SEC Company Response from WEINGARTEN REALTY INVESTORS — Dec 16, 2005
WEINGARTEN REALTY INVESTORS /TX/ (CIK 0000828916)
Date: Dec. 16, 2005 · CIK: 0000828916 · Accession: 0001140361-05-011058
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
Referenced dates: December 2, 2005
Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm
Weingarten Realty Investors Correspondence 12-16-2005
December
16, 2005
VIA
EDGAR
Ms.
Linda
van Doorn
Mail
Stop
4561
Securities
and Exchange Commission
450
Fifth
Street, N.W.
Washington,
D.C. 20549
Re:
Weingarten
Realty Investors
Form
10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004
Filed
March 16, 2005
File
No.
1-09876
Dear
Ms.
Linda van Doorn:
The
following are the responses of Weingarten Realty Investors ("WRI") to the
Staff's comment letter dated December 2, 2005.
Note
2. Newly Adopted Accounting Pronouncements, page 40
1.
We
have reviewed your response to prior comment 1. In future filings,
please
revise your disclosure to include the information contained in your
response.
We
agree
with your comment and will revise our FIN 46(R) disclosure to incorporate this
comment in future filings.
Note
14. Commitments and Contingencies, page 48
2.
We
have reviewed your response to prior comment 2. Please clarify whether
you
or any of your subsidiaries are the original sellers of property
to any of
the joint ventures. If so, then the option held by the outside limited
partners to put their interest to the partnership would preclude
a sale
under paragraph 26 of SFAS 66. In which case, please provide us with
an
analysis for each of these entities to determine whether the arrangement
represents a financing, leasing, or profit sharing based on the terms
of
the option and the likelihood that the option will be
exercised.
The
original sellers of property to these joint ventures have not been WRI or any
of
its subsidiaries.
3.
Please
tell us how you have considered the provisions of EITF 00-4 and EITF
00-19
in determining your accounting for the put options held by the outside
limited partners in the joint
ventures.
We
believe the provisions of EITF 00-4 and EITF 00-19 are not applicable. EITF
00-19 is not applicable as the Task Force reached a consensus that for purposes
of evaluating under paragraph 11(a) of Statement 133 whether an embedded
derivative indexed to a company’s own stock would be classified in stockholders’
equity if freestanding, the
requirements of paragraphs 12-32 of 00-19 do not apply
if the
hybrid contract is a conventional convertible debt instrument in which
the
holder may only realize the value of the conversion option by exercising the
option and receiving the entire proceeds in a fixed number of shares or the
equivalent amount of cash (at the discretion of the issuer).
As set
forth in our previous letter to the Staff, the holder may convert their
operating partnership units to either a fixed number of WRI shares or an
equivalent amount of cash, the choice of which is at WRI’s discretion (i.e.
“conventional convertibles”). EITF 00-4 is not applicable as the Task Force
observed, “this Issue is limited to the specific derivatives described in this
Issue.” The rights of the limited partners in the joint ventures do not
correspond with the specific derivatives described in EITF 00-4.
If
you
have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (713)
868-6540.
Sincerely,
/s/
Joe D. Shafer
Joe
D. Shafer
Vice
President/Chief Accounting Officer
cc:
William
Demarest, Securities and Exchange
Commission
Stephen
Richter, Weingarten Realty Investors
Elisabeth
Fisher, Deloitte & Touche LLP
Gina
Betts, Locke Liddell & Sapp LLP