SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Company Response from PARK NATIONAL (PRK) — Apr 16, 2009

PARK NATIONAL CORP /OH/ (PRK) (CIK 0000805676)
Date: April 16, 2009 · CIK: 0000805676 · Accession: 0001362310-09-005416

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Sentiment
Urgency
Document Type
Confidence
SEC Posture
Company Posture

Summary

Reasoning

File numbers found in text: 001-13006

Referenced dates: April 14, 2009, March 27, 2009

Date
April 16, 2009
Author
/s/ John W. Kozak
Form
CORRESP
Company
PARK NATIONAL CORP /OH/ (PRK) (CIK 0000805676)

Letter

Via EDGAR Transmission Division of Corporation Finance United States Securities and Exchange Commission Washington, D.C. 20549 Mail Stop 4561 RE: Response to Follow-Up Comment Letter dated April 14, 2009 concerning the review of Park National Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, filed February 25, 2009, File No. 001-13006.

Dear Mr. Webb:

Management of Park National Corporation (“Park,” “we” or “our”) has reviewed the above-referenced comment letter and offers the following explanations:

Part III

Item 1. Executive Compensation

1.

We note your response to prior comments 5, 6 and 7. In future filings, tailor your disclosure on executive compensation to more closely track and clarify the actual practices and decisions made. For clarity, quantify the amounts discussed and the time period to which they relate.

We agree with your comment and accordingly will include the requested tailored disclosure in future filings.

Exhibit 13

Credit Experience, page 39

2.

Please refer to your response to comment 3 of our letter dated March 27, 2009. We note your reference to the disclosures on page 32 of your annual report. While those disclosures provide information on the methodology used to determine the allowance for loan losses, they do not appear to discuss how the application of that methodology resulted in the significant changes in the allowance for loan losses in 2008. Please revise future filings to incorporate the substance of your response to our comment in your document, including changes in loan grades and the assumptions regarding your forecast for the loan loss provision in 2009.

We agree with your comment and will appropriately expand our disclosure in future filings.

Table 12 – Consolidated Five-Year Selected Financial Data, page 43

Table 13 – Quarterly Financial Data, page 44

3.

Please refer to your response to comment 4 of our letter dated March 27, 2009. We have the following additional comments:

•

Consistent with the guidance of Question 8 of the Frequently Asked Questions Regarding the Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and not withstanding your assertion that the goodwill at Park National will not be impaired, we continue to believe that excluding the goodwill impairment charges from various measures is not appropriate because of their recurring nature.

•

Regarding your assertions regarding the transparency of the trends on the return on average assets, we believe one of the primary purposes of MD&A is to describe for a reader the effects on the GAAP financial statements of the information you are currently presenting on a non-GAAP basis. We believe the effects of the write-offs can and should be effectively communicated in a narrative format. As stated in the guidance of FAQ 8, “Whether an item may, or indeed must, be discussed in MD&A is a different question from whether it may be eliminated or adjusted in connection with a non-GAAP financial measure.”

•

We note your reference to the analyst information you obtained through your inquiry and we are aware that analysts frequently adjust GAAP financial statements to suit the needs of their constituents; however, we do not believe that it is appropriate for reporting purposes to present non-GAAP information in anticipation of the needs of analysts’ constituents when such presentations conflict with the guidance of Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K. Further, we do not believe that presenting non-GAAP EPS for items that accrue to shareholders is appropriate. Please revise future filings accordingly.

We agree that in future filings, we will not include disclosure of non-GAAP financial measures involving goodwill impairment in our tables addressing consolidated five-year selected financial data and quarterly financial data.

Certification

The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Park, acknowledges the following:

•

Park is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the filing;

•

Staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filing; and

•

Park may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities law of the United States.

Please contact me at (740) 349-3792 with any questions.

Sincerely,
/s/ John W. Kozak

Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm

Correspondence

PARK NATIONAL CORPORATION

50 North Third Street

Post Office Box 3500

Newark, Ohio 43058-3500

(740) 349-8451

April 16, 2009

Via EDGAR Transmission

Mr. Mark Webb

Branch Chief

Division of Corporation Finance

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Washington, D.C. 20549

Mail Stop 4561

RE: Response to Follow-Up Comment Letter dated April 14, 2009 concerning the review of Park National Corporation’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, filed February 25, 2009, File No. 001-13006.

Dear Mr. Webb:

Management of Park National Corporation (“Park,” “we” or “our”) has reviewed the above-referenced comment letter and
offers the following explanations:

Part III

Item 1. Executive Compensation

    1.

    We note your response to prior comments 5, 6 and 7. In future filings, tailor your disclosure on
executive compensation to more closely track and clarify the actual practices and decisions made. For
clarity, quantify the amounts discussed and the time period to which they relate.

We agree with your comment and accordingly will include the requested tailored disclosure in future filings.

Exhibit 13

Credit Experience, page 39

    2.

    Please refer to your response to comment 3 of our letter dated March 27, 2009. We note your reference to
the disclosures on page 32 of your annual report. While those disclosures provide information on the
methodology used to determine the allowance for loan losses, they do not appear to discuss how the application
of that methodology resulted in the significant changes in the allowance for loan losses in 2008. Please
revise future filings to incorporate the substance of your response to our comment in your document, including
changes in loan grades and the assumptions regarding your forecast for the loan loss provision in 2009.

We agree with your comment and will appropriately expand our disclosure in future filings.

1

Table 12 – Consolidated Five-Year Selected Financial Data, page 43

Table 13 – Quarterly Financial Data, page 44

    3.

    Please refer to your response to comment 4 of our letter dated March 27, 2009. We have the
following additional comments:

    •

    Consistent with the guidance of Question 8 of the Frequently Asked Questions Regarding
the Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and not withstanding your assertion that the goodwill at Park
National will not be impaired, we continue to believe that excluding the goodwill impairment charges
from various measures is not appropriate because of their recurring nature.

    •

    Regarding your assertions regarding the transparency of the trends on the return on
average assets, we believe one of the primary purposes of MD&A is to describe for a reader the effects
on the GAAP financial statements of the information you are currently presenting on a non-GAAP basis.
We believe the effects of the write-offs can and should be effectively communicated in a narrative
format. As stated in the guidance of FAQ 8, “Whether an item may, or indeed must, be discussed in
MD&A is a different question from whether it may be eliminated or adjusted in connection with a
non-GAAP financial measure.”

    •

    We note your reference to the analyst information you obtained through your inquiry and
we are aware that analysts frequently adjust GAAP financial statements to suit the needs of their
constituents; however, we do not believe that it is appropriate for reporting purposes to present
non-GAAP information in anticipation of the needs of analysts’ constituents when such presentations
conflict with the guidance of Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K. Further, we do not believe that
presenting non-GAAP EPS for items that accrue to shareholders is appropriate. Please revise future
filings accordingly.

We agree that in future filings, we will not include disclosure of non-GAAP financial measures involving goodwill
impairment in our tables addressing consolidated five-year selected financial data and quarterly financial data.

Certification

The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Park, acknowledges the following:

    •

    Park is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the filing;

    •

    Staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments do not foreclose the
Commission from taking any action with respect to the filing; and

    •

    Park may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any
person under the federal securities law of the United States.

Please contact me at (740) 349-3792 with any questions.

Sincerely,

/s/ John W. Kozak

John W. Kozak

Chief Financial Officer

2

2