all information investors require
for
an informed decision.  Since the company and its management are in
possession of all facts relating to a company`s disclosure, they
are
responsible for the accuracy and adequacy of the disclosures they
have made.

      You may contact Rebekah Moore, Staff Accountant, at (202)
551-
3463 or me at (202) 551-3426 if you have questions.

Sincerely,

Angela Connell
Senior Accountant
??

??

??

??

David R. Brown
National Mercantile Bancorp
December 21, 2005
Page 3

</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>