SEC Comment Letter for RPC INC (RES) (CIK 0000742278) (RES) — Apr 7, 2017
RPC INC (RES) (CIK 0000742278)
Date: April 7, 2017 · CIK: 0000742278 · Accession: 0000000000-17-012056
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
Referenced dates: January 12, 2017
Show Raw Text
Mail Stop 4628 April 7 , 201 7 Via E -mail Ben M. Palmer Chief Financial Officer RPC, Inc. 2801 Buford Highway, Suite 520 Atlanta, Georgia 30329 Re: RPC, Inc. Form 10 -K for Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2015 Filed February 29, 2016 Form 10 -K for Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 201 6 Filed February 2 8, 201 7 Supplemental Response dated February 15 , 2017 File No. 1 -08726 Dear Mr. Palmer : We have reviewed your February 15 , 2017 response to our comment letter and have the following comments. In some of our comments , we may ask you to provide us with information so we may better understand your disclosure. Please respond to these comments within ten busine ss days by providing the requested information or advis e us as soon as possible when you will respond. If you do not believe our comments apply to your facts and circumstances, please tell us why in your response. After reviewing your response to these comments, we may have additional comments. Unless we note otherwise, our references to prior comments are to comments in our February 3 , 2017 letter . Ben M. Palmer RPC, Inc. April 7 , 2017 Page 2 Form 10 -K for Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2016 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, page 41 Note 5: Income Taxes, page 50 1. You have identified “basis differences in variable interest entities” as a component of your deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2016 and 2015. However, it does not appear that disclosure in other sections of your filing identifies or addresses this variable interest entity. Tell us about this entity, describe the nature of your interest, and explain your application of the guidance per FASB ASC 810. Note 12: Business Segment Information, page 62 2. We note your response to prior comment 1. Please provide additional detail regarding each legal entity grouping (“LEG”) to address the following: Clarify whether the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) is provided with or reviews financial data that includes any sub -categories within each LEG. For example, describe how your Technical Services and Support Services segments within each LEG are addressed as part of discussions between the general managers and the COD M regarding variances of budget to actual results ; Describe the extent to which general managers have decision making authority considering that, although the CODM has the authority to make final decisions, he relies on the general managers to execute h is strategic directives; and Tell us about the structure of your process for entering into service contracts (e.g., whether customers typically enter into contracts with each LEG separately). 3. Your letter dated January 12, 2017 states that the CODM does n ot make resource allocation decisions on any individual service line without considering all of the services offered in the specific operating segment since the service lines are closely aligned and managed. Clarify the manner in which your individual ser vice lines and operating segments are considered by the CODM and the general managers when resource allocation decisions are made considering that your organizational and management structure appears to be based on LEGs. 4. The response to comment 1 in your letter dated January 12, 2017 states that the CODM relies on the general managers to execute his strategic directives based on his review at the Technical Services and Support Services level. This response also states that the general managers are respons ible for both the Technical Services and Support Services Ben M. Palmer RPC, Inc. April 7 , 2017 Page 3 operating activities within their LEGs. Tell us how directives are made from the CODM to the general managers, the level at which these directives are made (e.g., at the Technical Services or Suppo rt Services level within the respective LEG) , and how the general managers consider the Technical Services and Support Services operating activities in executing these directives . In addition, tell us more about the manner in which the general managers di scuss the various growth opportunities, risks, and operational issues facing each operating segment with the CODM considering that their areas of responsibility are based on the LEGs. 5. We note that t he CODM makes resource allocation decisions based on your operating segments. Explain the request and approval process within each LEG for the allocation of capital between Technical Services and Support Services and tell us whether the CODM ever further allocates resources to a specific LEG. 6. You describe the service line financial information included in the monthly reporting package provided to the CODM as secondary in your letter dated January 12, 2017 . Tell us more about how the CODM uses service lin e revenue and gross profit information along with budget to actual data. In addition, clarify whether the monthly discussions of budget to actual variances include discussions at the service line level. You may contact Wei Lu, Staff Accountant, at (202) 551 -3725 or me at (202) 551 -3311 with any questions. Sincerely, /s/ Ethan Horowitz Ethan Horowitz Accounting Branch Chief Office of Natural Resources