SEC Company Response from SOLIGENIX, INC. (SNGX) (CIK 0000812796) (SNGX) — Sep 8, 2006
SOLIGENIX, INC. (SNGX) (CIK 0000812796)
Date: Sept. 8, 2006 · CIK: 0000812796 · Accession: 0000812796-06-000054
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
Referenced dates: August 15, 2006
Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm
DOR Letter 090806
DOR
BioPharma, Inc.
1101
Brickell Avenue
701-S
Miami,
FL
33131
September
8, 2006
SENT
VIA EDGAR
Amy
C. Buckner
Staff
Accountant
Division
of Corporation Finance
United
States Securities and Exchange Commission
100
F
Street, NE
Washington,
D.C. 20549
RE:
Review of Filings and comments related to Form 10KSB for the Fiscal Year
Ended
December 31, 2005 and Form 10QSB for the Fiscal Quarter Ended June 30, 2006.
Dear
Ms.
Buckner:
Thank
you
for the opportunity to work with you and discuss the disclosure requirements.
This letter is in response to your letter dated August 15, 2006. Below please
find our responses to your inquiries and comments.
Form
10-KSB for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31,
2005
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation
Material
Changes in Results of Operations
1.
Please
provide us with additional information, in a disclosure-type format,
that
clarifies why you appear to have recognized $285,891 in revenue that
relates to fiscal 2004 during the year ended December 31, 2005 when
you
received the actual cash
reimbursement.
RESPONSE
for 1.:
As
explained in paragraph 1 of Material
Changes in Results of Operations, Item 6, Managements Discussion and
Analysis,
we were
awarded a grant on September 15, 2004, in the amount of $5,173,298 from the
National Institutes of Health (“NIH”) for process development for manufacturing
our genetically engineered ricin vaccine. On May 6, 2005 we were awarded
a
provisional overhead rate (Facilities & Administrative (F&A) rate). This
rate permitted us to request additional funds from the NIH and we were
subsequently awarded an additional $1,260,018 for overhead. We previously
received a small overhead allowance. The provisional overhead rate could
be
retroactively applied to costs already reimbursed by the NIH. The intent
of our
disclosure was to explain that a portion of the revenues received in 2005
pertained to overhead reimbursement for the grant period in 2004. Therefore
we
recalculated our request at the new rate to the funds already applied and
received in 2004. During the second quarter of 2005 we received a retroactive
reimbursement of $285,891 for overhead expenses. We recognized the $285,891
in
2005, and not in 2004, since we did not know we would be receiving the amounts
until the provisional overhead rate was approved in 2005. We segregated the
$285,891 in an effort to be completely transparent. For your guidance, we
expect
to receive a final overhead rate before the end of 2006. This new rate could
be
higher or lower than the current one and could potentially allow the NIH
to
increase the grant amount and allow us to draw down additional funds
retroactively for prior periods. In summary, it is our belief that since
the
provisional rate was not awarded until 2005 that the revised overhead allowance
could be recognized in 2005.
2.
We
acknowledge your table included in the section entitled “Summary of Our Products
in Development,” as well as the information included in your “Material Results
of Operations” discussion. However, we believe that your disclosures about
historical research and development expenses and estimated future expenses
related to your major research and development projects could be enhanced
for
investors. Please refer to the Division of Corporation Finance “Current Issues
and Rulemaking Projects Quarterly Update” under section VIII— Industry Specific
Issues — Accounting and Disclosure by Companies Engaged in Research and
Development Activities. You can find it at the following website address:
http://www.sec.gov/divisions/corpfln/cfcrq032001.htm#secviii.
Please
then provide us with the following information, in a disclosure-type format,
for
each of your major research and development projects:
a.
The costs incurred during each period presented and to date on the
project;
b.
The nature, timing and estimated costs of the efforts necessary to complete
the
project;
c.
The anticipated completion date;
d.
The risks and uncertainties associated with completing development on schedule
and the consequences to your operations, financial position and liquidity
if the
project is not completed timely; and, finally
e.
The period in which material net cash inflows from your significant projects
are
expected to commence.
Regarding
a., if you do not maintain research and development costs by project, please
tell us why management does not maintain and evaluate research and development
costs by project. Include other quantitative or qualitative analyses that
indicate the amount of the company’s resources being used on these
projects.
Regarding
b. and c., please provide us with the amount or range of estimated costs
and
timing to complete the phase in process and each future phase. To the extent
that information is not estimable, please tell us the facts and circumstances
indicating the uncertainties that preclude you from making a reasonable
estimate-
RESPONSE
for 2.:
Although
we enumerate all our current products in tabular format, our primary focus
is
concentrated on: orBec®,
RiVaxTM,
our
injectable vaccine against ricin toxin, and BT-VACCTM,
our
oral/nasal vaccine against botulinum toxin. We explain our costs for all
our
programs in Note
13
Segment
Table.
Details:
Research
and Development Projects
A.
orBec®
orBec® is
the
latest stage product that we have in development. orBec® is
an
oral formulation of a very well known and widely prescribed glucocorticoid
called beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP). We have developed orBec® to
treat
inflammation that occurs within the mucosal lining of the gastrointestinal
tract
as a result of bone marrow or stem cell transplants. This affliction is known
as
gastrointestinal Graft-versus-Host disease (“GI GVHD”) and is life-threatening.
It is also an unmet medical need. We believe that we have completed the
necessary research and development of orBec®
necessary for approval by the U.S.
Food
and Drug Administration (“FDA”)
for the
treatment of GI GVHD. orBec® is a unique two-pill system: one pill is formulated
to dissolve in the stomach, while the second pill is formulated to dissolve
in
the more alkaline environment of the upper small bowel. We plan to file a
new
drug application (“NDA”)
with
the
FDA in September of 2006. We
also
plan on filing a Marketing Authorization Application (“MAA”) with the European
Central Authority, European Medicine Agency (“EMEA”) later this
year.
Although
we provide guidance on the timing of our filings, this guidance is subject
to
change based on many factors. If
we are
unsuccessful in developing our products, our ability to generate revenues
will
be significantly impaired. Because of the nature of the complex work that
we do
in preparation of these filings we may not be able to maintain our current
research and development schedules. In addition, our business is subject
to
extensive governmental regulation, which can be costly, time consuming and
subjects us to unanticipated delays.
orBec® Research
and Development
orBec®
has
completed a randomized, multi-center, double-blinded, placebo-controlled
pivotal
Phase III clinical trial for the treatment of acute GI GVHD. While
orBec®
did not
achieve statistical significance in its primary endpoint, orBec®
demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in mortality during the
prospectively defined Day 200 post-transplant period and positive trends
on its
primary endpoint. orBec®
achieved
a 70% reduction in mortality compared to placebo (p-value 0.011). In addition,
and in response to a specific FDA request and as part of its process to submit
an NDA, we collected further mortality data from our Phase II and Phase III
clinical trials. The new survival analysis of patients enrolled in the earlier
Phase II trial suggests that results were similar to those from the pivotal
Phase III multi-center study. In the Phase II trial, there were reductions
in
the risk of mortality of 55% and 43% at transplant day-200 and one-year
post-randomization among patients randomized to orBec®,
respectively. The comparable survival data from the 129-patient Phase III
pivotal trial were 66% and 51% reductions in the risk of morality at transplant
day-200 and one-year post-randomization among patients randomized to
orBec®,
respectively.
Since
2000, we have incurred expenses of $13,925,498 in the development of
orBec®.
Research and development costs for orBec®
totaled
$2,209,770 in 2005 and $1,940,052 in the second quarter of 2006. Since June
30th
2006, we
anticipate that the remaining R&D costs for orBec®
will
approximate $2 million. If orBec®
is
approved by the FDA in the first quarter of 2007, we expect orBec®
to begin
generating revenues by the third quarter of 2007. If the FDA rejects the
NDA or
does not approve orBec®
in a
timely manner, our financial condition, liquidity, and ability to raise
additional equity financing could be impaired.
B.
Ricin Vaccine (RiVax™)
Our
product RiVax™ is a genetically engineered recombinant vaccine against ricin
toxin. It is being developed in anticipation of obtaining government procurement
contracts under the biodefense act Project Bioshield of 2004 and its successors.
Products that fall under potential Bioshield funding are usually vaccines
or
therapeutics that are not considered to be marketed for widespread distribution
and use on a routine basis, but rather used for special populations (such
as the
military) or in the event of use of an agent as a biological weapon. Thus,
we
began the development of RiVax™ and licensed the underlying technology with a
view towards addressing the need for biodefense products, but considered
its
development to be integral with an effort to obtain research and development
costs through successive grants and contracts from government agencies. We
have
successfully developed this vaccine through the early manufacturing stages
and
the first Phase I trials for safety and efficacy, in large part by obtaining
funding through SBIR and larger government grants. At this point, the vaccine
is
poised for further development and we recently have obtained additional NIH
funding of approximately $5 million to carry through the activities to develop
and use animal models that will be required for licensure of the product.
The
potential purchase of RiVax™ by the government under project Bioshield funding
for procurement purposes does not necessarily depend on licensure by the
FDA.
RiVax™ Research
and Development
RiVax™
is
being developed as a conventional vaccine, to be administered by injections.
We
have secondary plans to develop RiVax™ as a nasally administered vaccine for the
medical purpose of stimulating immunity in the lungs to prevent toxicity
by the
anticipated route of exposure through inhalation if ricin were to be used
as a
bio-weapon. At this point we are focusing our efforts on the development
of the
injectable vaccine, and have deferred the development of a nasal vaccine.
The
safety and immunogenicity of the vaccine has been validated in a small Phase
I
pilot trial and thus we are making plans to continue development using vaccine
formulated with a well known immunological adjuvant.
Cost
and Development analysis for RiVax™
2007
2008
2009
$
$
$
cGMP
stability
85,000
-
-
Adjuvant
characterization
210,000
-
-
Animal
model development
500,000
-
-
Vaccine/protection
Inhaled
ricin
295,000
295,000
295,000
Clinical
supply
(3000
doses)
150,000
-
-
Release
and potency testing
-
250,000
-
Human/animal
correlation
130,000
130,000
-
Phase
I/II
(dose
determination)
150,000
1,250,000
-
Pivotal
animal studies
(primates)
-
-
1,500,000
Additional
manufacture
-
-
750,000
TOTALS
1,520,000
1,925,000
2,545,000
The
costs
that we have incurred to develop RiVax™
since
2002 to date total $6,360,523. R&D costs for RiVax™
totaled
$2,565,461 in 2005 and $2,130,516 in the second quarter of 2006.
The
key
uncertainty in the development of RiVax™ is the position of the government,
including the Department of Defense (“DoD”), on the acquisition of
countermeasures for ricin toxin. Although ricin is a category B agent and
is
known to be a highly toxic agent, the government has not yet published or
made
known its intent to purchase the vaccine for civilian use under project
Bioshield. The DoD has had plans for years to develop a ri