SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Company Response from WEINGARTEN REALTY INVESTORS — Dec 16, 2005

WEINGARTEN REALTY INVESTORS /TX/ (CIK 0000828916)
Date: Dec. 16, 2005 · CIK: 0000828916 · Accession: 0001140361-05-011058

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Referenced dates: December 2, 2005

Date
December 31, 2004
Author
/s/
Form
CORRESP
Company
WEINGARTEN REALTY INVESTORS /TX/ (CIK 0000828916)

Letter

VIA EDGAR Securities and Exchange Commission Weingarten Realty Investors Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 Filed March 16, 2005 File No. 1-09876

Dear Ms. Linda van Doorn:

The following are the responses of Weingarten Realty Investors ("WRI") to the Staff's comment letter dated December 2, 2005.

Note 2. Newly Adopted Accounting Pronouncements, page 40

1.

We have reviewed your response to prior comment 1. In future filings, please revise your disclosure to include the information contained in your response.

We agree with your comment and will revise our FIN 46(R) disclosure to incorporate this comment in future filings.

Note 14. Commitments and Contingencies, page 48

2.

We have reviewed your response to prior comment 2. Please clarify whether you or any of your subsidiaries are the original sellers of property to any of the joint ventures. If so, then the option held by the outside limited partners to put their interest to the partnership would preclude a sale under paragraph 26 of SFAS 66. In which case, please provide us with an analysis for each of these entities to determine whether the arrangement represents a financing, leasing, or profit sharing based on the terms of the option and the likelihood that the option will be exercised.

The original sellers of property to these joint ventures have not been WRI or any of its subsidiaries.

3.

Please tell us how you have considered the provisions of EITF 00-4 and EITF 00-19 in determining your accounting for the put options held by the outside limited partners in the joint ventures.

We believe the provisions of EITF 00-4 and EITF 00-19 are not applicable. EITF 00-19 is not applicable as the Task Force reached a consensus that for purposes of evaluating under paragraph 11(a) of Statement 133 whether an embedded derivative indexed to a company’s own stock would be classified in stockholders’ equity if freestanding, the requirements of paragraphs 12-32 of 00-19 do not apply if the hybrid contract is a conventional convertible debt instrument in which the holder may only realize the value of the conversion option by exercising the option and receiving the entire proceeds in a fixed number of shares or the equivalent amount of cash (at the discretion of the issuer). As set forth in our previous letter to the Staff, the holder may convert their operating partnership units to either a fixed number of WRI shares or an equivalent amount of cash, the choice of which is at WRI’s discretion (i.e. “conventional convertibles”). EITF 00-4 is not applicable as the Task Force observed, “this Issue is limited to the specific derivatives described in this Issue.” The rights of the limited partners in the joint ventures do not correspond with the specific derivatives described in EITF 00-4.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (713) 868-6540.

Sincerely,
/s/
Joe D. Shafer

Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm

      Weingarten Realty Investors Correspondence 12-16-2005

    December
      16, 2005

    VIA
      EDGAR

    Ms.
      Linda
      van Doorn

    Mail
      Stop
      4561

    Securities
      and Exchange Commission

    450
      Fifth
      Street, N.W.

    Washington,
      D.C. 20549

              Re:

              Weingarten
                Realty Investors

    Form
      10-K
      for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004

    Filed
      March 16, 2005

    File
      No.
      1-09876

    Dear
      Ms.
      Linda van Doorn:

    The
      following are the responses of Weingarten Realty Investors ("WRI") to the
      Staff's comment letter dated December 2, 2005.

    Note
      2. Newly Adopted Accounting Pronouncements, page 40

              1.

              We
                have reviewed your response to prior comment 1. In future filings,
                please
                revise your disclosure to include the information contained in your
                response.

    We
      agree
      with your comment and will revise our FIN 46(R) disclosure to incorporate this
      comment in future filings.

    Note
      14. Commitments and Contingencies, page 48

              2.

              We
                have reviewed your response to prior comment 2. Please clarify whether
                you
                or any of your subsidiaries are the original sellers of property
                to any of
                the joint ventures. If so, then the option held by the outside limited
                partners to put their interest to the partnership would preclude
                a sale
                under paragraph 26 of SFAS 66. In which case, please provide us with
                an
                analysis for each of these entities to determine whether the arrangement
                represents a financing, leasing, or profit sharing based on the terms
                of
                the option and the likelihood that the option will be
                exercised.

    The
      original sellers of property to these joint ventures have not been WRI or any
      of
      its subsidiaries.

              3.

              Please
                tell us how you have considered the provisions of EITF 00-4 and EITF
                00-19
                in determining your accounting for the put options held by the outside
                limited partners in the joint
                ventures.

    We
      believe the provisions of EITF 00-4 and EITF 00-19 are not applicable. EITF
      00-19 is not applicable as the Task Force reached a consensus that for purposes
      of evaluating under paragraph 11(a) of Statement 133 whether an embedded
      derivative indexed to a company’s own stock would be classified in stockholders’
equity if freestanding, the
      requirements of paragraphs 12-32 of 00-19 do not apply
      if the
      hybrid contract is a conventional convertible debt instrument in which
the
      holder may only realize the value of the conversion option by exercising the
      option and receiving the entire proceeds in a fixed number of shares or the
      equivalent amount of cash (at the discretion of the issuer).
      As set
      forth in our previous letter to the Staff, the holder may convert their
      operating partnership units to either a fixed number of WRI shares or an
      equivalent amount of cash, the choice of which is at WRI’s discretion (i.e.
“conventional convertibles”). EITF 00-4 is not applicable as the Task Force
      observed, “this Issue is limited to the specific derivatives described in this
      Issue.” The rights of the limited partners in the joint ventures do not
      correspond with the specific derivatives described in EITF 00-4.

    If
      you
      have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (713)
      868-6540.

              Sincerely,

            /s/
              Joe D. Shafer

              Joe
                D. Shafer

              Vice
                President/Chief Accounting Officer

              cc:

              William
                Demarest, Securities and Exchange
                Commission

    Stephen
      Richter, Weingarten Realty Investors

    Elisabeth
      Fisher, Deloitte & Touche LLP

    Gina
      Betts, Locke Liddell & Sapp LLP