SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Topics Monthly Activity About

CORRESP Filing

XOMA Royalty Corp
Date: July 23, 2025 · CIK: 0000791908 · Accession: 0001193125-25-163561

Business Model Clarity Financial Reporting Regulatory Compliance

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Sentiment
Urgency
Document Type
Confidence
SEC Posture
Company Posture

Summary

Reasoning

Referenced dates: July 18, 2025

Date
July 23, 2025
Author
By
Form
CORRESP
Company
XOMA Royalty Corp

Letter

Branden Berns Partner T: +1 415.393.4631 BBerns@gibsondunn.com July 23, 2025 VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL AND EDGAR FILING United States Securities and Exchange Commission Division of Corporation Finance Office of Mergers and Acquisitions 100 F Street NE Washington, D.C. 20549 Attention: Mr. Blake Grady XOMA Royalty Corporation Turnstone Biologics Corp. Schedule TO-T Filed July 11, 2025 Filed by XOMA Royalty Corporation File No. 005-94123 Dear Mr. Grady: On behalf of XOMA Royalty Corporation (the “ Purchaser ”), please find responses to comments received from the Staff of the Division of Corporation Finance (the “ Staff ”) of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “ Commission ”) by letter dated July 18, 2025 (“ Letter ”), with respect to the Purchaser’s Schedule TO-T filed on July 11, 2025 (the “ Schedule TO ”) and the Offer to Purchase, dated July 11, 2025 (the “ Offer to Purchase ” and, together with the Schedule TO, the “ Tender Offer Materials ”). Concurrently with delivery of this letter, the Purchaser filed updated Tender Offer Materials (the “ Revised Tender Offer Materials ”), including a Schedule TO-T/A and revised Offer to Purchase (the “ Revised Offer to Purchase ”), which reflect, among other things, revisions to address the Staff’s comments. For your convenience, we have restated below in bold each comment from the Letter and supplied our responses immediately thereafter. Unless otherwise specified, all references to page numbers and captions correspond to the Offer to Purchase and all capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the same meaning as in the Tender Offer Materials. General

1. We note that the principal business of Purchaser, as described on page A-1, is solely “to consummate the Offer and effect the Merger pursuant to the Merger Agreement, and to perform its obligations under the CVR Agreement.” However, your Schedule TO states that the principal business of Purchaser is “to engage in any lawful act or activity for which corporations may be organized under the Nevada Revised Statutes,” and Purchaser’s website states that “XOMA is a biotechnology royalty aggregator … with more than 70 assets.” Please revise to address these apparent discrepancies. Refer to Item 1003(b) of Regulation M-A. Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP One Embarcadero Center Suite 2600 | San Francisco, CA 94111-3715 | T: 415.393.8200 | F: 415.393.8306 | gibsondunn.com

July 23, 2025 Page

Response : In response to the Staff’s comment, Purchaser has revised the disclosure in the Revised Tender Offer Materials to clarify that Purchaser is a Nevada corporation whose primary business is as a biotech royalty aggregator with a sizable portfolio of economic rights to future potential milestone and royalty payments associated with partnered commercial and pre-commercial therapeutic drug candidates (see page 2 of the Schedule TO-T/A).

2. Disclosure on page A-1 indicates that “Mr. Burns joined Purchaser in August 2006.” However, based on disclosure in Item 3 of your Schedule TO, it appears that Purchaser was formed in 2011. Please revise or advise. Response : In response to the Staff’s comment, Purchaser has revised the disclosure in the Revised Tender Offer Materials to clarify that Purchaser was incorporated in Delaware in 1981 and redomiciled as a Bermuda-exempted company in December 1998. Effective December 31, 2011, Purchaser redomiciled from Bermuda back to Delaware. Purchaser subsequently reincorporated in Nevada on May 30, 2025 (see page 2 of the Schedule TO-T/A).

3. Please disclose the information required by Item 1008(a) and (b) of Regulation M-A. Response: In response to the Staff’s comment, Purchaser has revised the disclosure in the Revised Tender Offer Materials to include the following information (see page 34 of the Revised Offer to Purchase): “As of July 23, 2025, neither Purchaser nor any of Purchaser’s executive officers and directors beneficially owned any Shares of Turnstone. No transactions with respect to the Shares have been effected by Purchaser, or, to Purchaser’s knowledge after making reasonable inquiry, any of the directors, executive officers or affiliates of Purchaser, during the 60 days prior to the date of this Offer to Purchaser.”

4. Refer to the first bullet point under the caption “What Is the CVR and How Does It Work?” on page 2. Please provide illustrative disclosure, in plain English, showing how the CVR Proceeds will be calculated, including how Net Cash Excess and Net Cash Shortfall will be calculated. Refer to Item 1001 of Regulation M-A and to Item 1004(a)(1)(ii) of Regulation M-A. Response: In response to the Staff’s comment, Purchaser has revised the first bullet point and included a new second bullet under the caption “What Is the CVR and How Does It Work” in the Revised Tender Offer Materials with the following language (see page 3 of the Revised Offer to Purchase):

“At or prior to the Offer Closing Time, Purchaser, Merger Sub, the rights agent (the “ Rights Agent ”) and the representative of the holders of the CVRs (the “ Representative ”) will enter into the CVR Agreement, governing the terms of the CVRs. Each CVR will represent a

July 23, 2025 Page

contractual right to receive contingent cash payments equal to a pro rata share of: (i)(a) the net tax receivables from Canadian federal and territory/provincial tax authorities and/or Québec Scientific Research and Experimental Development (“SR&ED”) tax credit program as tax refunds up to $850,000 (excluding the $55,610 Québec SR&ED amount that has been scheduled on Schedule 1.01 of the Merger Agreement) and (b) the payments received from the landlord under the Sublease, dated November 16, 2022, between Turnstone and Medivis, Inc., as a return of security deposit up to $260,000 ((a) and (b) together, the “ Legacy Receivable Amount ”), plus (ii) Net Cash Excess (as defined below), if any, and minus (iii) Net Cash Shortfall (as defined below), if any. “ Net Cash Excess ” means if Final Net Cash is greater than Closing Net Cash (each as defined in the Merger Agreement and calculated in accordance with Section 2.01(c) of the Merger Agreement), then the amount equal to (a) Final Net Cash, minus (b) Closing Net Cash. “ Net Cash Shortfall ” means if Final Net Cash is less than Closing Net Cash, then the amount equal to (a) Closing Net Cash, minus (b) Final Net Cash.

For illustrative purposes only, assuming that: (a) Turnstone receives $510,000 in tax refunds from Canadian tax authorities (i.e., 60% of the maximum refund amount), and $156,000 from Medivis, Inc. as a return of the security deposit under the Sublease Agreement (also 60% of the maximum amount), and (b) Final Net Cash is $3,000,000 and Closing Net Cash is $3,000,000, such that there is no Net Cash Excess or Net Cash Shortfall, then the aggregate amount payable under the CVRs would be $666,000 or approximately $0.03 per CVR (based on (i) 23,140,691 Shares issued and outstanding, and (ii) 1,135 Shares underlying Turnstone RSUs).”

5. On page 3, disclosure indicates that the “offeror estimates that the amount that will be payable (on a pre-tax basis) under the CVRs will be approximately $0.03 per CVR.” Revise the Offer to Purchase to explain the basis for the offeror’s belief with respect to the CVRs. Response: In response to the Staff’s comment, Purchaser has revised the disclosure in the Revised Tender Offer Materials to explain the basis for the offeror’s belief with respect to the CVRs (see pages 2 and 3 of the Revised Offer to Purchase): “We cannot predict whether any CVR Proceeds will be received or, if any CVR Proceeds are received, the amount or timing of any such receipt. In connection with the Offer, the offeror did not engage any independent valuation firm to conduct an analysis of the potential value of the CVR Proceeds or receive any material non-public information assessing the value of the CVR Proceeds. The offeror is relying on Turnstone’s estimate of the CVR Proceeds that would be payable. Accordingly, in making a decision to tender your Shares in the Offer, you should understand that there can be no assurance whether there will be any payments under the CVR Agreement or with respect to the amount and timing of such payments (if any). You should also understand that, as discussed below, it is estimated that the amount that will be payable under the CVRs will be approximately $0.03 per CVR. Turnstone has determined that the maximum payout for the CVR is estimated to be up to $0.05 per CVR, assuming payment in full of the tax refund and lease deposit and no positive or negative adjustment to the CVR Proceeds because of a Net Cash Excess or a Net Cash Shortfall, respectively. After accounting for the likelihood of different payment scenarios for the tax refund and lease deposit, Turnstone has applied a 40% discount for the tax refund and lease deposit and has assumed no adjustments for net cash calculations under the CVR Agreement. Accordingly, the probability-weighted estimate of the amount payable is $0.03 per CVR.

July 23, 2025 Page

In determining the probability-weighted estimated payout, we note that there can be no assurance: (i) that Turnstone will receive the tax receivables and/or the return of a lease security deposit prior to the expiration of the CVRs necessary for payment pursuant to the CVRs, (ii) that there will be any positive or negative adjustments based on the post-closing calculation of Closing Net Cash or (iii) regarding the exact amount of CVR Proceeds or the timing of any such payment, if any. Neither the Merger Agreement nor the CVR Agreement requires Purchaser to use any efforts in connection with the CVR Proceeds. The discount reflects Turnstone’s assessment of the fair value of the CVRs, taking into account the contingent nature of the payment, the absence of industry benchmarks for similar instruments, and the inherent uncertainty regarding the receipt of payments for the tax refunds or security deposit. This estimate is subject to change and should not be construed as a prediction or guarantee of actual payments under the CVRs. If any CVR Proceeds are received after one year following the date of the closing of the Merger, holders of the CVRs will not receive any payment pursuant to the CVR Agreement. Accordingly, in deciding whether to tender your Shares into the Offer, you should understand that it is possible that no payment will be made pursuant to the CVRs.” * * * * * If you have any further questions or comments, or if you require any additional information, please contact Branden Berns of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, by telephone at (415) 393-4631. Thank you for your assistance.

Very truly yours,
Owen Hughes
By:

Show Raw Text
CORRESP
 1
 filename1.htm

 CORRESP

 Branden Berns Partner
 T: +1 415.393.4631 BBerns@gibsondunn.com
 July 23, 2025 VIA
ELECTRONIC MAIL AND EDGAR FILING United States Securities and Exchange Commission
 Division of Corporation Finance Office of Mergers and
Acquisitions 100 F Street NE Washington, D.C. 20549
 Attention: Mr. Blake Grady XOMA Royalty Corporation
 Turnstone Biologics Corp. Schedule TO-T Filed July 11, 2025 Filed by XOMA Royalty Corporation
 File No. 005-94123
 Dear Mr. Grady: On behalf of XOMA Royalty
Corporation (the “ Purchaser ”), please find responses to comments received from the Staff of the Division of Corporation Finance (the “ Staff ”) of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
“ Commission ”) by letter dated July 18, 2025 (“ Letter ”), with respect to the Purchaser’s Schedule TO-T filed on July 11, 2025 (the “ Schedule
TO ”) and the Offer to Purchase, dated July 11, 2025 (the “ Offer to Purchase ” and, together with the Schedule TO, the “ Tender Offer Materials ”). Concurrently with delivery of this letter, the Purchaser
filed updated Tender Offer Materials (the “ Revised Tender Offer Materials ”), including a Schedule TO-T/A and revised Offer to Purchase (the “ Revised Offer to Purchase ”), which
reflect, among other things, revisions to address the Staff’s comments. For your convenience, we have restated below in bold each
comment from the Letter and supplied our responses immediately thereafter. Unless otherwise specified, all references to page numbers and captions correspond to the Offer to Purchase and all capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the
same meaning as in the Tender Offer Materials. General

 1.
 We note that the principal business of Purchaser, as described on page
 A-1, is solely “to consummate the Offer and effect the Merger pursuant to the Merger Agreement, and to perform its obligations under the CVR Agreement.” However, your Schedule TO states that the
principal business of Purchaser is “to engage in any lawful act or activity for which corporations may be organized under the Nevada Revised Statutes,” and Purchaser’s website states that “XOMA is a biotechnology royalty
aggregator … with more than 70 assets.” Please revise to address these apparent discrepancies. Refer to Item 1003(b) of Regulation M-A.
 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
 One Embarcadero Center Suite 2600 | San Francisco, CA 94111-3715 | T: 415.393.8200 | F: 415.393.8306 | gibsondunn.com

 July 23, 2025
 Page
 2

 Response : In response to the Staff’s comment, Purchaser has revised the
disclosure in the Revised Tender Offer Materials to clarify that Purchaser is a Nevada corporation whose primary business is as a biotech royalty aggregator with a sizable portfolio of economic rights to future potential milestone and royalty
payments associated with partnered commercial and pre-commercial therapeutic drug candidates (see page 2 of the Schedule TO-T/A).

 2.
 Disclosure on page A-1 indicates that “Mr. Burns joined
Purchaser in August 2006.” However, based on disclosure in Item 3 of your Schedule TO, it appears that Purchaser was formed in 2011. Please revise or advise.
 Response : In response to the Staff’s comment, Purchaser has revised the disclosure in the Revised Tender Offer Materials to clarify
that Purchaser was incorporated in Delaware in 1981 and redomiciled as a Bermuda-exempted company in December 1998. Effective December 31, 2011, Purchaser redomiciled from Bermuda back to Delaware. Purchaser subsequently reincorporated in
Nevada on May 30, 2025 (see page 2 of the Schedule TO-T/A).

 3.
 Please disclose the information required by Item 1008(a) and (b) of Regulation M-A. Response: In response to the Staff’s comment, Purchaser has
revised the disclosure in the Revised Tender Offer Materials to include the following information (see page 34 of the Revised Offer to Purchase):
 “As of July 23, 2025, neither Purchaser nor any of Purchaser’s executive officers and directors beneficially owned any Shares
of Turnstone. No transactions with respect to the Shares have been effected by Purchaser, or, to Purchaser’s knowledge after making reasonable inquiry, any of the directors, executive officers or affiliates of Purchaser, during the 60 days
prior to the date of this Offer to Purchaser.”

 4.
 Refer to the first bullet point under the caption “What Is the CVR and How Does It Work?” on page
2. Please provide illustrative disclosure, in plain English, showing how the CVR Proceeds will be calculated, including how Net Cash Excess and Net Cash Shortfall will be calculated. Refer to Item 1001 of Regulation
 M-A and to Item 1004(a)(1)(ii) of Regulation M-A.
 Response: In response to the Staff’s comment, Purchaser has revised the first bullet point and included a new second bullet under
the caption “What Is the CVR and How Does It Work” in the Revised Tender Offer Materials with the following language (see page 3 of the Revised Offer to Purchase):

 •

 “At or prior to the Offer Closing Time, Purchaser, Merger Sub, the rights agent (the “ Rights
Agent ”) and the representative of the holders of the CVRs (the “ Representative ”) will enter into the CVR Agreement, governing the terms of the CVRs. Each CVR will represent a

 July 23, 2025
 Page
 3

contractual right to receive contingent cash payments equal to a pro rata share of: (i)(a) the net tax receivables from Canadian federal and territory/provincial tax authorities and/or
Québec Scientific Research and Experimental Development (“SR&ED”) tax credit program as tax refunds up to $850,000 (excluding the $55,610 Québec SR&ED amount that has been scheduled on Schedule 1.01 of the Merger
Agreement) and (b) the payments received from the landlord under the Sublease, dated November 16, 2022, between Turnstone and Medivis, Inc., as a return of security deposit up to $260,000 ((a) and (b) together, the “ Legacy
Receivable Amount ”), plus (ii) Net Cash Excess (as defined below), if any, and minus (iii) Net Cash Shortfall (as defined below), if any. “ Net Cash Excess ” means if Final Net Cash is greater than Closing Net Cash
(each as defined in the Merger Agreement and calculated in accordance with Section 2.01(c) of the Merger Agreement), then the amount equal to (a) Final Net Cash, minus (b) Closing Net Cash. “ Net Cash Shortfall ” means
if Final Net Cash is less than Closing Net Cash, then the amount equal to (a) Closing Net Cash, minus (b) Final Net Cash.

 •

 For illustrative purposes only, assuming that: (a) Turnstone receives $510,000 in tax refunds from Canadian
tax authorities (i.e., 60% of the maximum refund amount), and $156,000 from Medivis, Inc. as a return of the security deposit under the Sublease Agreement (also 60% of the maximum amount), and (b) Final Net Cash is $3,000,000 and Closing Net
Cash is $3,000,000, such that there is no Net Cash Excess or Net Cash Shortfall, then the aggregate amount payable under the CVRs would be $666,000 or approximately $0.03 per CVR (based on (i) 23,140,691 Shares issued and outstanding, and (ii) 1,135
Shares underlying Turnstone RSUs).”

 5.
 On page 3, disclosure indicates that the “offeror estimates that the amount that will be payable (on a pre-tax basis) under the CVRs will be approximately $0.03 per CVR.” Revise the Offer to Purchase to explain the basis for the offeror’s belief with respect to the CVRs.
 Response: In response to the Staff’s comment, Purchaser has revised the disclosure in the Revised Tender Offer Materials to explain
the basis for the offeror’s belief with respect to the CVRs (see pages 2 and 3 of the Revised Offer to Purchase): “We cannot
predict whether any CVR Proceeds will be received or, if any CVR Proceeds are received, the amount or timing of any such receipt. In connection with the Offer, the offeror did not engage any independent valuation firm to conduct an analysis of the
potential value of the CVR Proceeds or receive any material non-public information assessing the value of the CVR Proceeds. The offeror is relying on Turnstone’s estimate of the CVR Proceeds that would be
payable. Accordingly, in making a decision to tender your Shares in the Offer, you should understand that there can be no assurance whether there will be any payments under the CVR Agreement or with respect to the amount and timing of such
payments (if any). You should also understand that, as discussed below, it is estimated that the amount that will be payable under the CVRs will be approximately $0.03 per CVR. Turnstone has determined that the maximum payout for the CVR is
estimated to be up to $0.05 per CVR, assuming payment in full of the tax refund and lease deposit and no positive or negative adjustment to the CVR Proceeds because of a Net Cash Excess or a Net Cash Shortfall, respectively. After accounting for the
likelihood of different payment scenarios for the tax refund and lease deposit, Turnstone has applied a 40% discount for the tax refund and lease deposit and has assumed no adjustments for net cash calculations under the CVR Agreement. Accordingly,
the probability-weighted estimate of the amount payable is $0.03 per CVR.

 July 23, 2025
 Page
 4

 In determining the probability-weighted estimated payout, we note that there can be no
assurance: (i) that Turnstone will receive the tax receivables and/or the return of a lease security deposit prior to the expiration of the CVRs necessary for payment pursuant to the CVRs, (ii) that there will be any positive or negative
adjustments based on the post-closing calculation of Closing Net Cash or (iii) regarding the exact amount of CVR Proceeds or the timing of any such payment, if any. Neither the Merger Agreement nor the CVR Agreement requires Purchaser to use any
efforts in connection with the CVR Proceeds. The discount reflects Turnstone’s assessment of the fair value of the CVRs, taking into account the contingent nature of the payment, the absence of industry benchmarks for similar instruments, and
the inherent uncertainty regarding the receipt of payments for the tax refunds or security deposit. This estimate is subject to change and should not be construed as a prediction or guarantee of actual payments under the CVRs. If any CVR Proceeds
are received after one year following the date of the closing of the Merger, holders of the CVRs will not receive any payment pursuant to the CVR Agreement. Accordingly, in deciding whether to tender your Shares into the Offer, you should understand
that it is possible that no payment will be made pursuant to the CVRs.” * * * * *
 If you have any further questions or comments, or if you require any additional information, please contact Branden Berns of Gibson,
Dunn & Crutcher LLP, by telephone at (415) 393-4631. Thank you for your assistance.

 Very truly yours,
 Owen Hughes

 By:

 /s/ Owen Hughes

 Owen Hughes
 Via E-mail:

 cc:
 Ryan A. Murr, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
 Branden C. Berns, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
 Melanie E. Neary, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
 Sammy Farah, Turnstone Biologics Corp.