SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Company Response from Ernexa Therapeutics Inc. (ERNA, ERNAW) (CIK 0000748592) (ERNA) — Jun 16, 2005

Ernexa Therapeutics Inc. (ERNA, ERNAW) (CIK 0000748592)
Date: June 16, 2005 · CIK: 0000748592 · Accession: 0000748592-05-000021

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Sentiment
Urgency
Document Type
Confidence
SEC Posture
Company Posture

Summary

Reasoning

Referenced dates: May 24, 2005

Date
December 31, 2004
Author
Assistant Director
Form
CORRESP
Company
Ernexa Therapeutics Inc. (ERNA, ERNAW) (CIK 0000748592)

Letter

Mr. Larry Spirgel Assistant Director Mail Stop 0407 U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission 450 Fifth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20549

Re: NTN Communications, Inc. Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 File No. 1-11460

Dear Mr. Spirgel:

On behalf of NTN Communications, Inc. (the "Company"), this letter is being sent in response to the Staff's letter of comment dated May 24, 2005, with respect to the above-referenced Form 10-K. Set forth below are the Company's responses to the Staff's comments. As requested, the comments will be addressed in future filings as applicable. For the convenience of the Staff, each of the Staff's comments is set out immediately preceding the corresponding response.

Revenue Recognition, page F-12

Comment 1. We note your disclosure that arrangements for the transmission of the NTN iTV Network contain two deliverables; the installation of the equipment and the transmission of the network content. However, we also note on page 4 that the interactive content is stored on a site server equipped for satellite data reception at a subscriber's location. Additionally, the system requires the use of wireless playmakers which are provided by you. Tell us how you account for these additional deliverables including any related consideration received. Tell us if the arrangement also contains a lease and your consideration of EITF 01-8.

Response to comment 1.

The interactive content that is stored on a site server equipped for satellite data reception at a subscriber's location is not an additional deliverable from an accounting perspective. We transmit our ongoing network content to our customers either via satellite transmission or DSL. That content is generally sent on a "store forward" basis. The content typically resides on the hard drives of the site servers for up to a week before it is "pulled up" simultaneously at our customer sites across the country and is actually used in a game.

The description of our service in our Service Agreement is as follows: "DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE: NTN is providing CUSTOMER the right during the Term to use at the Site ... the NTN iTV Network promotional and marketing entertainment

<PAGE>

service..." The standard system covered by our Service Agreement allows for the use of our game content for a one-year period subject to renewals. The equipment that we provide in our initial installation is merely to facilitate the viewing of and interaction with our game content.

Our arrangements for the transmission of the NTN iTV Network contain two deliverables from an accounting perspective; the installation of our equipment for which we receive an upfront fee, and the transmission of our network content for which we receive monthly broadcast fees, which are separately identified in the Service Agreement. The term "deliverables" here is solely within the context of EITF 00-21 as it relates to determining elements for revenue recognition, however in and of itself the broadcast equipment or related installation is not the deliverable from the customer standpoint. The monthly broadcast fees therefore are primarily for the game content, which could not be accessed without the use of the site server and Playmakers(R). The broadcast fees are recognized as revenue on a monthly basis. As the installation deliverable does not have stand alone value to the customer, it does not represent a separate unit of accounting and therefore all installation fees received are deferred and recognized as revenue on a straight-line basis of 36 months, the estimated life of the customer relationship based on our historical experience.

Our Service Agreement with our customers does not include a lease. Our content is an intangible asset and according to paragraph 9 of EITF 01-8, "intangibles (for example, motion picture film licensing rights or workforce) ... may not be the subject of a lease." Since the game content is the primary element of our service and it is an intangible asset, our Service Agreement is not a lease per EITF 01-8.

Income Taxes, page F-20

Comment 2. We note your statement that approximately $508,000 of the valuation allowance, if realized, will be recognized as a credit to paid-in capital. Please provide us with more details and cite your basis in the accounting literature for your anticipated treatment of the valuation allowance.

Response to comment 2.

The $508,000 of valuation allowance referred to in our footnote represents a portion of our net operating loss carry-forward that relates to tax deductions taken for disqualifying dispositions of employee incentive stock options. The amounts were reported as income to our employees and taken as tax deductions on our federal tax return. The amounts were not expensed for book purposes. If that portion of the tax asset is eventually realized, the amount will be recognized as a credit to paid in capital in accordance with paragraphs 26 and 36e of FAS 109, as it represents the excess of the tax deduction over the amount reported for book purposes,

Media General Investment, pages F-24 - F-25

Comment 3. We note your statement that no allocation of fair value was made to the Buzztime warrants due to the lack of marketability of Buzztime common stock and limited convertibility into NTN common stock. Please:

o Clarify the nature of Media General's conversion rights on the second and fourth anniversaries of the transaction date as well as its co-sale rights.

o Tell us how your drag-along rights impact Media General's conversion rights.

<PAGE>

o Tell us how you considered whether your warrants have a beneficial conversion feature as addressed by Issue 13 of EITF 00-27.

Response to comment 3.

o Media General ("MEG") has the right to convert each share of Buzztime common stock into two shares of NTN common stock (subject to adjustment) based upon the following terms as set forth in the Investor Rights Agreement. Upon the occurrence of any of (a) the second anniversary of the date of this Agreement, (b) the fourth anniversary of the date of this Agreement, (c) a sale of Buzztime, (d) bankruptcy, liquidation, dissolution or other insolvency proceeding of Buzztime, whether voluntary or involuntary or (e) if NTN elects to exercise its drag-along rights and the consideration to be received is not cash and/or securities tradeable without restriction on a national securities exchange or the Nasdaq national market or smallcap market (each, a "Trigger Event"), MEG shall have the option ("NTN Optional Exchange"), upon notice to Buzztime and NTN, to exchange each share of common stock issued under the warrants or the Licensing Agreement held by MEG (the "Buzztime Exchange Shares") into two fully paid and nonassessable shares of NTN common stock (the "NTN Exchange Shares") (as adjusted to reflect any forward or reverse stock splits, stock combinations, stock dividends, mergers or reclassifications affecting the common stock or the NTN common stock). The Investor shall have the right to exercise the NTN Optional Exchange only twice.

We also note that the first Trigger Event of May 7, 2005 (two years after the MEG investment) has passed and MEG failed to make the Optional Exchange at that time. We will note this and whether MEG chooses to convert at the one later trigger point in our future filings.

In the event a sale of Buzztime occurs, NTN shall have the right to require MEG to exchange all of its Buzztime Exchange Shares for NTN Exchange Shares. In the event a sale of Buzztime occurs and MEG holds all or any portion of the warrants, NTN shall have the right to require MEG to effect one or more of the following alternatives (as determined by MEG in its sole discretion): (i) to exercise all or any portion of its warrants, at which time NTN shall have the right to require MEG to exchange all of its resulting Buzztime Exchange Shares as provided above; (ii) to surrender and forfeit all or any portion of its warrants in lieu of exercising the warrants and exchanging the resulting Buzztime Exchange Shares; or (iii) to accept the consideration offered for all or any portion of the warrants by the purchaser in such a sale of Buzztime, if any.

Should MEG choose to exercise its Buzztime warrant and then convert its Buzztime common stock into NTN common stock, they would initially receive their 500,000 shares of Buzztime common stock at a strike price of $3.46 per share and then convert that 500,000 shares of Buzztime common stock at a conversion ratio of $1.73 per NTN common share into 1,000,000 shares of NTN common stock.

To clarify the nature of MEG's co-sale rights, if NTN proposes to effect any transaction that would result in the transfer of all or a portion of

<PAGE>

NTN's securities to any "person" upon specific terms and conditions (including a specified purchase price payable in cash or other property), then, as a condition to such transfer, NTN shall promptly notify MEG in writing of the terms and conditions of such purchase offer.

MEG then has the right to participate in the sale of NTN's securities on the same specified terms and conditions of such purchase offer, including the price per share. To the extent MEG exercises such right of participation in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth below, the number of shares of the common stock (or securities from the Buzztime warrant convertible into such number of shares of common stock) that NTN may sell pursuant to such purchase offer shall be correspondingly reduced.

o Our Drag-Along Rights operate as follows: In connection with a sale to any unaffiliated "person" by NTN of a majority or more of the shares of Buzztime's common stock on a fully-diluted basis, NTN shall have the right, at its election and in its sole discretion, to cause MEG to sell its securities in such sale to such person for the same price per share and upon the same terms and conditions as the sale by NTN to such person.

In the event a sale occurs and MEG holds all or any portion of the Buzztime warrants, MEG may (i) exercise all or any portion of its warrants, at which time MEG's resulting common stock shall be subject to the terms and conditions set forth in such transfer notice unless MEG exercises its NTN Optional Exchange; (ii) surrender and forfeit all or any portion of its warrants in lieu of exercising the warrants; or (iii) accept the consideration offered for all or any portion of the warrants by the purchaser in such a sale, if any.

The drag along rights do not change the strike prices and conversion ratios in any way.

o The securities, including the shares of NTN common stock, and the Buzztime warrant were exchanged for $3,000,000 in cash. We ascribed the full $3,000,000 to the NTN common stock issued as we determined that the value of the Buzztime warrant was nominal. We determined that the Buzztime warrant was nominal based on the lack of marketability of Buzztime common stock and the very limited convertibility into NTN common stock. This determination was based upon a third party valuation. However, we did consider whether the warrants had a beneficial conversion feature as addressed by Issue 13 of EITF 00-27. Given the nominal difference between the $1.73 ultimate effective exercise price of the Buzztime warrant and the $1.77 market price of NTN common stock at the time of the transaction, we determined that the resulting beneficial conversion feature of approximately $40,000 was immaterial.

Comment 4. Tell us your basis for the valuation of the acquired Boxerjam game license.

Response to comment 4.

In the transactions with MEG, we received $3,000,000 in cash and the Boxergam game license and issued the NTN common stock and the warrants. The most determinable value of the consideration exchanged was the cash we received. The

<PAGE>

second most determinable value was the shares that we issued to MEG, which were valued at the closing price of the Company's stock on the date of the transaction. Since we determined that the value of the Buzztime warrant was nominal, the remainder of the consideration exchanged was assigned to the Boxerjam game license as that was the least determinable element of the transaction.

Specifically, we recorded both transactions with MEG (the $3,000,000 investment for 2 million shares and the Boxerjam license for 666,667 shares) at the fair value of the consideration exchanged on May 6, 2003. We used the publicly traded stock price, as of the date of the transactions, of $1.77 per share to determine the (2,666,667 share times $1.77 =) $4,720,000 fair value of the shares issued in both transactions. Since the consideration of the investment transaction was the $3 million invested by MEG and the value of the associated Buzztime warrant was considered to be nominal, the consideration allocated to the acquired Boxerjam game license was the remainder of the $4.72 million after subtracting the $3.0 million investment, or $1.72 million.

Breakaway International, page F-29

Comment 5. We note that you included deferred revenue as a liability assumed in connection with the Breakaway acquisition. Tell us your basis for recognition and measurement of the subject liability. Refer to EITF 01-3.

Response to comment 5.

We did consider EITF 01-3 in our accounting of the Breakaway acquisition. According to paragraph 3 of EITF 01-3, "The Task Force observed that under existing accounting principles, the acquired entity might have deferred recognition of revenue for a variety of reasons. The Task Force reached a consensus that the acquiring entity should recognize a liability related to the deferred revenue of an acquired entity only if that deferred revenue represents a legal obligation assumed by the acquiring entity (a legal performance obligation)."

Breakaway had several deferred revenue accounts on its books at the date of acquisition. We analyzed each liability account to determine whether it represented a legal obligation assumed by the Company. The account "deferred revenue - software" recorded on Breakaway's financial statements showed a balance of $332,784. The deferred revenue Breakaway had recorded in this account related to the entire arrangement fee(for both software license and post contract support, or PCS) for which VSOE was not achieved and therefore the entire arrangement fee was deferred and recognized ratably over the PCS period in accordance with SOP 97-2. We concluded that the fair value of the obligation to provide ongoing customer support represented approximately 20% of the total deferred revenue and the remaining 80% was the license component itself and had no future obligation associated with it (i.e. was deferred solely due to lack of VSOE for the undelivered element, PCS). Therefore, we recorded as deferred revenue the 20%, or approximately $67,000, attributable to ongoing customer support.

The remaind

Show Raw Text
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>CORRESP
<SEQUENCE>1
<FILENAME>filename1.txt
<TEXT>
Mr. Larry Spirgel
Assistant Director
Mail Stop 0407
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission 450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549

Re:      NTN Communications, Inc.
         Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004
         File No. 1-11460

Dear Mr. Spirgel:

On behalf of NTN Communications, Inc. (the "Company"), this letter is being sent
in response to the Staff's letter of comment dated May 24, 2005, with respect to
the  above-referenced  Form 10-K. Set forth below are the Company's responses to
the Staff's  comments.  As  requested,  the comments will be addressed in future
filings as applicable.  For the  convenience  of the Staff,  each of the Staff's
comments is set out immediately preceding the corresponding response.

Revenue Recognition, page F-12

Comment 1. We note your disclosure that arrangements for the transmission of the
NTN iTV Network contain two deliverables;  the installation of the equipment and
the  transmission of the network content.  However,  we also note on page 4 that
the  interactive  content is stored on a site server equipped for satellite data
reception at a subscriber's location.  Additionally, the system requires the use
of wireless  playmakers  which are provided by you.  Tell us how you account for
these additional deliverables including any related consideration received. Tell
us if the arrangement also contains a lease and your consideration of EITF 01-8.

Response to comment 1.

The  interactive  content that is stored on a site server equipped for satellite
data reception at a subscriber's location is not an additional  deliverable from
an  accounting  perspective.  We  transmit  our ongoing  network  content to our
customers  either via satellite  transmission  or DSL. That content is generally
sent on a "store  forward"  basis.  The  content  typically  resides on the hard
drives  of  the  site  servers  for  up  to a  week  before  it is  "pulled  up"
simultaneously  at our customer sites across the country and is actually used in
a game.

The  description  of  our  service  in  our  Service  Agreement  is as  follows:
"DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE:  NTN is providing CUSTOMER the right during the Term to
use at the Site ... the NTN iTV Network promotional and marketing  entertainment

<PAGE>

service..." The standard system covered by our Service  Agreement allows for the
use of our game content for a one-year period subject to renewals. The equipment
that we provide in our initial  installation is merely to facilitate the viewing
of and interaction with our game content.

Our  arrangements  for  the  transmission  of the NTN iTV  Network  contain  two
deliverables from an accounting  perspective;  the installation of our equipment
for which we receive an upfront fee, and the transmission of our network content
for which we receive monthly broadcast fees, which are separately  identified in
the Service Agreement. The term "deliverables" here is solely within the context
of EITF 00-21 as it relates to  determining  elements  for revenue  recognition,
however in and of itself the broadcast equipment or related  installation is not
the  deliverable  from the  customer  standpoint.  The  monthly  broadcast  fees
therefore  are  primarily  for the game  content,  which  could not be  accessed
without the use of the site server and  Playmakers(R).  The  broadcast  fees are
recognized as revenue on a monthly basis. As the  installation  deliverable does
not have stand alone  value to the  customer,  it does not  represent a separate
unit of accounting and therefore all installation fees received are deferred and
recognized as revenue on a straight-line  basis of 36 months, the estimated life
of the customer relationship based on our historical experience.

Our Service  Agreement with our customers does not include a lease.  Our content
is an intangible  asset and according to paragraph 9 of EITF 01-8,  "intangibles
(for example,  motion picture film licensing rights or workforce) ... may not be
the subject of a lease."  Since the game  content is the primary  element of our
service and it is an intangible  asset, our Service Agreement is not a lease per
EITF 01-8.

Income Taxes, page F-20

Comment 2. We note your statement that  approximately  $508,000 of the valuation
allowance,  if  realized,  will be  recognized  as a credit to paid-in  capital.
Please  provide  us with  more  details  and cite your  basis in the  accounting
literature for your anticipated treatment of the valuation allowance.

Response to comment 2.

The $508,000 of  valuation  allowance  referred to in our footnote  represents a
portion of our net operating loss  carry-forward  that relates to tax deductions
taken for disqualifying  dispositions of employee  incentive stock options.  The
amounts were reported as income to our employees and taken as tax  deductions on
our federal tax return. The amounts were not expensed for book purposes. If that
portion of the tax asset is eventually  realized,  the amount will be recognized
as a credit to paid in capital in accordance  with  paragraphs 26 and 36e of FAS
109, as it represents the excess of the tax deduction  over the amount  reported
for book purposes,

Media General Investment, pages F-24 - F-25

Comment 3. We note your  statement  that no allocation of fair value was made to
the Buzztime  warrants due to the lack of marketability of Buzztime common stock
and limited convertibility into NTN common stock. Please:

   o Clarify the nature of Media General's conversion rights on the second and
     fourth anniversaries of the transaction date as well as its co-sale rights.

   o Tell us how your  drag-along  rights  impact Media  General's  conversion
     rights.

<PAGE>

   o Tell  us how you  considered  whether  your  warrants  have a  beneficial
     conversion feature as addressed by Issue 13 of EITF 00-27.

Response to comment 3.

   o Media  General  ("MEG")  has the right to convert  each share of Buzztime
     common  stock into two shares of NTN common stock  (subject to  adjustment)
     based  upon  the  following  terms  as set  forth  in the  Investor  Rights
     Agreement.  Upon the occurrence of any of (a) the second anniversary of the
     date of this  Agreement,  (b) the  fourth  anniversary  of the date of this
     Agreement, (c) a sale of Buzztime, (d) bankruptcy, liquidation, dissolution
     or  other  insolvency   proceeding  of  Buzztime,   whether   voluntary  or
     involuntary or (e) if NTN elects to exercise its drag-along  rights and the
     consideration  to be  received  is not  cash  and/or  securities  tradeable
     without  restriction  on a  national  securities  exchange  or  the  Nasdaq
     national  market or smallcap  market (each, a "Trigger  Event"),  MEG shall
     have the option ("NTN Optional Exchange"), upon notice to Buzztime and NTN,
     to exchange  each share of common  stock  issued  under the warrants or the
     Licensing  Agreement held by MEG (the "Buzztime  Exchange Shares") into two
     fully paid and nonassessable  shares of NTN common stock (the "NTN Exchange
     Shares") (as adjusted to reflect any forward or reverse stock splits, stock
     combinations,  stock dividends,  mergers or reclassifications affecting the
     common stock or the NTN common stock). The Investor shall have the right to
     exercise the NTN Optional Exchange only twice.

     We also note that the first  Trigger  Event of May 7, 2005 (two years after
     the MEG investment) has passed and MEG failed to make the Optional Exchange
     at that time.  We will note this and  whether MEG chooses to convert at the
     one later trigger point in our future filings.

     In the event a sale of Buzztime occurs, NTN shall have the right to require
     MEG to  exchange  all of its  Buzztime  Exchange  Shares  for NTN  Exchange
     Shares.  In the event a sale of  Buzztime  occurs  and MEG holds all or any
     portion of the warrants,  NTN shall have the right to require MEG to effect
     one or more of the following alternatives (as determined by MEG in its sole
     discretion):  (i) to exercise all or any portion of its warrants,  at which
     time  NTN  shall  have the  right to  require  MEG to  exchange  all of its
     resulting Buzztime Exchange Shares as provided above; (ii) to surrender and
     forfeit  all or any  portion  of its  warrants  in lieu of  exercising  the
     warrants and exchanging the resulting Buzztime Exchange Shares; or (iii) to
     accept the consideration  offered for all or any portion of the warrants by
     the purchaser in such a sale of Buzztime, if any.

     Should MEG choose to exercise  its  Buzztime  warrant and then  convert its
     Buzztime common stock into NTN common stock,  they would initially  receive
     their  500,000  shares of Buzztime  common stock at a strike price of $3.46
     per share and then convert that 500,000 shares of Buzztime  common stock at
     a conversion  ratio of $1.73 per NTN common share into 1,000,000  shares of
     NTN common stock.

     To clarify the nature of MEG's  co-sale  rights,  if NTN proposes to effect
     any  transaction  that would  result in the transfer of all or a portion of

<PAGE>

     NTN's  securities  to any  "person"  upon  specific  terms  and  conditions
     (including a specified  purchase price payable in cash or other  property),
     then, as a condition to such  transfer,  NTN shall  promptly  notify MEG in
     writing of the terms and conditions of such purchase offer.

     MEG then has the right to  participate  in the sale of NTN's  securities on
     the same specified terms and conditions of such purchase  offer,  including
     the  price  per  share.   To  the  extent  MEG  exercises   such  right  of
     participation  in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth below,
     the number of shares of the common stock (or  securities  from the Buzztime
     warrant  convertible  into such number of shares of common  stock) that NTN
     may sell pursuant to such purchase offer shall be correspondingly reduced.

   o Our Drag-Along  Rights operate as follows:  In connection  with a sale to
     any  unaffiliated  "person"  by NTN of a majority  or more of the shares of
     Buzztime's common stock on a fully-diluted basis, NTN shall have the right,
     at its  election  and in its  sole  discretion,  to  cause  MEG to sell its
     securities  in such sale to such  person  for the same  price per share and
     upon the same terms and conditions as the sale by NTN to such person.

     In the event a sale occurs and MEG holds all or any portion of the Buzztime
     warrants, MEG may (i) exercise all or any portion of its warrants, at which
     time  MEG's  resulting  common  stock  shall be  subject  to the  terms and
     conditions  set forth in such transfer  notice unless MEG exercises its NTN
     Optional  Exchange;  (ii)  surrender  and forfeit all or any portion of its
     warrants  in  lieu  of  exercising  the  warrants;   or  (iii)  accept  the
     consideration  offered  for  all or any  portion  of  the  warrants  by the
     purchaser in such a sale, if any.

     The drag along rights do not change the strike prices and conversion ratios
     in any way.

   o The  securities,  including  the  shares  of NTN  common  stock,  and the
     Buzztime  warrant were  exchanged  for  $3,000,000 in cash. We ascribed the
     full  $3,000,000 to the NTN common stock issued as we  determined  that the
     value of the Buzztime warrant was nominal.  We determined that the Buzztime
     warrant was nominal based on the lack of  marketability  of Buzztime common
     stock and the very  limited  convertibility  into NTN  common  stock.  This
     determination  was based  upon a third  party  valuation.  However,  we did
     consider  whether  the  warrants  had a  beneficial  conversion  feature as
     addressed by Issue 13 of EITF 00-27.  Given the nominal  difference between
     the $1.73 ultimate effective exercise price of the Buzztime warrant and the
     $1.77 market price of NTN common stock at the time of the  transaction,  we
     determined   that  the   resulting   beneficial   conversion   feature   of
     approximately $40,000 was immaterial.

Comment 4. Tell us your basis for the valuation of the acquired Boxerjam game
license.

Response to comment 4.

In the  transactions  with MEG, we received  $3,000,000 in cash and the Boxergam
game  license  and  issued  the NTN  common  stock  and the  warrants.  The most
determinable value of the consideration  exchanged was the cash we received. The

<PAGE>

second most determinable  value was the shares that we issued to MEG, which were
valued  at the  closing  price  of  the  Company's  stock  on  the  date  of the
transaction.  Since we  determined  that the value of the  Buzztime  warrant was
nominal,  the  remainder  of the  consideration  exchanged  was  assigned to the
Boxerjam  game  license  as  that  was the  least  determinable  element  of the
transaction.

Specifically,  we recorded both transactions with MEG (the $3,000,000 investment
for 2 million  shares and the Boxerjam  license for 666,667  shares) at the fair
value of the consideration exchanged on May 6, 2003. We used the publicly traded
stock price, as of the date of the transactions, of $1.77 per share to determine
the (2,666,667  share times $1.77 =) $4,720,000  fair value of the shares issued
in both transactions.  Since the consideration of the investment transaction was
the $3 million invested by MEG and the value of the associated  Buzztime warrant
was  considered  to be nominal,  the  consideration  allocated  to the  acquired
Boxerjam game license was the  remainder of the $4.72 million after  subtracting
the $3.0 million investment, or $1.72 million.

Breakaway International, page F-29

Comment 5. We note that you included  deferred revenue as a liability assumed in
connection  with the Breakaway  acquisition.  Tell us your basis for recognition
and measurement of the subject liability. Refer to EITF 01-3.

Response to comment 5.

We did  consider  EITF  01-3 in our  accounting  of the  Breakaway  acquisition.
According  to  paragraph  3 of EITF 01-3,  "The Task Force  observed  that under
existing  accounting  principles,   the  acquired  entity  might  have  deferred
recognition  of revenue  for a variety  of  reasons.  The Task  Force  reached a
consensus that the acquiring entity should recognize a liability  related to the
deferred revenue of an acquired entity only if that deferred revenue  represents
a  legal  obligation  assumed  by the  acquiring  entity  (a  legal  performance
obligation)."

Breakaway  had  several  deferred  revenue  accounts on its books at the date of
acquisition.  We  analyzed  each  liability  account  to  determine  whether  it
represented a legal  obligation  assumed by the Company.  The account  "deferred
revenue -  software"  recorded  on  Breakaway's  financial  statements  showed a
balance of $332,784. The deferred revenue Breakaway had recorded in this account
related  to the  entire  arrangement  fee(for  both  software  license  and post
contract  support,  or PCS) for which VSOE was not  achieved and  therefore  the
entire  arrangement fee was deferred and recognized  ratably over the PCS period
in accordance  with SOP 97-2. We concluded that the fair value of the obligation
to provide ongoing customer support  represented  approximately 20% of the total
deferred revenue and the remaining 80% was the license  component itself and had
no future obligation associated with it (i.e. was deferred solely due to lack of
VSOE for the  undelivered  element,  PCS).  Therefore,  we  recorded as deferred
revenue the 20%, or  approximately  $67,000,  attributable  to ongoing  customer
support.

The  remaind