SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Company Response from NOBEL LEARNING COMMUNITIES INC (CIK 0000721237) — Jun 27, 2005

NOBEL LEARNING COMMUNITIES INC (CIK 0000721237)
Date: June 27, 2005 · CIK: 0000721237 · Accession: 0001193125-05-131591

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

File numbers found in text: 000-27024

Referenced dates: February 25, 2005

Date
June 24, 2005
Author
Thomas Frank
Form
CORRESP
Company
NOBEL LEARNING COMMUNITIES INC (CIK 0000721237)

Letter

Correspondence Letter

June 24, 2005

Via EDGAR

Via Facsimile

United States Securities and Exchange

Commission

Division of Corporation Finance

100 F Street, NE

Washington, D.C. 20549-5546

Attention: Larry Spirgel, Assistant Director

Re: Nobel Learning Communities, Inc.

Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 3, 2004

Filed September 15, 2004

Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 1, 2005

File No. 000-27024

Filed February 9, 2005

Ladies and Gentlemen:

This letter is written to address a question raised by the Staff in our last telephone conversation of June 3, 2005, regarding the amount of goodwill impairment to Nobel Learning Communities, Inc. (“NLCI”) applying two different reporting unit bases. Specifically, the Staff asked whether NLCI could represent that the difference, if any, in the goodwill impairment using 17 reporting units (based on NLCI’s districts) when compared to the goodwill impairment using 10 reporting units would not be material.

Based on the goodwill impairment analysis performed on a 17 reporting units basis, NLCI hereby represents that the estimated difference to the goodwill impairment would not be material to the financial statements for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2003 and July 3, 2004. The analysis shows differences of approximately $283,000, additional impairment, and $84,000, reduced impairment, for fiscal 2003 and 2004 respectively (net $199,000). The analysis was performed using consistently applied discounted cash flows, discount rates and net assets as in the 10 reporting unit analysis. NLCI’s analysis has been reviewed with our outside auditors, BDO Seidman, who has concurred that the difference would not be material.

NLCI believes it has addressed and responded to the comments in the original comment letter dated February 25, 2005. We appreciate the Staff’s time and effort in connection with this process.

Please contact me at (484) 947-2030 or NLCI’s outside counsel, Richard P. Jaffe, at (215) 864-8901 with any further questions. Thank you.

Sincerely,
Thomas Frank

Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm

Correspondence Letter

 June 24, 2005

 Via EDGAR

 Via Facsimile

 United States Securities and Exchange

 Commission

 Division of Corporation Finance

 100 F Street, NE

 Washington, D.C. 20549-5546

 Attention: Larry Spirgel, Assistant Director

Re:
Nobel Learning Communities, Inc.

Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 3, 2004

Filed September 15, 2004

Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 1, 2005

File No. 000-27024

Filed February 9, 2005

 Ladies and Gentlemen:

 This letter is written
to address a question raised by the Staff in our last telephone conversation of June 3, 2005, regarding the amount of goodwill impairment to Nobel Learning Communities, Inc. (“NLCI”) applying two different reporting unit bases.
Specifically, the Staff asked whether NLCI could represent that the difference, if any, in the goodwill impairment using 17 reporting units (based on NLCI’s districts) when compared to the goodwill impairment using 10 reporting units would not
be material.

 Based on the goodwill impairment analysis performed on a 17
reporting units basis, NLCI hereby represents that the estimated difference to the goodwill impairment would not be material to the financial statements for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2003 and July 3, 2004. The analysis shows differences of
approximately $283,000, additional impairment, and $84,000, reduced impairment, for fiscal 2003 and 2004 respectively (net $199,000). The analysis was performed using consistently applied discounted cash flows, discount rates and net assets as in
the 10 reporting unit analysis. NLCI’s analysis has been reviewed with our outside auditors, BDO Seidman, who has concurred that the difference would not be material.

 NLCI believes it has addressed and responded to the comments in the original comment letter dated February 25, 2005. We appreciate the
Staff’s time and effort in connection with this process.

 Please contact
me at (484) 947-2030 or NLCI’s outside counsel, Richard P. Jaffe, at (215) 864-8901 with any further questions. Thank you.

 Sincerely,

 Thomas Frank

 Chief Financial Officer

 Nobel Learning Communities, Inc.

cc:
Adam Washecka

Kathy Herman

Richard P. Jaffe

Wendy Hambleton