SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Company Response from Smart Powerr Corp. (CREG) (CIK 0000721693) (CREG) — May 30, 2014

Smart Powerr Corp. (CREG) (CIK 0000721693)
Date: May 30, 2014 · CIK: 0000721693 · Accession: 0001144204-14-034524

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Sentiment
Urgency
Document Type
Confidence
SEC Posture
Company Posture

Summary

Reasoning

File numbers found in text: 333-194470

Referenced dates: April 3, 2014

Date
May 30, 2014
Author
/s/ Thomas Wardell, Esq.
Form
CORRESP
Company
Smart Powerr Corp. (CREG) (CIK 0000721693)

Letter

Via EDGAR United States Securities and Exchange Commission Division of Corporation Finance Re: China Recycling Energy Corporation Registration Statement on Form S-3 Filed March 10, 2014 File No. 333-194470

Dear Ms. Ransom:

On behalf of our client, China Recycling Energy Corporation (“CREG” or the “Company” and sometimes referred to as “we” or “our”), this firm is filing a response to the SEC Comment Letter, dated May 7, 2014, in connection with complying with the issues and outstanding disclosure items set forth therein. For convenience of reference, we have included, in this response letter, the same caption and paragraph number, as well as the text of the comment, set forth in your May 7, 2014 comment letter followed by our response.

General

Comment 1: We note your response to comment 1 in our letter dated April 3, 2014. The issues raised in such comment apply to the lease agreement filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Form 8-K filed on September 16, 2014, as well. Please advise

Response:

The Company also confirms that Pucheng Xin Heng Yuan Biomass Power Generation Corporation signed the Biomass Power Generation Project Lease Agreement on September 11, 2013.

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

May 30, 2014

Page 2

Exhibit 5.1 – Opinion of McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP

Comment 2: We note your response to comment 3 in our letter dated April 3, 2014, including your belief that the language that the opinion “is provided for use solely in connection with the resale of the Common Stock covered by the Registrant Statement” should be interpreted as allowing investors to rely on Counsel’s opinion. While this language appears to appropriately limit the purpose for which the opinion may be used, it does not appear to speak as to a person or a class of persons. However, the language that the opinion “may not be furnished to, quoted from or relied upon by any other person, firm or corporation” appears to inappropriately limit the persons that may rely on the opinion to the addressee of the opinion (your board of directors). Accordingly, we re-issue this comment.

Response:

We will revise and replace the sentence “This opinion letter is provided for use solely in connection with the resale of the Common Stock covered by the Registration Statement may not be furnished to, quoted from or relied upon by any other person, firm, or corporation without our express written consent.” with a new sentence (italicized font reflects new proposed insert) that “This opinion letter is provided for use solely in connection with the resale of the Common Stock covered by the Registration Statement, and except for its use in connection with such resale may not be furnished to, quoted from or relied upon by any other person, firm, or corporation without our express written consent.”

If you have any further comments or require any further information or if any questions should arise in connection with this submission, please call me at (404) 527-4990, Derek Swanson at (404) 527-4037 or Jeffrey Li at (202) 496-7443.

Very truly
yours,
/s/ Thomas Wardell, Esq.

Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm

        Albany

        Atlanta

        Brussels

        Denver

        Los Angeles

        Miami

        New York

        Thomas
        Wardell

        404.527.4990

        mckennalong.com

        Northern Virginia

        Orange County

        Rancho Santa Fe

        San Diego

        San Francisco

        Seoul

        Washington, DC

        email
        address

        twardell@mckennalong.com

May 30, 2014

Via EDGAR

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Division of Corporation Finance

100 F Street, NE

Washington, D.C. 20549-0405

 Attn: Mara Ransom, Assistant Director

Lilyanna Peyser, Legal Branch Chief

Scott M. Anderegg

 Re: China Recycling Energy Corporation

Registration Statement on Form S-3

  Filed March 10, 2014

File No. 333-194470

Dear Ms. Ransom:

On behalf of our
client, China Recycling Energy Corporation (“CREG” or the “Company” and sometimes referred to as “we”
or “our”), this firm is filing a response to the SEC Comment Letter, dated May 7, 2014, in connection with complying
with the issues and outstanding disclosure items set forth therein. For convenience of reference, we have included, in this response
letter, the same caption and paragraph number, as well as the text of the comment, set forth in your May 7, 2014 comment letter
followed by our response.

General

Comment
1:	We note your response to comment 1 in our letter dated April 3, 2014. The issues raised in such comment apply
to the lease agreement filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Form 8-K filed on September 16, 2014, as well. Please advise

Response:

The
Company also confirms that Pucheng Xin Heng Yuan Biomass Power Generation Corporation
signed the Biomass Power Generation Project Lease Agreement on September 11, 2013.

United States Securities and Exchange
Commission

May 30, 2014

Page 2

Exhibit 5.1 – Opinion of McKenna Long &
Aldridge LLP

 Comment 2: We note your response to comment 3 in our letter dated
April 3, 2014, including your belief that the language that the opinion “is provided for use solely in connection with the
resale of the Common Stock covered by the Registrant Statement” should be interpreted as allowing investors to rely on Counsel’s
opinion. While this language appears to appropriately limit the purpose for which the opinion may be used, it does not appear
to speak as to a person or a class of persons. However, the language that the opinion “may not be furnished to, quoted from
or relied upon by any other person, firm or corporation” appears to inappropriately limit the persons that may rely on the
opinion to the addressee of the opinion (your board of directors). Accordingly, we re-issue this comment.

Response:

We will revise and
replace the sentence “This opinion letter is provided for use solely in connection with the resale of the Common Stock covered
by the Registration Statement may not be furnished to, quoted from or relied upon by any other person, firm, or corporation without
our express written consent.” with a new sentence (italicized font reflects new proposed insert) that “This opinion
letter is provided for use solely in connection with the resale of the Common Stock covered by the Registration Statement, and
except for its use in connection with such resale  may not be furnished to, quoted from or relied upon by any other
person, firm, or corporation without our express written consent.”

If you have any further
comments or require any further information or if any questions should arise in connection with this submission, please call me
at (404) 527-4990, Derek Swanson at (404) 527-4037 or Jeffrey Li at (202) 496-7443.

    Very truly
    yours,

    /s/ Thomas Wardell, Esq.

    Thomas Wardell, Esq.

 cc: David Chong, CFO, China Recycling Energy Corp.

Jeffrey Li, Esq.

Derek Swanson, Esq.