SEC Company Response from ALBANY INTERNATIONAL (AIN) — Feb 5, 2016
ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP /DE/ (AIN) (CIK 0000819793)
Date: Feb. 5, 2016 · CIK: 0000819793 · Accession: 0000903423-16-000791
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
Referenced dates: February 2, 2016
Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm
Albany International Corp.
P.O. Box 1907
Albany, NY 12201
(455 Patroon Creek Blvd., Suite 206, Albany,
NY 12206)
Tel. 518 445-2281
Fax: 518 677-1097
E-mail: john.cozzolino@albint.com
John Cozzolino
Chief Financial Officer & Treasurer
February 5, 2016
Ms. Jennifer Thompson
Accounting Branch Chief, Office of Consumer Products
Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549
Re: Albany International Corp.
Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2014, filed
February 27, 2015
Response dated January 15, 2016
File No. 1-10026
Dear Ms. Thompson:
We are pleased to respond to your letter dated February
2, 2016.
We have included in our response an illustration of how
the revised disclosure would have appeared in the relevant filing. New additions to the text are underlined. Each illustration
would also apply to any future filings in which the disclosure item is repeated.
Consolidated Results of Operations Gross Profit, page
24
1. We note your response to comment 1. Refer to your proposed
Machine Clothing disclosure where you state gross profit was impacted by, “a $1.7 million decrease in cost of goods sold
principally due to cost savings from restructuring activities, partially offset by inflation on wages and other manufacturing costs.”
Please quantify for us each of the significant underlying components that net to the $1.7 million decrease in cost of goods sold
you reference. In addition, tell us what comprised “other manufacturing costs.” Lastly, where a material change is
attributed to two or more factors, including any offsetting factors, please consider quantifying, where practicable and material,
the contribution of each identified factor. In this regard, we believe that quantifying offsetting factors that are driving an
overall change provides investors with greater transparency. Refer to Instruction 4 to Item 303(a) of Regulation S-K, Section III.D
of SEC Release No. 33-6835 and Section III.B of SEC Release No. 33-8350.
1
Response: As noted in our response dated January
15, 2016, we assess performance in the Machine Clothing business based on the extent to which we are able to maintain profitability.
Without good prospects for growth in unit sales or price per unit, an important element of our strategy is to offset the cost of
inflation through cost reduction initiatives, and our prior comment explained that the net effect of those factors was a decrease
in cost of $1.7 million, compared to the prior year. However, we note your suggestion that we consider quantifying, where practicable
and material, the impact of each of these offsetting factors. Please note that our revised disclosures include only individually
significant items. Accordingly, the net effect does not match the $1.7 million that we previously disclosed.
In our response dated January 15, 2016, we mentioned “other
manufacturing costs”. We were referring to manufacturing overhead costs and have used that description in our proposed revision.
See below for the revisions to the explanations included
in our 2014 Form 10-K, pages 24 and 30, that we propose to include in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2015. We would also expect to include similar detail in future filings with respect to future periods.
Total Company – page 24
The increase in gross profit during
2014 was principally due to the net effect of the following individually significant items:
· The reduction in MC sales described above resulted in a gross profit
decrease of $8.5 million.
· A $1.7 million decrease in Cost of goods sold principally due
to cost savings from restructuring activities, partially offset by inflation on wages and other manufacturing costs.
· A decrease of $7.5 million in MC Cost of goods sold resulting from
restructuring activities.
· An increase in MC Cost of goods sold from inflation on direct labor
and manufacturing overhead expenses, of approximately $2.6 million and $1.9 million, respectively.
· A $1.6 million charge to MC Cost of goods sold in 2014 to correct an
error in the value of inventories reported in prior periods.
· AEC’s Boerne, Texas operation increased gross profit by $5.0
million, principally due to operational improvements that resulted in lower cost of goods sold.
· A $1.9 million reduction in cost associated with the Company’s
U.S. postretirement plan, principally resulting from plan changes in 2013. These costs are reported as Corporate expenses in the
table above.
2
MC Gross Profit – Page 30
Gross Profit
The decrease in 2014 gross profit
was principally due to the net effect of the following individually significant items:
· An $8.5 million decrease related to lower sales, as noted above.
· A $1.7 million decrease in Cost of goods sold principally due
to cost savings from restructuring activities, partially offset by inflation on wages and other manufacturing costs.
· A decrease of $7.5 million in Cost of goods sold resulting from
restructuring activities.
· An increase in Cost of goods sold from inflation on direct
labor and manufacturing overhead expenses, of approximately $2.6 million and $1.9 million, respectively.
· A $1.6 million charge for the correction of the inventory valuation
error during 2014.
We confirm and acknowledge
to you that:
· The Company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure
in the filings;
· Staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to Staff comments
do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filings; and
· The Company may not assert Staff comments as a defense in any proceeding
initiated by the Commission or any person under the Federal Securities Laws of the United States.
Sincerely,
/s/ John B. Cozzolino
John B. Cozzolino
Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer
3