SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Comment Letter for RAYTECH CORP (CIK 0000797917) — Jul 20, 2005

RAYTECH CORP (CIK 0000797917)
Date: July 20, 2005 · CIK: 0000797917 · Accession: 0000000000-05-037195

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Referenced dates: June 8, 2005

Date
July 20, 2005
Author
John Hartz
Form
UPLOAD
Company
RAYTECH CORP (CIK 0000797917)

Letter

July 20, 2005 Mr. John Devlin Chief Financial Officer, Raytech Corporation Suite 295, Four Corporate Drive Shelton, CT 06484

Re: Raytech Corporation Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2005 Form 10-Q for the period ended April 3, 2005 File No. 1-9298

Dear Mr. Devlin:

We have reviewed your response to our letter dated June 8, and have the following comments. We ask that you respond by August 3, 2005.

Please understand that the purpose of our review process is to assist you in your compliance with the applicable disclosure requirements and to enhance the overall disclosure in your filing. We look forward to working with you in these respects. We welcome any questions you may have about our comments or on any other aspect of our review. Feel free to call us at the telephone numbers listed at the end of this letter.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

We have reviewed your response to our prior comments four and five and appreciate the additional information. Clarify that in future filings you will reclassify prior periods as appropriate and consistent with your response.

Revenue Recognition

We note your enhanced disclosures included in your most recent Form 10-Q. In future filings include the statement, if true, that this policy is followed consistently for all periods presented regarding any and all losses on contracts where costs exceed selling price. Specifically, losses are consistently recorded based on:

- All inventory and firm purchase orders, only; - The difference between contracted selling price and fully absorbed inventory costs, (consistent with our normal GAAP inventory historical cost system):

Note 9 - Litigation

We have reviewed your response to our prior comment ten and appreciate the additional information. If it is reasonably possible that additional losses related to the RPC facility, or to Ferndale, could be material, revise future filings to so state, and if you can, provide an estimate of the range of additional loss, or state that such an estimate cannot be made.

Revise your litigation footnote to clarify that you do not accrue probable and estimable litigation costs in the estimated accruals. If litigation costs are material to any particular period, or to an understanding of any particular contingency, disclose the periodic expense amounts.

Note 11 - Income Taxes

In future filings:

- Disclose the particular years in which significant amounts of NOL carryforwards, related to those NOLs that may inure to the PI Trust, will expire; - Provide a detailed discussion in MD&A concerning significant increases or decreases in your valuation account. Discuss the underlying changes in events, tax planning and expectations for future taxable income that changed from the previous period. Be specific and quantify your reasoning; - Make sure that your MD&A is consistent with you expectation that you will not have taxable income related to the Domestic Wet Friction business. For example the last paragraphs on pages 15 and 16 should be balanced with the expectations that it is more likely than not that most of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. - Discuss in better detail the uncertainties surrounding the method of allocation of the current and future operating losses between you and the PI Trust. What alternative methods could result? What impact would an alternate method have on your financial condition and results of operations?

As appropriate, please amend your filing and respond to these comments within 10 business days or tell us when you will provide us with a response. Please provide us with a supplemental response letter that keys your responses to our comments and provides any requested supplemental information. Detailed letters greatly facilitate our review. Please file your supplemental response on EDGAR as a correspondence file. Please understand that we may have additional comments after reviewing your responses to our comments.

If you have any questions regarding these comments, please direct them to Mindy Hooker, Staff Accountant, at (202) 551-3732 or to the undersigned at (202) 551-3689.

Sincerely,
John Hartz
Senior Assistant Chief Accountant
??

Show Raw Text
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>LETTER
<SEQUENCE>1
<FILENAME>filename1.txt
<TEXT>
July 20, 2005

Mr. John Devlin
Chief Financial Officer, Raytech Corporation
Suite 295, Four Corporate Drive
Shelton, CT 06484

Re:	Raytech Corporation
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2005
Form 10-Q for the period ended April 3, 2005
      File No. 1-9298

Dear Mr. Devlin:

      We have reviewed your response to our letter dated June 8,
2005
and have the following comments.  We ask that you respond by
August 3,
2005.

      Please understand that the purpose of our review process is
to
assist you in your compliance with the applicable disclosure
requirements and to enhance the overall disclosure in your filing.
We
look forward to working with you in these respects.  We welcome
any
questions you may have about our comments or on any other aspect
of
our review.  Feel free to call us at the telephone numbers listed
at
the end of this letter.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

We have reviewed your response to our prior comments four and five
and
appreciate the additional information.  Clarify that in future
filings
you will reclassify prior periods as appropriate and consistent
with
your response.

Revenue Recognition

We note your enhanced disclosures included in your most recent
Form
10-Q. In future filings include the statement, if true, that this
policy is followed consistently for all periods presented
regarding
any and all losses on contracts where costs exceed selling price.
Specifically, losses are consistently recorded based on:

- All inventory and firm purchase orders, only;
- The difference between contracted selling price and fully
absorbed
inventory costs, (consistent with our normal GAAP inventory
historical
cost system):

Note 9 - Litigation

We have reviewed your response to our prior comment ten and
appreciate
the additional information.  If it is reasonably possible that
additional losses related to the RPC facility, or to Ferndale,
could
be material, revise future filings to so state, and if you can,
provide an estimate of the range of additional loss, or state that
such an estimate cannot be made.

Revise your litigation footnote to clarify that you do not accrue
probable and estimable litigation costs in the estimated accruals.
If
litigation costs are material to any particular period, or to an
understanding of any particular contingency, disclose the periodic
expense amounts.

Note 11 - Income Taxes

In future filings:

- Disclose the particular years in which significant amounts of
NOL
carryforwards, related to those NOLs that may inure to the PI
Trust,
will expire;
- Provide a detailed discussion in MD&A concerning significant
increases or decreases in your valuation account. Discuss the
underlying changes in events, tax planning and expectations for
future
taxable income that changed from the previous period. Be specific
and
quantify your reasoning;
- Make sure that your MD&A is consistent with you expectation that
you
will not have taxable income related to the Domestic Wet Friction
business. For example the last paragraphs on pages 15 and 16
should be
balanced with the expectations that it is more likely than not
that
most of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
- Discuss in better detail the uncertainties surrounding the
method of
allocation of the current and future operating losses between you
and
the PI Trust. What alternative methods could result? What impact
would
an alternate method have on your financial condition and results
of
operations?

      As appropriate, please amend your filing and respond to
these
comments within 10 business days or tell us when you will provide
us
with a response.  Please provide us with a supplemental response
letter that keys your responses to our comments and provides any
requested supplemental information.  Detailed letters greatly
facilitate our review.  Please file your supplemental response on
EDGAR as a correspondence file.  Please understand that we may
have
additional comments after reviewing your responses to our
comments.

If you have any questions regarding these comments, please direct
them
to Mindy Hooker, Staff Accountant, at (202) 551-3732 or to the
undersigned at (202) 551-3689.

Sincerely,

John Hartz
Senior Assistant Chief Accountant
??

??

??

??

John Devlin
Raytech Corporation
July 20, 2005
Page 1

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549-7010

         DIVISION OF
CORPORATION FINANCE

</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>