SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Company Response from CARNIVAL CORP (CCL) (CIK 0000815097) (CCL) — Jan 10, 2008

CARNIVAL CORP (CCL) (CIK 0000815097)
Date: Jan. 10, 2008 · CIK: 0000815097 · Accession: 0000950142-08-000107

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Sentiment
Urgency
Document Type
Confidence
SEC Posture
Company Posture

Summary

Reasoning

Referenced dates: December 17, 2007

Date
January 10, 2008
Author
Senior Vice President and General Counsel
Form
CORRESP
Company
CARNIVAL CORP (CCL) (CIK 0000815097)

Letter

January 10, 2008 Ms. Hana T. Teshome, Special Counsel Securities and Exchange Commission Division of Corporate Finance 450 Fifth Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20549

RE: CARNIVAL CORPORATION COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 1-9610 CARNIVAL PLC COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 1-15136 FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2006

Dear Ms. Teshome:

We have reviewed the comments of the Staff regarding the Carnival Corporation and Carnival plc joint Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2006, which are set forth in your letter dated December 17, 2007, which was received by us on December 26, 2007. The numbered responses set forth below contain each of the Staff's comments in bold text and correspond to the numbered comments contained in your December 17, 2007 letter. Our responses are printed below each comment.

As requested, we acknowledge that:

o The company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the filing;

o Staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to Staff comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filing; and

o The company may not assert Staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.

SCHEDULE 14A

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION, PAGE 36

PROCESS FOR MAKING COMPENSATION DETERMINATIONS, PAGE 47

<PAGE> Securities and Exchange Commission January 10, 2008 Page 2

1. PLEASE REVISE YOUR DISCLOSURE TO PROVIDE A QUANTITATIVE DISCUSSION OF ALL THE PERFORMANCE TARGET LEVELS TO BE ACHIEVED IN ORDER FOR YOUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS TO EARN THEIR PERFORMANCE-RELATED COMPENSATION. WE WOULD EXPECT TO SEE THE SPECIFIC COMPANY FINANCIAL GOALS, KEY OPERATING DRIVERS AND INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES USED TO DETERMINE PERFORMANCE-RELATED COMPENSATION AND HOW YOUR PERFORMANCE-RELATED AWARDS ARE SPECIFICALLY STRUCTURED AROUND SUCH PERFORMANCE GOALS. TO THE EXTENT YOU BELIEVE THAT DISCLOSURE OF THE PERFORMANCE MEASURES IS NOT REQUIRED BECAUSE IT WOULD RESULT IN COMPETITIVE HARM SUCH THAT IT COULD BE EXCLUDED UNDER INSTRUCTION 4 TO ITEM 402(B) OF REGULATION S-K, PLEASE PROVIDE IN YOUR RESPONSE LETTER A DETAILED EXPLANATION FOR YOUR CONCLUSION AS TO COMPETITIVE HARM. TO THE EXTENT THAT IT IS APPROPRIATE TO OMIT SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE MEASURES FROM YOUR DISCLOSURE, PLEASE PROVIDE DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO INSTRUCTION 4 TO ITEM 402(B) OF REGULATION S-K. IN DISCUSSING HOW DIFFICULT IT WILL BE FOR AN EXECUTIVE OR HOW LIKELY IT WILL BE FOR YOU TO ACHIEVE THE TARGET LEVELS OR OTHER FACTORS, YOU SHOULD PROVIDE AS MUCH DETAIL AS NECESSARY WITHOUT PROVIDING INFORMATION THAT WOULD RESULT IN COMPETITIVE HARM. GENERAL STATEMENTS REGARDING THE LEVEL OF DIFFICULTY, OR EASE ASSOCIATED WITH ACHIEVING PERFORMANCE GOALS, ARE NOT SUFFICIENT. REFER ALSO TO QUESTION 3.04 OF THE ITEM 402 OF REGULATION S-K INTERPRETATIONS AVAILABLE ON OUR WEBSITE AT WWW.SEC.GOV.

We understand your comment and will provide a quantitative discussion of any performance target levels, and related metrics, as required, in our upcoming proxy statement.

2. YOU STATE THAT YOU USE PEER GROUP INFORMATION AND RELY ON IT TO DETERMINE INDIVIDUAL COMPENSATION AMOUNTS. PLEASE REVISE YOUR DISCLOSURE TO SPECIFY HOW EACH ELEMENT OF COMPENSATION RELATES TO THE INFORMATION YOU HAVE ANALYZED FROM THE COMPARATOR COMPANIES. DISCUSS WHERE ACTUAL PAYMENTS FALL WITHIN TARGETED PARAMETERS AND TO THE EXTENT ACTUAL COMPENSATION WAS OUTSIDE A TARGETED PERCENTILE RANGE, PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY. REFER TO ITEM 402(B)(2)(XIV) OF REGULATION S-K.

We understand your comment and will disclose each element of compensation and how the peer group information was used to determine pay levels. We will compare any target levels against actual payouts, as required.

If you have any comments or questions regarding our responses to your December 17, 2007 letter, please contact me by phone at (305) 406-8608 or by fax at (305) 406-4758. Thank you for your assistance in this matter.

Very truly yours,
/s/ Arnaldo Perez
-------------------------
Arnaldo Perez
Senior Vice President and General Counsel

Show Raw Text
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>CORRESP
<SEQUENCE>1
<FILENAME>filename1.txt
<TEXT>

                                                              January 10, 2008

Ms. Hana T. Teshome, Special Counsel
Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporate Finance
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, DC  20549

RE:     CARNIVAL CORPORATION
        COMMISSION FILE NUMBER:  1-9610
        CARNIVAL PLC
        COMMISSION FILE NUMBER:  1-15136
        FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2006

Dear Ms. Teshome:

        We have  reviewed  the  comments of the Staff  regarding  the  Carnival
Corporation  and Carnival  plc joint Annual  Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended November 30, 2006, which are set forth in your letter dated December
17, 2007, which was received by us on December 26, 2007. The numbered responses
set  forth  below  contain  each  of the  Staff's  comments  in bold  text  and
correspond to the numbered comments contained in your December 17, 2007 letter.
Our responses are printed below each comment.

        As requested, we acknowledge that:

        o    The company is  responsible  for the  adequacy and accuracy of the
             disclosure in the filing;

        o    Staff  comments  or changes to  disclosure  in  response  to Staff
             comments do not  foreclose the  Commission  from taking any action
             with respect to the filing; and

        o    The  company  may not assert  Staff  comments  as a defense in any
             proceeding  initiated  by the  Commission  or any person under the
             federal securities laws of the United States.

SCHEDULE 14A

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION, PAGE 36

PROCESS FOR MAKING COMPENSATION DETERMINATIONS, PAGE 47

<PAGE>
Securities and Exchange Commission
January 10, 2008
Page 2

        1.      PLEASE  REVISE  YOUR   DISCLOSURE  TO  PROVIDE  A  QUANTITATIVE
DISCUSSION  OF ALL THE  PERFORMANCE  TARGET  LEVELS TO BE ACHIEVED IN ORDER FOR
YOUR  EXECUTIVE  OFFICERS TO EARN THEIR  PERFORMANCE-RELATED  COMPENSATION.  WE
WOULD EXPECT TO SEE THE SPECIFIC COMPANY FINANCIAL GOALS, KEY OPERATING DRIVERS
AND INDIVIDUAL  PERFORMANCE  OBJECTIVES  USED TO DETERMINE  PERFORMANCE-RELATED
COMPENSATION   AND  HOW  YOUR   PERFORMANCE-RELATED   AWARDS  ARE  SPECIFICALLY
STRUCTURED  AROUND  SUCH  PERFORMANCE  GOALS.  TO THE EXTENT YOU  BELIEVE  THAT
DISCLOSURE OF THE PERFORMANCE  MEASURES IS NOT REQUIRED BECAUSE IT WOULD RESULT
IN COMPETITIVE HARM SUCH THAT IT COULD BE EXCLUDED UNDER  INSTRUCTION 4 TO ITEM
402(B) OF REGULATION  S-K,  PLEASE  PROVIDE IN YOUR RESPONSE  LETTER A DETAILED
EXPLANATION FOR YOUR  CONCLUSION AS TO COMPETITIVE  HARM. TO THE EXTENT THAT IT
IS  APPROPRIATE  TO OMIT SPECIFIC  PERFORMANCE  MEASURES FROM YOUR  DISCLOSURE,
PLEASE  PROVIDE  DISCLOSURE  PURSUANT  TO  INSTRUCTION  4  TO  ITEM  402(B)  OF
REGULATION  S-K. IN DISCUSSING HOW DIFFICULT IT WILL BE FOR AN EXECUTIVE OR HOW
LIKELY IT WILL BE FOR YOU TO ACHIEVE THE TARGET  LEVELS OR OTHER  FACTORS,  YOU
SHOULD PROVIDE AS MUCH DETAIL AS NECESSARY WITHOUT  PROVIDING  INFORMATION THAT
WOULD RESULT IN COMPETITIVE  HARM.  GENERAL  STATEMENTS  REGARDING THE LEVEL OF
DIFFICULTY,  OR EASE  ASSOCIATED  WITH  ACHIEVING  PERFORMANCE  GOALS,  ARE NOT
SUFFICIENT.  REFER  ALSO TO  QUESTION  3.04 OF THE ITEM 402 OF  REGULATION  S-K
INTERPRETATIONS AVAILABLE ON OUR WEBSITE AT WWW.SEC.GOV.

        We understand  your comment and will provide a quantitative  discussion
of any performance  target levels,  and related  metrics,  as required,  in our
upcoming proxy statement.

        2.      YOU STATE THAT YOU USE PEER GROUP INFORMATION AND RELY ON IT TO
DETERMINE  INDIVIDUAL  COMPENSATION  AMOUNTS.  PLEASE REVISE YOUR DISCLOSURE TO
SPECIFY HOW EACH ELEMENT OF  COMPENSATION  RELATES TO THE  INFORMATION YOU HAVE
ANALYZED FROM THE  COMPARATOR  COMPANIES.  DISCUSS  WHERE ACTUAL  PAYMENTS FALL
WITHIN TARGETED  PARAMETERS AND TO THE EXTENT ACTUAL COMPENSATION WAS OUTSIDE A
TARGETED  PERCENTILE RANGE, PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY. REFER TO ITEM 402(B)(2)(XIV) OF
REGULATION S-K.

        We   understand   your  comment  and  will  disclose  each  element  of
compensation  and how the peer  group  information  was used to  determine  pay
levels. We will compare any target levels against actual payouts, as required.

        If you have any comments or questions  regarding  our responses to your
December 17, 2007 letter,  please  contact me by phone at (305)  406-8608 or by
fax at (305) 406-4758. Thank you for your assistance in this matter.

                                      Very truly yours,

                                      /s/ Arnaldo Perez
                                      -------------------------
                                      Arnaldo Perez
                                      Senior Vice President and General Counsel

cc:  Micky Arison

</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>