SEC Comment Letter for BROOKSTONE INC (CIK 0000830134) — Aug 3, 2005
BROOKSTONE INC (CIK 0000830134)
Date: Aug. 3, 2005 · CIK: 0000830134 · Accession: 0000000000-05-039909
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
Referenced dates: June 27, 2005
Show Raw Text
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>LETTER
<SEQUENCE>1
<FILENAME>filename1.txt
<TEXT>
Mail Stop 3561
August 2, 2005
Philip W. Roizin
Executive Vice President, Finance and Administration
Brookstone, Inc.
One Innovation Way
Merrimack, New Hampshire 03054
Re: Brookstone, Inc.
Preliminary Schedule 14A
Amendment Filed July 18, 2005
File No. 0-21406
Schedule 13E-3/A
Amendment Filed July 18, 2005
Dear Mr. Roizin:
We have reviewed your amended filings and have the following
comments. Please note that the page numbers referenced below
correspond to the courtesy black-lined copies you have provided.
Where indicated, we think you should revise your document in
response
to these comments. If you disagree, we will consider your
explanation as to why our comment is inapplicable or a revision is
unnecessary. Please be as detailed as necessary in your
explanation.
In some of our comments, we may ask you to provide us with
information so we may better understand your disclosure. After
reviewing this information, we may raise additional comments.
Please understand that the purpose of our review process is
to
assist you in your compliance with the applicable disclosure
requirements and to enhance the overall disclosure in your filing.
We look forward to working with you in these respects. We welcome
any questions you may have about our comments or any other aspect
of
our review. Feel free to call us at the telephone numbers listed
at
the end of this letter.
We note that there are numerous filers listed on your
Schedule
13E-3 and we have asked you to add additional filing persons. To
the
extent applicable, please respond to each comment below for each
new
filing person.
Schedule 13E-3
1. We note your responses to comments 1 and 2. Please provide us
with the following additional information. We may have additional
comments after reviewing your response.
* When did the acquiring entities first raise the need to obtain
Mr.
Anthony`s agreement to reinvest his proceeds from the merger into
the
new holding entity?
* What was the purpose of obtaining that agreement from the point
of
view of the acquiring entities?
* When did the management reinvestment agreements begin to be
negotiated?
* How did the negotiation of this agreement progress in relation
to
the merger agreement negotiation?
* What are the activities of Brookstone Holdings, Inc., Brookstone
Acquisition Corporation, OSIM Brookstone Holdings, L.P., and OSIM
Brookstone Holdings, Inc.?
* What was the purpose for forming these entities? Was it solely
to
effect the merger and hold the securities of Brookstone, Inc.?
* With respect to the directors and executive officers of these
entities, as listed on page 103 of the preliminary proxy
statement,
are they employed by these acquisition entities?
2. Please refer to comment 6 in our letter dated June 27, 2005.
General Instruction C to Schedule 13E-3 requires you to provide
information about control persons where named filers are corporate
entities. To the extent you add additional filers on the Schedule
13E-3, please revise to ensure that you have provided all
disclosure
required by Items 3, 5, 6, 10 and 11 for these filing persons.
Exhibits
3. We note your response to comment 7. Please tell us your basis
for
not including the term sheet related to exhibit (d)(3) or file the
agreement and the term sheet with your next amendment.
Schedule 14A
Summary Term Sheet
4. We note that the merger consideration has been reduced from
$20.50
per share to $20.00 per share. Please revise here to briefly
explain
the circumstances that caused the parties to reduce the
consideration
in the merger agreement.
Conditions to Closing, page 15
5. We reissue comment 20. We note that there are significant
financial conditions before the debt financing funds may be
obtained
and that these conditions necessitated the amendment of the merger
agreement. Briefly describe those conditions here.
Background of the Merger, page 19
6. Describe in greater detail the discussions relating to Mr.
Anthony`s agreement to reinvest his proceeds from the merger into
the
new holding entity and the negotiation of that agreement.
7. Please refer to comment 25 in our letter dated June 27, 2005.
We
note your response in your correspondence letter, but it remains
unclear in the disclosure why the board waited until March 21,
2005
to form the special committee, despite the fact that negotiations
with the investor group regarding this transaction had commenced
in
2003. As requested previously, revise your disclosure to clearly
state the specific reasons why the board delayed forming the
special
committee.
8. Refer to the last paragraph on page 32. Please clarify why Mr.
Anthony and Mr. Roizin participated in the special committee
meeting
and clarify the extent of their participation.
9. Refer to the second full paragraph on page 35 relating to the
July
11 special committee meetings. Describe in the last sentence the
assessment made by the company`s management in greater detail.
Reasons for the Merger
10. We reissue comment 31. It does not appear that the disclosure
added on page 24 responds to our comment.
11. We reissue comment 32 and note that the paragraph referenced
is
now the last bullet point on page 37.
Fees and Other Benefits for Special Committee Members, page 41
12. Please correct the reference to a consideration of $20.50 in
the
last line of page 41.
Opinion of CIBC World Markets Corp., page 42
13. Please revise to disclose that CIBC World Markets Corp.
rendered
a written opinion dated April 15, 2005 stating that the previous
merger consideration of $20.50 in cash was fair to the holders of
Brookstone common stock. Please also fully discuss the
circumstances
that resulted in the revised fairness opinion.
14. Please tell us, with a view toward revised disclosure, why
CIBC
did not conduct a premiums paid analysis with respect to the
revised
merger consideration.
15. We reissue comment 34 in part. With respect to each analysis,
include the underlying data that resulted in each implied per
share
equity reference range.
16. Please refer to comment 35 in our letter dated June 27, 2005.
We
note the disclosure at the top of page 44 stating that the
"summary
is not a complete description of the financial analyses performed
and
factors considered...." This broad disclaimer is inconsistent
with
your obligations under Item 1015 of Regulation M-A. As requested
previously, please delete this statement.
Selected Companies Analysis, page 44
17. Please explain why CIBC excluded "outliers" in conducting this
analysis. What were the criteria used by CIBC to determine what
comparable company would be an outlier? Also tell us, with a view
toward revised disclosure, why you refer to results of this
analysis
being based on the average of the highs and the lows of the
implied
per share equity reference ranges when the presentation made by
CIBC
uses the low and median results (see pages 11 and 12 of exhibit
(c)(8) to the Schedule 13E-3).
Leveraged Buyout Analysis, page 47
18. The implied per share equity reference range does not appear
to
be consistent with the analysis provided on pages 11 and 15 in the
updated CIBC presentation. With a view towards disclosure, please
reconcile this apparent discrepancy.
Other Factors, page 47
19. Please disclose in the second bullet point that CIBC did not
use
the projected results for 2008 and 2009 to calculate the results
identified in therein.
Position of Mr. Michael Anthony and Mr. Philip Roizin at to
fairness,
page 48
Positions of Parent, Acquisition, OSIM Brookstone Holdings, L.P.
and
OSIM Brookstone Holdings, Inc. as to Fairness, page 50
20. Please refer to comment 44 in our letter dated June 27, 2005.
We
note disclosure indicating that the special committee considered
the
fact that the company`s common stock traded near or above the
merger
price within the twelve months preceding the merger agreement. As
requested previously, discuss how each filing person considered
the
higher trading price.
Interests of the Company`s Directors and Executive Officers, page
62
21. We note that Michael Luce is no longer included among the
executive officers that will receive a payment in connection with
the
merger but we have found no reference to any change in his status
as
an officer of Gardeners` Eden. We also note that you have
determined
to dispose of Gardeners` Eden but there is no reference that this
has
already occurred. Please tell us why Mr. Luce is no longer
included
in this disclosure.
Management Reinvestment, page 65
22. We note that Mr. Anthony has agreed, and other executive
officers
may agree, to invest in OSIM Brookstone Holdings, L.P. in
connection
with the merger. We also note that the new chart on page 11
states
that management members will hold ownership interests in OSIM
Brookstone Holdings, Inc. Please reconcile this apparent
discrepancy
here and throughout the proxy statement.
Adjournment or Postponement of the Annual Meeting, page 109
23. Refer to your response to previous comment 50 in which you
confirmed that you will re-solicit proxies if you waive any
material
closing condition. Please tell us why you have included the
language
in this proposal that you may adjourn the meeting in the event the
closing conditions have not been satisfied.
Definitive Additional Soliciting Materials filed July 18, 2005
24. We note your reference to the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995 in the press release filed as an exhibit to
your
soliciting materials. The safe harbor for forward looking
statements
provided in the Reform Act does not apply to statements made in
connection with a going private transaction. See Sec.
21E(b)(1)(E)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Please confirm that in
all
future soliciting materials you will exclude the reference to the
Reform Act or state explicitly that these safe harbor provisions
do
not apply in the context of this transaction.
* * * *
As appropriate, please amend your filings and respond to
these
comments within 10 business days or tell us when you will provide
us
with a response. You may wish to provide us with marked copies of
the amendment to expedite our review. Please furnish a cover
letter
with your amendment that keys your responses to our comments and
provides any requested information. Detailed cover letters
greatly
facilitate our review. Please understand that we may have
additional
comments after reviewing your amendment and responses to our
comments.
Please contact Matthew Benson, Attorney-Advisor, at (202)
551-
3335 or, in his absence, to the undersigned at (202) 551-3619 with
any questions you may have.
Sincerely,
Daniel F. Duchovny
Attorney-Advisor
Office of Mergers &
Acquisitions
cc: David Walek, Esq.
Jason Cole, Esq.
Ropes & Gray LLP
Fax - (617) 951-7050
??
??
??
??
Philip W. Roizin
Brookstone, Inc.
August 2, 2005
Page 6
</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>