SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Company Response from VOXX International Corp (CIK 0000807707) — Jun 15, 2005

VOXX International Corp (CIK 0000807707)
Date: June 15, 2005 · CIK: 0000807707 · Accession: 0000807707-05-000030

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Referenced dates: May 31, 2005

Date
June 15, 2005
Author
Not clearly detected
Form
CORRESP
Company
VOXX International Corp (CIK 0000807707)

Letter

June 15, 2005 Mr. Brian Cascio Accounting Branch Chief United States Securities and Exchange Commission Division of Corporate Finances 450 Fifth Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20549

Re: Audiovox Corporation Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2004 Filed March 31, 2005 Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended February 28, 2005 File No. 1-09532

Dear Mr. Cascio:

This letter is being submitted in response to the comments set forth in the Staff of the Division of Corporate Finance's (the "Staff") letter dated May 31, 2005, with respect to the above-referenced filings (the "Comment Letter"). The responses to the Comment Letter regarding the aforementioned filings appear below.

The following numbered paragraphs, which correspond to the number paragraphs of the Comment Letter, set forth our responses to the Staff's comments contained in the Comment Letter.

Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended November 30, 2004

Item 7 - Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates - Page 30

SEC Comment:

(1) We note your disclosure on Page 31 that reversals of previously established sales incentive liabilities were $3,889 and $1,803 for fiscal years 2004 and 2003, respectively. We also note your disclosure on Page 40 that net

<page> Mr. Brian Cascio United States Securities and Exchange Commission June 15, 2005 Page 2 of 7

income was favorably impacted by sales incentive reversals of $5,083 and $2,940 for fiscal years 2004 and 2003, respectively. Please reconcile these two amounts. Additionally, please tell us, in substantive detail, the reasons for the significant increase in sales incentives reversals for unearned and unclaimed sales incentives from fiscal year 2003 to 2004 and how this impacts your ability to establish reasonable and reliable estimates of your sales incentive liabilities.

Response:

The reconciliation of reversals of previously established sales incentives liabilities is provided below: <TABLE>

Fiscal Description 2004 2003 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <S> <C> <C> Electronics (continuing operations - page 31) $3,889 $1,803 Wireless (discontinued operations - page 40) 1,194 1,137 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Consolidated reversals $5,083 $2,940 ====== ====== </TABLE>

As noted above, the reversals of previously established sales incentive liabilities for the Electronics segment were included in the disclosures on page 31 (critical accounting policies and estimates) as these amounts were included within net sales from continuing operations. The Company's consolidated reversals, including the discontinued Wireless operations, were disclosed on page 40 (MD&A discussion of net income).

The increase in sales incentive reversals from fiscal year 2003 to 2004 was due to a $1,270 and $816 increase in unearned and unclaimed sales incentives from continuing operations, respectively. The increase in the reversals of previously established sales incentives is a direct result of the increase in the amount of sales incentives being accrued to our customers in order to promote sales growth, support new product offerings and remain competitive. The increase in the reversals of unearned sales incentives was due to lower than expected post-holiday sales and an overall reduction in sales from the Company's mass merchants and retail customers that did not meet forecasted sales targets due to economic conditions, competition and pricing pressures in the industry. Accordingly, the actual sales related to certain customer programs did not meet their estimated sales targets required to earn sales incentive funds. The Company has a policy to reverse unearned sales incentive liabilities upon the analysis of actual and subsequent sales data. Unearned sales incentives are reversed into income in the period when the customer does not purchase the required minimum quantities of the product during the specified time period.

The increase in unclaimed sales incentive reversals was due to the expiration of certain sales incentive programs prior to the customer submitting a claim. The Company's policy is to reverse earned but unclaimed sales incentive liabilities upon the expiration of the claim period for each program. The Company believes the reversal of previously established sales incentives liabilities is a disciplined, rational, consistent and systematic method.

<page> Mr. Brian Cascio United States Securities and Exchange Commission June 15, 2005 Page 3 of 7

The increase in reversals from fiscal 2003 to fiscal 2004 does not impact the Company's ability to establish reasonable and reliable sales incentive estimates, as the Company believes the provision for and reversal of sales incentives is a disciplined, rational, consistent and systematic process. As discussed in Note 1(g) of the Company's notes to the consolidated financial statements, the process for establishing reliable estimates for sales incentive liabilities is impacted by numerous external factors such as the purchasing volume of our customers, the ability of our customers to achieve their sales targets and the timely submission of sales incentive claims by our customers prior to the expiration date of the claim period. Although the Company makes its best estimate of its sales incentive liability, external factors may impact the Company's actual sales incentive liability and reported operating results.

Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 17 - Contingencies - Page 100

SEC Comment:

(2) We note disclosures related to multiple outstanding litigation that "no assurances regarding the outcome of this matter can be given at this point in the litigation." We also note your general disclosure that "the outcome of all pending legal proceedings in the aggregate is unlikely to have a material adverse effect on the business or consolidated financial condition." Please tell us and disclose more details in future filings of the status of the litigation matters and why you believe that they will not have a significant impact on the financial statements. In addition, as discussed in SAB 5Y, a statement that a contingency is not expected to be material does not satisfy the requirements of SFAS 5 if there is at least a reasonable possibility that a loss exceeding amounts already recognized may have been incurred and the amount of that additional loss would be material to a decision to buy or sell the registrant's securities. In that case, the registrant must either (a) disclose the estimated additional loss, or range of loss, that is reasonably possible, or (b) state that such an estimate cannot be made. Please respond to us supplementally and revise future filings to comply.

Response:

The Company considers the following factors in determining whether accruals or disclosures are required for pending litigation matters: the date of the occurrence and the cause of action; the degree of probability of an unfavorable outcome and the ability to reasonably estimate the amount of loss. In evaluating the probability of an unfavorable outcome for asserted claims, the Company considered the nature of the litigation, the progress of the case (includes progress after the date of the financial statements but before the issuance of the financial statements), opinions and views of our legal counsel and how the Company intends to defend or respond to the lawsuit. If management determines,

<page> Mr. Brian Cascio United States Securities and Exchange Commission June 15, 2005 Page 4 of 7

based on the underlying facts and circumstances, that it is probable a loss will result from a litigation contingency and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated, the estimated loss is accrued for.

The Company believes the specific litigation matters disclosed in our fiscal 2004 Form 10-K will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial statements, individually or in the aggregate, at the time of the filing. Even though the possibility of an unfavorable outcome is reasonably possible for any one of these claims, the range or amount of loss, if any, cannot be reasonably estimated at this stage of the specific litigation. The majority of these asserted claims are in the early discovery stages of litigation or covered by insurance policies and each case was reviewed by legal counsel. In addition, management evaluated and reviewed these claims with the criteria of SFAS 5. As the estimated loss or range of loss for each asserted claim could not be reasonably estimated at the time of filing as a result of consultation with legal counsel, such information was not disclosed.

For future filings, the Company will continue to update and evaluate the status of each case and enhance the financial statement disclosures in order to address the impact on the Company's financial statements and the possible range of loss, if such estimate can be made at that time. If no estimate of range or loss can be determined, such fact will be disclosed.

Form 10-Q for the Fiscal Quarter Ended February 28, 2005

Item 4 - Controls and Procedures - Page 33

SEC Comment:

(3) Refer to your disclosures related to the material weaknesses identified in your internal control over financial reporting as of February 28, 2005. Supplementally and in future filings, please revise to discuss the impact of the material weakness on financial reporting and the control environment. Additionally, please tell us and disclose in future filings whether your remediation measures have been implemented and when you expect that the remediation of the material weaknesses will be complete.

Response:

Based on the material weaknesses identified during the Company's 2004 fiscal year-end and the control deficiencies that continue to be characterized as material weaknesses during the Company's first quarter ended February 28, 2005, the Company's overall internal controls over financial reporting is determined to be ineffective in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. As discussed in Item 4 on page 35, the Company states that these control deficiencies are classified as material weaknesses as there is a more than a remote possibility that a material misstatement to the Company's interim or annual financial statements could occur. However, the material weaknesses identified by management did not cause a material misstatement or have an adverse impact to the Company's financial position or results of operations during fiscal 2004 or the first quarter of fiscal 2005.

<page> Mr. Brian Cascio United States Securities and Exchange Commission June 15, 2005 Page 5 of 7

Based on the nature and extent of the material weakness identified, these deficiencies did impact the Company's financial reporting to the extent that certain controls were put into place to address the specific material weaknesses.

The Company's control environment reflects the tone set by top management and the overall attitude, awareness and actions of the board of directors, management, process owners and others concerning the importance of internal control as well as the emphasis placed on the control in the Company's policies, procedures, methods and organizational structure. These four material weaknesses impacted the Company's control environment to the extent that it increased the awareness of fraud and business risk by the board of directors, management and the process owners. No significant impact to the Company's control environment was otherwise noted.

As discussed in Item 4 on page 35, these control deficiencies have either been remediated or are in the process of being remediated subsequent to February 28, 2005, and before the issuance of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. To date, certain of the remediation plans are operating and other remediation plans are currently being implemented and are expected to be completed and fully implemented before the end of fiscal 2005.

For future filings, the Company will continue to discuss the impact of the material weaknesses on our financial reporting and control environment and the status of implementing our remediation measures.

SEC Comment:

(4) As a related matter, we note your disclosure that "there has been no significant change in the company's internal control over financial reporting during the most recently completed fiscal quarter that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting." You then disclosure certain changes to the design and operation of internal control during the first quarter. Supplementally and in future filings please clarify whether there were any changes in your internal control over financial reporting that occurred during this quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, your internal control over financial reporting.

Response:

To clarify our disclosures in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal 2005 first quarter ended February 28, 2005; the Company asserts that there were no changes to its internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the fiscal 2005 first quarter that would materially affect, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

Supplementally, the Company made changes to some lower level ancillary controls during the fiscal 2005 first quarter that are not considered material, or significant to the company's internal controls over financial reporting or that are reasonably likely to materially affect the Company's internal control over financial reporting. As noted in our response to Comment #3, the Company has

<page> Mr. Brian Cascio United States Securities and Exchange Commission June 15, 2005 Page 6 of 7

implemented, or is in the process of implementing, new internal control changes to remediate control deficiencies.

For future filings, the Company will clarify its disclosures concerning material changes in its internal controls over financial reporting that occurred, or are reasonably likely to materially affect its internal controls over financial reporting, during the quarter.

<page> Mr. Brian Cascio United States Securities and Exchange Commission June 15, 2005 Page 7 of 7

If you have any additional

Show Raw Text
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>CORRESP
<SEQUENCE>1
<FILENAME>filename1.txt
<TEXT>
June 15, 2005

Mr. Brian Cascio
Accounting Branch Chief
United States Securities and
  Exchange Commission
Division of Corporate Finances
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, DC  20549

Re:      Audiovox Corporation
         Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2004
         Filed March 31, 2005
         Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended February 28, 2005
         File No.  1-09532

Dear Mr. Cascio:

This letter is being  submitted  in response  to the  comments  set forth in the
Staff of the Division of Corporate  Finance's (the "Staff") letter dated May 31,
2005, with respect to the above-referenced  filings (the "Comment Letter").  The
responses to the Comment  Letter  regarding the  aforementioned  filings  appear
below.

The following numbered paragraphs,  which correspond to the number paragraphs of
the Comment Letter, set forth our responses to the Staff's comments contained in
the Comment Letter.

Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended November 30, 2004

Item 7 - Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
          of Operations

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates - Page 30

SEC Comment:

(1)  We note your disclosure on Page 31 that reversals of previously established
     sales  incentive  liabilities  were $3,889 and $1,803 for fiscal years 2004
     and 2003,  respectively.  We also note your  disclosure on Page 40 that net

<page>
Mr. Brian Cascio
United States Securities
  and Exchange Commission            June 15, 2005                 Page 2 of  7

     income was favorably  impacted by sales  incentive  reversals of $5,083 and
     $2,940 for fiscal years 2004 and 2003, respectively. Please reconcile these
     two  amounts.  Additionally,  please tell us, in  substantive  detail,  the
     reasons for the  significant  increase in sales  incentives  reversals  for
     unearned and unclaimed  sales  incentives from fiscal year 2003 to 2004 and
     how  this  impacts  your  ability  to  establish  reasonable  and  reliable
     estimates of your sales incentive liabilities.

Response:

The  reconciliation  of reversals of  previously  established  sales  incentives
liabilities is provided below:
<TABLE>

                                                                             Fiscal
  Description                                                      2004                  2003
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                               <C>                    <C>
 Electronics  (continuing operations - page 31)                   $3,889                 $1,803
 Wireless (discontinued operations - page 40)                      1,194                  1,137
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Consolidated reversals                                           $5,083                 $2,940
                                                                  ======                 ======
</TABLE>

As  noted  above,  the  reversals  of  previously  established  sales  incentive
liabilities for the Electronics segment were included in the disclosures on page
31 (critical  accounting  policies and estimates) as these amounts were included
within  net  sales  from  continuing  operations.   The  Company's  consolidated
reversals,  including the discontinued  Wireless  operations,  were disclosed on
page 40 (MD&A discussion of net income).

The increase in sales incentive  reversals from fiscal year 2003 to 2004 was due
to a $1,270 and $816 increase in unearned and unclaimed  sales  incentives  from
continuing operations, respectively. The increase in the reversals of previously
established sales incentives is a direct result of the increase in the amount of
sales  incentives  being  accrued to our  customers  in order to  promote  sales
growth,  support new product offerings and remain  competitive.  The increase in
the  reversals  of  unearned  sales  incentives  was due to lower than  expected
post-holiday  sales and an overall  reduction in sales from the  Company's  mass
merchants and retail customers that did not meet forecasted sales targets due to
economic  conditions,   competition  and  pricing  pressures  in  the  industry.
Accordingly,  the actual sales related to certain customer programs did not meet
their  estimated  sales  targets  required to earn sales  incentive  funds.  The
Company has a policy to reverse  unearned sales incentive  liabilities  upon the
analysis of actual and  subsequent  sales data.  Unearned  sales  incentives are
reversed  into  income in the period when the  customer  does not  purchase  the
required minimum quantities of the product during the specified time period.

The increase in unclaimed sales incentive reversals was due to the expiration of
certain sales incentive  programs prior to the customer  submitting a claim. The
Company's policy is to reverse earned but unclaimed sales incentive  liabilities
upon the expiration of the claim period for each program.  The Company  believes
the  reversal  of  previously  established  sales  incentives  liabilities  is a
disciplined, rational, consistent and systematic method.

<page>
Mr. Brian Cascio
United States Securities
  and Exchange Commission            June 15, 2005                 Page 3 of  7

The  increase in  reversals  from fiscal 2003 to fiscal 2004 does not impact the
Company's   ability  to  establish   reasonable  and  reliable  sales  incentive
estimates,  as the Company  believes  the  provision  for and  reversal of sales
incentives is a disciplined,  rational,  consistent and systematic  process.  As
discussed  in Note 1(g) of the  Company's  notes to the  consolidated  financial
statements,  the process for establishing reliable estimates for sales incentive
liabilities  is impacted by numerous  external  factors  such as the  purchasing
volume of our  customers,  the ability of our  customers to achieve  their sales
targets and the timely  submission  of sales  incentive  claims by our customers
prior to the expiration date of the claim period. Although the Company makes its
best estimate of its sales incentive liability,  external factors may impact the
Company's actual sales incentive liability and reported operating results.

Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 17 - Contingencies - Page 100

SEC Comment:

(2)  We note  disclosures  related to multiple  outstanding  litigation that "no
     assurances  regarding the outcome of this matter can be given at this point
     in the litigation." We also note your general  disclosure that "the outcome
     of all pending  legal  proceedings  in the  aggregate is unlikely to have a
     material   adverse  effect  on  the  business  or  consolidated   financial
     condition."  Please tell us and disclose more details in future  filings of
     the status of the litigation matters and why you believe that they will not
     have a significant  impact on the  financial  statements.  In addition,  as
     discussed in SAB 5Y, a statement  that a contingency  is not expected to be
     material does not satisfy the requirements of SFAS 5 if there is at least a
     reasonable possibility that a loss exceeding amounts already recognized may
     have been incurred and the amount of that additional loss would be material
     to a decision to buy or sell the registrant's securities. In that case, the
     registrant must either (a) disclose the estimated additional loss, or range
     of loss,  that is reasonably  possible,  or (b) state that such an estimate
     cannot be made.  Please  respond to us  supplementally  and  revise  future
     filings to comply.

Response:

The Company considers the following  factors in determining  whether accruals or
disclosures  are  required  for  pending  litigation  matters:  the  date of the
occurrence and the cause of action;  the degree of probability of an unfavorable
outcome and the ability to reasonably estimate the amount of loss. In evaluating
the  probability  of an  unfavorable  outcome for asserted  claims,  the Company
considered  the nature of the  litigation,  the  progress of the case  (includes
progress  after the date of the financial  statements but before the issuance of
the financial  statements),  opinions and views of our legal counsel and how the
Company intends to defend or respond to the lawsuit.  If management  determines,

<page>
Mr. Brian Cascio
United States Securities
  and Exchange Commission            June 15, 2005                 Page 4 of  7

based on the underlying facts and circumstances, that it is probable a loss will
result  from  a  litigation  contingency  and  the  amount  of the  loss  can be
reasonably estimated, the estimated loss is accrued for.

The Company  believes the specific  litigation  matters  disclosed in our fiscal
2004  Form  10-K  will not  have a  material  adverse  effect  on the  Company's
financial  statements,  individually  or in the  aggregate,  at the  time of the
filing.  Even though the  possibility  of an  unfavorable  outcome is reasonably
possible  for any one of these  claims,  the range or  amount  of loss,  if any,
cannot be  reasonably  estimated at this stage of the specific  litigation.  The
majority  of  these  asserted  claims  are  in the  early  discovery  stages  of
litigation or covered by insurance  policies and each case was reviewed by legal
counsel.  In addition,  management  evaluated and reviewed these claims with the
criteria  of SFAS 5. As the  estimated  loss or range of loss for each  asserted
claim  could not be  reasonably  estimated  at the time of filing as a result of
consultation with legal counsel, such information was not disclosed.

For future filings,  the Company will continue to update and evaluate the status
of each case and enhance the financial statement disclosures in order to address
the impact on the Company's financial statements and the possible range of loss,
if such  estimate can be made at that time.  If no estimate of range or loss can
be determined, such fact will be disclosed.

Form 10-Q for the Fiscal Quarter Ended February 28, 2005

Item 4 - Controls and Procedures - Page 33

SEC Comment:

(3)  Refer to your disclosures related to the material weaknesses  identified in
     your  internal  control over  financial  reporting as of February 28, 2005.
     Supplementally  and in future filings,  please revise to discuss the impact
     of  the  material   weakness  on  financial   reporting   and  the  control
     environment.  Additionally,  please tell us and disclose in future  filings
     whether your remediation measures have been implemented and when you expect
     that the remediation of the material weaknesses will be complete.

Response:

Based on the material  weaknesses  identified  during the Company's  2004 fiscal
year-end  and the control  deficiencies  that  continue to be  characterized  as
material  weaknesses during the Company's first quarter ended February 28, 2005,
the Company's overall internal  controls over financial  reporting is determined
to be ineffective in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities
and Exchange  Commission.  As discussed in Item 4 on page 35, the Company states
that these control  deficiencies are classified as material  weaknesses as there
is a  more  than  a  remote  possibility  that a  material  misstatement  to the
Company's  interim or annual  financial  statements  could occur.  However,  the
material   weaknesses   identified  by  management  did  not  cause  a  material
misstatement  or have an adverse impact to the Company's  financial  position or
results of  operations  during  fiscal 2004 or the first quarter of fiscal 2005.

<page>
Mr. Brian Cascio
United States Securities
  and Exchange Commission            June 15, 2005                 Page 5 of  7

Based on the  nature  and  extent of the  material  weakness  identified,  these
deficiencies  did impact the  Company's  financial  reporting to the extent that
certain  controls  were  put  into  place  to  address  the  specific   material
weaknesses.

The Company's  control  environment  reflects the tone set by top management and
the  overall  attitude,  awareness  and  actions  of  the  board  of  directors,
management,  process  owners and others  concerning  the  importance of internal
control as well as the emphasis placed on the control in the Company's policies,
procedures, methods and organizational structure. These four material weaknesses
impacted the Company's  control  environment to the extent that it increased the
awareness of fraud and business risk by the board of directors,  management  and
the process owners. No significant  impact to the Company's control  environment
was otherwise noted.

As discussed in Item 4 on page 35, these control  deficiencies  have either been
remediated or are in the process of being remediated  subsequent to February 28,
2005,  and before the issuance of the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q.  To date,
certain of the remediation  plans are operating and other  remediation plans are
currently  being  implemented  and  are  expected  to  be  completed  and  fully
implemented before the end of fiscal 2005.

For future  filings,  the  Company  will  continue  to discuss the impact of the
material  weaknesses on our financial  reporting and control environment and the
status of implementing our remediation measures.

SEC Comment:

(4)  As a  related  matter,  we note your  disclosure  that  "there  has been no
     significant  change  in  the  company's  internal  control  over  financial
     reporting  during  the most  recently  completed  fiscal  quarter  that has
     materially  affected  or is  reasonably  likely to  materially  affect  our
     internal  control over financial  reporting." You then  disclosure  certain
     changes to the design and  operation of internal  control  during the first
     quarter.  Supplementally and in future filings please clarify whether there
     were any changes in your internal  control over  financial  reporting  that
     occurred  during  this  quarter  that  have  materially  affected,  or  are
     reasonably  likely  to  materially  affect,   your  internal  control  over
     financial reporting.

Response:

To clarify our  disclosures in the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
2005 first quarter ended February 28, 2005; the Company  asserts that there were
no changes to its internal  controls  over  financial  reporting  that  occurred
during the fiscal  2005 first  quarter  that  would  materially  affect,  or are
reasonably  likely to materially  affect,  our internal  controls over financial
reporting.

Supplementally,  the Company made changes to some lower level ancillary controls
during the fiscal  2005  first  quarter  that are not  considered  material,  or
significant to the company's internal controls over financial  reporting or that
are reasonably likely to materially  affect the Company's  internal control over
financial  reporting.  As noted in our  response  to Comment #3, the Company has

<page>
Mr. Brian Cascio
United States Securities
  and Exchange Commission            June 15, 2005                 Page 6 of  7

implemented, or is in the process of implementing,  new internal control changes
to remediate control deficiencies.

For future filings, the Company will clarify its disclosures concerning material
changes in its internal controls over financial reporting that occurred,  or are
reasonably  likely to materially  affect its internal  controls  over  financial
reporting, during the quarter.

<page>
Mr. Brian Cascio
United States Securities
  and Exchange Commission            June 15, 2005                 Page 7 of  7

If you have any  additional