SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Comment Letter for KOPIN CORP (KOPN) (CIK 0000771266) (KOPN) — Sep 5, 2013

KOPIN CORP (KOPN) (CIK 0000771266)
Date: Sept. 5, 2013 · CIK: 0000771266 · Accession: 0000000000-13-048865

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Sentiment
Urgency
Document Type
Confidence
SEC Posture
Company Posture

Summary

Reasoning

File numbers found in text: 001-19882

Date
September 5, 2013
Author
/s/ Kevin L. Vaughn
Form
UPLOAD
Company
KOPIN CORP (KOPN) (CIK 0000771266)

Letter

Re: Kopin Corporation Form 10 -K for the Fiscal Year Ended December 2 9, 2012 Filed March 18, 2013 File No. 001-19882 Dear Mr. Sneider : We have reviewed your filing an d have the following comments. In some of our comments, we may ask you to provide us with information so we may better understand your disclosure.

September 5, 2013

Via Email Richard A. Sneider Chief Financial Officer Kopin Corporation 125 North Drive Westboro, MA 01581 -3335

Please respond to this letter within ten business days by providing the requested information, or by advising us when you will provide the requested response. If you do not believe our comments apply to your facts and c ircumstances please tell us why in your response.

After reviewing the information you provide in response to these comments, we may have additional comments.

Form 10 -K for the Fiscal Year Ended December 29, 2012

Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, page 47

– Immaterial Restatement with Reclassification of Discontinued Operations, page 51

1. We note your disclosure that in the second quarter of 2012, you identified an error in the calculation of intercompany profit elimination in inventory for prior periods, including the years ended December 31, 2011 and December 25, 2010. We note the effect of the error correction on your loss from operations for the year ended December 31, 2011 was $831, or 108% of your pr eviously reported loss from operations. Please address the following:

 Tell us how you discovered the error.  Describe to us in greater detail the nature of the error in the calculation of intercompany profit elimination.

Richard A. Sneider Kopin Corporation September 5, 2013 Page 2

 Please provide us with your anal ysis of the materiality of the error. Discuss why you concluded that amendment to the December 31, 2011 Form 10 -K was not necessary.  We do not see where you have provided clear disclosure on the face of the balance sheet or the statements of operations tha t the prior year amounts have been restated. Please explain why you concluded such disclosure was not necessary.  Please have your auditor address how it considered paragraph 9 of PCAOB Auditing Standard No. 6 and why it ultimately concluded reference to th e restatement in the audit report was not required.

Note 15. Segments and Geographical Information, page 68

2. We note your disclosure of revenues by geographical area, including “Asia -Pacific, Europe and Americas.” Please explain to us how your disclosure complies with FASB ASC 280 -10- 50-41a, which requires separate disclosure of revenues attributed to your country of domicile. Alternatively, revise future filings to comply.

In responding to our comments, please provide a written statement from the compa ny acknowledging that:

 the company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the filing;

 staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filing; and

 the company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.

You may contact Eric Atallah, Staff Accountant at (202) 551 -3663 or me at (202) 551 - 3643 if you have questions regarding these comments. In this regard, do not hesitate to contact Martin James, Senior Assistant Chief Accountant at (202) 551 -3671 .

Sincerely,
/s/ Kevin L. Vaughn

Show Raw Text
September 5, 2013

Via Email
Richard A. Sneider
Chief Financial Officer
Kopin Corporation
125 North Drive
Westboro, MA  01581 -3335

 Re: Kopin Corporation
Form 10 -K for the Fiscal Year Ended December 2 9, 2012
  Filed March  18, 2013
  File No.  001-19882
Dear Mr. Sneider :
We have reviewed your filing an d have the following comments.  In some of our
comments, we may ask you to provide us with information so we may better understand your
disclosure.

Please respond to this letter within ten business days by providing the requested
information, or by advising us when you will provide the requested response.   If you do not
believe our comments apply to your facts and c ircumstances please tell us why in your response.

After reviewing the information you provide in response to these  comments, we may
have  additional comments.

Form 10 -K for the Fiscal Year Ended December 29, 2012

Note 1.  Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, page 47

– Immaterial Restatement with Reclassification of Discontinued Operations, page 51

1. We note your disclosure that in the second quarter of 2012, you identified an error in the
calculation of intercompany  profit elimination in inventory for prior periods, including the
years ended December 31, 2011 and December 25, 2010. We note the effect of the error
correction on your loss from operations for the year ended December 31, 2011 was $831, or
108% of your pr eviously reported loss from operations. Please address the following:

 Tell us how you discovered the error.
 Describe to us in greater detail the nature of the error in the calculation of intercompany
profit elimination.

Richard A. Sneider
Kopin Corporation
September 5, 2013
Page 2

  Please provide us with your anal ysis of the materiality of the error. Discuss why you
concluded that amendment to the December 31, 2011 Form 10 -K was not necessary.
 We do not see where you have provided clear disclosure on the face of the balance sheet
or the statements of operations tha t the prior year amounts have been restated. Please
explain why you concluded such disclosure was not necessary.
 Please have your auditor address how it considered paragraph 9 of PCAOB Auditing
Standard No. 6 and why it ultimately concluded reference to th e restatement in the audit
report was not required.

Note 15. Segments and Geographical Information, page 68

2. We note your disclosure of revenues by geographical area, including “Asia -Pacific, Europe
and Americas.” Please explain to us how your disclosure complies with FASB ASC 280 -10-
50-41a, which requires separate disclosure of revenues attributed to your country of domicile.
Alternatively, revise future filings to comply.

 In responding to our comments, please provide  a written statement from the compa ny
acknowledging that:

 the company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the filing;

 staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments do not foreclose
the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filing; and

 the company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by
the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.

You may contact Eric Atallah, Staff Accountant at  (202) 551 -3663 or me at (202) 551 -
3643 if you have questions regarding these comments.   In this regard, do not hesitate to contact
Martin James, Senior Assistant Chief Accountant at (202) 551 -3671 .

Sincerely,

 /s/ Kevin L. Vaughn

Kevin L. Vaughn
Accounting Branch Chief