SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Company Response from CALYPSO WIRELESS INC (CIK 0000719729) — Sep 19, 2005

CALYPSO WIRELESS INC (CIK 0000719729)
Date: Sept. 19, 2005 · CIK: 0000719729 · Accession: 0001295345-05-000031

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Date
September 19, 2005
Author
/s/ Cheryl Dotson
Form
CORRESP
Company
CALYPSO WIRELESS INC (CIK 0000719729)

Letter

Attention: Mr. Al Rodriguez RE: Calypso Wireless, Inc. Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 File No. 01-08497

Dear Mr. Rodriguez:

This revised letter supplements the additional correspondence transmitted on September 15, 2005 and is in response to the staff’s letter to Calypso Wireless, Inc. dated June 13, 2005. We will also submit via EDGAR the amended Form 10-KSB for 2004 and the Form 10-QSB for the first quarter of 2005 in response to the staff’s letter following our receipt of the staff’s further comments.

FORM 10-KSB FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004

Response 1

In response to the comment concerning our auditor's consideration given to AU Section 341, our auditor provided us with the following letter concerning consideration given to AU Section 341:

Re: Calypso Wireless, Inc.

Dear Mr. Rodriguez:

This letter is in response to comment number 1 to your letter of comments on your review of Calypso Wireless, Inc. (the "Company") Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 and Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005.

At April 15, 2005, we evaluated the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern as of December 31, 2004. As a part of our evaluation, we asked the Company to provide us with an operating cash budget (semi-fixed operating expenses) for the year ending December 31, 2005. Based on the operating cash budget, we noted that the Company estimated the cash requirements to be approximately $2,000,000 (excluding the cost to produce the telephones). We noted that the Company had available cash of $36,000 at December 31, 2004, had received $1,000,000 of equity financing from January 1, 2005 through April 15, 2005, and had outstanding signed commitment agreements for additional equity financing in the amount of $2,000,000 from a funding source who had successfully completed equity financing for the Company over the last two years. The funds received plus the outstanding commitments would provide the Company with $3,000,000 in equity financing for the 2005 year. We compared the $3,000,000 in equity funding to the operating cash requirements, considered the history of the Company, its ability to cut costs if necessary, and concluded that the Company had the ability to continue as a going concern.

In concluding that the Company had the ability to continue as a going concern, we only considered the semi-fixed operating cash requirements of approximately $2,000,000 because the cost of actually producing the telephones are variable costs that would be funded by the letters of credit that would accompany any purchase orders received by the Company. Therefore, we concluded that the Company had and still has the ability to continue in existence through December 31, 2005. However, based on your concerns and to take the conservative approach, we have encouraged the Company to add a note to the consolidated financial statements disclosing the Company’s current operating status and a need for additional equity and/or debt financing to allow the Company the ability to fund the cash operating plans and production of the telephones (see revised note 10 to the financial statements).

We performed a subsequent review of the Company’s financial status as of August 1, 2005 and noted that the Company actually collected $1,050,000 of the $2,000,000 commitments for the equity funding that was disclosed in note 10 to the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2004. In addition to the outstanding commitment of $950,000 ($2,000,000 less $1,050,000) at August 1, 2005, the Company has received two additional commitments to raise (on a "best effort basis") $5,000,000.

Based on our subsequent review, we still consider the Company to have the ability to continue as a going concern through December 31, 2005.

If you should have any additional questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 713-272-8500.

Sincerely,

/s/ Everett R. Bassie

Response 2

In response to this comment regarding management's plan for the overcoming its financial difficulties, the Company has prepared and we shall file an amendment to the Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 and will include a new note 12, "Operational Status" and expand disclosure under Liquidity and Capital Resources.

With regard to the observation in comment 1 that the Company requires approximately $7 million to complete the manufacturing process and begin shipment of the products, as disclosed in our Form 10-KSB for 2004, we will clarify that $1.5 million is needed to fund its 2005 annual operating budget and $2.5 million for investment in manufacturing set-up, molds and tooling, intellectual property protection in foreign markets and initial sales and marketing efforts. If we are successful in negotiating new orders for the sale of our products, we expect to experience working capital requirements related to the financing of receivables and inventory. Because we expect to receive letters-of-credit securing purchases by our customers, and favorable terms from suppliers, we believe our total requirement for working capital financing will not exceed $3 million during the year 2005. Financing of this type can generally be obtained, using the accounts receivable and inventory as collateral, however there is no assurance that such financing can be arranged. Further, the Company expects to begin shipping its products during the fourth quarter of 2005.

In addition, we have expanded disclosure in a new note 12 "Operational Status" that shall be included in the Form 10-KSB amendment as follows:

Note 12. Operational Status

The Company is a development stage corporation. Successful development and marketing of the Company’s products and the procurement of additional financing is necessary for the Company to continue as a going concern.

The Company signed investment banking agreements with three investment banking firms to assist the Company with raising additional capital.

In view of these matters, realization of a major portion of the assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet is dependent upon continued operations of the Company and the success of raising additional capital through debt and/or equity financing. Management believes that actions presently being taken to obtain additional equity financing will provide the opportunity for the Company to continue as a going concern.

Response 3

We have revised the disclosure in Item 8A Controls and Procedures to disclose that our controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2004. The Form 10-KSB amendment will provide as follows:

Item 8A. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.

The Company's former chief executive officer and former chief financial officer conducted an evaluation regarding the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act. Based upon the evaluation of these controls and procedures, our former chief executive officer and former chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2004. The Company is undertaking to establish disclosure controls and procedures that are compliant with procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act.

Changes in internal controls.

During the period covered by this report, no changes occurred in our internal control over financial reporting that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. However, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was not compliant with the procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act.

The Company has acted to improve, and will continue to strengthen certain corporate governance procedures and certain disclosure controls and procedures. As part of this commitment, our new Chief Financial Officer, working with the Chief Executive Officer and the Board of Directors have initiated a number of steps, including those in response to the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 and corresponding SEC requirements. Specific action taken or planned by us includes the following:

We are conducting a comprehensive review of the adequacy of our policies and procedures with respect to the administration of our equity compensation plans (including stock grants, stock option and warrant plans) and purchases and sales of our securities.

We are implementing a Section 16 reporting program for officers, directors and 10% beneficial owners to advise those persons of their reporting responsibilities and to make arrangements for filing timely reports in the event a reportable transaction occurs.

Our new Chief Executive Officer and new Chief Financial Officer are carrying out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-14 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Based upon the steps outlined in the preceding paragraph, our new Chief Executive Officer and new Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2004 and the restatements to the financial statements for the 2002, 2003 and 2004 fiscal years are reflected in this filing. Further, new procedures and controls are being implemented to insure that material information relating to us and our consolidated subsidiary will be made known in a timely manner as required to include such information in the Company's periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission."

Response 4

In accordance with SFAS 86, the Company expensed as research and development costs, all costs associated with establishing the technological feasibility of the software. Technological feasibility was demonstrated in the first quarter of 1999. Attached is a summary of expenditures capitalized as software development costs and reflecting the adjustments for amortization being recognized with this restatement. With the granting of the patent in January 2004 and the completion of the phone in early 2005, the Company established a policy to amortize the December 31, 2004 balance over a three year period beginning in 2004. Effective January 1, 2005, all costs associated with the development of the phones, which were completed in early 2005, will be expended as incurred. In 2004, the amortization amounted to $1,552,698. SOP 98-1 deals with software developed for internal use. Because the software of the Company was developed for sale, either as a component of phones sold by the Company, or in the form of license agreements, which will permit other manufacturers to incorporate the Calypso ASNAP(TM) technology into their products, we believe that SOP98-1 does not apply.

Note 4. Software Development Costs

Software development costs represent capitalized costs incurred in the development of the cellular phones and telecommunications infrastructure software. The Company began capitalizing this cost once technological feasibility had been established during the first quarter of 1999. All costs incurred prior to establishment of technological feasibility were expensed as research and development expenses. The Company will begin amortizing this cost once the products are available for general release to customers. See note 9 for restatement of amounts reported as software development costs in 2003 and 2002. Effective December 31, 2004, the Company began amortizing the December 31, 2004 balance of software development costs over a three-year period, beginning on January 1, 2004. For the year ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, amortization expense for software development cost was $1,552,698 and $0, respectively. Effective January 1, 2005, Company is no longer capitalizing software development costs.

Note 11. Subsequent Restatements will provide as follows:

(11) Subsequent Restatements

The December 31, 2004 and 2003 financial statements have been restated to correct for the unrecorded liabilities related to non-employee stock based compensation, and the amortization of software development costs. The prior period adjustments to present the correction of errors are as follows:

247:

As Previously

As Restated

As Previously

As Restated

Reported

Reported

December 31:

Net software development costs $ 4,718,238

3,105,399

-

-

Other assets

54,310

114,451

-

-

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

557,263

2,880,691

273,497

1,240,443

Deficit accumulated during the development stage

(16,475,915)

(19,974,040)

(8,473,464)

(9,079,910)

Total stockholders' equity

5,171,519

1,295,394

9,055,140

8,088,194

For the years ended December 31:

General and administrative expenses $ 4,247,065

5,586,046

2,427,133

3,033,579

Depreciation and amortization

59,118

1,611,816

-

-

Net loss

(8,002,451)

(10,894,130)

(3,202,702)

(3,809,148)

Basic loss per share

(0.07)

(0.10)

(0.03)

(0.04)

410:

Response 5

We will undertake to incorporate the staff’s comments and corresponding disclosure in the Company’s Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 as soon as we receive the additional comments from the staff that you indicated were forthcoming, as well as any comments related to this letter.

We are continuing to evaluate the Company’s prior disclosures and will notify you immediately in there are any other adjustments necessary. Further, we acknowledge that:

-the Company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of disclosures in its filings;

-staff comments or changes to disclosures do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filings; and

-the Company may not assert Staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.

If you should have any additional comments, please do not hesitate to call me at 713-952-7300.

Sincerely,
/s/ Cheryl Dotson

Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm

CLYW

CALYPSO WIRELESS, INC.

5753 N.W. 158th Street

Miami Lakes, Florida 33014

September 19, 2005

U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission

450 Fifth Street, NW

Washington, DC 20549

Attention: Mr. Al Rodriguez

RE: Calypso Wireless, Inc.

Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004

Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005

File No. 01-08497

Dear Mr. Rodriguez:

This revised letter supplements the additional correspondence
transmitted on September 15, 2005 and is in response to the staff’s letter to Calypso
Wireless, Inc. dated June 13, 2005. We will also submit via EDGAR the amended Form 10-KSB
for 2004 and the Form 10-QSB for the first quarter of 2005 in response to the staff’s
letter following our receipt of the staff’s further comments.

FORM 10-KSB FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004

Response 1

In response to the comment concerning our auditor's consideration given
to AU Section 341, our auditor provided us with the following letter concerning
consideration given to AU Section 341:

        Re: Calypso Wireless, Inc.

Dear Mr. Rodriguez:

This letter is in response to comment number 1 to your letter of
comments on your review of Calypso Wireless, Inc. (the "Company") Form 10-KSB
for the year ended December 31, 2004 and Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005.

At April 15, 2005, we evaluated the Company’s ability to continue
as a going concern as of December 31, 2004. As a part of our evaluation, we asked the
Company to provide us with an operating cash budget (semi-fixed operating expenses) for
the year ending December 31, 2005. Based on the operating cash budget, we noted that the
Company estimated the cash requirements to be approximately $2,000,000 (excluding the cost
to produce the telephones). We noted that the Company had available cash of $36,000 at
December 31, 2004, had received $1,000,000 of equity financing from January 1, 2005
through April 15, 2005, and had outstanding signed commitment agreements for additional
equity financing in the amount of $2,000,000 from a funding source who had successfully
completed equity financing for the Company over the last two years. The funds received
plus the outstanding commitments would provide the Company with $3,000,000 in equity
financing for the 2005 year. We compared the $3,000,000 in equity funding to the operating
cash requirements, considered the history of the Company, its ability to cut costs if
necessary, and concluded that the Company had the ability to continue as a going concern.

In concluding that the Company had the ability to continue as a going
concern, we only considered the semi-fixed operating cash requirements of approximately
$2,000,000 because the cost of actually producing the telephones are variable costs that
would be funded by the letters of credit that would accompany any purchase orders received
by the Company. Therefore, we concluded that the Company had and still has the ability to
continue in existence through December 31, 2005. However, based on your concerns and to
take the conservative approach, we have encouraged the Company to add a note to the
consolidated financial statements disclosing the Company’s current operating status
and a need for additional equity and/or debt financing to allow the Company the ability to
fund the cash operating plans and production of the telephones (see revised note 10 to the
financial statements).

We performed a subsequent review of the Company’s financial status
as of August 1, 2005 and noted that the Company actually collected $1,050,000 of the
$2,000,000 commitments for the equity funding that was disclosed in note 10 to the
financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2004. In addition to the outstanding
commitment of $950,000 ($2,000,000 less $1,050,000) at August 1, 2005, the Company has
received two additional commitments to raise (on a "best effort basis")
$5,000,000.

Based on our subsequent review, we still consider the Company to have
the ability to continue as a going concern through December 31, 2005.

If you should have any additional questions, please do not hesitate to call me at
713-272-8500.

Sincerely,

/s/ Everett R. Bassie

Response 2

In response to this comment regarding management's plan for the
overcoming its financial difficulties, the Company has prepared and we shall file an
amendment to the Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 and will include a new
note 12, "Operational Status" and expand disclosure under Liquidity and Capital
Resources.

With regard to the observation in comment 1 that the Company requires
approximately $7 million to complete the manufacturing process and begin shipment of the
products, as disclosed in our Form 10-KSB for 2004, we will clarify that $1.5 million is
needed to fund its 2005 annual operating budget and $2.5 million for investment in
manufacturing set-up, molds and tooling, intellectual property protection in foreign
markets and initial sales and marketing efforts. If we are successful in negotiating new
orders for the sale of our products, we expect to experience working capital requirements
related to the financing of receivables and inventory. Because we expect to receive
letters-of-credit securing purchases by our customers, and favorable terms from suppliers,
we believe our total requirement for working capital financing will not exceed $3 million
during the year 2005. Financing of this type can generally be obtained, using the accounts
receivable and inventory as collateral, however there is no assurance that such financing
can be arranged. Further, the Company expects to begin shipping its products during the
fourth quarter of 2005.

In addition, we have expanded disclosure in a new note 12 "Operational
Status" that shall be included in the Form 10-KSB amendment as follows:

Note 12. Operational Status

The Company is a development stage corporation. Successful development
and marketing of the Company’s products and the procurement of additional financing
is necessary for the Company to continue as a going concern.

The Company signed investment banking agreements with three investment
banking firms to assist the Company with raising additional capital.

In view of these matters, realization of a major portion of the assets
in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet is dependent upon continued operations of
the Company and the success of raising additional capital through debt and/or equity
financing. Management believes that actions presently being taken to obtain additional
equity financing will provide the opportunity for the Company to continue as a going
concern.

Response 3

We have revised the disclosure in Item 8A Controls and Procedures to
disclose that our controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2004. The
Form 10-KSB amendment will provide as follows:

Item 8A. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.

The Company's former chief executive officer and former chief financial
officer conducted an evaluation regarding the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the Exchange
Act. Based upon the evaluation of these controls and procedures, our former chief
executive officer and former chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure
controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2004. The Company is
undertaking to establish disclosure controls and procedures that are compliant with
procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act.

Changes in internal controls.

During the period covered by this report, no changes occurred in our
internal control over financial reporting that materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. However, the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting was not compliant with the
procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act.

The Company has acted to improve, and will continue to strengthen
certain corporate governance procedures and certain disclosure controls and procedures. As
part of this commitment, our new Chief Financial Officer, working with the Chief Executive
Officer and the Board of Directors have initiated a number of steps, including those in
response to the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 and corresponding SEC requirements. Specific
action taken or planned by us includes the following:

We are conducting a comprehensive review of the adequacy of our
policies and procedures with respect to the administration of our equity compensation
plans (including stock grants, stock option and warrant plans) and purchases and sales of
our securities.

We are implementing a Section 16 reporting program for officers,
directors and 10% beneficial owners to advise those persons of their reporting
responsibilities and to make arrangements for filing timely reports in the event a
reportable transaction occurs.

Our new Chief Executive Officer and new Chief Financial Officer are
carrying out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-14 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Based upon the steps outlined in the preceding paragraph, our new Chief Executive Officer
and new Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and
procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2004 and the restatements to the
financial statements for the 2002, 2003 and 2004 fiscal years are reflected in this
filing. Further, new procedures and controls are being implemented to insure that material
information relating to us and our consolidated subsidiary will be made known in a timely
manner as required to include such information in the Company's periodic filings with the
Securities and Exchange Commission."

Response 4

In accordance with SFAS 86, the Company expensed as research and
development costs, all costs associated with establishing the technological feasibility of
the software. Technological feasibility was demonstrated in the first quarter of 1999.
Attached is a summary of expenditures capitalized as software development costs and
reflecting the adjustments for amortization being recognized with this restatement. With
the granting of the patent in January 2004 and the completion of the phone in early 2005,
the Company established a policy to amortize the December 31, 2004 balance over a three
year period beginning in 2004. Effective January 1, 2005, all costs associated with the
development of the phones, which were completed in early 2005, will be expended as
incurred. In 2004, the amortization amounted to $1,552,698. SOP 98-1 deals with software
developed for internal use. Because the software of the Company was developed for sale,
either as a component of phones sold by the Company, or in the form of license agreements,
which will permit other manufacturers to incorporate the Calypso ASNAP(TM) technology
into their products, we believe that SOP98-1 does not apply.

Note 4. Software Development Costs

Software development costs represent capitalized costs incurred in the
development of the cellular phones and telecommunications infrastructure software. The
Company began capitalizing this cost once technological feasibility had been established
during the first quarter of 1999. All costs incurred prior to establishment of
technological feasibility were expensed as research and development expenses. The Company
will begin amortizing this cost once the products are available for general release to
customers. See note 9 for restatement of amounts reported as software development costs in
2003 and 2002. Effective December 31, 2004, the Company began amortizing the December 31,
2004 balance of software development costs over a three-year period, beginning on January
1, 2004. For the year ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, amortization expense for software
development cost was $1,552,698 and $0, respectively. Effective January 1, 2005, Company
is no longer capitalizing software development costs.

Note 11. Subsequent Restatements will provide as follows:

(11) Subsequent Restatements

The December 31, 2004 and 2003 financial statements have been restated
to correct for the unrecorded liabilities related to non-employee stock based
compensation, and the amortization of software development costs. The prior period
adjustments to present the correction of errors are as follows:

247:

    2004

    2003

    As Previously

    As Restated

    As Previously

    As Restated

    Reported

    Reported

    December 31:

    Net software development costs
    $
    4,718,238

    3,105,399

    -

    -

    Other assets

    54,310

    114,451

    -

    -

    Accounts payable and accrued expenses

    557,263

    2,880,691

    273,497

    1,240,443

    Deficit accumulated during the development
    stage

    (16,475,915)

    (19,974,040)

    (8,473,464)

    (9,079,910)

    Total stockholders' equity

    5,171,519

    1,295,394

    9,055,140

    8,088,194

    For the years ended December 31:

    General and administrative expenses
    $
    4,247,065

    5,586,046

    2,427,133

    3,033,579

    Depreciation and amortization

    59,118

    1,611,816

    -

    -

    Net loss

    (8,002,451)

    (10,894,130)

    (3,202,702)

    (3,809,148)

    Basic loss per share

    (0.07)

    (0.10)

    (0.03)

    (0.04)

410:

Response 5

We will undertake to incorporate the staff’s comments and
corresponding disclosure in the Company’s Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31,
2005 as soon as we receive the additional comments from the staff that you indicated were
forthcoming, as well as any comments related to this letter.

We are continuing to evaluate the Company’s prior disclosures and
will notify you immediately in there are any other adjustments necessary. Further, we
acknowledge that:

    -the Company is responsible for the adequacy and
accuracy of disclosures in its filings;

    -staff comments or changes to disclosures do not
foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filings; and

    -the Company may not assert Staff comments as a
defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal
securities laws of the United States.

If you should have any additional comments, please do not hesitate to
call me at 713-952-7300.

Sincerely,

/s/ Cheryl Dotson

Cheryl Dotson

Chief Financial Officer