SEC Company Response from LESCO — Jul 15, 2005
LESCO INC/OH (CIK 0000745394)
Date: July 15, 2005 · CIK: 0000745394 · Accession: 0000950152-05-005948
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
Show Raw Text
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>CORRESP
<SEQUENCE>1
<FILENAME>filename1.txt
<TEXT>
<PAGE>
LESCO, Inc.
1301 East 9th Street, Suite 1300
Cleveland, Ohio 44114
July 15, 2005
VIA EDGAR CORRESPONDENCE
Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20549
Attention: Michael Moran, Branch Chief
Division of Corporation Finance
Re: LESCO, Inc. (the "Company")
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004
File No. 0-13147
Dear Mr. Moran:
This letter responds to the comment letter from the staff of the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission"), dated June 16, 2005, in
response to the Company's letter, dated May 31, 2005, responding to the
Commission's initial comment letter concerning the Company's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. For the convenience of the
staff, we have repeated the text of the staff's comments, followed by the
Company's response. A courtesy copy of this letter is being sent to you via
facsimile.
Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2004
Note 3: Accounts Receivable
1. We note your response to previous comment 14. As vendor rebates are
recognized ratably over all purchases or sales, please address the
following individual factors detailed in paragraph 8 of EITF 02-16
concerning your historical rebate experiences:
- Tell us whether rebates or refunds relate to purchases that
occur over relatively long periods;
- Tell us if significant adjustments to expected cash rebates or
refunds have been necessary in the past.
Please be specific concerning your historical rebate experiences in
your response.
<PAGE>
Mr. Michael Moran
Securities and Exchange Commission
Page 2 of 2
RESPONSE: The Company's rebate arrangements relate to purchases over a
period of one year or less. The only rebate arrangement based on purchases
extending beyond one year expired on December 31, 2004, and the Company has
received full payment under that rebate program.
The Company recognizes vendor rebate allowances in a systematic,
rational manner based on qualified purchases under specific vendor agreements.
The Company does not recognize rebate allowances if it is uncertain as to
whether or not specific purchases will qualify under its rebate arrangements. As
a result, after final discussions and negotiations concerning rebate allowances
with the Company's vendors and subsequent cash settlement from those vendors,
the Company received additional cash of $868,000 and $926,000, subsequent to
December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2004, respectively.
Note 12: Commitments and Contingencies
2. We note your response to previous comment 18. Specifically for the
complaint filed against the Company by the State of New York Department
of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC), tell us, and disclose in future
filings, the following:
- The likelihood of the potential loss as defined in paragraph 3
of FAS 5 as probable, reasonably possible, or remote:
- The nature of the accrual and the amount accrued in accordance
with paragraphs 8-10 of FAS 5.
RESPONSE: The Company believes that the likelihood of potential loss as
defined in paragraph 3 of FAS 5 is probable. After consulting with counsel
concerning possible outcomes in the suit, the Company accrued an immaterial
amount, approximately $300,000, based on its assessment of the likely outcome
in the suit. Because the amount accrued is not material, the Company does not
intend to disclose the amount accrued in future filings.
Any questions concerning this letter can be directed to me at
216-706-9250.
Very truly yours,
/s/ Jeffrey L. Rutherford
Jeffrey L. Rutherford
Senior Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer, Treasurer and
Secretary
</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>