SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Company Response from ALPHA SPACECOM INC (CIK 0000763245) — Nov 1, 2005

ALPHA SPACECOM INC (CIK 0000763245)
Date: Nov. 1, 2005 · CIK: 0000763245 · Accession: 0001013596-05-000071

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

File numbers found in text: 000-13628

Referenced dates: August 9, 2005

Date
November 1, 2005
Author
Not clearly detected
Form
CORRESP
Company
ALPHA SPACECOM INC (CIK 0000763245)

Letter

November 1, 2005 VIA EDGAR Mr. Patrick Gilmore, Staff Accountant US Securities and Exchange Commission 450 Fifth Street, N. W. Washington, D.C. 20549

Re: Alpha Spacecom, Inc.; Form 8-K, Item 4.01 Filed May 13, 2005, June 14, 2005 and August 4, 2005 SEC File No. 000-13628 Response to August 9, 2005 Letter

Dear Mr. Gilmore:

On behalf of the above referenced registrant (the "Company"), this letter is intended to provide a response to the staff's letter dated August 9, 2005 concerning the above referenced report. Relevant thereto, please note that the Company filed another amendment to said report with the Commission on or about October 28, 2005. In regard to the same and in response to the staff's above referenced letter, please be advised as follows. Each response numbered below corresponds to the staff's applicable comment in its aforesaid letter:

1. The letter from DeJoya & Company, included as an exhibit to the Company's Form 8-K, contained a list of five alleged "disagreements" between that firm and the Company. However, a review of the contents included in said letter determines that, in reality, only the initial two items included in said letter were, in fact, disagreements. On behalf of the Company, it is submitted that Items III, IV and V included in this letter were not and are not "disagreements on any matter of accounting principles or practices," but rather, events which, according to De Joya & Co., occurred during the audit process. Subsequent to the issuance of this letter and filing of the report, the Company's President and CEO withdrew his claim that he had incurred additional expenses. Therefore, the only outstanding disagreement related to Item II of the De Joya letter. The amended Form 8-K addresses this disagreement and attempts to explain what the Company believes to be the reason for such disagreement.

2. The most recent amendment to the Company's Form 8-K includes a currently dated letter from De Joya & Company relating to disagreements between the Company and De Joya.

3. The Company believes that its most recent amendment to its Form 8-K includes all disclosure required under Regulation SB. Specifically, The amended report addresses all of the issues raised in Item 304(a)(1)(i) through (iv). Further, subparagraph (B) is not applicable, as De Joya did not advise the Company of any matter addressed in subsections (1) through (3) therein. Subsection (C) is identified in the amended report. Relevant to Subsection (D), obviously, discussions between the Company's Board of

<PAGE> Mr. Patrick Gilmore US Securities and Exchange Commission November 1, 2005 Page 2

Directors and De Joya took place, but due to the nature of the relationship as we discussed in our phone conversation of this date, these discussions resulted in no resolution of the existing dispute. Finally, relevant to subsection (E), a new sentence has been added to the amended report relevant to this issue.

In addition, relevant to Section (a) (2) of Item 304, the amended report discloses the Company's new accountant and confirms that the Company did not consult with the Company's new accountant on those matters described in subsections (i) and (ii) of said subsection. The Company also complied with Subsection (3), as evidenced by the De Joya letter attached as an exhibit to the amended report. The Company also believes that it has complied with the provisions included in subparagraph (b) as the same is applicable to this situation.

Finally, please be advised that management of the Company has provided this firm with written authorization, authorizing the undersigned to advise the Commission that management of the Company acknowledges the following:

1. That it is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in its filings, including but not limited to the amended Form 8-K relevant herein;

2. That staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filing; and

3. That it may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.

In the event you wish to discuss any of the responses included herein, or any other matter concerning the Company, please contact the undersigned at the address and phone number listed on the preceding page.

Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.

Yours truly,

ANDREW I. TELSEY, P.C.

s/Andrew I. Telsey

Andrew I. Telsey For the Firm

cc: Client (via fax only) R. Chadwick (via fax only)

AIT/ddk

Show Raw Text
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>CORRESP
<SEQUENCE>1
<FILENAME>filename1.txt
<TEXT>
ANDREW I. TELSEY, P.C. - Attorney at Law
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    12835 E. Arapahoe Road, Tower One, Penthouse #803, Englewood, Colorado 80112
  Telephone: (303) 768-9221 / Facsimile (303) 768-9224 / E-mail: aitelsey@cs.com

November 1, 2005

VIA EDGAR

Mr. Patrick Gilmore, Staff Accountant
US Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N. W.
Washington, D.C.  20549

Re:     Alpha Spacecom, Inc.;
        Form 8-K, Item 4.01 Filed May 13, 2005, June 14, 2005 and August 4, 2005
        SEC File No. 000-13628
        Response to August 9, 2005 Letter

Dear Mr. Gilmore:

On behalf of the above  referenced  registrant (the  "Company"),  this letter is
intended  to provide a  response  to the  staff's  letter  dated  August 9, 2005
concerning the above referenced report.  Relevant thereto,  please note that the
Company filed another  amendment to said report with the  Commission on or about
October 28,  2005.  In regard to the same and in  response to the staff's  above
referenced  letter,  please be advised as follows.  Each response numbered below
corresponds to the staff's applicable comment in its aforesaid letter:

     1. The  letter  from  DeJoya  &  Company,  included  as an  exhibit  to the
Company's  Form 8-K,  contained a list of five alleged  "disagreements"  between
that firm and the Company.  However,  a review of the contents  included in said
letter determines that, in reality,  only the initial two items included in said
letter were, in fact,  disagreements.  On behalf of the Company, it is submitted
that  Items  III,  IV and V  included  in  this  letter  were  not  and  are not
"disagreements on any matter of accounting principles or practices," but rather,
events which,  according to De Joya & Co.,  occurred  during the audit  process.
Subsequent  to the  issuance  of this  letter  and  filing  of the  report,  the
Company's  President and CEO withdrew his claim that he had incurred  additional
expenses. Therefore, the only outstanding disagreement related to Item II of the
De Joya letter. The amended Form 8-K addresses this disagreement and attempts to
explain what the Company believes to be the reason for such disagreement.

     2. The most recent amendment to the Company's Form 8-K includes a currently
dated  letter  from De Joya & Company  relating  to  disagreements  between  the
Company and De Joya.

     3. The  Company  believes  that its most recent  amendment  to its Form 8-K
includes all disclosure required under Regulation SB. Specifically,  The amended
report  addresses  all of the issues raised in Item  304(a)(1)(i)  through (iv).
Further,  subparagraph  (B) is not  applicable,  as De Joya did not  advise  the
Company  of any  matter  addressed  in  subsections  (1)  through  (3)  therein.
Subsection (C) is identified in the amended report.  Relevant to Subsection (D),
obviously, discussions between the Company's Board of

<PAGE>
Mr. Patrick Gilmore
US Securities and Exchange Commission
November 1, 2005
Page 2

Directors and De Joya took place,  but due to the nature of the  relationship as
we discussed in our phone conversation of this date, these discussions  resulted
in no resolution of the existing dispute. Finally, relevant to subsection (E), a
new sentence has been added to the amended report relevant to this issue.

In  addition,  relevant  to  Section  (a) (2) of Item 304,  the  amended  report
discloses  the Company's  new  accountant  and confirms that the Company did not
consult  with the  Company's  new  accountant  on  those  matters  described  in
subsections  (i) and (ii) of said  subsection.  The Company also  complied  with
Subsection (3), as evidenced by the De Joya letter attached as an exhibit to the
amended  report.  The  Company  also  believes  that it has  complied  with  the
provisions  included  in  subparagraph  (b) as the  same is  applicable  to this
situation.

Finally, please be advised that management of the Company has provided this firm
with written authorization, authorizing the undersigned to advise the Commission
that management of the Company acknowledges the following:

     1. That it is  responsible  for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure
in its  filings,  including  but not  limited to the amended  Form 8-K  relevant
herein;

     2. That staff  comments  or  changes to  disclosure  in  response  to staff
comments do not foreclose the Commission  from taking any action with respect to
the filing; and

     3. That it may not assert  staff  comments  as a defense in any  proceeding
initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal  securities  laws of
the United States.

In the event you wish to discuss any of the responses  included  herein,  or any
other matter  concerning  the Company,  please  contact the  undersigned  at the
address and phone number listed on the preceding page.

Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.

Yours truly,

ANDREW I. TELSEY, P.C.

s/Andrew I. Telsey

Andrew I. Telsey
For the Firm

cc:   Client (via fax only)
      R. Chadwick (via fax only)

AIT/ddk

</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>